Aller au contenu

Photo

Let's hate on Eamon Guerrin.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
969 réponses à ce sujet

#776
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...


Anora's line would be hardly unrelated to the Theirins (like the queen is not decende drom William I, but related to him).

I don't think that this is true, actually. When the Orlesians came, they killed every Theirin they could. After Maric's mother died, he was the last to carry that name. There may be nobles who were too distantly related to them that the Orlesians didn't bother to kill but I think things like first cousins and the like would have been killed as well as they could claim the throne through that.

Anora is not related to ANY noble (save her father). Her father was the son of a freeholding farmer and was only promoted to the nobility for her service to Maric. Her mother was the daughter of a cabinet-maker.



Then is up to Anora's subjects/allies to help her out of the Loghain mess, not actively plot against her.

Okay, I like Anora and usually put her and Alistair on the throne together but this sounds a lot like 'If Anora is not competent enough to keep her father from stealing her throne, other people should do so for her instead of trying to provide a legitimate challenge to force Loghain to step down if not necessarily to give the formerly-helpless queen power.'

 I acknowledge that Anora was sitting on the throne but since it is required by law that each new monarch be voted on by the Landsmeet and this did not happen, I don't see 'her' rule post-Cailan's death and pre-Landsmeet as legitimate and if she did then I doubt she'd need to make a bid for the throne and would instead talk about how she is the legitimate ruler and Alistair is a usurper.

If she is not the legitimate queen, she does not have subjects and no one - least of all Eamon - has any obligation to just give her the throne because she wants it.


Ok, I meant they'd be related by marriage. Which is sketchy, but still.

The Landsmeet DID NOT vote on the monarch though; the sole casting vote is the warden's.

#777
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
They do vote and then they agree to do what whoever wins the duel says. If Alistair kills Logain, is hardened, and not engaged he takes the throne without you getting invokved. The duel is basically Alistair vs. Anora and it is only when Alistair disputes this that Anora can keep pushing her claim and you are called upon to decide

#778
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

They do vote and then they agree to do what whoever wins the duel says. If Alistair kills Logain, is hardened, and not engaged he takes the throne without you getting invokved. The duel is basically Alistair vs. Anora and it is only when Alistair disputes this that Anora can keep pushing her claim and you are called upon to decide


The warden is the one who proposes the duel. The vote is just to decide about Loghain's position. Nowhere was Alistair brought up in debate save at the end when Eamon springs his will on the whole chamber.

#779
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages
The Warden CAN propose the duel. If you don't and fight the brawl (or if you lose) then the nobles stop it and insist on you dueling as that is the proper response to someone not accepting the vote.



Eamon is proposing Alistair take the throne. You are speaking as Eamon's supporter (regardless of if you really do) and that is why you are given the floor. Loghain is proposing that Anora keep the throne. If the vote is in Loghain's favor, Anora keeps the throne (and he the regency) and he orders you hauled off to be executed right there and you're forced to fight in order to prevent this. If you win, Alistair wins the throne and if you don't like it but Alistair accepts there is nothing you can do and nobody asks for your opinion. It is only if Alistair wants it to be a little more official than 'the pro-Anora side lost the duel and the pro-Alistair side won so Alistair will be king' that it even comes up that you could pick Anora.



If the outcome of the throne wasn't decided when the Landsmeet swore to accept the outcome of the duel then why can Eamon just say Alistair is king, Alistair accept it, and everyone else goes along with it? They're not lemmings. If Alistair says that they Landsmeet didn't decide anything, Anora calls it him 'refusing the throne.' Strange way of deciding the kingship or not, they're literally having you fight for it. Whether Anora is on his side or not, Loghain is her champion and thus if you're fighting him you are considered Alistair's.

#780
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
Eventually, but I wish Eamon gave consideration to Anora, rather than just dismissing my opinion out of hand, and then still thinking I'm fully on his side.

He's considered Anora and rejected her as first choice.  Why should he change his opinion just because you disagree?  You're a punk kid and he was already an arl when Anora and Cailan were born.  I think he's had enough time and experience in Fereldan politics to make up his own mind.


