Aller au contenu

Photo

Why couldn't Duncan and the HN catch up with Fergus and the highever troops?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
106 réponses à ce sujet

#76
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Glaucon wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

Apples and Pears.  And who makes this charge?  I can only begin to render the implications of dual loyalty, that's a whole other debate imo.


Disagree.  The stucture of the Wardens is strikingly similiar to many orders of knighthood in the middle ages (Knight Templar especially).  That makes this a very fair point of comparison.  Dual loyalty also existed IRL with such orders as well often with unfortunate consequences.

-Polaris


No.  It does not support you argument and cannot be used to point to validity: one is Fantasy the other isn't.


Yes it does because RL examples are used to guide fantasy and always has been. 

-Polaris

#77
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Glaucon wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

One problem with saying that Duncan is bordering treason is that legally speaking, the Right of conscription trumps all other legal matters, at least in theory. In practise, Duncan could not have conscripted anyone he likes, but that's for practical reasons, not because he can't. Bryce for instance, when the subject of the Cousland becoming a Warden was brought, quite strongly rejects the idea but also says "unless you wish to invoke the right of conscription?". That would have overpowered him, legally at least.

So, if Duncan invoked the right of conscription on the last Cousland, legally it's binding and not treasonous, regardless of who he is consripting (except if it was the king I suspect). But granted, he doesn't invoke the Right until we object.


Yes -  the right of conscription clearly beats all hands in that game.


All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

-Polaris

#78
Guest_Glaucon_*

Guest_Glaucon_*
  • Guests

IanPolaris wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

Apples and Pears.  And who makes this charge?  I can only begin to render the implications of dual loyalty, that's a whole other debate imo.


Disagree.  The stucture of the Wardens is strikingly similiar to many orders of knighthood in the middle ages (Knight Templar especially).  That makes this a very fair point of comparison.  Dual loyalty also existed IRL with such orders as well often with unfortunate consequences.

-Polaris


No.  It does not support you argument and cannot be used to point to validity: one is Fantasy the other isn't.


Yes it does because RL examples are used to guide fantasy and always has been. 

-Polaris


Guide being the operative word in action.  This is where I believe you to be muddying the waters and I cannot accept  a sound and well formed argument  that navigates such a polluted stream.

*edit* grammar

Modifié par Glaucon, 28 novembre 2010 - 12:51 .


#79
Guest_Glaucon_*

Guest_Glaucon_*
  • Guests

IanPolaris wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

One problem with saying that Duncan is bordering treason is that legally speaking, the Right of conscription trumps all other legal matters, at least in theory. In practise, Duncan could not have conscripted anyone he likes, but that's for practical reasons, not because he can't. Bryce for instance, when the subject of the Cousland becoming a Warden was brought, quite strongly rejects the idea but also says "unless you wish to invoke the right of conscription?". That would have overpowered him, legally at least.

So, if Duncan invoked the right of conscription on the last Cousland, legally it's binding and not treasonous, regardless of who he is consripting (except if it was the king I suspect). But granted, he doesn't invoke the Right until we object.


Yes -  the right of conscription clearly beats all hands in that game.


All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

-Polaris


My inexperience prevents me from responding to that argument as I have only played DA:O.

#80
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

No, the crown is just backing you up here. They don't decide Anders is free to go with you, you decide to conscript him and they add their support to you since Rylock is freaking.

#81
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

DPSSOC wrote...
The problem with this idea is it ignores the circumstances you're making your exit under.  You've no supplies, no food, water, nothing but the clothes on your back.  Not to mention the fact you're wounded; damn the gameplay there's no way you got dressed let alone slipped armor on before Howe's men entered stabbing distance.  You're hurt, cold, and probably avoiding the main roads (Howe would have men watching for escapees) you will not be moving quickly.


The gameplay evidence says that neither I nor Duncan are wounded.  In fact I am seldom scratched and never suffer an injury during the escape.  That means you have two lightly geared people and such people can go a long way.  Also remember that the secret tunnel is through the LARDER and that means you have food (certainly enough food...even if it's hard-tack and left-overs...for two people to easily carry and still be very light on their feet.  Water...same, same.


Note the bolded portion.  Unless your Warden is named Achilles or Logan there's no way you're walking out of that castle unscathed.  Furthermore remember every point of damage is an arrow in your flesh or a blade slicing your skin.  You.  Are.  Hurt.

