Aller au contenu

Photo

If DA2 is to DAO what ME2 is to ME then I'm ALL in


211 réponses à ce sujet

#176
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Sylvius the Mad wrote...
But this is just insane.  Whether you experiences the history doesn't change whether it's there.


It seemed to be the case the other poster was suggesting that Bioware had recently made games of the sort like DA:O, and it was DA2 and ME2 that was the departure, as opposed to DA:O being the departure from more recent trends. This is what I objected to.

Put more broadly, historical trends are only informative about current trends if there are relevant similarities for the comparison. I can plausibly say that if a Conservative government where to change their position dramatically on the gun registry (that it should be preserved) that would be a dramatic departure with history; if I instead say that the Democratic endorsement of an African-American President is absurd given the racist history of the democratic party, that is an inaccurarte comparison because of all of the intervenining things between that point in history and the present.

It is the same thing here. At some point, Bioware designed the sort of games the poster was talking about. But he point of departure to simplified gameplay and console-style games was many years ago.

Whereas, I would count the core features of all the pre-ME games as the same.  There was a free-form roleplaying opportunity revolving around the silent protagonist.


That feature persistent, certainly, but that was not the objection. Console style gameplay was; but that was implemented since KoTOR.

ME changed that.  ME is different in kind.


Certainly, but there is no reason to use your RP style or VO alone as the standard of comparison, particularly since that was not the one offered by the previous poster.

You're drawing arbitrary lines and then using them to categorise the games (just as arbitrarily).


I was following a previous classification. You are arguing the central classifying feature out to be silent VO and your standard of roleplay; but that's just idiosyncratic and unrelated to the discussion at hand.

Sylvius the Mad wrote...
Based on our
previous discussions, that makes it clear why I would dislike them. 
I object to relying on reflex.  I want conscious control of everything,
all of the time.


Out of curiosity, do you drive? I'm just curious how you feel you experience driving, because driving is something that becomes automated with practice, and there isn't much conscious choice (it's like typing; at this point I am typing as if I was speaking, because I have so much practice doing it there is no practical difference for me in how easy it is to type something as I think it versus say something as I think it).

I don't like multiplayer.  I play games partly to get away from
people.  I never want multiplayer in games.  Any games.  I've enjoyed
some racing games, but never multiplayer.  I've enjoyed some shooters,
but never multiplayer.  And I've even enjoyed some MMOGs, but my play
has always been purely solo (I think online games often do a better job
of providing me with a setting that doesn't feel contrived).


As it happens, I agree. Although I tend to act in ways that make people think I'm an extrovert, I've recently taken a class that had an interesting personality classification that made me realize I am an ambivert. Essentially, I map well onto the social dominance site of the extraversion scale - I'm competitive, highly driven toward being the centre of attention, highly personable and animated, but at the same time, I map on the relationship side of the introversion scale - make what I consider friends very rarely, unwind only by myself, do not invest time to maintain social relationships, feel exhausted after spending time with people, love to work independently.

It leads to some very weird moments where I can charm a room of people and hate them all annoyed with me a week later when I haven't keep in touch, becasue I simply cannot appreciate that there is any need to keep in touch.

That little self-description aside, I absolutely agree on single-player games. In fact, I'm terified that there is a drive toward greater and greater social video-games, like MMOs and multiplayer shooters that are going to push single games out of the AAA market. This is one of the things that could take video-games away from me. The other threat is the Nintendo Wii style controller (and now Kinetic) which I think are just abominations.

#177
soteria

soteria
  • Members
  • 3 307 messages
I feel a little like the odd man out. Or, at least, in the minority. I enjoy pretty much all team sports, MMOs, RPGs, RTS's, and shooters. Also, pinochle. In any of those settings, there's usually someone making fun of one of my other pastimes. Actually, not true, the folks I play WoW with are a lot more inclusive.

What I enjoy about RTS gameplay is that it requires a much more diverse skillset than other games. You need a grasp of strategy, a good memory for what different units do, the ability to think on your feet and react/adapt, and organizational skills. Winning is very rewarding because of all the things that have to come together.

#178
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

Sylvius the Mad wrote...

Lyssistr wrote...

other aspects of 90s 3D games were good, their graphics looked **** tho :D.

I can't speak for the '90s, but my all-time favourite 3D game came out in 1989.


 Fair enough, I doubt it was the quality of graphics that pulled you in tho. In 1989, there were some pretty good looking 2D titles, while 3D didn't look that great till ~ '03-'04.

#179
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

/shrug

I don't get Starcraft. We've all got our blind spots.