I didn't say he should. I just wish he wouldn't reject it out of hand. I don't remember him giving any satisfactory reason why Anora shouldn't be queen. I wish I could really get that across in-game, but alas...

She doesn't have royal blood and is just Cailan's widow.  To him that's plenty satisfactory.  (Per RtO he also thinks she might be barren, but that doesn't come up in the regular game.)  So again, why does he have to simply agree with you?  He has his own thoughts on the matter and tries to carry them out.  In the end, he bows to the Landsmeet and even defers to a very young Warden.

Not sure what the problem is here.

#781
Eber

Eber
  • Members
  • 416 messages
I more or less hated Eamon in my first playthrough. The very idea of fetching the urn was absurd to me so he had a lot to make up for before even being brought back. He did not. Instead he started bossing me around but I can't really blame him for that either because my Warden was servile and asking for guidance. Every line seemed to suddenly read: What do you suggest? Do you think your plan will work? etc.



Still I wasn't fond of the guy. Then I came to the final boss fight and who was first to show up if not Arl Eamon (he always is). I wasn't using back up troops so he looked especially heroic when he alone stormed the Archdemon, me and my allies prefered a ranged approach to this battle.



I felt all was forgiven. This was clearly a brave and heroic man worthy of our respect! I tried hard to keep him alive but having only one healer it was not possible. He died redeemed in my eyes. Then I saw he was revived for the Coronation and standing there interactable as if he was one of my companions. The nerve! I felt cheated and wen't straight back to hating him. Do you think Eamon knows he has plotarmor in the AD fight? Is it in character for him to be there leading the fight, always ending up in the demon's mouth, or is it a game mechanic to be ignored when evaluating the character?



Image IPB


#782
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

Do you think Eamon knows he has plotarmor in the AD fight? Is it in character for him to be there leading the fight, always ending up in the demon's mouth, or is it a game mechanic to be ignored when evaluating the character?

Irving and Greagoir are the same way. I don't think any named character actually really dies in the battle no matter what happens in the fight.

#783
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages
I'm having a bit of trouble in the Landsmeet with killing Loghain AND marrying Anora AND keeping Alistair in the party. I arranged it at Eamon's place, won the Landsmeet, let Alistair kill Loghain and pick me ruling with Anora. She acts like she's queen and engaged to me, but in the codex it says Alistair is king. The wiki says it's possible but how? Off topic, but vital to my current campaign. Help would be appreciated. I've never done it this way before; Alistair was exiled last time. Also, when I tried importing to Awakening Alistair was king, so I deleted that game. He is not hardened.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 11 janvier 2011 - 10:01 .


#784
Eber

Eber
  • Members
  • 416 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...

Do you
think Eamon knows he has plotarmor in the AD fight? Is it in character for him to be there leading the fight, always ending up in the demon's mouth, or is it a game mechanic to be ignored when evaluating the character?

Irving and Greagoir are the same way. I don't think any named character actually really dies in the battle no matter what happens in the fight.


That is true. But I would expect guys like Gregoir and Kardol to be there leading their men willing to put their life on the line. I did not expect Eamon to show up and fight the archdemon so that why I was impressed and felt I should reevaluate him. But maybe I shouldn't if Eamon the character is there only because game mechanics force him to be, every faction get's one strong, named, helper (who can die but not really die).

Edit:
When I think about it not every faction get's a leader. The dalish only have Zathrian (so no helper if Lanaya is made Keeper) and the regular dwarf army gets no named character either, only the Legion has their leader present. So the Redcliffe troops could have been without a leader without breaking any absolute pattern but they are not. Eamon is there, first in line and most eager to die of them all.

Modifié par Eber, 11 janvier 2011 - 10:14 .


#785
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
Eventually, but I wish Eamon gave consideration to Anora, rather than just dismissing my opinion out of hand, and then still thinking I'm fully on his side.

He's considered Anora and rejected her as first choice.  Why should he change his opinion just because you disagree?  You're a punk kid and he was already an arl when Anora and Cailan were born.  I think he's had enough time and experience in Fereldan politics to make up his own mind.


I didn't say he should. I just wish he wouldn't reject it out of hand. I don't remember him giving any satisfactory reason why Anora shouldn't be queen. I wish I could really get that across in-game, but alas...

