Aller au contenu

Photo

Why Leliana is crazy.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
498 réponses à ce sujet

#476
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

I don't really buy the 'she wouldn't have had sex with him if it weren't for X' line of thinking in regards to it being called borderline rape.

There are lots of reasons people have sex that are not due to love.
They could both be wasted, one of them could be getting paid for it, one of them could be seeking information from the second, the woman could be trying to get pregnant, one of them could be using the other for their money, they could just be trying to get a release, whatever.

So basically, no one would go around having sex if it weren't for...whatever their reason was for having sex.


Right because when someone's going to kill you the first thing on your mind is how hot they are and how much you want to screw them. :mellow:

Where the heck is the bolded even coming from? I know all of that and it's not even remotely relevant.

She wanted to live and slept with him to get away. Didn't work but that's what she was trying to do. She was trying to save her life and that for is duress and will always, always make that encounter extremely grey and not fully consensual sex.

It's not like she slept with him before she knew he was trying to kill her. That's a completely different situation.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 20 novembre 2010 - 08:39 .


#477
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 276 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...

I don't really buy the 'she wouldn't have had sex with him if it weren't for X' line of thinking in regards to it being called borderline rape.

There are lots of reasons people have sex that are not due to love.
They could both be wasted, one of them could be getting paid for it, one of them could be seeking information from the second, the woman could be trying to get pregnant, one of them could be using the other for their money, they could just be trying to get a release, whatever.

So basically, no one would go around having sex if it weren't for...whatever their reason was for having sex.


Right because when someone's going to kill you the first thing on your mind is how hot they are and how much you want to screw them. :mellow:

Where the heck is the bolded even coming from? I know all of that and it's not even remotely relevant.

She wanted to live and slept with him to get away. Didn't work but that's what she was trying to do.

Dismissiving everything I said with a 'I know all of it and it's not even remotely relevant' is really rude, you know. Clearly, I felt that it was relevant or I wouldn't have brought it up.

I don't see where I said that the first thing that would pop into your mind when someone is there to kill you is how hot they are or even that they would think this at all.

The reason I said it and the reason I feel that it is relevant is because I've seen a variation of the phrase 'she would not have slept with him if it had not been for X' used over and over as a reason why it's borderline rape. If he had said "I'm a Crow. I'm here to kill you. **** me and you might live" then I could see how it would be not just borderline but actual rape regardless of if he did as he promised.

All those things after the bolded part were examples and you could easily fill the X in with 'if she hadn't wanted a baby' or 'if he hadn't been paying for it.'

The fact that she brought up the sex and clearly wanted to use the opportunity to try and kill him (as well as the fact that I personally do not believe that if the mark was clearly unwilling to have sex but just trying to stave off the inevitable that Zevran would sleep with her) is why I don't think it's anywhere near rape that he did so.

#478
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

ejoslin wrote...

Honestly, it's not much of a leap to make (like not one at all really, but no point arguing it).

but again, he was not there to have sex with her.  He SHOULD have just killed her instead of having sex with her first.  Agreed.  i've said that before.  But she asked him for sex, and so he did.  He tried to save her too.  I'd say, if it were a game, it was one she actually won.


Yeah I see it as a rather large leap because I fail to see how I'm making a direct comparison by calling both actions raw and realistic.

He really should've. I would've respected hima lot more for just finishing her off.

If she had won it doesn't make it any less not fully consensual nor does that negate her duress .Just means that she pulled it off.

Considering the fact that she still ends up dead I'd say she lost.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 20 novembre 2010 - 08:53 .


#479
Zjarcal

Zjarcal
  • Members
  • 10 836 messages

ejoslin wrote...
Edit;It's an interesting thing, though, I've noticed (and not just you, but just about everyone here), when we hear about the monstrous acts our companions have done, we can look at the same situation with two companions, and feel it's a reason to be more sympathetic for a character we like, and think it's irrelevant for a character we don't.

for instance: Leliana as an adult was tortured, most like raped, and was used and hurt.             
                   Zevran as a child was beaten, tortured, most likely raped, and was used and hurt probably to a greater extent as far younger.

both horrific and both shaped them in ways (though given zevran's age when it happened to him, it probably shaped him more).  But i see people who prefer either one dismissing the other.

It is interesting is all.


This is very true.