Don't tell me you also don't get Warcraft strategy games, I mean sinners ought to burn in hell :D.

#180
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Lyssistr wrote...
Don't tell me you also don't get Warcraft strategy games, I mean sinners ought to burn in hell :D.


I played Warcraft 2 and had infinitely more fun designing maps than playing the game.  Blizzard RTS, Command & Conquer etc, bore me. 

Total War and Paradox Interactive games are my strategy games of choice.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 04 novembre 2010 - 10:16 .


#181
Eternal Phoenix

Eternal Phoenix
  • Members
  • 8 471 messages
To me, ME was an average game. ME2 was a massive improvement. DA:O was amazing and if Bioware succeed in doing what they did with ME2, then DA2 will be even greater.

#182
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Lyssistr wrote...
Don't tell me you also don't get Warcraft strategy games, I mean sinners ought to burn in hell :D.


I played Warcraft 2 and had infinitely more fun designing maps than playing the game.  Blizzard RTS, Command & Conquer etc, bore me. 

Total War and Paradox Interactive games are my strategy games of choice.


tbh I haven't played Total War nor any strategy game from Paradox but if you're not a Warcraft lore junkie, you have no idea what you're missing :D 

#183
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Lyssistr wrote...
tbh I haven't played Total War nor any strategy game from Paradox but if you're not a Warcraft lore junkie, you have no idea what you're missing :D 


Warcraft lore?  Now that's different.  I hate Warcraft lore.  It's beyond indifference with their games, Warcraft lore kept me from even considering playing WoW when it came out.  So I embrace my dislike of Warcraft lore because it saved me from that monstrosity.

#184
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

I played Warcraft 2 and had infinitely more fun designing maps than playing the game.  Blizzard RTS, Command & Conquer etc, bore me. 


Thats probably because the Blizzard RTSs and the C&C/Red Alert series all use old fashioned RTS mechanics. Games more on the cutting edge like the Dawn of War series, the Kohan series, Warlords Battlecry, Company of Heroes, Men of War are far more interesting to play.

#185
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Morroian wrote...
Company of Heroes


I thought that was a good game, but I couldn't stay into it.  Pure RTS in that mold always just seem too limiting to me as far as the things I want to be able to do.  Hence my preference for Total War and Paradox Interactive strategy games.

#186
addiction21

addiction21
  • Members
  • 6 066 messages
Mmmmmmm Kohan.

Dont know if its your cup of tea but a new Majesty Expansion is coming from paradox next week.

Modifié par addiction21, 04 novembre 2010 - 10:35 .


#187
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Lyssistr wrote...
tbh I haven't played Total War nor any strategy game from Paradox but if you're not a Warcraft lore junkie, you have no idea what you're missing :D 


Warcraft lore?  Now that's different.  I hate Warcraft lore.  It's beyond indifference with their games, Warcraft lore kept me from even considering playing WoW when it came out.  So I embrace my dislike of Warcraft lore because it saved me from that monstrosity.


 If you didn't play it at the beginning you missed some pretty awesome raid dungeons BWL, AQ40 and the old Naxx were pretty awesome. I've quit so I don't know how things are now, people tell me some changes are good but the game has lost part of its "feel".

 In any case, WoW imo is the best game I've ever played, it's just that RL is better and so I quit.

#188
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages
 Btw, lore wise, the Warcraft universe is awesome imo, I look at Cataclysm the way diabetics look at chocolate.

#189
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Eh, every MMO I've played was full of people mocking WoW. Some with experience in it, some just jumping on the bandwagon. Still, it makes it impossible for me to take seriously.



But I'll defend the much-maligned Age of Conan till I'm blue in the face, despite it being flawed as well and a game I left months ago.

#190
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Eh, every MMO I've played was full of people mocking WoW. Some with experience in it, some just jumping on the bandwagon. Still, it makes it impossible for me to take seriously.

But I'll defend the much-maligned Age of Conan till I'm blue in the face, despite it being flawed as well and a game I left months ago.


 Well, even within WoW servers you would see people mocking WoW, yet being there every day. At the end of the day, everybody hates the champ ;).

 I haven't tried AoC, I'm mmo-free for a few years now and promised myself to never play an mmo again(*), that's why I'm so eager to play Diablo III, I can catch up with old guildies in a more casual manner through multi-coop.

(*) If in 10 years Blizzard announces WoW II, then I'm royally ****ed tho :D

Modifié par Lyssistr, 04 novembre 2010 - 10:49 .