She doesn't have royal blood and is just Cailan's widow.  To him that's plenty satisfactory.  (Per RtO he also thinks she might be barren, but that doesn't come up in the regular game.)  So again, why does he have to simply agree with you?  He has his own thoughts on the matter and tries to carry them out.  In the end, he bows to the Landsmeet and even defers to a very young Warden.

Not sure what the problem is here.


Indeed, I have said before that Alistair's blood status is a matter of opinion, but it doesn't generally alter what I have previously said about Eamon.

#786
Graspiloot

Graspiloot
  • Members
  • 120 messages
Ehm, do these leaders only come there on pc? I play on ps3, and I have never seen any of these guys in the last fight.

#787
Eber

Eber
  • Members
  • 416 messages
I play on the PC but I think they are in the PS3 game aswell. Eamon is the only one who always shows and he can be missed (dies fast, not a very distinct appearance). You have to drag the fight out to get the others to show. If you killed the generals before going to the roof you're unlikely to see more than Eamon.

#788
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Indeed, I have said before that Alistair's blood status is a matter of opinion, but it doesn't generally alter what I have previously said about Eamon.


Matter of opinion? He's the son of the King, which means he's of royal blood. Opinion doesn't factor into it. It's the reason he can become the ruler of Ferelden. Anora's status as the daughter of a Teyrn technically makes her a noble, too, although many simply view her as a commoner because Loghain used to be a farmer's son (and even view him as a commoner because of his background, despite being made Teyrn of Gwaren, and therefore being a noble).

#789
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Indeed, I have said before that Alistair's blood status is a matter of opinion, but it doesn't generally alter what I have previously said about Eamon.

You don't believe he's Maric's son or you don't believe it should matter?

Either way, the Warden has no political standing as of game time even as a Cousland.  Eamon needs your armies, but you need his political connections or there would be no Landsmeet.  And he's been at the game a lot longer than any PC.  Don't see why he should lick your boots.  Anora's certainly going to do what she's going to do with or without you, and Eamon has his agenda as well.

#790
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Indeed, I have said before that Alistair's blood status is a matter of opinion, but it doesn't generally alter what I have previously said about Eamon.


Matter of opinion? He's the son of the King, which means he's of royal blood. Opinion doesn't factor into it. It's the reason he can become the ruler of Ferelden. Anora's status as the daughter of a Teyrn technically makes her a noble, too, although many simply view her as a commoner because Loghain used to be a farmer's son (and even view him as a commoner because of his background, despite being made Teyrn of Gwaren, and therefore being a noble).


It is my opinion that as a bastard Alistair has no reasonable claim to the throne. We can  argue about this for all time and not reach a consensus, but I reserve the right to have my own views and play the game as I see fit. My original post was not to attack Alistair's controversial blood, but to attack Eamon's demeanor pertaining to the warden and Anora, his dominating manner and his (on my part) arrogance, not to mention his treason against Anora. 

#791
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

Indeed, I have said before that Alistair's blood status is a matter of opinion, but it doesn't generally alter what I have previously said about Eamon.


Either way, the Warden has no political standing as of game time even as a Cousland.  Eamon needs your armies, but you need his political connections or there would be no Landsmeet.  And he's been at the game a lot longer than any PC.  Don't see why he should lick your boots.  Anora's certainly going to do what she's going to do with or without you, and Eamon has his agenda as well.


The warden has the opportunity to assert his/her own political agenda at the Landsmeet, and we all certainly have our own, regardless of origin or Howe seizing your Terynir; whether that coincides with Eamon's is another matter entirely. so the warden is by no means without political influence.

Where have you got the idea that I want Eamon to do what I say?

Modifié par Wereparrot, 12 janvier 2011 - 01:53 .


#792
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages
You're criticizing Eamon for pursuing his agenda, though apparently it's fine for Anora to pursue hers or the Warden to have one at odds with him? Just try telling Anora that you think the Landsmeet should give the crown to Alistair and see how well she takes that. Eamon is very supportive, even deferential, to a young Warden, while still having his own political plans. So I guess what I'm wondering is why you criticize him.

