charmingcharlie wrote...
The fact you won't accept there is a disparity between the PS3 version of Mass Effect 2 and the PC/360 version shows how close minded you are. Let me remind you again what the word "disparity" means :-
dictionary .....
lack of similarity or equality
Now PS3 Mass Effect 2 allows you to alter decisions that will affect the game, the PC/360 version of Mass Effect 2 does not allow you to do that. Hm that sounds like a lack of similarity or equality there. It is irrelevant whether PC/360 users can go out and BUY and additional game. It is relevant that in one version you can do something that you can not do in another version hence there is a disparity.
You're right its not equal.
THE PS3 USERS GET THE WORSE DEAL! Now I freely admit there is a disparity in the Mass Effect series between PS3 and PC/360 users which is unfortunate and unfair on PS3 users. However you don't fix things by creating yet more disparity which is what the PS3 version of Mass Effect 2 is doing.
It's a comic that serves as a poor replacement of ME1. The game is supposed to be a trilogy and based off your decisions. There is no disparity other than what you're trying to claim the PC/Xbox users being wronged despite the fact that they already have the comic in a better form. Like I said the TV show analogy you're complaining about a summarization when you
already have the whole first season that they don't get.
THE WHOLE ARGUMENT IS REALLY PETTYIf you are going to turn around and tell people to buy Mass Effect 1 if they are that bothered about not being able to alter decisions in Mass Effect 2 then I think it is equally fair to say the same thing to PS3 users then. If missing out on Mass Effect 1 is such a massive burden then there are plenty of choices open to them to play the Mass Effect series
What? If you buy the sequel to a game that's selling point is the ability to import decisions from the previous game and you decide not to buy the previous game than *gasps* you shouldn't be able to import the decisions! Why? Because you chose not too! The PS3 users
never had that choice in the first place!WOW this is a new one for me, I didn't realise the software industry had developed this policy. As a PC gamer I am well versed in the practices of releasing games a year later and this is the first time I have ever heard of this "oh it is a year old game so we have to flog it cheaply". I certainly remember when I bought GTA 4 a year later on the PC it cost the same price as the console (minus the console royalty fee). I know for a fact when Fable 3 gets finally released on the PC a year later than the 360 version it will have a console price tag and with no extra dlc included free of charge.
You're kidding right? Sony actually has a policy if a game is being relased late that already was on another console it has to have something extra before they consider it . It's a good policy too. If you decided to buy GTA4
(which was a ****** poor console port) that's your perogative. But I'm willing to bet you a great deal sales took a hit because of it.
I doubt Fable 3 will
ever get released on PC. >_> And if it does we'll at least have the benefit of fixing that buggy mess.
In other words Bioware are doing this because they want to offer value to PS3 users and give PS3 users a fantastic deal. I do not have a problem with this in the slightest. I don't have a problem with the price of ME 2 on the PS3, I don't have a problem with the DLC being given away for free and I don't have a problem with the introductory module. I do have a problem with them holding the introductory module OFF the PC/360 when there is absolutely no need for them to do that.
Uh. No they're doing it because there's a good chance SONY wouldn't accept it if they didn't. As well as the fact that one of the selling points of ME2 was how your decisons in ME1 shaped the game. If they wanted to make the game make sense to ME2 people much of the plot in ME1 would be trivilaized or summarized in ME3 regardless.
Hm a discussion board where people discuss issues regarding Bioware and their products yet you think we should shut up about them. You know Bioware could bring this discussion to an end in a second by telling us exactly what "intially released as a PS3 exclusive" actually means. After all they rushed to clarify that the PS3 wasn't getting a 6 hour exclusive mission.
I didn't say that. But this sense of entitlement is childish. I'm not saying you shouldn't ask for it but screaming it's not fair and is a disparity is not true.
Initally released means initally released I.E. when it's first released it'll be exclusive. Not hard to figure out. You'll get it at a later date.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 13 novembre 2010 - 08:55 .