Since I love both characters, I don't dismiss either argument. Both are heavily scarred people and both try to make amends for their actions in their own way.

But if anyone tries to convince me that Wynne is a good person, I'll just tell them to talk to the hand. :P

#480
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...
 Dismissiving everything I said with a 'I know all of it and it's not even remotely relevant' is really rude, you know. Clearly, I felt that it was relevant or I wouldn't have brought it up.


Right.

I don't see where I said that the first thing that would pop into your mind when someone is there to kill you is how hot they are or even that they would think this at all.

The reason I said it and the reason I feel that it is relevant is because I've seen a variation of the phrase 'she would not have slept with him if it had not been for X' used over and over as a reason why it's borderline rape. If he had said "I'm a Crow. I'm here to kill you. **** me and you might live" then I could see how it would be not just borderline but actual rape regardless of if he did as he promised.

All those things after the bolded part were examples and you could easily fill the X in with 'if she hadn't wanted a baby' or 'if he hadn't been paying for it.'

The fact that she brought up the sex and clearly wanted to use the opportunity to try and kill him (as well as the fact that I personally do not believe that if the mark was clearly unwilling to have sex but just trying to stave off the inevitable that Zevran would sleep with her) is why I don't think it's anywhere near rape that he did so.


*sighs* We're not going to agree. It doesn't matter that she brought it up and wanted to use the oppotrunity to kill him. She knew he was there to kill her. The whole thing was self defense. Which makes it to me not completely consensual. She had a choice between dying or agreeing to sleep with him for an oppotrunity to save herself. You guys keep saying how death or choosing to kill someone isn't really a choice. How is this situation any different?

Modifié par Ryzaki, 20 novembre 2010 - 08:45 .


#481
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 276 messages
I know we're not going to agree. You don't have to be dismissive of my opinion just because of that, you know.

#482
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

I know we're not going to agree. You don't have to be dismissive of my opinion just because of that, you know.


I was dismissive of it because we're not talking about two fully consensual adults having a good time. We're talking about a woman trying to get out of a man killing her.

Edit: Before prostitutes/people who sleep their way up to the top are even brought up. Someone trying to earn their life back as payment isn't a legitimate business deal.

Edit: As for the wasted bit. I consider that unconsensual. They're thinking and judgement is impared. (And frankly that's why I personally wouldn't sleep with someone I suspect is drunk).

Modifié par Ryzaki, 20 novembre 2010 - 08:57 .


#483
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...
 Dismissiving everything I said with a 'I know all of it and it's not even remotely relevant' is really rude, you know. Clearly, I felt that it was relevant or I wouldn't have brought it up.


Right.

I don't see where I said that the first thing that would pop into your mind when someone is there to kill you is how hot they are or even that they would think this at all.

The reason I said it and the reason I feel that it is relevant is because I've seen a variation of the phrase 'she would not have slept with him if it had not been for X' used over and over as a reason why it's borderline rape. If he had said "I'm a Crow. I'm here to kill you. **** me and you might live" then I could see how it would be not just borderline but actual rape regardless of if he did as he promised.

All those things after the bolded part were examples and you could easily fill the X in with 'if she hadn't wanted a baby' or 'if he hadn't been paying for it.'

The fact that she brought up the sex and clearly wanted to use the opportunity to try and kill him (as well as the fact that I personally do not believe that if the mark was clearly unwilling to have sex but just trying to stave off the inevitable that Zevran would sleep with her) is why I don't think it's anywhere near rape that he did so.


*sighs* We're not going to agree. It doesn't matter that she brought it up and wanted to use the oppotrunity to kill him. She knew he was there to kill her. The whole thing was self defense. Which makes it to me not completely consensual. She had a choice between dying or agreeing to sleep with him for an oppotrunity to save herself. You guys keep saying how death or choosing to kill someone isn't really a choice. How is this situation any different?



The difference is, she did not agree to sleep with him... he agreed to sleep with her.  it's a minor difference, but yet, it's there.  Had she not brought it up, he would have killed her and it would have been over.  If your sentence read, 'she seduced him as she saw that may be a chance to save her life, at least temporarily" I would agree 100%, and yes, in our modern society, i would fully agree it's still rape.  But in this world, most likely not.

Modifié par ejoslin, 20 novembre 2010 - 09:23 .