#793
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

You're criticizing Eamon for pursuing his agenda, though apparently it's fine for Anora to pursue hers or the Warden to have one at odds with him? Just try telling Anora that you think the Landsmeet should give the crown to Alistair and see how well she takes that. Eamon is very supportive, even deferential, to a young Warden, while still having his own political plans. So I guess what I'm wondering is why you criticize him.


I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly. At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet. And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair. You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern.  I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

#794
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

It is my opinion that as a bastard Alistair has no reasonable claim to the throne. We can argue about this for all time and not reach a consensus, but I reserve the right to have my own views and play the game as I see fit. My original post was not to attack Alistair's controversial blood, but to attack Eamon's demeanor pertaining to the warden and Anora, his dominating manner and his (on my part) arrogance, not to mention his treason against Anora.

I think you've missed the point slightly. Alistair does not really have a claim to the throne and neither does Anora or anyone else. Cailan has no heir. There is no one in line for the throne. Under these circumstances, candidates can make a bid for the throne and politics support them. Only two p eople have made a bid. Anora-Loghain's faction and Alistair-Eamon's faction. Half of the nobles support Anora and half support Eamon.



I really don't understand why you think it is treason for Eamon to act against Anora. She was queen while Cailan was alive because he was king and she was his wife. Cailan died and it was required that a Landsmeet be called to confirm the new monarch. It wasn't. Just because Loghain had the biggest army left (and the second biggest was Eamon's and thus not available) and insisted on acting like Anora was still queen while he was the one to really rule does not mean that Anora was legitimately the ruler. It is not in any way treason that when a monarch dies with no heir and the time comes to propose a new ruler to put forth a candidate of your own instead of supporting the wife of the previous king whose name has been used for her father's rule over the past year.



The warden has the opportunity to assert his/her own political agenda at the Landsmeet, and we all certainly have our own, regardless of origin or Howe seizing your Terynir; whether that coincides with Eamon's is another matter entirely. so the warden is by no means without political influence.

Okay, how exactly do you get the opportunity to assert your own political agenda at the Landsmeet? Are you talking about when Eamon's done with his speech and Loghain starts debating with you? I don't think that really counts since Loghain and you just take turns accusing each other of things. Is it when Alistair won't accept that winning the duel means winning the crown and Anora tries to claim that this means he doesn't want the crown and thus she should be queen and thus EAMON says that she isn't impartian and thus asks you to do something? Becuase if it is then you only have influence because Eamon gives it to you. If Eamon had asked the Grand Cleric to decide then you would have had no influence at all and no one would have cared what you wanted.



I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly.

Define 'overly hostile.' What she does is pretend that she will support you and then turn around and tell everyone at the Landsmeet that you kidnapped her and, when pressed, will admit that she never felt she was in danger from her father. It is REALLY difficult to win the Landsmeet without Anora's support.



If you did not say you'd support her by herself, with you, or with Alistair

Anora: Lords and ladies of Ferelden, hear me. This Warden has slandered and defamed Ferelden's greatest hero in a bid to put an imposter on Maric's throne.

[PC: What?!

Anora: It has become clear to me, Warden, that the true threat to this nation is you. I offered you the chance to ally with me for the good of this nation, and you refused it. I will not allow you to destroy the throne Cailan and I have held.]

[PC: He tried to kill you!

Anora: Did he? Are you certain of that? I know my father. He would never do less than his utmost for the sake of his country. But I needed to know <emp>your</emp> mind, Warden. You could have proven yourself an ally of Ferelden. It is unfortunate for all of us that you did not.]

[PC: I knew you were working with Loghain.

Anora: My father will always do what must be done for Ferelden. And it is clear to me now that you will not.]

Loghain: Who here can say that Anora is not fit to rule this land? And who can say that this Alistair is? We know nothing of him save that he <emp>may</emp> have royal blood. For five years Anora has been queen, and proven herself worthy of the Theirin name. She can lead our people through this crisis, and I can lead her armies.



How much more hostile can she get? Unlike Eamon, Anora will turn against you to support her father knowing full well that this will probably mean your death. She will put all of Ferelden at risk because she can't keep her crown.



At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet.

