axl99 wrote...
Just curious, how many people are playing w/ mouse and keyboard or gamepad [ie xbox controller]?
Mouse keyboard.
I do have an Xbox 360, but honestly, I think I'd prefer mouse and keyboard. I may try it out though.
axl99 wrote...
Just curious, how many people are playing w/ mouse and keyboard or gamepad [ie xbox controller]?
axl99 wrote...
Just curious, how many people are playing w/ mouse and keyboard or gamepad [ie xbox controller]?
Not accusing of any sites of being paid. But I find it funny that the Escapist had full site advertisement and informational videos of Dragon Age II at the time of its release. Also, calling DAII not only best looking game for this generation but also, the "pinnacle of role playing games", which the reviewer has every right to call since it's his opinion, but I find it odd, he didn't mentioned the recycled environments, I mean you have to be blind not to notice it. I guess he's too busy making the point that DAII is the Empire Strikes Back of video game sequels. Also, he mentioned that you can enable auto-attack in option menu and he reviewed the Xbox version of the game, which at the time of review wasn't available. He did say that "a source that I trust made sure that I say the option was there and I included it without verifying for myself". http://www.escapistm...-Review?page=12 The fug? It is too much trouble to look for it yourself instead of relying on on this "source".TwistedComplex wrote...
ScepticMatt wrote...
Argh those paid reviewers get my goat! Must ... keep ... cool
"Paid reviewers"
I think that's the second most used term right next to "Rushed" on these forums
Someone didn't like the game i like? PAID REVIEWER
Someone liked the game i didn't like? PAID REVIEWER
Wrath of Bong wrote...
Not accusing of any sites of being paid. But I find it funny that the Escapist had full site advertisement and informational videos of Dragon Age II at the time of its release. Also, calling DAII not only best looking game for this generation but also, the "pinnacle of role playing games", which the reviewer has every right to call since it's his opinion, but I find it odd, he didn't mentioned the recycled environments, I mean you have to be blind not to notice it. I guess he's too busy making the point that DAII is the Empire Strikes Back of video game sequels. Also, he mentioned that you can enable auto-attack in option menu and he reviewed the Xbox version of the game, which at the time of review wasn't available. He did say that "a source that I trust made sure that I say the option was there and I included it without verifying for myself". http://www.escapistm...-Review?page=12 The fug? It is too much trouble to look for it yourself instead of relying on on this "source".
Anyway, his reviews of DA2 and TW2 doesn't bother me one bit, I read multiple reviews to make my choice (though, because I liked the original Witcher, I was going to buy TW2 anyway) and if I listen to just the Escapist's review of TW2, I'm probably be waiti for the price of the game to drop before buying, as he mentioned it in his review.
Not saying all developers who put up ads on gaming websites are buying out reviews, although it does happen like Gerstmanngate with Gamespot. My post wasn't trying to start a BIoware vs CDPR thing, I'm more focusing on the reviewer. How do you explain the same reviewer criticising one game's design choices. which he has every right to but he hardly mentioned it for the other game? Not saying the review was paid, maybe it's more that he's incompetent reviewer or a big Bioware fan (being a fan doesn't mean he gets paid). Of course, the easy answer is reviews are subjective so that's the end of that.Savber100 wrote...
Wrath of Bong wrote...
Not accusing of any sites of being paid. But I find it funny that the Escapist had full site advertisement and informational videos of Dragon Age II at the time of its release. Also, calling DAII not only best looking game for this generation but also, the "pinnacle of role playing games", which the reviewer has every right to call since it's his opinion, but I find it odd, he didn't mentioned the recycled environments, I mean you have to be blind not to notice it. I guess he's too busy making the point that DAII is the Empire Strikes Back of video game sequels. Also, he mentioned that you can enable auto-attack in option menu and he reviewed the Xbox version of the game, which at the time of review wasn't available. He did say that "a source that I trust made sure that I say the option was there and I included it without verifying for myself". http://www.escapistm...-Review?page=12 The fug? It is too much trouble to look for it yourself instead of relying on on this "source".
Anyway, his reviews of DA2 and TW2 doesn't bother me one bit, I read multiple reviews to make my choice (though, because I liked the original Witcher, I was going to buy TW2 anyway) and if I listen to just the Escapist's review of TW2, I'm probably be waiti for the price of the game to drop before buying, as he mentioned it in his review.
In reply to bold, so did the Witcher 2 or did you not see the various ads for the Witcher 2 on the Escapist.
I would like to say that CDPR bribed IGN and Gamespot to give scores ranging above 9.0. Oh wait... look at ME2's 9.5... BIOWARE BOUGHT THEM OUT! <_<
And reviews are subjective, some people simply can't get into the hardcore RPG experience and will prefer a lighter, more casual RPG.
Modifié par Wrath of Bong, 28 mai 2011 - 11:38 .
Modifié par Wrath of Bong, 28 mai 2011 - 05:03 .
zazally wrote...
I beat this game on hard whilst I was taking bong hits every 10 mins of game play I was ****ing smashed best game to play stoned
axl99 wrote...
I wish I had a dollar for every time I hear "WAIT TILL HE DROPS HIS @#$%-ING GUARD!"
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
virumor wrote...
The combat would leave a better impression if blocking wasn't tied to vigor.
I disagree. I like the fact that you can't block indefinitely.Or maybe there should've been a different dodge animation, more like in the first game, rather than rolling around.
In TW1, Geralt could vault over enemies' heads, very similar to Batman in Arkham Asylum.
Agreed, though Geralt's dodging in TW1 was over short distances. But yea, different animations would have been nice. And yea, I do miss the vaulting.
The only thing that somewhat bothers me with combat is that if a group of enemies corners you against a wall, you can't really escape and you're almost always effed (at least on hard). Vaulting would fix that.
naughty99 wrote...
axl99 wrote...
I wish I had a dollar for every time I hear "WAIT TILL HE DROPS HIS @#$%-ING GUARD!"
What exactly are those guys saying about "LIllies"?
I have all the subtitles turned off in my game, but I keep hearing something like Throw the Lillies!
Modifié par RageGT, 28 mai 2011 - 06:11 .
neppakyo wrote...
Thought this was humorous as I was taking a SS showing me wearing all the free DLC items. The kid is wearing a pot on his head like a helmet.
Modifié par RageGT, 28 mai 2011 - 06:13 .
neppakyo wrote...
Thought this was humorous as I was taking a SS showing me wearing all the free DLC items. The kid is wearing a pot on his head like a helmet >.<
erynnar wrote...
...
The difference between riding a bike with training wheels and straddling a Harley between your legs.
Niniva wrote...
neppakyo wrote...
Combat mod tweak. For balance. Check it out, quite interesting.
http://www.witcherne.../file.php?id=44
EDIT:
Oh, for those who didnt like triss nudity, here's a mod too.
http://www.witcherne.../file.php?id=43
Thats a new one, a patch from the nexus to REMOVE nudity rather than add it?
Modifié par RageGT, 28 mai 2011 - 06:51 .