The evaluation of armor, it's purpose in companions' use, & it's effects in the game
#926
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 02:47
#927
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 02:49
damn
#928
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 03:00
crimzontearz wrote...
this thread is still going?
damn
What thread? I dont see any thread. This is not the thread you are looking for?
#929
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 03:01
#930
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 03:02
#931
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 03:57
But to each their own, I imagine.
#932
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 05:06
#933
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 07:44
Maria Caliban wrote...
Guys, do you know how to report posts? Because if the mods are aware that there's an image of someone defecating on a thread, they'll take it down.
I had reported both posts, it's in the moderator's hands now.
#934
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 07:45
#935
Posté 03 décembre 2010 - 09:11
David Gaider wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
Anyone else noticed that we've seen a lot of this sort of thing lately? Poster puts up something that he doesn't actually mean because it sounds more important than what he does actually mean, someone calls him on it, and the thread degenerates. The behavior seems to be associated with the DA2 skeptics. I guess because they really want to have their points noticed.
There is lip service paid to the idea by some posters that they're trying to be persuasive and actually convince others of their points, but evidence would indicate that isn't really the case.The strange part is that anyone who's paying attention knows that this not only doesn't work on Bio staff, it's counterproductive. Even I can't match Gaider when he's in full contempt mode, which is all the response that this kind of rhetoric gets you.
**FULL CONTEMPT MODE ACTIVATED**
ASSUMING DIRECT CONTROL
I knew he was a Reaper!!!





Retour en haut