#484
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

ejoslin wrote...

The difference is, she did not agree to sleep with him... he agreed to sleep with her.  it's a minor difference, but yet, it's there.  Had she not brought it up, he would have killed her and it would have been over.  If your sentence read, 'she seduced him as she saw that may be a chance to save her life, at least temporarily" I would agree 100%, and yes, in our modern society, i would fully agree it's still rape.  But in this world, most likely not.


Eh. I already said how I felt with the "this world" excuse.

So yeah...Agree to disagree?

#485
EccentricSage

EccentricSage
  • Members
  • 1 067 messages
Oh gods, this is going to be a hard thread to get caught up with. Before I loose track of my train of thought, I just want to point out that in the case of Zevran and his marks, his marks, if his marks KNOW he is there to kill him, then they also know he's a Crow, and very likely know that this is a life or death situation for him as well. If he fails, but survives, the Crows will punish him, with death at least. The House of Crows are renowned and respected as much as they are feared and abhorred. They make no effort to hide what they are, as is evidenced by the fact that they like to have distinctively attractive assassins like Zevran, and have tattoos that identify them as Crows.

So it really is a sort of sick game being played, and IMO, they are both victims. One walks away with his or her life, the other dies, weather that be the assassin or the mark. Not to mention, the Mark who escapes knows he or she will be hunted and killed later. So Zevran's POV that he can offer one night of pleasure to the mark makes a lot of sense from his POV, weather or not his Mark feels that way on the inside. I strongly believe if Zevran were in the mark's shoes, he'd probably see it as making the best of the situation, as he is the sort who tries his best to take any moment of pleasure and joy he can get, knowing that death will always be imminent in his life. I think he would be thinking of how to kill or escape the other, if in the marks shoes, but would enjoy it as much as he could. He has that type of personality. It's probably the only way he could have coped as well as he did with his lot in life.

I really don't think it can be seen the same as rape, even though I see how normally it would be... there's nothing normal about the situation or culture. It's still dark and to us, in our lives, wrong. But psychologically, under those circumstances, I can't see blaming him. And ultimately, we aren't there, we don't experience this in game, so we really don't know. I'll agree completely, it comes CLOSE to being rape. It is very gray. But that is the point of this game. Sometimes IRL, good people do bad things, too, not even knowing that they are doing something bad. I think what is so compelling about Zevran is that his friendship or romance is a story of redemption.

I'll get back to discussing Lelliana soon, btw. It had seemed as though the thread were about to fizzle out, and Zevran, among others, came up in debating Lelliana. Sorry it kind of transformed into a Zevran debate, everyone. Yet, it seems if I started a seperate thread, it would only make things more confusing, as I think the Zevran debate here is nearing it's end, some already agreeing to dissagree or agreeing on grey areas. I'm not sure it would be worthwhile to start a thread about this and just attract true trolls who spam with "I killed that ****er, hur hur"


*edit* Actualy, if someone is drunk they can still consent.  Unless they were drugged, being drunk does not make anything less consensual, as it was self-inflicted and their own responsability.  I have NO SYMPATHY for people who get wasted, have sex, then panick about it once sober and go OMGZ, RAPE.  People need to take responsability for their own choices.

Modifié par EccentricSage, 21 novembre 2010 - 03:28 .


#486
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages
^Even if that person was so drunk he/she fell unconscious? Frankly I think it's the sober person who should be decent enough to go "Uh...no. You're drunk." If you can't be bothered to respect the person that much you deserve to be screamed at and accused when they sober up. So no I feel no sympathy for anyone who can't be decent enough to turn away someone who is obviously not completely in their right mind. (I know this from the girl who will steal someone's computer if they leave it lying about. I have odd morals I know.)

Now if they're both drunk...idiots will be idiots.

That said I am in the it's really grey catagory. I've never said it was rape. Borderline but that's what I mean when I say grey.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 21 novembre 2010 - 03:47 .


#487
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 276 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

^Even if that person was so drunk he/she fell unconscious? Frankly I think it's the sober person who should be decent enough to go "Uh...no. You're drunk." If you can't be bothered to respect the person that much you deserve to be screamed at and accused when they sober up.

Now if they're both drunk...idiots will be idiots.

Presumably it's a judgement call and if someone is 'so drunk he/she fell unconscious' then that would fall under 'too drunk to sleep with.'