As for your proimity to the larder you forget that the Arl's men are practically at the door, you don't have time to raid the larder looking for something you can carry (having no packs handy) that's also readily edible.  You're have neither the time to gather supplies nor do you have the means to carry them.

IanPolaris wrote...

I dunno, send out scouts (who have no real use in battle) with orders to watch for signs of the darkspawn doing anything sneaky.  These scouts would be in the field until they either A) found something and ran back with word, or B) received orders (probably an agreed upon signal if they were mobile or a runner if not) that the battle was over and they should come on in.  You don't stop scouting just because you've engaged the enemy you need to keep an eye out for flanking movements, reinforcements, etc.


This is wrong.  Read up on battles up to the thirty years war and even beyond.  Scouts DO have a strong use in battle especially as light skirmish units (who move to support rapidly moving cavalry units while maintaining cover and fire.  Scouting units can not withstand the shock of the main battle (often Tercios and the like) but to say that Scouts have no use on battle is utterly ridiculous.


Perhaps you're right (wouldn't know) but still it's a valid point to have scouts in the field (actually scouting) durring a battle and they'd be unlikely or unable to return until after it was finished.

IanPolaris wrote...

Actually it teaches them to watch Nobles they conscript into the Grey Wardens, not do it less.  The idea of Sophia using the Grey Wardens to stage a rebellion didn't occur to anyone because it had never happened.  After the fact they know to keep an eye on these people (though really you should watch anyone you recruit into the army against their will).


I already answered this.  Conscripting a high noble against their will is a very bad idea on a lot of levels.  Not only will the high noble not appreciate it, but the high noble will usually have connections, political skills, and the willingness to use them to be a headache for years if not decade.  If Sofia Dryden wasn't exhibit "A" as to why you don't conscript such people, then nothing is.  In fact Duncan DOES fully realize this when he visits Orzammar during the DN origin story and flat out refuses to deal with the DN as long as he is a DN at least when it comes to GW recruitment.  He only takes you after you are no longer a person in Dwarf society.


Again that's a reason to watch, not stop.  What makes conscripted nobles dangerous also makes them valuable, the skill and will to command, their ability to politic, etc.  These are valuable skills and ones the Grey Wardens need.  However these people do need to be watched, that's what we learned from Sophia.  You'll notice that in Awakening when a Warden is given political power they are now have a member of their staff who answers directly to the First Warden.  It was lack of oversight that allowed things with Sophia to go as far as they did.  Duncan's reason for not recruiting the DN is the same he doesn't initially try recruiting the HN, it's stepping on toes that don't need to be stepped on.  When the HN is about to escape the situation has changed, Duncan can not afford for this to be a wasted trip so he does need to step, and with the DN there's no longer any toes to step on besides yours.

Edit to add

IanPolaris wrote...
All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.


That's not a matter of limitation on the Right of Conscription that's the Chantry overstepping it's bounds (not uncommon among medieval religious groups).  It's not that the WC needs the OK it's that the Chantry won't quietly accept letting Anders slip through their fingers.  Now you are right that the King/Queen could deny the Warden's the Right of Conscription in specific instances but that's no different than how your government can, in theory, suspend your rights in specific instances.

Modifié par DPSSOC, 28 novembre 2010 - 01:25 .


#82
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

-Polaris

And yet Cailan is more than thrilled to hear Bryce's youngest is going to be a Grey Warden.  So....

#83
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

-Polaris

And yet Cailan is more than thrilled to hear Bryce's youngest is going to be a Grey Warden.  So....


Cailan is a fool and would volunteer to be a Grey Warden himself (crown or no) if the GWs would take him.

-Polaris

#84
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

No, the crown is just backing you up here. They don't decide Anders is free to go with you, you decide to conscript him and they add their support to you since Rylock is freaking.


Not true.  Play that scene again and you find that the King or Queen explicitly "allow it".  If they did not, you would not get Anders.

-Polaris

#85
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
[quote]DPSSOC wrote...

