Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 02 mai 2012 - 01:25 .
The Legendary "The Witcher 2" RPG.
#12226
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:24
#12227
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:26
Persephone wrote...
Deal with it.....? Really? How about some maturity rather than constant jabs? Just lost a ton of my respect here, KOP. Not that that'll matter to you, I am sure.
If you believe that we are violating forum rules by "bashing bioware characters in their forum" then just report it. If I get banned for it, you'll be happy. If not, then you'll have to deal with me doing it again and again if I deem it necessary or pertinent. It's as simple as that.
Dammit. I was SO hoping to see that hunch explained. Perfect opportunity lost. Again.
Yes that was dissapointing.
#12228
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:30
<_<
Modifié par slimgrin, 02 mai 2012 - 01:30 .
#12229
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:30
Persephone wrote...
Deal with it.....? Really?
Yup.
Loredo is very well written and not some one demonsional character like Rendon Howe.
#12230
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:30
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Deal with it.....? Really? How about some maturity rather than constant jabs? Just lost a ton of my respect here, KOP. Not that that'll matter to you, I am sure.
If you believe that we are violating forum rules by "bashing bioware characters in their forum" then just report it. If I get banned for it, you'll be happy. If not, then you'll have to deal with me doing it again and again if I deem it necessary or pertinent. It's as simple as that.Dammit. I was SO hoping to see that hunch explained. Perfect opportunity lost. Again.
Yes that was dissapointing.
I do not report people at all unless they really break the rules horribly. And I would not be happy so you banned. It's neither necessary nor pertinent & you are better than that. It's childish at this point. As in: More balanced & unbiased. Or so I thought.
Again, on topic (Let's discuss the other stuff off board):
Disappointing indeed. As is fixing the Shani issue through a codex. I hope Act III really kicks butt now. The game is still amazing but that's two major issues of mine being handwaved so far.....
#12231
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:32
Skelter192 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Deal with it.....? Really?
Yup.
Loredo is very well written and not some one demonsional character like Rendon Howe.
That's mature.
And yup, Loredo had loads more demonsions than Howe ever did.
I actually prefer Howe because....Tim Curry kicks ass.
#12232
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:34
slimgrin wrote...
Why does the hunch have to be explained? We saw what happend when they explained Cedric's fate.
<_<
Is that in Act III? Or what am I missing here? What does Cedric's fate have to do with Ves lying about what happened with Dethmold?
#12233
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:35
Persephone wrote...
I do not report people at all unless they really break the rules horribly. And I would not be happy so you banned. It's neither necessary nor pertinent & you are better than that. It's childish at this point. As in: More balanced & unbiased. Or so I thought.
I deem my comparison perfectly pertinent. There is not a single NPC, baring people like Loghain or Saren, in ME or DA that I can think of that was as well written and presented as Loredo. And that's just Loredo, I didn't even go into people like Henselt yet.
If you believe that the statement is incorrect, then give arguments. Don't attempt to silence me because of the fact that I am in a bioware forum. If you can't be bothered to do that, then better just leave it be and move on.
#12234
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:38
#12235
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:38
Persephone wrote...I actually prefer Howe because....Tim Curry kicks ass.
Yes he does.
Persephone wrote...
Disappointing indeed. As is fixing the Shani issue through a codex.
What? The way CDPR handled Shani and Geralt's breakup (?) was great. Felt real and not forced. I wouldn't want to see Shani in the game since well she has no reason to be out in the Pontar Valley.
Modifié par Skelter192, 02 mai 2012 - 01:42 .
#12236
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:42
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Persephone wrote...
I do not report people at all unless they really break the rules horribly. And I would not be happy so you banned. It's neither necessary nor pertinent & you are better than that. It's childish at this point. As in: More balanced & unbiased. Or so I thought.
I deem my comparison perfectly pertinent. There is not a single NPC, baring people like Loghain or Saren, in ME or DA that I can think of that was as well written and presented as Loredo. And that's just Loredo, I didn't even go into people like Henselt yet.
Anora. Hackett. Legion. Zaeed. Cauthrien. Bhelen. I could name more that I thought were amazingly written but I'm afraid our tastes in writing clash way too much. I for one didn't think Loredo was all that well written. Henselt....a capable leader but not a very interesting character to me. He IS well written, mind you. But I wouldn't call him complex ala Radovid. Or Dethmold, whom I consider to be fascinating.
#12237
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:42
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
#12238
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:43
Skelter192 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Disappointing indeed. As is fixing the Shani issue through a codex.
What? The way CDPR handled Shani and Geralt's breakup (?) was great. Felt real and not forced. I wouldn't want to see Shani in the game since well she has no reason to be out in the Pontar Valley.
No need to bring her into the game itself. But have Triss behave differently to reflect the choice instead of nullifying it completely.
#12239
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:44
Hackett's a moron.
Legion's a moron.
Zaeed's a moron.
Cauthrien's a moron.
Bhelen's a moron.
They're all morons.
#12240
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:45
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Oh noes, someone is complaining about a company you love. Call the police!
Happens a lot when TW2 or CDPR are criticized, gotta say that.