How did you come to this conclusion? And what's with all the accusations of treason? Obviously, Eamon has no choice but to support the Warden but that's not because otherwise he'd commit treason or because the Warden has so much power and influence. He has to support the Warden because he was the one to give the power to make a decision to the Warden. If he says that the Warden should make the call and then turns around and says they should let someone else decide if you pick Anora then it's clear that he's only looking for a yes-man.



And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair.

Can you please try to remember that the game is very limited in terms of politics? I doubt that they have ANYONE'S position fully fleshed out. They had to cut a lot of things as it is, why would they spend time getting into little things like policies that Eamon opposes?



You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern. I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

You know nothing of Anora's politics either so yes, you are forced to vote for someone who you know nothing about politically. The conversations in the tavern don't mean that Alistair would find it impossible to win these people over. They don't want to replace Anora at the moment because of the Blight and because they know nothing about him so it looks like a power grab from Eamon.



I have to say, it really seems more like you object to Eamon more out of a bruised ego than anything else.



PC: I think she would make a better ruler than Alistair.

Eamon: Anora was a capable administrator for Cailan's lands, but she has not a drop of royal blood. We did not fight the Orlesians all those years just to lose our royal line in a single generation. Not when there's a surviving son of the blood.

PC: Alistair doesn't know the first thing about being king.

Alistair: No. I don't. Which I've told both of you on many occasions. If Anora's turned against Loghain, I say let her keep the crown. It looks better on her, anyway.

Eamon: You're both wrong. With a few months of experience, Alistair will make a fine king. He knows how to lead troops to defend his land. He knows how to stand and fight for justice. He knows how to show compassion to those less fortunate, and how to trust to the Maker's guidance to know right from wrong. And he knows who to turn to for aid should that training fail him. He will be fine.



Is this where he's being dismissive and insulting your intelligence? When you think that he would be a failure as a king and he takes the time to explain to you why he wouldn't be? I'm really not seeing the brush-off at all. Or maybe here?



PC: And she's single now, right...?

Eamon: Are you thinking you might stand a chance at courtship? It would be unseemly for her to marry so soon after Cailan's death. She wouldn't take that risk unless it helps her secure the throne.



Yes, he does think it's a bad idea but he's right that in Ferelden it would look bad for her to do that only a year after Cailan died. She will marry if marrying you or Alistair gets her the throne but only if it's a requirement. I don't see Eamon as insulting you here. He's explaining that it's unlikely that she would unless it helps her get the throne.



Keeping in mind the limits of game mechanics, where did Eamon go wrong? How is he insulting you or acting like you can't have an agenda? And what do you think that he should say that would make him not so detestable (also keeping in mind that it's unreasonable to expect him to change his mind)? His position isn't that Anora would make a horrible queen, just that Alistair would also make a capable king and he's a Theirin.

#795
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Addai67 wrote...

You're criticizing Eamon for pursuing his agenda, though apparently it's fine for Anora to pursue hers or the Warden to have one at odds with him? Just try telling Anora that you think the Landsmeet should give the crown to Alistair and see how well she takes that. Eamon is very supportive, even deferential, to a young Warden, while still having his own political plans. So I guess what I'm wondering is why you criticize him.


I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly. At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet. And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair. You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern.  I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.


Except neither of them are hostile, it's simply that both of them don't waiver in their view of who should take the throne. Anora dismisses the idea of Alistair ruling as much as Eamon dismisses the idea of anyone but a person of the Theirin bloodline taking the throne. Alistair is the son of King Maric, so Eamon supports Alistair taking the throne. Both of them explain their positions to the Warden when asked, and neither of them really waiver in their convinction of who should lead Ferelden. Why would Eamon support a Cousland taking the throne when he makes it clear that he believes that someone descended from Calenhad should lead Ferelden?

#796
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...



It is my opinion that as a bastard Alistair has no reasonable claim to the throne. We can argue about this for all time and not reach a consensus, but I reserve the right to have my own views and play the game as I see fit. My original post was not to attack Alistair's controversial blood, but to attack Eamon's demeanor pertaining to the warden and Anora, his dominating manner and his (on my part) arrogance, not to mention his treason against Anora.

