46 réponses à ce sujet

[L33TDAWG]

     I have seen some videos on it and it looks amazing, but looks aren't everything. Since it will be out this month in Europe and that's where the development is can anyone tell a bit about it or post gameplay footage of what they have done when it comes out? Trusting the forums more than the videos floating around.

Modifié par L33TDAWG, 15 novembre 2010 - 01:35 .

[Crippledcarny]

I've heard it's endlessly better than the first, but that's about all I've heard. I wish I had more cash floating around. I most likely wont bother with this game till it's around 20-30USD. =(

[ErichHartmann]

I've been reading mixed responses on the forum. Seems that most of the content is geared for multiplayer. Probably a good thing the US version was delayed too. Gives the developers a few months to fix any problems in the European version and apply to the US.

Modifié par ErichHartmann, 15 novembre 2010 - 01:54 .

[slimgrin]

ErichHartmann wrote...

I've been reading mixed responses on the forum. Seems that most of the content is geared for multiplayer. Probably a good thing the US version was delayed too. Gives the developers a few months to fix any problems in the European version and apply to the US.

Multiplayer, really, for this game? I had no idea it had multiplayer.


I was most unimpressed by the first one.

[Archdemon Cthulhu]

The European magazines have been giving it high numerical scores, but I can;t read the actual reviews so I'm unsure about details. It appears to be leaps and bounds better than the first.

[Busomjack]

I haven't played the first since I heard it was mostly crap. What kind of game should we expect from the second one though? Is it a sandbox style game like Oblivion?

[Crippledcarny]

Busomjack wrote...

I haven't played the first since I heard it was mostly crap. What kind of game should we expect from the second one though? Is it a sandbox style game like Oblivion?

If I'm not mistaken the first one was so I'd assume the second would be as well.

[Ponce de Leon]

It's a Sandbox game, yes, and it's action-oriented. You have many different moves, both with melee weapons and ranged ones (hell, you can kill 2 targets with a bow). It's also Multiplayer, but I don't know how that is played.

There should be a demo around, but I never found where.

[L33TDAWG]

Thanks for the feedback, I am hoping for more videos and news since it is nearly time for release. I did read it'll be out in early January for the US.

[Busomjack]

I just hope it's better than Gothic 4.

[Ponce de Leon]

I'm uploading a short gameplay video on youtube now. It's just a few minutes long, but it's still the game. Sneaking and blocking tutorial part. Of course, it will contain minor spoilers but nothing too serious.

Edit : btw, for those interested, the protagonist of TW2 has chest hair. 

Modifié par dark-lauron, 15 novembre 2010 - 12:18 .

[DarthCaine]

I've played it, though I uninstalled it soon after (I didn't see a multiplayer option). It seemed better than Gothic 4, and not as horrible as the first one, but still pretty bad.

The interface is absolutely horrible and the camera seemed titled towards the left (like for left handed people) which really annoyed me that I didn't see an option to change that.

The character creator is pretty limited and no matter how hard I tried the main character looked ugly as hell. Also his personality really sucked as well as his VA.

The graphics seemed ok, but I didn't care about that. Dialogue and story are what I value, and those seemed pretty boring (the cinematics were nice though)

The fighting is as bad as in the first game. The whole gameplay felt pretty bad and clunky.

Modifié par DarthCaine, 15 novembre 2010 - 02:16 .

[HoonDing]

You can play as a woman in the multiplayer.

[Ponce de Leon]

virumor wrote...

You can play as a woman in the multiplayer.

Really? Ooh, that makes it cooler. Still, it was a nice change to see that some women play much more important roles in TW2. Never got why they have to wear latex armors and robes... 

[I Valente I]

I've heard lots of good things. And honestly, it would be naive to rate it based solely on the first one, even the developers accepted that the first was bad. I'm holding to see how it is, if it is similar to Morrowind, then I will consider it, the graphics etc don't matter as much as the gameplay and story. Also, the art style, which I'm still iffy about..

[L33TDAWG]

I have seen some gameplay footage, and I must say that it does look pretty nice, but I haven't seen enough to really impact me any. I was skeptical about renting the first one, so I am waiting for a review on the second, and if it does good I will start there.

[ErichHartmann]

dark-lauron wrote...

virumor wrote...

You can play as a woman in the multiplayer.

Really? Ooh, that makes it cooler. Still, it was a nice change to see that some women play much more important roles in TW2. Never got why they have to wear latex armors and robes... 

Which is why I won't be buying Two Worlds 2.  Too much content is locked out for the single player game.  

[MrnDvlDg161]

The first one was complete garbage so someone saying that the 2nd one is way better isn't saying too much --- there are some Atari 2600 games that were made better than the first Two Worlds.



Seriously.



And further more, it seems to me that any game that tries to boast itself as being " Morrowind or Oblivian" like have been epic fails.



Only people that come close to such heights is BioWare --- the only thing that holds back Bethesda from being a perfect 10 is its lack of character immersion in their huge worlds. Lots of empty space and whistling trees along with repetitious voice and character designs.

[Eternal Phoenix]

They never boasted that it was a Morrowind or Oblivion - it was a magazine that did that by calling it Oblivion on steroids. Oblivion was garbage anyway, what sort of RPG has enemies level up with you? If you got past the bad voice acting and graphical glitches - Two Worlds was a good RPG. Two Worlds II has received positive reviews so far and despite what some forum members have said - there's still at least 70 hours worth of single player which is more than what you can get from the original.
What's missing is the island in the middle (only 20% of it is explorable) - which is actually most likely part of an expansion or DLC obviously. It's a greater improvement upon the original voice acting and graphic wise but still maintains the original and traditional RPG elements. If you type up "Two Worlds II Vs Gothic 4 or Oblivion" you will seriously be surprised and just because you didn't like the first one, doesn't mean you can't like the second.

Unlike some companies *coughbethesdacough* Reality Pump actually listened to feedback and when making Two Worlds II they put in what people liked and took out what people hated from the first game and added what people wanted.

Two Worlds I & II shouldn't be compared to Oblivion anyway - Two Worlds has traditional RPG elements where fighting a dragon at Level One will have it hand your ass back to you, while later on at a high level - you'll be able to kill a dragon with one hit. In Oblivion - you can be LV 50 with 100 + strength and the most powerful weapon in the game and you have to give people 5 hits to kill them - they can also knock you over (all NPCs in Oblivion get the knock down skill soon enough).

Modifié par Elton John is dead, 13 décembre 2010 - 10:14 .

[L33TDAWG]

I don't want to one shot everything at max level or near it, but have a constant challenge. Since TWII is free roam, I'd rather there not be a system of level scaling, but rather have certain area difficulties like an mmo since it's free roam.

[B3taMaxxx]

Capt. Obvious wrote...

I'm going to take a leap of faith. I'll buy this game and hope that it's good.

 I think it'll be a good filler title. There is a 15 minute gameplay vid floating around the IGN website (it's from late summer).

[Eternal Phoenix]

L33TDAWG wrote...

I don't want to one shot everything at max level or near it, but have a constant challenge. Since TWII is free roam, I'd rather there not be a system of level scaling, but rather have certain area difficulties like an mmo since it's free roam.

Well according to one interview for Two Worlds II - there was level scaling added but not of the type of Oblivion's. There will be enemies that present a challenge to you but at the same time - other enemies will no longer pose a threat to you. So it is sort of balanced. 

Modifié par Elton John is dead, 14 décembre 2010 - 01:21 .

[B3taMaxxx]

I liked the Sacred II enemy scaling. The less you die, the higher the level enemy you'll face, granting more xp and higher level loot. That system works well for all skill levels and rewards those who build better.