#488
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

^Even if that person was so drunk he/she fell unconscious? Frankly I think it's the sober person who should be decent enough to go "Uh...no. You're drunk." If you can't be bothered to respect the person that much you deserve to be screamed at and accused when they sober up.

Now if they're both drunk...idiots will be idiots.

Presumably it's a judgement call and if someone is 'so drunk he/she fell unconscious' then that would fall under 'too drunk to sleep with.'


Personally I won't sleep with anyone who is swaying. Once you start to sway and giggle and act like a fool or start crying on me I'm throwing you on the nearest couch and heading to bed while calling you a idiot in my head. (Or outloud depending on who it is). I don't drink for that very reason.

That said I'm paranoid enough not to accept any opened drink from anyone. IF it's open I'm not drinking it. Don't know what the hell someone coul've put in it. (Heck I'm even paranoid enough to wash the glass in case it's been smeared).

I've never felt the urge to get wasted either. But that's probably becaus when I was younger if I wanted toget a drink all I had to do was ask and they'd let me drink with them. It's not as facinating when you know you can get it whenver you want to.

That said that might be because I could see how it could destroy people first hand.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 21 novembre 2010 - 03:52 .


#489
EccentricSage

EccentricSage
  • Members
  • 1 067 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

^Even if that person was so drunk he/she fell unconscious? Frankly I think it's the sober person who should be decent enough to go "Uh...no. You're drunk." If you can't be bothered to respect the person that much you deserve to be screamed at and accused when they sober up. So no I feel no sympathy for anyone who can't be decent enough to turn away someone who is obviously not completely in their right mind. (I know this from the girl who will steal someone's computer if they leave it lying about. I have odd morals I know.)

Now if they're both drunk...idiots will be idiots.

That said I am in the it's really grey catagory. I've never said it was rape. Borderline but that's what I mean when I say grey.


I think we are pretty much in agreement then. 

I think even if one is drunker, or one drunk and one sober, the drunk person who regrets it later made their own bad choices.  If the drunk person is passed out, it's clearly rape, but if the drunk person had a blackout, and does not remember clearly why they had sex with the other person, or weather they agreed to it or not, then the drunk person had better hope there was a witness, or no one will ever know. 

You can think someone is an **** for taking advantage of someone elses' intoxication, but it's not a crime.  It's just not very nice, but, well, that just is what it is.

#490
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

EccentricSage wrote...

I think we are pretty much in agreement then. 

I think even if one is drunker, or one drunk and one sober, the drunk person who regrets it later made their own bad choices.  If the drunk person is passed out, it's clearly rape, but if the drunk person had a blackout, and does not remember clearly why they had sex with the other person, or weather they agreed to it or not, then the drunk person had better hope there was a witness, or no one will ever know. 

You can think someone is an **** for taking advantage of someone elses' intoxication, but it's not a crime.  It's just not very nice, but, well, that just is what it is.


Actually it is a crime. Being drunk means you can't fully give consent.

Though yes rape is very hard to prove in court.

So we're not in agreement at all.

Frankly I don't think it's very nice I think people who do that are scum. Digusting scum that should be shot. I hold them on the same level of contempt that I do child abusers.

#491
EccentricSage

EccentricSage
  • Members
  • 1 067 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Actually it is a crime. Being drunk means you can't fully give consent.

Though yes rape is very hard to prove in court.

So we're not in agreement at all.

Frankly I don't think it's very nice I think people who do that are scum. Digusting scum that should be shot. I hold them on the same level of contempt that I do child abusers.


Wait... since when?  I've never heard of a law against having sex while someone is nowingly and of their own free will intoxicated.  What country? 

I agree taking advantage of a situation like that is terrible.  However, I believe the responsability is on the person who chose to willingly put themselves in an altered state of mind.  One is responsible for one's own actions and choices when intoxicated so long as it was one's own choice to get intoxicated.  For example, a drunk driver who runs a person over can not say it was just an accident, as it was the person's own choice to get drunk and drive.  A person who decides to get drunk and have sex made an unfortunate series of decisions, but it was that person's own bad decision, and not rape.

#492
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages

EccentricSage wrote...
Wait... since when?  I've never heard of a law against having sex while someone is nowingly and of their own free will intoxicated.  What country? 