#12241
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:45
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Anora's a moron.
Hackett's a moron.
Legion's a moron.
Zaeed's a moron.
Cauthrien's a moron.
Bhelen's a moron.
They're all morons.
That is...a convincing argument indeed.
#12242
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:46
Oh it's TIM Curry so I like Howe more!
#12243
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:46
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Your arguments are just as pathetic.
Oh it's TIM Curry so I like Howe more!
It was a bloody JOKE, wasn't that obvious?
#12244
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:47
Persephone wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Disappointing indeed. As is fixing the Shani issue through a codex.
What? The way CDPR handled Shani and Geralt's breakup (?) was great. Felt real and not forced. I wouldn't want to see Shani in the game since well she has no reason to be out in the Pontar Valley.
No need to bring her into the game itself. But have Triss behave differently to reflect the choice instead of nullifying it completely.
Well I see two problems with that. CDPR would have to get Triss's VA backin for just a few lines of dialogue and the second why bring up something like that ultimately Triss ends up with Geralt live and let die and all that.
#12245
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:48
Persephone wrote...
Anora. Hackett. Legion. Zaeed. Cauthrien. Bhelen. I could name more that I thought were amazingly written but I'm afraid our tastes in writing clash way too much. I for one didn't think Loredo was all that well written. Henselt....a capable leader but not a very interesting character to me. He IS well written, mind you. But I wouldn't call him complex ala Radovid. Or Dethmold, whom I consider to be fascinating.
Philippa Eilhart beats the crap out of Anora so bad, it's not even funny. Plus, her role in Origins was weak and the politics behind her were decent at best.
Hackett has no character, he just has a cool voice and follows a stupid plan.
Legion is a companion, who happens to be a walking codex in the 2nd one anyways.
Zaeed virtually has no character. He's just there to be a badass.
Cauthrien with one or two lines?
Bhelen is a more likeable character, but in terms of presence in the story, Loredo was better executed. Bhelen only shines if you play the Dwarf noble origin.
If by complex you mean having several dimensions, then Henselt is definitely complex. More so than Dethmold.
What you find fascinating is a different issue.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 02 mai 2012 - 01:50 .
#12246
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:49
Skelter192 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Skelter192 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Disappointing indeed. As is fixing the Shani issue through a codex.
What? The way CDPR handled Shani and Geralt's breakup (?) was great. Felt real and not forced. I wouldn't want to see Shani in the game since well she has no reason to be out in the Pontar Valley.
No need to bring her into the game itself. But have Triss behave differently to reflect the choice instead of nullifying it completely.
Well I see two problems with that. CDPR would have to get Triss's VA backin for just a few lines of dialogue and the second why bring up something like that ultimately Triss ends up with Geralt live and let die and all that.
Well, they could have edited dialogue to reflect it. Maybe not have you wake up with her but keep the rose of rememberance scene.
Dunno, the more I hear about Yennefer, the less interesting Triss becomes.
#12247
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:53
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
If by complex you mean having several dimensions, then Henselt is definitely complex. More so than Dethmold.
What you find fascinating is a different issue.
Explain it to me then just what you think makes him complex. As in: More than a competent if abrasive character who knows no scruples & is useful to keep alive? (Which is refreshing but hardly complex) Asking sincerely here. I often miss stuff and love to read more in depth observations.
#12248
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 01:57
Guest_forsaken gamer_*
Aw, you gotta be kiddin me. Zaeed and Hacket are some of the most engaging complex fleshed out characters I've ever come across. There's a lot of depth there! You almost had my respect until that post.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Anora. Hackett. Legion. Zaeed. Cauthrien. Bhelen. I could name more that I thought were amazingly written but I'm afraid our tastes in writing clash way too much. I for one didn't think Loredo was all that well written. Henselt....a capable leader but not a very interesting character to me. He IS well written, mind you. But I wouldn't call him complex ala Radovid. Or Dethmold, whom I consider to be fascinating.
Philippa Eilhart beats the crap out of Anora so bad, it's not even funny. Plus, her role in Origins was weak and the politics behind her were decent at best.
Hackett has no character, he just has a cool voice and follows a stupid plan.
Legion is a companion, who happens to be a walking codex in the 2nd one anyways.
Zaeed virtually has no character. He's just there to be a badass.
Cauthrien with one or two lines?
Bhelen is a more likeable character, but in terms of presence in the story, Loredo was better executed. Bhelen only shines if you play the Dwarf noble origin.
If by complex you mean having several dimensions, then Henselt is definitely complex. More so than Dethmold.
What you find fascinating is a different issue.
#12249
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 02:00
Edit...Bloware?...lol, that was a typo.
Modifié par slimgrin, 02 mai 2012 - 02:03 .
#12250
Posté 02 mai 2012 - 02:03
forsaken gamer wrote...
Aw, you gotta be kiddin me. Zaeed and Hacket are some of the most engaging complex fleshed out characters I've ever come across. There's a lot of depth there! You almost had my respect until that post.
But Hackett doesn't do anything but give you some missions since Mass Effect 1. What has he really done?





Retour en haut





