Aller au contenu

Photo

Multiplayer for ME3?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
21 réponses à ce sujet

#1
RandomJPG

RandomJPG
  • Members
  • 7 messages
Now I know some may think that Mass Effect should ONLY be single player. But hear me out.

ME3
would be the best if if had multiplayer. I like the idea of co-op. You
can play as either your Shepard ( but he would be a parthner in somebody
else's game, similar to Fable ). You still can make choices but most of
the choices would be with the primary player. 2-3 players should be the
max as that is the most people you can normally have on a mission.
Throw in some made for co-op missions and your golden. Think of it like a
improved Fable henchman system.

Competitive multiplayer would
also be nice if its good. I mean, as long as it doesn't hurt the quality
of single player ( which I don't think it will since bioware has no set
deadline to finish the game ) another game mode never hurt anybody. If
you don't like it, then just don't play it.

So what are you guys ideas? What would you like to see if it did have multiplayer?

#2
ThirtyS1x

ThirtyS1x
  • Members
  • 55 messages
Hm,maybe,but you have to think about if everbody would like multiplayer.

#3
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages
No

#4
poyk

poyk
  • Members
  • 6 messages

RandomJPG wrote...
ME3
would be the best if if had multiplayer.


Nope...

#5
RandomJPG

RandomJPG
  • Members
  • 7 messages
I don't see the harm in it. I mean it's Bioware, not Activision. No mater what they are going to finish the game as much as they can. I am not saying to give me another COD there is no point for that. But you have to admit that co-op would be fun. And again, if you don't like it, then don't play co-op. It's that simple. You still have the amazing single player to enjoy.

#6
Isaidlunch

Isaidlunch
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages
Even if it's not ME3 it's eventually going to happen. Multi-player shooters are what sell these days and it's too big of an opportunity for EA to ignore. I'm expecting to see it in ME3 but not done very well, to "test the waters" so to speak.



As for campaign multi-player, perhaps but only extremely minimal (eg the other player can only be one of your squadmates during battle and that's it).

#7
blank1

blank1
  • Members
  • 363 messages
What would be wrong with a mutiplayer ME3? If you don't like it, just don't play it. I think a good, 3rd person cover style shooter would be amazing for ME3. They'd need to find a way to balance out biotics though.

#8
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

RandomJPG wrote...
And again, if you don't like it, then don't play co-op. It's that simple.

No, no its not.
For multiplayer to exist resources would have to be spent on implementing it.
Resources that could be spent on far more important things like more dialogue for characters/companions.

#9
Crazyfulla

Crazyfulla
  • Members
  • 23 messages
would prefer for it to not have it at all and add another disc... ME had 1 ME2 had 2 so...

on another note if they did have multiplayer...
playable as commander shepard?
playable as Tali (or at least being able to be a quarian)
defenitly keep 3rd person style!!

still i would prefer to get the main Trilogy done first then they can focus on the MP versions

Modifié par Crazyfulla, 27 novembre 2010 - 08:14 .


#10
MTN Dew Fanatic

MTN Dew Fanatic
  • Members
  • 884 messages
Never.

EDIT: I love the "If you don't like, don't play it!" line; because since it's there, that means time was spent making it instead of great story or gameplay, et cetera, et cetera.

Modifié par MTN Dew Fanatic, 27 novembre 2010 - 08:18 .


#11
StrikeSaber47

StrikeSaber47
  • Members
  • 401 messages
As what I said back when ME 2 was being developed and I will say it again. Heck no!

#12
TheNexus

TheNexus
  • Members
  • 565 messages
No. Please no. Never. Ever.



Ever.



I guess I'm being a little too blunt. Let me elaborate.



...



It's an awful idea. Don't do it. You will kill your game.

#13
poyk

poyk
  • Members
  • 6 messages

GodWood wrote...

RandomJPG wrote...
And again, if you don't like it, then don't play co-op. It's that simple.

No, no its not.
For multiplayer to exist resources would have to be spent on implementing it.
Resources that could be spent on far more important things like more dialogue for characters/companions.


I agree. Bioshock 2 and 2K fell for this and look what happened, a half ass multiplayer that's boring and no fun and I don't want that same thing to taint ME3 review scores and it's image of Bioware' quality. I don't get this "EVERY GAME HAS TO HAVE A MULTIPLAYER!" trend. Yeah I'm all for future multiplayer themed Mass Effect games. But for the love of god Bioware please finish this game with a bang and not a 10 year old kid calling you a F***** over the mic.

