Does the genophage actually kill baby Krogan or prevent pregnancies?
#26
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 12:03
It's never outright said if Krogan lay eggs or not. We can't use Reptile Logic here.
Besides, remember the Duckbilled Platapus? Yeah, that really killed some age old theories there.
#27
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 08:32
The platypus didn't kill any theories, the platypus is a mammal.
#28
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 09:29
wookieeassassin wrote...
Still, Mordin says it affects fertility. We shouldn't have to decipher if he is redefining the word "fertility". The codex says it isn't fertility, but offspring viability. According to the codex then, the fertility would mean that there wouldn't be lots of stillbirths. Maybe Mordin is twisting definitions or doesn't actually understand the difference, but there is really no way of knowing. When a main character is telling you history, it is just assumed they are telling you the correct version. Were we supposed to think about Wrex's bias in ME1 and think that he didn't really mean stillbirths, but unsuccessful pregnancies? I know it isn't a perfect example, but yeah.
Wrex isn't the only one who goes on about still births tho and there really is only one way of interpreting the term.
Yeah...the only known mammal that lays eggs.wookieeassassin wrote...
The platypus didn't kill any theories, the platypus is a mammal.
Modifié par Manic Sheep, 19 novembre 2010 - 09:35 .
#29
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 12:58
Modifié par Monochrome Wench, 19 novembre 2010 - 01:00 .
#30
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 03:38
Plus, given the Krogan's habitual rivalry and high aggression rate, a result of their hazardous homeworld, vulnerable and stationary eggs would be a distinct evolutionary weakness.
Actually on my first playthrough of ME.-2 I was really looking forward to recruiting Okeer and hear some hard facts about the genophage from a trained Krogan. Alas.....
Modifié par achwas, 19 novembre 2010 - 03:39 .
#31
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 04:41
1/1000 female Krogan is capable of producing living offspring.
999/1000 females can never give birth to living offspring.
#32
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 05:08
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Genophage affects Krogan fertility rates, as follows:
1/1000 female Krogan is capable of producing living offspring.
999/1000 females can never give birth to living offspring.
Source?
#34
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 05:12
#35
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 05:17
Separation of the females and young ones of the clan from the males probably is a measure to keep secret which females are fertile, to prevent the fighting.
#36
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 05:43
Modifié par Count Viceroy, 19 novembre 2010 - 08:10 .
#37
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 07:50
#38
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 09:51
Count Viceroy wrote...
Fair enough. Making 99 % of females infertile is not something you can do by design though?
Depends upon whether you can attach the fertility inducing viral attachments to a genetic marker of a certain rarity. Or vice versa, having it blocked by a certain marker...
As for "vocabulary" - I'd rather stick with Mordin than with Wrex on this, since for one he is a scientist as was directly involved in the project (while Wrex is a layman ) and is himself rather critical and conscious of its effects, wishing there having been a better alternative. So I don't think there is a clasjh - just layman's terms versus statements from on of the guys who designed the second series genophage.
#39
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 10:13
achwas wrote...
As for "vocabulary" - I'd rather stick with Mordin than with Wrex on this, since for one he is a scientist as was directly involved in the project (while Wrex is a layman ) and is himself rather critical and conscious of its effects, wishing there having been a better alternative. So I don't think there is a clasjh - just layman's terms versus statements from on of the guys who designed the second series genophage.
I'm referring to Okeer's use of the word "clutch", which distinctly means a collection of eggs in a single place.
#40
Posté 19 novembre 2010 - 11:05
Like I've said:
The codex says it affects offspring viability, and explicitly says "not fertility". Thus, according to the codex, fertility based would not cause tons of stillbirths. However, Mordin says it affects fertility. Either he is defining fertility as "offspring viability" to twist words (something I wouldn't think a player would be expected to interpret) and make himself feel better, or Bioware has introduced inconsistencies between what are supposed to be considered two pretty official sources.
I'd really like it if Bioware cleared this up. If the genophage doesn't call stillbirths then it isn't nearly as much of a moral problem as causing 999 stillbirths for every baby Krogan.
#41
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 12:49
Huh.. Your right he does say the word clutch. I completely missed that. =____=Googlesaurus wrote...
achwas wrote...
As for "vocabulary" - I'd rather stick with Mordin than with Wrex on this, since for one he is a scientist as was directly involved in the project (while Wrex is a layman ) and is himself rather critical and conscious of its effects, wishing there having been a better alternative. So I don't think there is a clasjh - just layman's terms versus statements from on of the guys who designed the second series genophage.
I'm referring to Okeer's use of the word "clutch", which distinctly means a collection of eggs in a single place.
“let a thousand die in a clutch” 7:10 in this video for those who want proof
If Krogans lay eggs as it would seem from that statement then this makes allot more sense. So only every 1 in 1000 eggs end up being fertile and hatching. Infertile eggs could also be interpreted as still born.
It also explains how the krogan can have an absurdly high birthrate.
