Why the hell is Udina the canon choice??
#1
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:00
#2
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:04
kylecouch wrote...
Every comic and book that comes out has Udina the "Councilor"....why exactly??? these are things you should avoid saying because it makes our choices seem pointless...you can't just say Anderson or Udina without a title? I mean what the frick man?
What single male person are you directing this at?
I mean, who is the "man" at the end of that?
Who are you heaping the blame onto?
#3
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:06
#4
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:07
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 18 novembre 2010 - 02:08 .
#5
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:08
Udina was probably the choice for the books and comics simply because unlike Anderson,
he is the quintisential politican, or simply because the books/comics work under the assumption
of the worst possible (for paragons anyway) ending in ME1.
#6
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:08
#7
Guest_mrsph_*
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:08
Guest_mrsph_*
That's why.
#8
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:09
Ryzaki wrote...
...It's a turn of phrase. It doesn't actually mean a certain individual.
Shh, I want to see his answer.
#9
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:14
Default plot. Not canon.kylecouch wrote...
Every comic and book that comes out has Udina the "Councilor"....why exactly??? these are things you should avoid saying because it makes our choices seem pointless...you can't just say Anderson or Udina without a title? I mean what the frick man?
For purposes of expanding the ME universe, works such as Retribution assume that Udina was chosen as Councilor. They are not retcons of game choices.
#10
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:20
#11
Guest_mrsph_*
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:21
Guest_mrsph_*
Modifié par mrsph, 18 novembre 2010 - 02:21 .
#12
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:23
Glorious.
#13
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:36
It's like getting mad that Harrowmont dies if you pick him to be king of Orzammar.
#14
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 02:37
Anderson never stepped down if you chose him as Councilor.mrsph wrote...
Retribution looked more like a flub on Karpyshyns fault. And the comic takes place around a year after Mass Effect 2 (and after Anderson stepped down from his position)
Retribution and its like were written from the basis that Anderson was never Councilor in the first place. If Anderson was your pick for Councilor, the events in your canon don't happen as they do in Retribution and Inquisition. How much different is up to debate (certainly Inquisition doesn't require much), but Retribution would not occur as told.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 18 novembre 2010 - 02:37 .
#15
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 03:30
#16
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 03:31
Udina is a Natural Born Politician who knows how to get the things that he desires. The Alliance would much rather have him in power than Andersan because Udina is 'very good' at playing Politics and isn't afraid to toss his morales aside if it serves in the best interest for humanity.
He's like an older Renegade Shepard who dabbles in Politics.
#17
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 03:32
gadna13 wrote...
I recently read Retribution and don't remember it anywhere saying that Udina was ambassador or that Anderson was not ambassador. I do recall at that the end Anderson said he was stepping down from his position (which again is never listed.) If you can find the page for me where it says this, (I overlook things when reading all the time, bad habit) then I would agree. However, I took the book as saying that Anderson was giving up his job whether it be ambassador or assitant...or just his Alliance admiral position.
Anderson is referenced to as Admiral Anderson, a title he never recieves as Councilor.
Udina is referenced as Councilor by Aria a few chapters in.
#18
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 04:18
Dave of Canada wrote...
gadna13 wrote...
I recently read Retribution and don't remember it anywhere saying that Udina was ambassador or that Anderson was not ambassador. I do recall at that the end Anderson said he was stepping down from his position (which again is never listed.) If you can find the page for me where it says this, (I overlook things when reading all the time, bad habit) then I would agree. However, I took the book as saying that Anderson was giving up his job whether it be ambassador or assitant...or just his Alliance admiral position.
Anderson is referenced to as Admiral Anderson, a title he never recieves as Councilor.
Udina is referenced as Councilor by Aria a few chapters in.
Yep, I just reread some parts and noticed that. I don't know how I overlooked that the first time.
And in this post quoted by me, I used 'ambassador' when I meant 'councilor'. Thanks for pointing me towards this, much appreciated.
I now agree that this is pretty odd that Udina is automatically named 'Councilor'. Hell, keep calling him just an ambassador in Retribution and the story would work with Anderson stepping down. Don't know why he's just automatically placed there.
#19
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 04:31
#20
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 05:51
I can see how this could be a literary headache, so I don't blame Drew too much. It's exceptionally difficult to write a good story with so many variables in people's personal canon.
#21
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 05:53
No book or comic has said that.
I love you all, but you can be idiots sometimes.
Ok, udina does become the Councilor. But he is not the canon choice. People have misunderstood Retribution.
Modifié par Alocormin, 18 novembre 2010 - 05:55 .
#22
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 06:04
ME2 even treats the plot essentially as if the council was killed even if they weren't (by way of the Council's denial).
#23
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 06:14
The Comic/Novel doesn't contradict anything.
#24
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 06:16
#25
Posté 18 novembre 2010 - 06:58





Retour en haut