I agree taking advantage of a situation like that is terrible.  However, I believe the responsability is on the person who chose to willingly put themselves in an altered state of mind.  One is responsible for one's own actions and choices when intoxicated so long as it was one's own choice to get intoxicated.  For example, a drunk driver who runs a person over can not say it was just an accident, as it was the person's own choice to get drunk and drive.  A person who decides to get drunk and have sex made an unfortunate series of decisions, but it was that person's own bad decision, and not rape.


Whoops they were considering making it a law. It isn't one yet apparently. *hits head on desk for being so quick*  That said rape is so hard to prove even when someone is fully aware that the rates of acquittal are low. (That said I'm not talking normal drunk I'm talking "hehehe" when someone is falling all over the place reeking of booze drunk). Why would anyone want to sleep with someone who reeks of booze anyways? Urgh.

Frankly I think responsibility is on both sides. You can choose to be a scumbag and take advantage of someone and that person couldve chosen not to drink.

To me its similar to someone walking down a dark alley and ending up beaten/kidnapped and killed. Sure that person could've avoided doing that in the first place but what right did that whoever hurt them had to do it. None.

A drunk driver is something different in my mind althoughter. If you're drunk and you get in a car that is on you. No one is taking advantage of you you're just being a complete and utter douchebag.

And I don't believe that. That said those are my own personal beliefs and I'm not going to tell people what they should or should not do. That said I find those people to be scum and worth absolutely nothing. I'd kill all of them if it was legal. 

Screwing someone completly over when they have full control of their facilities: Go ahead. I'll probably even give you a high five if you completely screw them over. That said it's probably just the fact that I have a deep loathing of people who have sex with people when they're drunk. Just one of my buttons. It's not logical and I don't pretend it is.

Male or Female. If someone isn't trying to have sex with you in the first place and they're too drunk to fight you off you deserve to be taken out somewhere and shot. Bloody sleaze balls .<_<

Now for the drunk idiots that initate the sex. They're just drunken idiots and deserve everything that happens when they open their eyes. :lol:

Edit: On topicI think 'll romance Leliana and Zevran again. I had to drag myself away from Alistair eventually. :lol: Just to be sure I can't slip I'll play a male elf.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 21 novembre 2010 - 07:07 .


#493
EccentricSage

EccentricSage
  • Members
  • 1 067 messages

Ryzaki wrote...
Whoops they were considering making it a law. It isn't one yet apparently. *hits head on desk for being so quick*  That said rape is so hard to prove even when someone is fully aware that the rates of acquittal are low. (That said I'm not talking normal drunk I'm talking "hehehe" when someone is falling all over the place reeking of booze drunk). Why would anyone want to sleep with someone who reeks of booze anyways? Urgh.


I agree, that's creepy, desperate, gross, just generaly inconsiderate...  But if the drunk says 'yes' it is not rape.  I mean, really, as you said, it's hard to proove rape to begin with.  The flip side of that is that there are already a lot of people who's lives are also seriously messed up by false accusations of rape made be ideots who simply regretted their choices the next day, and did not want to be responsible.  Making sex with 'very drunk people' a crime, even if the drunk person said yes, only will make matters worse.  By time the acusation is even made, they'll both have matabolized too much of the alchohol in their systems for reliable testing.

Frankly I think responsibility is on both sides. You can choose to be a scumbag and take advantage of someone and that person couldve chosen not to drink.

To me its similar to someone walking down a dark alley and ending up beaten/kidnapped and killed. Sure that person could've avoided doing that in the first place but what right did that whoever hurt them had to do it. None.


Walking down an ally and getting jumped would be equivillent to getting drunk and being taken sexualy by force, which is not what we are talking about.  You're making yourself an easier target, yes, but that does not make you less of a victim, nor disolve the responsability of the one inflicting themselves uppon you against your will.  But that is not what we are talking about here.  We are talking about somebody getting drunk, agreeing to sex, and regretting it once sober.  You can think whatever you want about the person they had sex with... Responsability for their own actions and their personal reprecussions are on them each individually, and only extend to one another if pregnancy occurs or a vinerial dissease one knew he or she had is transmitted to the other who did not know.  That is not rape.

A drunk driver is something different in my mind althoughter. If you're drunk and you get in a car that is on you. No one is taking advantage of you you're just being a complete and utter douchebag.

