13812 réponses à ce sujet

[Chewin]

Seboist wrote...

I hope TW4+ take place outside of the Northern Kingdoms and Nilfgaard in places like Zerrakania. It would be nice for them to explore places that were lightly touched upon in the novels.

And seen from different eyes than Geralt's, for once.

EDIT: Of course, it depends entirely on where the game series will lead, but personally would hope to play as a different person.

Modifié par Chewin3, 10 mai 2012 - 08:27 .

[Dave of Canada]

Playable Dandelion.

[Costin_Razvan]

No, please God no.

[tez19]

Costin_Razvan wrote...

He kills enemies of Temeria, Scoai'tael kills for their political aims, it's all the same. And you're wrong that they don't use terror tactics. You're talking like the kings of the North are liberal democrats.

The Scoia'Tel until Iorveth decided to join Saskia butchered humans in towns and villages just because of hatred after the war with Nilfgaard ended, that was five years.

And I wasn't talking about the Kings of the North ( Demavend and Henselt well now that's a different argument ), I was talking about Roche and by extension Foltest, where is your evidence to back your claim? You have nothing. 

Wild Hunt Note: They are not a big bad evil BS based on book information, and I doubt Geralt's goal will be to unite nations to stop them. I am curios about them though and I think Geralt will fight them at one point because of different goals. Or he might join up with them. Depends really.

Truth be told I think TW3 will be about Nilfgaard and Emhyr and TW4 will have Geralt visiting the world of the wild hunt for one reason or another.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM yes mate, i agree with u. Comparing the scoitael with the blue stripes is like comparing Alqueda with the u.s armed forces. I wonder if addai also supports the muslim fanatics? No way would i side with evil terrorists that butcher peasants because they are human and walked into a forest. FOR TEMERIA. DIE SCOITAEL.

Modifié par tez19, 10 mai 2012 - 08:39 .

[Sebby]

Costin_Razvan wrote...

No, please God no.

You wouldn't want to play a Witcher game where you screw more chicks than even TW1?

[Dreadstruck]

Seboist wrote...
You wouldn't want to play a Witcher game where you screw more chicks than even TW1?

Half of the game would involve running away from angry mob of husbands and looking for an escape route from a castle/house.

On a serious note, I'd really love to see CD Projekt tackle a spin-off RPG from the Witcher world. Who wouldn't love running around Temeria as a female Mercenary commander? A knight-errant of the *insert name here* Order? Or an elven rogue archer hiding from main roads and civilized places?
Think of the possibilities! Could be even an Origins killer!

Modifié par Avalla'ch, 10 mai 2012 - 09:23 .

[Nordicus]

tez19 wrote...

Comparing the scoitael with the blue stripes is like comparing Alqueda with the u.s armed forces. I wonder if addai also supports the muslim fanatics?

What. The. F***?!

[Nerevar-as]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Playable Dandelion.

The Bard. Savior of Queens for real?  Would be interesting, to say the least. And Jaskier does try to sleep with almost every woman around.

About the Wild Hunt, it´s very likely they´ll be important in the next game. The only reason I can think why they went for Geralt and Yenn is to try to capture Ciri again. Which is going to anger Geralt, Yenn and Emhyr a lot (at least I hope the writers include him). The comparison with the Reapers is not that farfetched, considering what they do when they settle in a new world, but I don´t thik they have the numbers or power to be a world ending threat in the game setting.

[Addai]

tez19 wrote...
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM yes mate, i agree with u. Comparing the scoitael with the blue stripes is like comparing Alqueda with the u.s armed forces. I wonder if addai also supports the muslim fanatics? No way would i side with evil terrorists that butcher peasants because they are human and walked into a forest. FOR TEMERIA. DIE SCOITAEL.

Invalid comparison and please do not bring modern politics into the discussion.

If you go into a game like this assigning white hats and black hats, you're missing the whole point and a lot of the quality of the game's writing.  Just because someone wears a crown and calls themselves "the law" doesn't mean they don't do evil and butcher people for illegitimate reasons.

[Costin_Razvan]

Addai please don't use the word "evil" when talking of anything in the Witcher games, you're better then that.

As for the Scoia'Tel being compared to Al Qaeda....ugh...that' missing the point.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 10 mai 2012 - 09:55 .

[Leinadi]

Addai please don't use the word "evil" when talking of anything in the Witcher games, you're better then that.

