yeah i also really didnt like how aesymetrical all the heavy armor was.outlaworacle wrote...
I don't want to romance her, so if she is romance-able, I'd like a toggle.
More sincerely, I like that her giant shoulder pads are not the size of a large tent. If all armor is like that, perhaps I'll actually be able to see... anything at all... during the dialogue cutscenes.
New character screenshot
#101
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 12:57
#102
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 12:57
tmp7704 wrote...
Ohh, so it seems mage condom hats are still in.
Excellent.
She's a mage? It also seems to go pretty far down the back of her head. It's not so much a cowl as a...er...hair...blanket...
#103
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 12:58
Saibh wrote...
tmp7704 wrote...
Ohh, so it seems mage condom hats are still in.
Excellent.
She's a mage? It also seems to go pretty far down the back of her head. It's not so much a cowl as a...er...hair...blanket...
I'd think it's part of her uniform or something. Or she's a summoner!
Ahem, she's carrying a sword, so she can't be a mage.
#104
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 12:59
#105
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:00
True and at least this one doesnt have a pom pom sticking out the back of it.outlaworacle wrote...
THOSE were not the stupid kind of mage hats. Those were almost tolerable. It was the festive Conehead party hats that were actually Abominations in disguise.
#106
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:01
#107
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:02
Atakuma wrote...
True and at least this one doesnt have a pom pom sticking out the back of it.outlaworacle wrote...
THOSE were not the stupid kind of mage hats. Those were almost tolerable. It was the festive Conehead party hats that were actually Abominations in disguise.
If she had she would be a moogle :<
#108
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:05
Seeing how in the Rise to Power video she seems to acknowledge Hawke becoming the champion or something to this effect, i'm thinking she may be some crossover between Ser Cauthrien and Grand Cleric of the Chantry. The second-in-command for the city.Dhiro wrote...
The strange thing is that she doesn't look like a mage to me.
Though maybe that's revised templar armour she's wearing --the overall form is similar with the skirt and Andraste symbols-- and she's the knight commander, like others have guessed.
#109
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:05
And I don't think that crest on her headband has anything to do with Flemeth's Dragon crescent spire, unless it's an old Tevinter symbol, of course.
Modifié par Blacklash93, 16 novembre 2010 - 01:10 .
#110
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:08
#111
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:14
#112
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:15
#113
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:17
Is it really necessary to ask this about every character?Atakuma wrote...
Bioware, can we romance her?
#114
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:20
I was kidding, sorry:Pziggehunderslash wrote...
Is it really necessary to ask this about every character?Atakuma wrote...
Bioware, can we romance her?
#115
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:21
ziggehunderslash wrote...
Is it really necessary to ask this about every character?Atakuma wrote...
Bioware, can we romance her?
These are the Bioware Forums. Yes it totally is.
#116
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:23
Ha, apologies then (that's the kind of thing I often do, so I should have seen that one), but I don't believe you're the only one asking!Atakuma wrote...
I was kidding, sorry:Pziggehunderslash wrote...
Is it really necessary to ask this about every character?Atakuma wrote...
Bioware, can we romance her?
#117
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:26
I't was a sort of preemptive strikeziggehunderslash wrote...
Ha, apologies then (that's the kind of thing I often do, so I should have seen that one), but I don't believe you're the only one asking!Atakuma wrote...
I was kidding, sorry:Pziggehunderslash wrote...
Is it really necessary to ask this about every character?Atakuma wrote...
Bioware, can we romance her?
#118
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:31
Guest_Puddi III_*
#119
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:37
filaminstrel wrote...
I don't like how many identical things there are in the architecture, it reminds me of looking at the backdrop of Redcliffe or Honnleath and wondering where the mass-production Windmill factory was located.
This actually makes a lot of sense to me if my perceptions of Kirkwall are correct. They said it was sort of like a gulag or a slave Ellis Island in the past. If most of the city was originally built as a slaving facility and then later taken over and turned into a city, it would make sense that a lot of the architecture looks the same since most of the buildings would be repurposed original structures. In this case I would still expect to see different styles scattered around the city and especially in the outlying areas, though. But then again, we don't know what parts of the city we're seeing just yet.
If that's not the case though, and the gulag part is only a small section of the city, then I agree that it probably does look too unified.
#120
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:40
Actually, I don't see any reason to think this "character" is anything more than a gate guard, for that matter.
Modifié par the_one_54321, 16 novembre 2010 - 01:42 .
#121
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:43
#122
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:45
Guest_Puddi III_*
Anarya wrote...
filaminstrel wrote...
I don't like how many identical things there are in the architecture, it reminds me of looking at the backdrop of Redcliffe or Honnleath and wondering where the mass-production Windmill factory was located.
This actually makes a lot of sense to me if my perceptions of Kirkwall are correct. They said it was sort of like a gulag or a slave Ellis Island in the past. If most of the city was originally built as a slaving facility and then later taken over and turned into a city, it would make sense that a lot of the architecture looks the same since most of the buildings would be repurposed original structures. In this case I would still expect to see different styles scattered around the city and especially in the outlying areas, though. But then again, we don't know what parts of the city we're seeing just yet.
If that's not the case though, and the gulag part is only a small section of the city, then I agree that it probably does look too unified.
Hm well that makes sense, maybe I misstated it a bit though, it's not so much the architecture as it is the.. decoration? I'm talking about, for instance, the millions of stone slaves hanging on the sides of pillars covering their faces in sorrow, and all of the "beaks" protruding from the sides of pillars in this new shot. All looking absolutely identical. I mean, I could accept that maybe they just really loved making statues of slaves back in the day, but there should at least be some variation in the cracks in the stone that have accumulated over time, kind of like a fingerprint, but I imagine they will all have all of the same cracks in all of the same places.
edit for reducing redundant redundancy
Modifié par filaminstrel, 16 novembre 2010 - 01:47 .
#123
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:47
#124
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:51
Guest_Puddi III_*
It's a problem with those hurlocks all having an identical bloody teardrop coming out of their left eye, too.
I was kind of kidding though, I can't really accept that they loved making that many identical statues of slaves that much. It's a little ridiculous.
#125
Posté 16 novembre 2010 - 01:53





Retour en haut






