This is a topic that I believe to be deserving of its own thread.
Humanity stood a decent shot of winning outright the First Contact War, had it gone on, and a very good shot of inflicting such losses on the turians to force them to sue for peace.
In addition to humanity’s penchant of innovative tactics, which Zulu_DFA so very rightly pointed out in another thread, humanity and the Alliance obviously had not signed on to any of the Citadel Conventions at the time of the War of Turian Aggression; so innovative technologies such as AI, which (as EDI has shown us can be a decisive advantage) would be very much on the table.
Humanity, as the victims of outside aggression, would enjoy the advantage of an interior position for the entirety of the war. In other words, the turians would have had to take and hold human possessions, but our side could limit the aims of any offensives to raids and taking relays, instead of entire planets or star systems.
And if the turians did reach out to their fellow Council races for aid, would they help? The turians were forced to pay reparations to humans for the war; that strongly implies they were also forced to accept some sort of war guilt clause. It sure wasn’t humanity that forced them to accept either of those things, so it must have been the asari and/or the salarians. Would they really be willing to send soldiers to die to support the turians in a war they obviously opposed, at least on some level?
Besides, how long would the war go on before humanity started discovering, and reaching out to the races the Council has wronged over the years, namely the krogan and the quarians?
Ships with quarian crews, ground armies with krogan troops, and humans setting the strategy and tactics. Sounds like a Council-crushing force to me.
NOW WITH BETTER POLL
Modifié par General User, 26 novembre 2010 - 04:23 .





Retour en haut







