Saibh wrote...
I have this problem with generalizing everyone. Even when I type things I can think of great examples of where this is not the case, but I usually just generalize with a "you" or "they".
I mean to say that you see movies and games and TV shows with beefcakes (honestly, that word is so...I mean, does anyone else get a little revolted imagining it?) that are made and marketed to men by men, and many of them feature gigantically muscular men. I don't mean to say this is true of all mens across the board.
Well, this is a chicken and egg problem, though.
It's certainly true that the majority of executives in film and marketing today are men. So insofar as those executives are driving the unrealistic standards of beauty, you're 100% right. The thing is, your argument (philosophically) is more fundamental than that.
What you're claiming is that when most men (if not all men) sit down to imagine their honest ideal for themselves, it is to be tall, and large, and muscular. And that's an incredibly complicated claim to make, and the fact that there is a gender imbalance in the media isn't sufficient.
As for shows marketed to men by men - not all of the guys are beefcakes. Let me give you some examples:
- 2 1/2 men has Charlie Seen as some hedonistic icon sleeping with beauties left and right. He is no beefcake.
- The King of Queens has an overweight man with a beautiful trophy wife
- According to Jim follows the same formula
And as one counter-example I can think of:
- Brothers & Sisters ( my ex-gf was really into this show) basically has OK looking actresses with beefcakes all around them
Yes, the male standard of beauty is the tal, chiseled Adonis. But that isn't the only body type shown on TV even, for shows designed to draw in a large male audience.