Dave of Canada wrote...
And Dragon Age was marketed as...
"Engage in Bone-Crushing, Visceral Combat: Battle against massive and terrifying creatures
Unleash legendary powers and choose from over 100 different magical spells and skills
Experience the adrenaline rush of brutal combat, beheading your foes or casting spells that make enemies explode from within"
... but that doesn't make it an ARPG to the people on this forum.
Buzz words do not define a genre.
It depends on what you take action rpg to mean.
I go with "combat is the focus of the game and combat depends more (or solely) on player reaction times and reflexes rahter than on character stats."
DA:O, for me on the PC, reaction time was not an issue.
ME2, even with being able to pause, reflexes and reaction times were definitely an issue.
Again, it depends on what you think an action RPG is.
I said the video have looked like X... it may well play like Y for me and in the end I won't call it an action rpg.
But that's neither here nor there -
a person asked "why would anyone not like what they are seeing" and I gave an option of why.
That option got attacked for being inaccurate, but I think it stands. Some people have seen the gameplay shown (official and unofficial) and think it looks like gameplay they don't enjoy.
You can't disagree with that.
I just listed a bunch of games that had combat that could LOOK the same if you weren't playing it.
Pick this all apart as you will.
Modifié par MerinTB, 08 novembre 2010 - 09:42 .