MisterMonkeyBanana wrote...
Bethesda games I find are only described as action RPG's by people don't like them. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the vast majority of FO3 and Oblivion fans didn't enjoy the game for it's combat but for the exploration and immersion in a vast beautiful world in which they can make their mark on. Basically the same thing as what a Bioware game does at the end of the day, but done in a very different way.
Yeah, I would say that Bethesda and Bioware both clearly make RPG's, just very differen RPG's. Actually, by my definition, Bethesda has stayed closer to RPG roots with its more open ended game play and less defined protagonists. That's not to say I like their games
better (I don't), but you can certainly roleplay in them. It's a little disappointing that it doesn't seem to matter very much how you roleplay in Bethesda's games, but there's never been any doubt in my mind to what genre they belong.
I don't get calling Fallout 3 a shooter--its gameplay is really not very different from Oblivion's. Does playing an archer in Oblivion make it a "shooter"? Plus, you can play it in turn-based mode if you choose which makes it a hell of a lot less shooter-like than the Mass Effect games.
Modifié par maxernst, 04 novembre 2010 - 02:11 .