1815 réponses à ce sujet

[Harbinger of your Destiny]

The second the trailer ended I was like



AOOOOEEAAAAOOOOOOOOAAAAAEEEEEOOIIIAIOIIA!!!



those noises exactly.

[Harbinger of your Destiny]

Also I am glad San Francisco or New York isn't being attacked in the trailer. The golden gate bridge has been destroyed too many times.

[AngusJimiKeith]

yeah but...if all of earth gets destroyed by the time shepard shows up, whats the point of "saving" it?

id like to see the resistance be a trump card for humanity--and the galaxy in general. if the resistance can destroy just two reapers-two-it will be one hell of a shock to them. throw in the fact that earth likely still has a stockpile of nuclear warheads, and that may just be possible.

[Stormy-B]

kill_switch_423 wrote...

For anyone who missed it, here's the trailer.

Thankee sai, thankee big big.
That beginning of the trailer on gametrailers was killing me.

Modifié par Stormy-B, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:34 .

[Legion 2.5]

Still can't believe how the Collector's survive. The silhouette of the thing the sniper guy shot at resembles a collector. Does anyone agree?

[TemplarofSteel]

spooky3 wrote...

casedawgz wrote...

And we all thought it was a screencap of a multiplayer game. It was just some nub hiding out in Big Ben waiting for Shepard to save him. Can. Not. Wait.

Lol, who said there wont be a multiplayer in ME3 there will be at least co-op !

Who said there will be MP in ME3? For all we know there won't be an ounce of MP in ME3. Who knows while there making ME3, they could be starting to work on the spin-off which may include MP.  We just don't know yet.

[Stormy-B]

@AngusJimiKeith: Hopefully that won't be an issue. The game should be about the time before the attack, and then an crazy race to get the last allies/weapons/poodles/whatever that is needed and rush back to our blue ball and beat the crap out of the reapers.



Yeah, that's why I'm thinking that a possible MP might be about resistance vs invaders, not only because it seems obvious but I too would like to see the resistance having a major role in some way.

Imagine fighting inside a reaper to plant a nuke in the drive core... Could be sweet.

[MrFob]

AngusJimiKeith wrote...

yeah but...if all of earth gets destroyed by the time shepard shows up, whats the point of "saving" it?
id like to see the resistance be a trump card for humanity--and the galaxy in general. if the resistance can destroy just two reapers-two-it will be one hell of a shock to them. throw in the fact that earth likely still has a stockpile of nuclear warheads, and that may just be possible.

OK, probably thinking way too much on this again but assuming (not direct control but) that the trailer shows the events in the beginning of ME3, the guy says 2+7=9 million dead in the first week. That is actually a surprisingly low number IMO. Given the reapers capabilities, they should be able to destroy whole cities with one strike and given the population growth in between nowadays and the time ME plays, you'd think the initial death toll would be much higher (unless of course they want to indoctrinate instead of destroy). In any event, there are still more than enough people around for a useful resistance.
Oh and I doubt nuclear weapons will be of much use against the reapers. Mass Accelerators are much more efficient and look how much use they were against Sovereign. A couple of Thanix cannons would be nice though .

EDIT: @Stormy-B: Nukes in the drive core? Why didn'*t I think of that? It is the ultimate weapon in just about any SciFi scenario after all. Alright, strike the comment about the nukes. Reapers are gonna be virmired!

Modifié par MrFob, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:45 .

[Xan Kreigor Mk2]

Legion 2.5 wrote...

Still can't believe how the Collector's survive. The silhouette of the thing the sniper guy shot at resembles a collector. Does anyone agree?

fraid not.  watched it 5+ times, lookes like a husk

[Stormy-B]

Harbinger of your Destiny wrote...

Also I am glad San Francisco or New York isn't being attacked in the trailer. The golden gate bridge has been destroyed too many times.

X2

[ralph2190]

Legion 2.5 wrote...

Still can't believe how the Collector's survive. The silhouette of the thing the sniper guy shot at resembles a collector. Does anyone agree?

Nope. I think that thing was the blue zombie (husk?) that Reapers create by impaling humans on those dragon's teeth spikes.

[Legion 2.5]

Xan Kreigor Mk2 wrote...

Legion 2.5 wrote...

Still can't believe how the Collector's survive. The silhouette of the thing the sniper guy shot at resembles a collector. Does anyone agree?

fraid not.  watched it 5+ times, lookes like a husk

Could be a new form of collector?

[AngusJimiKeith]

Stormy-B wrote...

@AngusJimiKeith: Hopefully that won't be an issue. The game should be about the time before the attack, and then an crazy race to get the last allies/weapons/poodles/whatever that is needed and rush back to our blue ball and beat the crap out of the reapers.

Yeah, that's why I'm thinking that a possible MP might be about resistance vs invaders, not only because it seems obvious but I too would like to see the resistance having a major role in some way.
Imagine fighting inside a reaper to plant a nuke in the drive core... Could be sweet.

indeed. i still cant believe how overlooked nukes have been in the "we need a weapon to stop the reapers" discussions...we already have one, we just need to USE IT. EMP from the nuke alone would fry a reaper's circuitry; not to mention the ridiculous heat and blast radius...once you get past the barriers, reapers are toast. Soverign proved that. since nukes arent kinetic weapons, barriers are useless.

