28 réponses à ce sujet

[Loerwyn]

bzombo wrote...

wow, the pc elitism comes shining out in threads like this. "just go spend money you may not have on something you don't need because that is what i say is the standard for a pc." jeez. how about just a yes or no. why all the condescension?

If you're buying a computer (Whether laptop or desktop), you do not buy for one game and you do not buy its minimum/recommended. You aim above and for a wider range. Why? It extends the lifespan (Well, delays upgrades) and allows for the increase in system requirements. A PC is obsolete before you've bought it, so you might as well try to negate that obsolesence as much as reasonably possible.

It's not elitism, it's common sense.

[Moondoggie]

Christ some people do moan. It's not being elitist to offer sound advice. Nobody said you need to get a $4000 system with ramped up specs a huge TFT monitor and a massive GPU to play DA you don't. But playing games on intergated chipsets is never a good idea as 90% of the time it causes graphical issues or major lag.

[SSV Enterprise]

bzombo wrote...

wow, the pc elitism comes shining out in threads like this. "just go spend money you may not have on something you don't need because that is what i say is the standard for a pc." jeez. how about just a yes or no. why all the condescension?

Because the game might not run at all unless you have good enough hardware.

[Gorath Alpha]

There was one of these threads like this one with some good information on the newest of the Intel Chipset chips that rides piggyback inside of an i3 - i5 - i7 package, and I can't seem to find it, but I did notice that no one named the better tool for automatically testing a system against requirements, the Game-o-Meter at YouGamers.

Dom1da wrote...

Useful site:http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/

No way!  Awful suggestion!  They are wrong a truly HUGE part of the time.

At least this time, it recognized that Intel cannot make graphics chips that work properly. 

G