Modifié par poyk, 27 novembre 2010 - 08:25 .


#14
Mister Mida

Mister Mida
  • Members
  • 3 239 messages
No.

#15
MisterDyslexo

MisterDyslexo
  • Members
  • 1 472 messages
I wouldn't mind it if Bioware made a solely multiplayer game *cough cough December 11th *cough* but they should definitely keep it out of ME3. For all the reasons you've heard already, and more. They could definitely set the scene of some battles (Torfan, Elysium, First Contact, etc) in the ME universe, and have the single-player sorta set out like Star Wars Battlefront was. It would be simpler than making a huge, vastly different single-player mode, provide a somewhat accurate portrayal of the battles, and it would do us mroe hardcore fans some justice, so long as they kept it at a reasonable arms-length from Commander Shepard's trilogy. We win, new players win, and Bioware wins with a lot of money to help develop a different game to make it better.

Thats just my idea. I wouldn't consider that desecrating the Mass Effect universe, or having Bioware completely sell out, since they'd still be giving us a little of what we'd like to see.

But let me make it clear, absolutely no way for ME3. Trying to foce multiplayer to places it shouldn't be has really screwed over some games, like the aforementioned Bioshock 2 (although to be fair, it wasn't a true sequel) and Warcraft. Can't think of any of my own at the moment, but there are plenty of examples out there.

Modifié par MisterDyslexo, 27 novembre 2010 - 08:47 .


#16
TheNexus

TheNexus
  • Members
  • 565 messages
Good example: Warcraft universe by Blizzard.



Warcraft 1, 2, 3. Great RTSs, GREAT STORY. Loyal following.



release MMO. What happens?



Story goes to poo poo chute. Appeal to wider demographic by dumbing game down and simplifying story. General population becomes limited to young children who think Chuck Norris jokes are the height of intellectual pursuit.



Long story short: Bioware has a great community, great team, intelligent design. Multiplayer will destroy all of that. End of story.


#17
Phategod1

Phategod1
  • Members
  • 990 messages
No and after playing Fable III hell no. I play RPG's at a certain pace (Slow as hell) I watch every cutscene I dont want to tell someone to shut up every 5 minutes, I dont want suggestions about where to go next or what to next, I dont want Idle chatter about dancing with the stars, I want to be able to go back to 4th deck for the third time in a row because I forgot to talk to jack after a mission and not feel guilty about it. ME is about the story of Commander Sheppard not Commander Sheppard and his annoying sidekick who beat the game 3 days ago.

#18
TheNexus

TheNexus
  • Members
  • 565 messages

Phategod1 wrote...

No and after playing Fable III hell no. I play RPG's at a certain pace (Slow as hell) I watch every cutscene I dont want to tell someone to shut up every 5 minutes, I dont want suggestions about where to go next or what to next, I dont want Idle chatter about dancing with the stars, I want to be able to go back to 4th deck for the third time in a row because I forgot to talk to jack after a mission and not feel guilty about it. ME is about the story of Commander Sheppard not Commander Sheppard and his annoying sidekick who beat the game 3 days ago.


Also this x 5000

What's great about RPG pace is that it's YOUR pace, and that's how you can enjoy the story (which, again, is the games strongest point) to its full potential. You would never be able to do that in multiplayer. It would honestly ruin everything.

#19
Matchy Pointy

Matchy Pointy
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages
I just say: No. Feel free to do some other multplayer game in the Mass Effect universe, as lng is it don't hinder the developlment of the solo games, but playing co-op in three, with two shepards? This is your Shepard's story, I sure as hell don't want other poeple in my game ruining how my world evolves.

#20
zsom

zsom
  • Members
  • 333 messages
In one word: no.

#21
Marzillius

Marzillius
  • Members
  • 361 messages
NONONONONONO!



And BioWare has a vague deadline, they've said that ME3 will be developed in the same timeframe as ME2 was.

#22
Pacifien

Pacifien
  • Members
  • 11 527 messages
Please use the following thread to discuss anything multiplayer related about ME: Rumor: BioWare's New Mass Effect is a Multiplayer Spin-off