I get what you mean but let's not forget that the first chapter of the first game has an evil dog beast that is somehow formed from the wickedness of the villagers there.

[Dreadstruck]

Leinadi wrote...

Addai please don't use the word "evil" when talking of anything in the Witcher games, you're better then that.

I get what you mean but let's not forget that the first chapter of the first game has an evil dog beast that is somehow formed from the wickedness of the villagers there.

Lies. The dog is misunderstood. It just wants its plushy toy back, that is all.

Modifié par Avalla'ch, 10 mai 2012 - 10:05 .

[Leinadi]

Its plushy toy being human flesh.

[Addai]

Costin_Razvan wrote...

Addai please don't use the word "evil" when talking of anything in the Witcher games, you're better then that.

I'm using the term because the other poster did.  I was in a hurry but should have put it in quotes.

[KnightofPhoenix]

Modern politics should not be mentionned, especially when it's done impertinently.

As for the Wild Hunt. As long as we don't jump into other dimensions, I don't mind them being explored. I am hesitant of going to alternate dimensions because that's tough to do without being silly, and I am too invested in the politics of the continent.

I do not mind exploring Zerrikania in the future though, preferrably with a new protagonist.

[slimgrin]

Agreed. The Wild Hunt has to be suggested, not illustrated. Right now, the concept is still hazy, still ambiguous. It should stay that way.

Modifié par slimgrin, 11 mai 2012 - 12:35 .

[KnightofPhoenix]

 
* I also think Letho is naive to think that Emhyr is just going to leave him alone, after having used him to such ruthless effect.

Letho never claimed or even implied he thought that. he believes that the Witchers need to adapt to the new order to survive. That will require serving the state. Something I agree with, the old Witcher ways are dead, killed by the same people it was meant to protect.


As for the Blue Stripes being terrorists. imo they are, fear was, is and will remain a part of war. I have no doubt that the stripes have terrorized rebelling nonhuman communities.

The difference is that the Scoia'tael are fighting against a whole race. One only needs to see Iorveth amused at the tught of human innocents to see that. Stripes, at least most, don't think that.

[Sebby]

Maybe CDPR can tie the Wild Hunt into the Witcher world's Human-Elven conflict somehow but I'm not sure if the KOTWH even cares.

[Costin_Razvan]

Terrorism is not just using terror tactics as I see it. It means targeting non-combatants with such tactics. The Blue Stripes use such tactics against rebels, but those are combatants.

Anyway interesting Forbes article appeared here: 
http://www.forbes.co...rojekt-red-ceo/ 

Among the things they talk it's also revealed how much of a proift CDPR made from TW2 PC version. Roughly 6 million dollars compared to an 8 million budget the game original had...I expected them to have made more. Bear in mind the also made that 8 million back so in total it's 14 million revenue.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 11 mai 2012 - 01:03 .

[KnightofPhoenix]

I believe the stripes target everyone in rebelling communities, combatants or no. As is always the case when one tries to deal with rebellions.

[Costin_Razvan]

Truth be told there is no evidence that they even dealt with rebelling non-human communities. besides what Iorveth says which can also be taken as meaning Roche was hunting Scoia'Tel in the Mahkahm Foothills.

The Journal entry refers to them fighting Scoia'Tel only. That and dealing with other dangerous missions. Of course there is also Loredo who states that when men like Roche innocent blood is surely spilled.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 11 mai 2012 - 01:13 .

[KnightofPhoenix]

No the journal mentions all rebelling nonhuman commmunities.

[Tirigon]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

I believe the stripes target everyone in rebelling communities, combatants or no. As is always the case when one tries to deal with rebellions.

As is always the case in war. Both sides do it. The Scoia'Tael, even though I think they are the "good guys" there, are definitely not above murdering civilians if it seems to further their cause.

[Costin_Razvan]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

No the journal mentions all rebelling nonhuman commmunities.

Ah you mean Roche's journal entry.

Tirigon: The Scoia'Tel do it just for the lulz.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 11 mai 2012 - 01:41 .

[Addai]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Letho never claimed or even implied he thought that. he believes that the Witchers need to adapt to the new order to survive. That will require serving the state. Something I agree with, the old Witcher ways are dead, killed by the same people it was meant to protect.

I thought in his final chat with Geralt he says he plans to disappear and just wants to be left alone.