Modifié par AngusJimiKeith, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:46 .

[Xan Kreigor Mk2]

ralph2190 wrote...

Legion 2.5 wrote...

Still can't believe how the Collector's survive. The silhouette of the thing the sniper guy shot at resembles a collector. Does anyone agree?

Nope. I think that thing was the blue zombie (husk?) that Reapers create by impaling humans on those dragon's teeth spikes.

lol. ur not sure its called a husk, but u know dragons' teeth?

[AngusJimiKeith]

could be a scion...some kind of husk definately.
harbinger himself said that the collecters had failed and "we will find another way," so i would think they're out of the equation.

EDIT: @ mr. fob: i think he was talking london or england alone. no way a full scale reaper invasion only "kills" (or indoctrinates) 9 million in a week.

Modifié par AngusJimiKeith, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:49 .

[Legion 2.5]

We'll see until BioWare confirms but if they are Collector's then I'm saving the base.

[scarface71795]

AngusJimiKeith wrote...

Stormy-B wrote...

@AngusJimiKeith: Hopefully that won't be an issue. The game should be about the time before the attack, and then an crazy race to get the last allies/weapons/poodles/whatever that is needed and rush back to our blue ball and beat the crap out of the reapers.

Yeah, that's why I'm thinking that a possible MP might be about resistance vs invaders, not only because it seems obvious but I too would like to see the resistance having a major role in some way.
Imagine fighting inside a reaper to plant a nuke in the drive core... Could be sweet.

indeed. i still cant believe how overlooked nukes have been in the "we need a weapon to stop the reapers" discussions...we already have one, we just need to USE IT. EMP from the nuke alone would fry a reaper's circuitry; not to mention the ridiculous heat and blast radius...once you get past the barriers, reapers are toast. Soverign proved that. since nukes arent kinetic weapons, barriers are useless.

I'm guessing Weapons of Mass destruction are no longer illegal?
CALL THE GUNNY:O
WE are about to ruin someones day sometime and somewhere

[AngusJimiKeith]

they probably are still illegal. that doesnt mean we didnt stockpile them anyway. humans have a tendancy to ignore the council's laws....AI research anyone? (though i do have serious problems with that law in particular)

[Stormy-B]

@AngusJimiKeith: Well, chances are that nuclear stockpiles would have been dismantled by that time since it simply is to expensive to maintain and use it in when there are mass accelerators that are at the very least "cleaner" than nukes.

Using it is one thing, using it in an effective way is a totally other. Chances are that detonating a nuke in space might do nothing to a reaper, so it needs to be used in atmosphere to get the heat and blastwave. That means dealing with radioactive fallout etc etc... I'm not totally discounting nukes, but I think BioWare's got something snazzy in store for us to go reaperbashing with comes winter 2011

[scarface71795]

AngusJimiKeith wrote...

they probably are still illegal. that doesnt mean we didnt stockpile them anyway. humans have a tendancy to ignore the council's laws....AI research anyone? (though i do have serious problems with that law in particular)

Okay think of it this way
America is under attack by China
We're going to fall
Nukes are illegal
We don't care
**** China 
Everyone else launches
Nukes are no longer Illegal
Get it?

[N085]

Will there be any nukes left to use on earth? The guy in the trailer said EVERY defence annihilated! i would have thought nukes were a line defence.

[Jonathan Tavier]

MrFob wrote...

OK, probably thinking way too much on this again but assuming (not direct control but) that the trailer shows the events in the beginning of ME3, the guy says 2+7=9 million dead in the first week. That is actually a surprisingly low number IMO. Given the reapers capabilities, they should be able to destroy whole cities with one strike and given the population growth in between nowadays and the time ME plays, you'd think the initial death toll would be much higher (unless of course they want to indoctrinate instead of destroy). In any event, there are still more than enough people around for a useful resistance.

I imagine he was talking about the death toll in London, not the entire Earth.

[scarface71795]

Stormy-B wrote...

@AngusJimiKeith: Well, chances are that nuclear stockpiles would have been dismantled by that time since it simply is to expensive to maintain and use it in when there are mass accelerators that are at the very least "cleaner" than nukes.
Using it is one thing, using it in an effective way is a totally other. Chances are that detonating a nuke in space might do nothing to a reaper, so it needs to be used in atmosphere to get the heat and blastwave. That means dealing with radioactive fallout etc etc... I'm not totally discounting nukes, but I think BioWare's got something snazzy in store for us to go reaperbashing with comes winter 2011

I'm willing to destroy London to kill six Reapers.

Modifié par scarface71795, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:56 .

[scarface71795]

N085 wrote...

Will there be any nukes left to use on earth? The guy in the trailer said EVERY defence annihilated! i would have thought nukes were a line defence.

He said they were pulling back to regroup
I think he meant active deployed army and fleet defense were destroyed

Modifié par scarface71795, 12 décembre 2010 - 03:59 .

[Dazaster Dellus]

The creatures on earth may be a new enemy all together. I mean, The guy says he doesn't know "what they are" right after he snipes the thing. I am guessing he knows what a husk is seeing as how the Alliance and almost everyone else knows what they are. Plus at the angle that thing fell at when he shot it, it looks to have been running quite fast. Though it could be an even more advanced husk. So many possibilities.