And I don't believe that. That said those are my own personal beliefs and I'm not going to tell people what they should or should not do. That said I find those people to be scum and worth absolutely nothing. I'd kill all of them if it was legal. 

Screwing someone completly over when they have full control of their facilities: Go ahead. I'll probably even give you a high five if you completely screw them over. That said it's probably just the fact that I have a deep loathing of people who have sex with people when they're drunk. Just one of my buttons. It's not logical and I don't pretend it is.


This I do not get.  Cruelty is cruelty.  How is it less bad to intentionaly use and harm a person that has full control of their facilities than it is someone who does not?  The results are just as bad.  Me, I don't respect those who comit needlessly cruel and abusive acts uppon others.  Unless by screw over in this case, you mean it purely as in work them over sexualy.  I'm with you on that.  I could be miss understanding you, as in the area of the states where I live 'Screw over' is usually meant as to use someone and take advantage of them, leaving them worse for wear, rather than the sexual conotation... though sex can be involved.  Don't want any more missunderstandings.  lol

I get what you mean, about certain things pushing buttons for personal reasons.  I'm cool with that.

Male or Female. If someone isn't trying to have sex with you in the first place and they're too drunk to fight you off you deserve to be taken out somewhere and shot. Bloody sleaze balls .<_<

Now for the drunk idiots that initate the sex. They're just drunken idiots and deserve everything that happens when they open their eyes. :lol:


I agree... if they are too incoherent to fight a person off, or say 'no' but they are not saying yes and actively participating ether, that IS rape, as there is no clear consent.

I agree... sometimes a person might be less drunk, and the drunk ideot really hot, and coming on strong, and hormonal reactions happen.  My point about black outs before was to do with this... not falling asleep drunk.  some people get completely crazy when drunk, but still seem to be... very active participants... but they don't remember what happened the next day.  That's called a black out in the context of drunkeness.  It hadn't even occured to me before that it may have sounded like I meant passing out when I said black out.

Edit: On topicI think 'll romance Leliana and Zevran again. I had to drag myself away from Alistair eventually. :lol: Just to be sure I can't slip I'll play a male elf.


I want to try to really properly romance Lelliana, too... with a mod to fix some dialogue bugs, as I did not know untill today that she had any.  XD  Like you with Zev, though... something about her bordering on irrational makes my skin crawl.  But I wonder if I can get into her head with the right character?  Granted, I think we are quite different in tastes. 

Romancing Alistair pains me... I liked him better as a friend to my male Warden than as a romance option for my female... mage, no less.  It's going rather disasterously.  But you know how sometimes you create a character, and they seem to just develop and go in a direction and have a mind of their own, and you just easily start to fill out a background for them... Well, she's one of those playthroughs.  And she has some serious issues and a massive complex when it comes to Templars.  I thought, if I was unhappy with Al, I could just have her fall for Zevran... but no... she actually likes him, but finds him creepy.  I'm not even sure how her friendship with him will develop, and at what rate.  It's kind of exciting, as I'd not gotten this perspective before, so it feels new again.  Likewise, she likes Leliana ok, but she's the one who does kind of pick on Leliana... XD  It's just her impish personality.  She is quite confused by her, actually.

I still need to do a nice Queen Cousland playthrough.  Maybe I can get a female Cousland going who will actually 'fit' with Alistair.  Argh, it's so hard for me, because I just CAN'T seem to create a character who has those white knight tendancies.  Mind you, I don't do 'evil bastard' characters, ether... the closest to that I have is a male Cousland named Davend who is rather cold and calculating, but he is just deaply damaged by what happened, and driven by a new sense of duty and desire for vengance.  He means well, but rather than not seeing the forest for the trees like Alistair, he sees the forest and forgets that it is made of trees.  Mmmm... also have a Male Blood Mage in the works, Astor, who is kind and sentimental, but driven by fear and hatred of the Chantry.  He will romance Morrigan all the way through to the end.  I will have to break up with Zevran and get the puppy dog eyes of doom.  :crying:

I don't know what I'm going to do about romancing Lelliana, though.  From what perspective do you aprouch her relationship?  What is the mindset of your main Lelliana romancing warden?  I wish there had been a Templar Origin, as then I could feel a bit more compelled to role a religious warden.  It's really hard for me.  Goes against my grain.  Strangely, my Dalish got along with her famously at first, but then he got really really creeped out with her around the whole Marjolain thing, and stopped liking her.  He was my first character in Origins, Dristen, and is my avatar on this forum.  Maybe the perspective I had on her through the eyes of my Dalish who romanced Zevran has left me with a really bad taste in my mouth towards her. 

