Aller au contenu

Photo

Blank Gamers' list of predictions for ME3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
12 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Bourne Endeavor

Bourne Endeavor
  • Members
  • 2 451 messages
For the lazy, I shall c/p the list the site has provided. Please note this is all mere speculation not documented fact and meant entirely for the purpose of discussion.

Source


1. Mass Effect 3 is destined for a January 2012 release

The Dev Team has told us that Mass Effect 3 will be released either late2011 or early 2012. Ray Muzyka stated that they want to “maximize the quality [of ME3] for our fans and maximize the commercial success for the company”. By maximize commercial success they mean, “Our fans will have lots of Christmas gift cards.” So our safest prediction is a January 2012 release date.

2. Team Division

Face it, the team conflict train has left the station and it ain’t coming back. And since we expect Mass Effect 3 will increase the size of your team, the juicy opportunities for back stabbing will be far to tempting for the developers. Did we say the team size will expand? Sure did, so expect at least half of the cast from Mass Effect 2 to return (if they survived the Suicide Mission, that is), some of the folks from the original, and a handful of new ones.

Now about that conflict..you’d better start preparing your apologies nowbecause your love interest from the original Mass Effect is going to call you out for cheating in Mass Effect 2. Emotions will be flying so high, you’ll have to tip toe past some rooms. There are enough conflicting interests in the game to start a nuclear war inside the new Normandy (more on that later).

Relationally speaking, the most drama will come from Ashley Williams andMiranda Lawson [or your ME1/ME2 love interests of choice]. They don’t call ’em bombshells for nothing. Williams and Lawson in particular, are both beautiful, both are competitive, and both have enough insecurity to need Shepard to prop them up. Three’s a crowd in that triangle, and Shepard will more than likely choose which one to embrace and which one will die a Heroine’s death. Of course if you’re playing a female Shepard, the three of you might be best friends and have some killer intergalactic slumber parties (hello, zero gravity pillow fights!).

So what does this all mean? Don’t expect all members to stay on the team from start to finish. In Mass Effect 2, the team barely held together. So, after throwing in the characters from the original game, you’ll have too much for one commander to control.

3. Grunt and Urdnot Wrex fix their baby makers

On a more uplifting note, we anticipate a quest that will trigger a touching, right-of-passage relationship between Grunt and Urdnot Wrex asthey find a cure for their sterile race. This will more than likely be aside mission that forces Shepard to decide between curing the Krogan reproduction problem or some other galactically important option.

4. BioWare plays the ‘Judas’ card

And you can count on one major, major betrayal. Let that sink in...Think about it, every epic story has betrayal. William Wallace was betrayed by Robert the Bruce, Obi-Wan was betrayed by Anakin, Frodo was betrayed
by Boromir, Jesus was betrayed by Judas and Kenny is betrayed every day by the writers of South Park. The difficult thing about predicting who will be the Judas is that all the characters could betray Shepard
depending on how a player plays. They each have their own passionate issues.

Here are a few scenarios to consider:

* Miranda might betray Shepard if he endangers her sister, or sense of family.

* Ashley and Garrus might betray Shepard if he sides with Cerberus.

* Grunt and Urdnot might betray Shepard if he seals the fate of the sterile Krogan race.

* Tali'Zorah could be the Judas if Shepard ruins the Quarian's chances to return to their homeland.

* Jacob could betray the team if he feels Shepard is putting the Human race in danger.

* It might be Mordin Solus if logically betrayal will lead to the greater good for the galaxy.

* It could be Legion, but I'm guessing not. That would be too obvious.

5. The old Normandy was so 2010...it gets a make-over

What’s that? A new Normandy? That’s right, we’re doubling down with all our chips to bet there’ll be a new Normandy. We’re guessing about 20% bigger to make room for the 12- to 14-member team. They also have to make some room for the new MAKO (wink, wink) – more than likely a hover-tank. Here’s a freebie prediction, they won’t go back to the straight land-exploration of Mass Effect, but it wouldn’t surprise us if they used a new MAKO to break up the action some with some mission-related functionality.

6. The Cerberus are smug lying bastards and the Illusive Man is an android.

We expect Cerberus to take off their “greater good” pretenses and Shepard must make a choice between Miranda and Jacob with Cerberus or Ashley and Garrus against Cerberus. Or perhaps that spark in the Illusive Man’s eye turns out to be synthetic and he’s using Shepard to defeat the Reapers making way for a Geth uprising. Of course the beauty of Mass Effect is that all options are possible.