#191
John Epler

John Epler
  • BioWare Employees
  • 3 390 messages
Alright, folks, I'm going to have to ask you guys to get back on topic. We've veered a little too far away from DA2-related discussion at this point ^_^

Modifié par JohnEpler, 04 novembre 2010 - 10:49 .


#192
soteria

soteria
  • Members
  • 3 307 messages

Eh, every MMO I've played was full of people mocking WoW. Some with experience in it, some just jumping on the bandwagon. Still, it makes it impossible for me to take seriously.


/shrug. Haters gonna hate. All I can say is probably over 2/3 of all the criticisms I've seen of it were factually inaccurate, spoken from ignorance, or criticisms of MMO gameplay in general ("grouping sucks!"). Then there's definitely a subset of the population who automatically reject whatever is popular, same as other people gravitate to the popular thing.

#193
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

JohnEpler wrote...

Alright, folks, I'm going to have to ask you guys to get back on topic. We've veered a little too far away from DA2-related discussion at this point ^_^


Ah but every time I get to mention Age of Conan on the Dragon Age boards, my crusade to get a Bioware dev to say  that the Conan combo system is the way to go for future RPGs gets that much closer to achieving Phase 2.

Phase 1 was already achieved when Mike Laidlaw admitted that he used the combo system when he played Conan.

Phase 2 will be reached when a Bioware dev says that the Conan combo system was good (awesome will be acceptable as well)

Phase 3 is when a Bioware devs says something along the lines of how they're looking at it for DA#.

and Phase 4 will result in success when that system is implemented.

Totally on topic!

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 04 novembre 2010 - 10:59 .


#194
Lyssistr

Lyssistr
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages

soteria wrote...

Eh, every MMO I've played was full of people mocking WoW. Some with experience in it, some just jumping on the bandwagon. Still, it makes it impossible for me to take seriously.

/shrug. Haters gonna hate. All I can say is probably over 2/3 of all the criticisms I've seen of it were factually inaccurate, spoken from ignorance, or criticisms of MMO gameplay in general ("grouping sucks!"). Then there's definitely a subset of the population who automatically reject whatever is popular, same as other people gravitate to the popular thing.


 It's not that WoW didn't have it's problems but that's like saying "porsches suck", a porsche is still the best car one can hope for.

#195
CoS Sarah Jinstar

CoS Sarah Jinstar
  • Members
  • 2 169 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

JohnEpler wrote...

Alright, folks, I'm going to have to ask you guys to get back on topic. We've veered a little too far away from DA2-related discussion at this point ^_^


Ah but every time I get to mention Age of Conan on the Dragon Age boards, my crusade to get a Bioware dev to say  that the Conan combo system is the way to go for future RPGs gets that much closer to achieving Phase 2.

Phase 1 was already achieved when Mike Laidlaw admitted that he used the combo system when he played Conan.

Phase 2 will be reached when a Bioware dev says that the Conan combo system was good (awesome will be acceptable as well)

Phase 3 is when a Bioware devs says something along the lines of how they're looking at it for DA#.

and Phase 4 will result in success when that system is implemented.

Totally on topic!


Phase 5 Angry Pants forces his preferences on everyone else. :whistle:

#196
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...
Phase 5 Angry Pants forces his preferences on everyone else. :whistle:


I've got just as much of a right to my preferences as anyone.  It's no different than Sylvius wanting to hammer home his preference for a return to BG1.

Still, I have no expectations that my "plan" will advance beyond Phase 2.

#197
Anarya

Anarya
  • Members
  • 5 552 messages
That whistling smiley is starting to provoke a Pavlovian irritation response in me.

#198
CoS Sarah Jinstar

CoS Sarah Jinstar
  • Members
  • 2 169 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...
Phase 5 Angry Pants forces his preferences on everyone else. :whistle:


I've got just as much of a right to my preferences as anyone.  It's no different than Sylvius wanting to hammer home his preference for a return to BG1.

Still, I have no expectations that my "plan" will advance beyond Phase 2.


For sure, I tried a demo of AOC. It was promptly uninstalled 10 mins later. Different strokes for different folks and all that.

#199
mellifera

mellifera
  • Members
  • 10 061 messages

Anarya wrote...

That whistling smiley is starting to provoke a Pavlovian irritation response in me.


Same here. Along with ;) , and after the whole Isabela thing, that one jerk who kept on using :P makes that face extremely punchable to me.

#200
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...
For sure, I tried a demo of AOC. It was promptly uninstalled 10 mins later. Different strokes for different folks and all that.


You don't even get combos within 10 minutes, which is even assuming you took a melee class. :unsure:

But your point is of course taken, different strokes.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 04 novembre 2010 - 11:15 .