[quote]IanPolaris wrote...
[quote]DPSSOC wrote...
The problem with this idea is it ignores the circumstances you're making your exit under.  You've no supplies, no food, water, nothing but the clothes on your back.  Not to mention the fact you're wounded; damn the gameplay there's no way you got dressed let alone slipped armor on before Howe's men entered stabbing distance.  You're hurt, cold, and probably avoiding the main roads (Howe would have men watching for escapees) you will not be moving quickly.
[/quote]

The gameplay evidence says that neither I nor Duncan are wounded.  In fact I am seldom scratched and never suffer an injury during the escape.  That means you have two lightly geared people and such people can go a long way.  Also remember that the secret tunnel is through the LARDER and that means you have food (certainly enough food...even if it's hard-tack and left-overs...for two people to easily carry and still be very light on their feet.  Water...same, same.[/quote]

Note the bolded portion.  Unless your Warden is named Achilles or Logan there's no way you're walking out of that castle unscathed.  Furthermore remember every point of damage is an arrow in your flesh or a blade slicing your skin.  You.  Are.  Hurt.
[/quote]

No you're not.  You DO NOT get to ignore gameplay.  You also can take a cask/sack or two of flour without packs.  You might eat lean for a couple of days, but you'd eat.....and you can also in a very small group grab something later on (perhaps literally).

[quote]
As for your proimity to the larder you forget that the Arl's men are practically at the door, you don't have time to raid the larder looking for something you can carry (having no packs handy) that's also readily edible.  You're have neither the time to gather supplies nor do you have the means to carry them.
[/quote]

You don't need much.  A single small sack of flour would do in a pinch or a single sack of dried herbs.  Not Hard.


[quote]
[quote]IanPolaris wrote...
[quote]
I dunno, send out scouts (who have no real use in battle) with orders to watch for signs of the darkspawn doing anything sneaky.  These scouts would be in the field until they either A) found something and ran back with word, or B) received orders (probably an agreed upon signal if they were mobile or a runner if not) that the battle was over and they should come on in.  You don't stop scouting just because you've engaged the enemy you need to keep an eye out for flanking movements, reinforcements, etc.
[/quote]

This is wrong.  Read up on battles up to the thirty years war and even beyond.  Scouts DO have a strong use in battle especially as light skirmish units (who move to support rapidly moving cavalry units while maintaining cover and fire.  Scouting units can not withstand the shock of the main battle (often Tercios and the like) but to say that Scouts have no use on battle is utterly ridiculous.[/quote]

Perhaps you're right (wouldn't know) but still it's a valid point to have scouts in the field (actually scouting) durring a battle and they'd be unlikely or unable to return until after it was finished.
[/quote]

That's what light cavalry is for.  You don't want your skirmishing footmen in exposed positions when the battle starts.

[quote]
[quote]IanPolaris wrote...
[quote]
Actually it teaches them to watch Nobles they conscript into the Grey Wardens, not do it less.  The idea of Sophia using the Grey Wardens to stage a rebellion didn't occur to anyone because it had never happened.  After the fact they know to keep an eye on these people (though really you should watch anyone you recruit into the army against their will).[/quote]

I already answered this.  Conscripting a high noble against their will is a very bad idea on a lot of levels.  Not only will the high noble not appreciate it, but the high noble will usually have connections, political skills, and the willingness to use them to be a headache for years if not decade.  If Sofia Dryden wasn't exhibit "A" as to why you don't conscript such people, then nothing is.  In fact Duncan DOES fully realize this when he visits Orzammar during the DN origin story and flat out refuses to deal with the DN as long as he is a DN at least when it comes to GW recruitment.  He only takes you after you are no longer a person in Dwarf society.[/quote]

Again that's a reason to watch, not stop.  What makes conscripted nobles dangerous also makes them valuable, the skill and will to command, their ability to politic, etc.  These are valuable skills and ones the Grey Wardens need.  However these people do need to be watched, that's what we learned from Sophia.  You'll notice that in Awakening when a Warden is given political power they are now have a member of their staff who answers directly to the First Warden.  It was lack of oversight that allowed things with Sophia to go as far as they did.  Duncan's reason for not recruiting the DN is the same he doesn't initially try recruiting the HN, it's stepping on toes that don't need to be stepped on.  When the HN is about to escape the situation has changed, Duncan can not afford for this to be a wasted trip so he does need to step, and with the DN there's no longer any toes to step on besides yours.
[/quote]

All this is only true if the High Noble volunteers willingly (and many would).  Conscripting such capable people that have every reason to both hate you and follow their own agendas is chock full of FAIL.