Modifié par Manic Sheep, 20 novembre 2010 - 01:02 .
#42
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 12:52
Modifié par Whatever666343431431654324, 20 novembre 2010 - 12:57 .
#43
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 01:00
#44
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 01:30
Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
I'm still not convinced Krogan have live births. They're reptiles and don't breastfeed (Okeer's reference to collective human teats infers that). And I didn't notice the word "clutch" either. That pretty much cinches it for me. We're simply talking about eggs.
I cannot say if the krogan lay eggs or not but I would lean towards the latter, since we have no idea what a female krogan looks like any for or against be able to breastfeed is at this point is null.
Also the krogan are 7 ft tall, weigh a ton in armor, talk and have multiple organs there are pretty far away from your typical earth reptile. Besides how can you have a stile born egg? The krogan never have referenced eggs directly. The only thing near to that is: Warlord Okeer states "let 1000 die in a clutch".
On a side if krogan do or do not not lay egg, would it ever change anyones view on the genophage?
#45
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 02:19
Epic777 wrote...
I cannot say if the krogan lay eggs or not but I would lean towards the latter, since we have no idea what a female krogan looks like any for or against be able to breastfeed is at this point is null.
Also the krogan are 7 ft tall, weigh a ton in armor, talk and have multiple organs there are pretty far away from your typical earth reptile.
That is true, we shouldn't make assumptions abased in them looking reptilian but why dose the fact that we know nothing about their reproduction make you lean towards live births? It just means we don't know. I still think they probably lay eggs tho obviously I can't know for sure.
Epic777 wrote...
Besides how can you have a stile born egg?
Simple, an egg that never hatches could easily be interpreted as still born.
Epic777 wrote...
The krogan never have referenced eggs directly. The only thing near to that is: Warlord Okeer states "let 1000 die in a clutch".
They never directly reference live births either and a clutch dose specifically mean eggs.
Either way I'm still for the genophage. Tho I’m not going to pretend I'm for it to help the Krogan. It’s to protect everyone else at the Krogans expense. The only difference them laying eggs would make is that its slightly less horrific to think of thousands off eggs that never hatch ( would still suck and be stressful for the korgans tho) than thousands of malformed lifeless babies being born. An egg is less personal than a baby, at least to us because we have live births.Epic777 wrote...
On a side if krogan do or do not lay egg, would it ever change anyones view on the genophage?
Modifié par Manic Sheep, 20 novembre 2010 - 02:25 .
#46
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 02:26
#47
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 02:44
Then why talk about "piles of children who have never lived" but anyway at this point I am retelling why I am leaning towards live births. I am guessing maybe me3 or some spin off will shed light on the matter but at the mean time all we (live birth vs eggs) have is speculation based on strange scifi biology.Manic Sheep wrote...
Epic777 wrote...
I cannot say if the krogan lay eggs or not but I would lean towards the latter, since we have no idea what a female krogan looks like any for or against be able to breastfeed is at this point is null.
Also the krogan are 7 ft tall, weigh a ton in armor, talk and have multiple organs there are pretty far away from your typical earth reptile.
That is true, we shouldn't make assumptions abased in them looking reptilian but why dose the fact that we know nothing about their reproduction make you lean towards live births? It just means we don't know. I still think they probably lay eggs tho obviously I can't know for sure.Epic777 wrote...
Besides how can you have a stile born egg?
Simple, an egg that never hatches could easily be interpreted as still born.Epic777 wrote...
The krogan never have referenced eggs directly. The only thing near to that is: Warlord Okeer states "let 1000 die in a clutch".
They never directly reference live births either and a clutch dose specifically mean eggs.Either way I'm still for the genophage. Tho I’m not going to pretend I'm for it to help the Krogan. It’s to protect everyone else at the Krogans expense. The only difference them laying eggs would make is that its slightly less horrific to think of thousands off eggs that never hatch ( would still suck and be stressful for the korgans tho) than thousands of malformed lifeless babies being born. An egg is less personal than a baby, at least to us because we have live births.Epic777 wrote...
On a side if krogan do or do not lay egg, would it ever change anyones view on the genophage?
#48
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 03:45
Modifié par Deltamon, 20 novembre 2010 - 03:45 .
#49
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 08:10
#50
Posté 20 novembre 2010 - 02:34
Manic Sheep wrote...
If Krogans lay eggs as it would seem from that statement then this makes allot more sense. So only every 1 in 1000 eggs end up being fertile and hatching. Infertile eggs could also be interpreted as still born.
Eggs? Lol!
It also explains how the krogan can have an absurdly high birthrate.
The high Krogans' birthrate is explained by the fact that they live for millennia. 1 female can produce thousands of baby Krogans over life time. This is it.
The formula of the genophage is very simple: Take the average number of babies a female Krogan statistically produces, divide by two. The result is the number of Krogan females, which only one is left fertile in. 1 in 1000.





Retour en haut