To be honest, I kind of wonder if it's the lack of emotion in Lelliana's VA most of the time, and her lack of facial expression a lot of the time, that really makes her words once she starts talking about her past so chilling.  She's vague and claims to be remorseful, but I don't hear it in her voice, nor see the pain or sorrow of it in her face.  I've wondered weather that was a shortcoming on the part of the VA and the animator, or weather that was fully an intentional effect.  I can't really tell for certain, and the last thread I braught it up in I just got a lot of angry comments and not much serious discussion of this issue I have with Leliana.  Don't get me wrong, her VA has a beautiful and cute voice, very charming.  But the inflections during serious conversation do not sound realistic or sincere to me, and I can't tell weather the VA is just bad at acting, or if Lelliana is supposed to sound a bit fake.  It really could be the latter, since she IS a bard and very well COULD have some serious mental and emotional issues, even dissorder, going on.


OK, I'm rambling really bad and a bit too incoherent tonight.  lol  I really really need to get to bed.  (I always SAY that, but it's really hard for me to sleep at night)  I'll have to do the back-tracking and catching up when I have ... coherent thought on my side.  At least now I'm no further behind than I otherwise would have been...

#494
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 400 messages
Nah. It's fine. See when I say drunk I mean slurring, obviously not in full control of facilities but like I said it's not a logical distaste so I can't really explain it. I just hate people who do that sort of thing.

And huh. I don't know I actually don't see many drunk girls propositioning guys to be honest. I get guys noticing they're drunk and then propositoning them. So maybe that colored my view on it a little. Just thinking about it makes my stomach churn. And then they act all hurt that I don't want to drink with them. Bastards. (Well more like they drink while I buy a soda from the corner store and drink that while watching them be idiots).

With Leliana romance see...I enjoy playing white knight characters people who are trying to do as much good in the world as they possibly can despite their rocky starts. Sure they slip and sometimes they hurt people they didn't mean to but in the end their true goal is to make the world a better place. I feel that those characters tend to be the ones that mesh the best with Leliana in my games.

Huh? I heard plenty of sadness in Leliana's voice and tone. When she speaks of torture she is very cold yes but she's being matter of fact rather than brooding over it. She doesn't seem to like to dwell on what she sees as unpleasant and frankly I don't blame her.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 21 novembre 2010 - 11:25 .


#495
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 276 messages

I still need to do a nice Queen Cousland playthrough. Maybe I can get a female Cousland going who will actually 'fit' with Alistair.

You can always do a political marriage, you know.

#496
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

I still need to do a nice Queen Cousland playthrough. Maybe I can get a female Cousland going who will actually 'fit' with Alistair.

You can always do a political marriage, you know.


that's my favorite slide ending for Origins -- the political marriage with Alistair.  i'm right now trying to play a female who won't marry him -- I'm not sure i will be able to do it.  

#497
Giggles_Manically

Giggles_Manically
  • Members
  • 13 708 messages
Except that Awakening uses the same slide for politcal/romanced queens yes?

#498
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages

Giggles_Manically wrote...

Except that Awakening uses the same slide for politcal/romanced queens yes?


Yeh, they do.  BUT!  A warden who is married to royalty disappears after awhile (their spouse does not disappear).  So I figure mine disappeared to go to Antiva.  she did get Zevran's letter, after all.

Modifié par ejoslin, 21 novembre 2010 - 05:34 .


#499
Giggles_Manically

Giggles_Manically
  • Members
  • 13 708 messages

ejoslin wrote...

Giggles_Manically wrote...

Except that Awakening uses the same slide for politcal/romanced queens yes?


Yeh, they do.  BUT!  A warden who is married to royalty disappears after awhile (their spouse does not disappear).  So I figure mine disappeared to go to Antiva.  she did get Zevran's letter, after all.

I would love for that to be referenced in DA2, just like a little nod at the Warden and their LI.
That would make me happy.