[quote]
Edit to add

[quote]IanPolaris wrote...
All but one.  The Crown has the right to disband the order at any time AND change the wardens with treason (and exile on pain of death).

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.
[/quote]

That's not a matter of limitation on the Right of Conscription that's the Chantry overstepping it's bounds (not uncommon among medieval religious groups).  It's not that the WC needs the OK it's that the Chantry won't quietly accept letting Anders slip through their fingers.  Now you are right that the King/Queen could deny the Warden's the Right of Conscription in specific instances but that's no different than how your government can, in theory, suspend your rights in specific instances.[/quote]

Which means that the Wardens answer fundamentally to the Crown and not the reverse, and the Teryn of Highever being #2 noble in Fereldan is very much part of the crown.

-Polaris

#86
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

No, the crown is just backing you up here. They don't decide Anders is free to go with you, you decide to conscript him and they add their support to you since Rylock is freaking.


Not true.  Play that scene again and you find that the King or Queen explicitly "allow it".  If they did not, you would not get Anders.

-Polaris

I KNOW they say "I'll allow it." They say that because, again, Rylock is taking issue with it and trying to appeal to the crown because the crown has a giant army and you have a handful of people. Regardless of who has what right, the crown's army means they can really do what they want.

Edit: And besides, when has there ever been anything besides the casual 'I'll allow it' that implies the crown can trump right of conscription? In the DC origin, Rica mentions GWs can conscript the king's own sons and in the HN origin Bryce makes it clear that Duncan can conscript you like he can conscript absolutely anyone but he won't because doing so will ****** off the Teyrn of Highever and he doesn't need to make enemies. The GW have the right of conscription but it's up to the crown whether they will enforce the GWs rights. This doesn't give them legal power over the GWs but rather practical power in that they rule the country and have an army.

Modifié par Sarah1281, 28 novembre 2010 - 03:54 .


#87
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Cailan is a fool and would volunteer to be a Grey Warden himself (crown or no) if the GWs would take him.

-Polaris

Immaterial.  You keep saying Duncan commits treason, but the king doesn't feel that way.  And he's the king.  Like it or not.

#88
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Which means that the Wardens answer fundamentally to the Crown and not the reverse, and the Teryn of Highever being #2 noble in Fereldan is very much part of the crown.

-Polaris

I think you're crossing strands here.  I agree with you that the right of conscription as it operates in Ferelden flows from the crown.  It's traditional in other lands, as well, but in Ferelden it was re-instituted by Maric when he let the order back in.  Cailan obviously carried on with that.  So, the Grey Wardens' authority is traditional and confirmed by the crown, and the title of Teyrn is traditional but conferred by the crown.  Technically conscription applies to everyone, but if there is a conflict then the crown mediates.  In this case, Cailan.  And we see in Ostagar how he feels about it.  End of story.

#89
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Cailan is a fool and would volunteer to be a Grey Warden himself (crown or no) if the GWs would take him.

-Polaris

Immaterial.  You keep saying Duncan commits treason, but the king doesn't feel that way.  And he's the king.  Like it or not.


You keep on leaving out the key word "borderline" and it's the king who determines where that border lies.  My point is that with a different king (even perhaps a hypothetical King Logain pre-Ostagar) you'd see that line perhaps drawn on the other side.  So my point is NOT immaterial.

Duncan at best skirts just on the inside of the letter of the law to the detriment of Fereldan and that damn fool Cailan lets him get away with it.  Logain may be a first class donkey's posterior and ass (and Howe definately is) but that doesn't mean they are completely wrong about either King Cailan, Duncan, or the Wardens and this is such a case.

-Polaris

#90
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Which means that the Wardens answer fundamentally to the Crown and not the reverse, and the Teryn of Highever being #2 noble in Fereldan is very much part of the crown.

-Polaris

I think you're crossing strands here.  I agree with you that the right of conscription as it operates in Ferelden flows from the crown.  It's traditional in other lands, as well, but in Ferelden it was re-instituted by Maric when he let the order back in.  Cailan obviously carried on with that.  So, the Grey Wardens' authority is traditional and confirmed by the crown, and the title of Teyrn is traditional but conferred by the crown.  Technically conscription applies to everyone, but if there is a conflict then the crown mediates.  In this case, Cailan.  And we see in Ostagar how he feels about it.  End of story.