7. The playthrough score will include all three games

Lastly, lets try a technical prediction for a change. We know that BioWare is working hard to cement the ties between all three games. And what better way to do this than at the end of Mass Effect 3 have the
player's achievements rank based on how well you finished the ENTIRE trilogy. Players who take their time, do the exploration and complete all character quests will proudly know they’ve got nothing left to prove. Slackers will beat the game and see just how much more replay they’ve got.
******

TIM being a synthetic would be intriguing and could explain the Human-Reaper. If he was being controlled by the Geth or was apart of them - a leader even. It could be theorized he commissioned the Reaper to be constructed or used Harbringer in some manner, sense a humanoid variation. In addition we open the door to why he desired the Collector base so much, why he revived Shepard. I like this theory!

Do not mind me, I am in my moment and hypnotizing all this. :D

Modifié par Bourne Endeavor, 23 novembre 2010 - 08:44 .


#2
LorDC

LorDC
  • Members
  • 519 messages
This article consists of complete BS and playing Captain Obvious 50/50.

#3
Alienmorph

Alienmorph
  • Members
  • 5 583 messages
Yes, the "Judas card" is part of the saga since the beginning... think about Wrex on Virmire and what happens to you if you take the wrong unloyal companions in the End Run of the Suicide Mission. I like the idea that anyone migh be the traitor depending by our choices, but that wasn't so unpredictable...

#4
Alienmorph

Alienmorph
  • Members
  • 5 583 messages

Alienmorph wrote...

Yes, the "Judas card" for example is part of the saga since the beginning... think about Wrex on Virmire and what happens to you if you take the wrong unloyal companions in the End Run of the Suicide Mission. I like the idea that anyone migh be the traitor depending by our choices, but that wasn't so unpredictable...



#5
Da_Lion_Man

Da_Lion_Man
  • Members
  • 1 604 messages
2,3 and 6 sound like terrible ideas...

#6
Rekkampum

Rekkampum
  • Members
  • 2 048 messages
2, 5, 6 are dumb

#7
Onyx Jaguar

Onyx Jaguar
  • Members
  • 13 003 messages
Actually a new Normandy would make sense if they would find a way to design the ship so Loading screens would not be necessary.

#8
vinak

vinak
  • Members
  • 71 messages
1 - meh

2-4 - obvious

5 - I don't really see it happening. Refit at best. The Normandy was supposed to be the Millennium Falcon/Ebon hawk of the series. They already screwed that up with the original blowing up. They might as well replace it outright. Shepard could use his/her own Juggernaut at this point I suppose.

6 - that's stretching the story too much.

7- don't really care.

Modifié par vinak, 24 novembre 2010 - 01:46 .


#9
Sursion

Sursion
  • Members
  • 950 messages
By "New Normandy" they better be talking about a refit, not a Normandy SR-3. Especially now that the Normandy actually has a personality (EDI) now.



Also, I doubt the credibility of this entire thing.

#10
Soahfreako

Soahfreako
  • Members
  • 1 214 messages
 Theory to support TIM related to the Geth: ~!~WARNING BOOK SPOILERS~!~










If you've read the 3rd book then you should know what I'm hinting at. What if a few years (maybe even many) before the events of ME1, before anyone even knew about the Reapers, TIM wanted to conduct the experiment but with Geth tech. Perhaps in the beginning stages of Cerberus, he needed some sort of edge over an enemy, possibly the Turians as the new comic series suggests that he does not think to well of them. He by chance comes across some Geth tech on a random world he explores (I remember reading somewhere that before he really started Cerberus he traveled the galaxy, could've been the book, could've been something else). But seeing as Cerberus doesn't have much influence at this time, and was probably short staffed, he uses himself as a test subject. I've had this theory for awhile, but the recent pictures of the new comic series on him sorta helped me solidify it a bit. Thoughts?

#11
Count Viceroy

Count Viceroy
  • Members
  • 4 095 messages

LorDC wrote...

This article consists of complete BS and playing Captain Obvious 50/50.



#12
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
I was patiently nodding and occasionally agreeing until we hit "new Normandy and TIM's a robot."



What.

#13
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages
Yeah no, just some guy jumping to conclusions based on decisions he made in game.