Actually King Cailan does not 'mediate' the Cousland conscription.  Duncan presents it as a fait accompli.  That's much different.

The point is that unlike other lands (except maybe Orlais), the Grey Wardens operate SOLEY on the sufferance of the crown (including their right of conscription) and everyone knows it.  Thus the GW Commander does indeed have to swear loyalty (not fealty but loyalty) to the crown.

-Polaris

#91
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...

The Crown can trump the right of conscription and even in Awakenings, your Warden Commander can't conscript Anders from under Chantry justice without the King (or Queen's) explicit OK....and even then the chantry contests this.

No, the crown is just backing you up here. They don't decide Anders is free to go with you, you decide to conscript him and they add their support to you since Rylock is freaking.


Not true.  Play that scene again and you find that the King or Queen explicitly "allow it".  If they did not, you would not get Anders.

-Polaris

I KNOW they say "I'll allow it." They say that because, again, Rylock is taking issue with it and trying to appeal to the crown because the crown has a giant army and you have a handful of people. Regardless of who has what right, the crown's army means they can really do what they want.

Edit: And besides, when has there ever been anything besides the casual 'I'll allow it' that implies the crown can trump right of conscription? In the DC origin, Rica mentions GWs can conscript the king's own sons and in the HN origin Bryce makes it clear that Duncan can conscript you like he can conscript absolutely anyone but he won't because doing so will ****** off the Teyrn of Highever and he doesn't need to make enemies. The GW have the right of conscription but it's up to the crown whether they will enforce the GWs rights. This doesn't give them legal power over the GWs but rather practical power in that they rule the country and have an army.


In Orzammar, Rica is correct.  The Dwarves being a very traditional people give the Grey Wardens an absolute right of conscription.  However, the GWs have a longstanding tradition of close friendship between them and the Nobles and the Legion of the Dead, and GWs are not expected to participate in Dwarven politics (and so becoming a GW is considered equivalent to joining the Legion).  The Sofia Dryden disaster never happened with Orzammar and probably never could given Dwarven politics, and so the rules are slightly different in Orzammar.

Not only all that, but the phrase "I'll allow it" pretty much explicitly grants the crown (saying this) the RIGHT to judge otherwise if they so choose so again, the GW right of conscription isn't as absolute as you think.  The crown can (at least in Fereldan) overturn it.

-Polaris

#92
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Actually King Cailan does not 'mediate' the Cousland conscription.  Duncan presents it as a fait accompli.  That's much different.

The point is that unlike other lands (except maybe Orlais), the Grey Wardens operate SOLEY on the sufferance of the crown (including their right of conscription) and everyone knows it.  Thus the GW Commander does indeed have to swear loyalty (not fealty but loyalty) to the crown.

-Polaris

You meet Cailan before your Joining.  If he had any objections, he could voice them then.  If the crown is superior as you say, it wouldn't matter what Duncan said.  Not only doesn't he say boo, Cailan is thrilled that you're joining the Wardens.  He thinks it's glorious!

Not sure where you get the idea that Wardens are more bound in Ferelden than other places, either.  Source?  I can't imagine that even more autocratic lands like Orlais don't also keep a tight rein.  In Anderfels, different story, of course.

#93
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Not only all that, but the phrase "I'll allow it" pretty much explicitly grants the crown (saying this) the RIGHT to judge otherwise if they so choose so again, the GW right of conscription isn't as absolute as you think.  The crown can (at least in Fereldan) overturn it.

-Polaris

In that case, the monarch is stepping in between the Chantry and the Wardens and acting as mediator.  Different story than the usual conscription.  Not like you have to go ask the crown's permission to conscript anyone else, say, Nathaniel Howe or whoever.

Re Loghain being right about the Wardens... if Loghain had had his way, Ferelden would be a smoking ruin and the Blight would have moved on to other lands.  In this case he was not only wrong, he was dangerously wrong.

Modifié par Addai67, 28 novembre 2010 - 08:27 .


#94
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Actually King Cailan does not 'mediate' the Cousland conscription.  Duncan presents it as a fait accompli.  That's much different.

The point is that unlike other lands (except maybe Orlais), the Grey Wardens operate SOLEY on the sufferance of the crown (including their right of conscription) and everyone knows it.  Thus the GW Commander does indeed have to swear loyalty (not fealty but loyalty) to the crown.

-Polaris

You meet Cailan before your Joining.  If he had any objections, he could voice them then.  If the crown is superior as you say, it wouldn't matter what Duncan said.  Not only doesn't he say boo, Cailan is thrilled that you're joining the Wardens.  He thinks it's glorious!


Ye of very convenient memory seems to have forgotten that Duncan does NOT say that he conscripted you.  Given that King Cailan has every reason to think you joined of your own volition....and the dialog does not give you the opportunity to make your case to the king (and it should even if you lose that case).

Not sure where you get the idea that Wardens are more bound in Ferelden than other places, either.  Source?  I can't imagine that even more autocratic lands like Orlais don't also keep a tight rein.  In Anderfels, different story, of course.


Very simple.  Only in Fereldan have the Grey Wardens been kicked out and that exile was made to stick.  That clearly puts the crown in a superier position vs the Grey Wardens....something that isn't so clear in other lands.

-Polaris

#95
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Not only all that, but the phrase "I'll allow it" pretty much explicitly grants the crown (saying this) the RIGHT to judge otherwise if they so choose so again, the GW right of conscription isn't as absolute as you think.  The crown can (at least in Fereldan) overturn it.

-Polaris

In that case, the monarch is stepping in between the Chantry and the Wardens and acting as mediator.  Different story than the usual conscription.  Not like you have to go ask the crown's permission to conscript anyone else, say, Nathaniel Howe or whoever.


In DAO, you can also attempt to conscript Sten and YOU CAN NOT.  Basically the Grey Wardens in Fereldan only have conscription rights during a time of blight (as confirmed by the Alistair convo paths before the battle of Ostegar) and only if the crown agrees.  Nathanial Howe is a special case since he is a condemed criminal that is subject to high justice by ..... drumroll please.....  the Arl of Amaranthine and you sentence Nathanial to the Grey Wardens not per the right of conscription per se but rather via your rights under "High Justice" as Arl of Amaranthine.

Re Loghain being right about the Wardens... if Loghain had had his way, Ferelden would be a smoking ruin and the Blight would have moved on to other lands.  In this case he was not only wrong, he was dangerously wrong.


Both Arl Howe and Teryn Logain are correct that the Grey Wardens are far too high handed in their politics.  They were both dreadfully wrong about the blight.  The difference is that King Maric was a strong beloved ruler that could keep the Grey Wardens in check while still respecting them.  King Calain was a disaster.

-Polaris

#96
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
In DAO, you can also attempt to conscript Sten and YOU CAN NOT.  Basically the Grey Wardens in Fereldan only have conscription rights during a time of blight (as confirmed by the Alistair convo paths before the battle of Ostegar) and only if the crown agrees. 

Not true.  Duncan is conscripted in The Calling.  No Blight.  Alistair himself was recruited 6 months prior to the PC and no indication there's a Blight at the time- Duncan is recruiting at a Chantry tourney.  Alistair says the right was given to Wardens during Blights, but it appears to have been generalized, even though they rarely exercise it during the time between Blights (also per The Calling).

Nathanial Howe is a special case since he is a condemed criminal that is subject to high justice by ..... drumroll please.....  the Arl of Amaranthine and you sentence Nathanial to the Grey Wardens not per the right of conscription per se but rather via your rights under "High Justice" as Arl of Amaranthine.

And the Wardens have their authority from the crown, too, so they can exercise it without asking permission.  As they did for Daveth, as they do for the PC.

Both Arl Howe and Teryn Logain are correct that the Grey Wardens are far too high handed in their politics.  They were both dreadfully wrong about the blight.  The difference is that King Maric was a strong beloved ruler that could keep the Grey Wardens in check while still respecting them.  King Calain was a disaster.

-Polaris

The Wardens are no more political in Cailan's day than they were in Maric's.  Duncan is carefully apolitical.

Not sure what you mean to prove.  I get that you believe the HN PC should have had the right to appeal their conscription, but then a big Game Over would have sounded and how much fun would that be?  Or did you want to have a post-mortem trial for Duncan?  Pointless.

Modifié par Addai67, 28 novembre 2010 - 09:19 .


#97
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Addai67 wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...
In DAO, you can also attempt to conscript Sten and YOU CAN NOT.  Basically the Grey Wardens in Fereldan only have conscription rights during a time of blight (as confirmed by the Alistair convo paths before the battle of Ostegar) and only if the crown agrees. 

Not true.  Duncan is conscripted in The Calling.  No Blight.  Alistair himself was recruited 6 months prior to the PC and no indication there's a Blight at the time- Duncan is recruiting at a Chantry tourney.  Alistair says the right was given to Wardens during Blights, but it appears to have been generalized, even though they rarely exercise it during the time between Blights (also per The Calling).


Duncan was conscripted in ORLAIS not Fereldan so that doesn't count.

Alistair does NOT say that Grey Wardens have the right to conscript all the time.  He very specifically says (pull up the dialog lines youself) that they only have that right (in Fereldan) during a time of blight as confirmed by King Maric.  He also says the GWs have to use it sparingly.

Nathanial Howe is a special case since he is a condemed criminal that is subject to high justice by ..... drumroll please.....  the Arl of Amaranthine and you sentence Nathanial to the Grey Wardens not per the right of conscription per se but rather via your rights under "High Justice" as Arl of Amaranthine.

And the Wardens have their authority from the crown, too, so they can exercise it without asking permission.  As they did for Daveth, as they do for the PC.


They don't have that right from the crown unconditionally.  Anders proves my point on this.  If you don't want to be conscripted you CAN appeal to the crown (as can those who otherwise have rights to you).  This is canon in DAA.

As for Daveth, that WAS during a time of blight (as was your City Elf) and in neither case was their real polical impact from conscripting a commoner convict.  Huge difference here.....so much so I am shocked you even bothered to bring it up.

Both Arl Howe and Teryn Logain are correct that the Grey Wardens are far too high handed in their politics.  They were both dreadfully wrong about the blight.  The difference is that King Maric was a strong beloved ruler that could keep the Grey Wardens in check while still respecting them.  King Calain was a disaster.

-Polaris

The Wardens are no more political in Cailan's day than they were in Maric's.  Duncan is carefully apolitical.


Bolloxs.  Duncan was no more apolical than Ronald Reagan was.  Conscripting the last (known) surviving Cousland, running interference and misleading Logain (per Return to Ostagar) are all intensely political acts and the Grey Wardens pay for those acts dearly.

Not sure what you mean to prove.  I get that you believe the HN PC should have had the right to appeal their conscription, but then a big Game Over would have sounded and how much fun would that be?  Or did you want to have a post-mortem trial for Duncan?  Pointless.


I want to see a lot less hero worship of Duncan.  At least when it comes to the HN background the man was a rat and should be regarded as such.

-Polaris

Modifié par IanPolaris, 28 novembre 2010 - 09:31 .


#98
Marvin_Arnold

Marvin_Arnold
  • Members
  • 1 121 messages
Um, excuse me? Duncan saves your life and wants something in exchange. So? The Cousland line is still secure at that moment, since it's only AFTER Ostagar that Fergus is missing.

Sending off the second son to a (military or religious) order was common practice even in medieval Europe, if not to secure the right of the firstborn over his brother. Duncan doesn't consciously weaken anything at that moment.

Anything to stop the Blight. Should he better have left the HN to die at Highever? Would you have preferred that, Mr oh so righteous? This is War. Quid pro quo. I need able recruits, so I save your second son and he joins the order. Your heir to the Teynir is still happily on his way to Ostagar and we'll catch up with him there.

Modifié par Marvin_Arnold, 28 novembre 2010 - 06:00 .


#99
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
Bolloxs.  Duncan was no more apolical than Ronald Reagan was.  Conscripting the last (known) surviving Cousland, running interference and misleading Logain (per Return to Ostagar) are all intensely political acts and the Grey Wardens pay for those acts dearly.


Maybe you need to take Loghain back to Ostagar but what the hell are you talking about?

#100
Marvin_Arnold

Marvin_Arnold
  • Members
  • 1 121 messages
Besides, it's official word by God, I mean David Gaider, that Wardens can indeed have children, except with other Wardens. So, dynastic problems mostly solved.