I think you've missed the point slightly. Alistair does not really have a claim to the throne and neither does Anora or anyone else. Cailan has no heir. There is no one in line for the throne. Under these circumstances, candidates can make a bid for the throne and politics support them. Only two p eople have made a bid. Anora-Loghain's faction and Alistair-Eamon's faction. Half of the nobles support Anora and half support Eamon.

I really don't understand why you think it is treason for Eamon to act against Anora. She was queen while Cailan was alive because he was king and she was his wife. Cailan died and it was required that a Landsmeet be called to confirm the new monarch. It wasn't. Just because Loghain had the biggest army left (and the second biggest was Eamon's and thus not available) and insisted on acting like Anora was still queen while he was the one to really rule does not mean that Anora was legitimately the ruler. It is not in any way treason that when a monarch dies with no heir and the time comes to propose a new ruler to put forth a candidate of your own instead of supporting the wife of the previous king whose name has been used for her father's rule over the past year.



The warden has the opportunity to assert his/her own political agenda at the Landsmeet, and we all certainly have our own, regardless of origin or Howe seizing your Terynir; whether that coincides with Eamon's is another matter entirely. so the warden is by no means without political influence.

Okay, how exactly do you get the opportunity to assert your own political agenda at the Landsmeet? Are you talking about when Eamon's done with his speech and Loghain starts debating with you? I don't think that really counts since Loghain and you just take turns accusing each other of things. Is it when Alistair won't accept that winning the duel means winning the crown and Anora tries to claim that this means he doesn't want the crown and thus she should be queen and thus EAMON says that she isn't impartian and thus asks you to do something? Becuase if it is then you only have influence because Eamon gives it to you. If Eamon had asked the Grand Cleric to decide then you would have had no influence at all and no one would have cared what you wanted.



I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly.

Define 'overly hostile.' What she does is pretend that she will support you and then turn around and tell everyone at the Landsmeet that you kidnapped her and, when pressed, will admit that she never felt she was in danger from her father. It is REALLY difficult to win the Landsmeet without Anora's support.

If you did not say you'd support her by herself, with you, or with Alistair
Anora: Lords and ladies of Ferelden, hear me. This Warden has slandered and defamed Ferelden's greatest hero in a bid to put an imposter on Maric's throne.
[PC: What?!
Anora: It has become clear to me, Warden, that the true threat to this nation is you. I offered you the chance to ally with me for the good of this nation, and you refused it. I will not allow you to destroy the throne Cailan and I have held.]
[PC: He tried to kill you!
Anora: Did he? Are you certain of that? I know my father. He would never do less than his utmost for the sake of his country. But I needed to know your mind, Warden. You could have proven yourself an ally of Ferelden. It is unfortunate for all of us that you did not.]
[PC: I knew you were working with Loghain.
Anora: My father will always do what must be done for Ferelden. And it is clear to me now that you will not.]
Loghain: Who here can say that Anora is not fit to rule this land? And who can say that this Alistair is? We know nothing of him save that he may have royal blood. For five years Anora has been queen, and proven herself worthy of the Theirin name. She can lead our people through this crisis, and I can lead her armies.

How much more hostile can she get? Unlike Eamon, Anora will turn against you to support her father knowing full well that this will probably mean your death. She will put all of Ferelden at risk because she can't keep her crown.



At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet.

How did you come to this conclusion? And what's with all the accusations of treason? Obviously, Eamon has no choice but to support the Warden but that's not because otherwise he'd commit treason or because the Warden has so much power and influence. He has to support the Warden because he was the one to give the power to make a decision to the Warden. If he says that the Warden should make the call and then turns around and says they should let someone else decide if you pick Anora then it's clear that he's only looking for a yes-man.



And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair.

Can you please try to remember that the game is very limited in terms of politics? I doubt that they have ANYONE'S position fully fleshed out. They had to cut a lot of things as it is, why would they spend time getting into little things like policies that Eamon opposes?



You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern. I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

You know nothing of Anora's politics either so yes, you are forced to vote for someone who you know nothing about politically. The conversations in the tavern don't mean that Alistair would find it impossible to win these people over. They don't want to replace Anora at the moment because of the Blight and because they know nothing about him so it looks like a power grab from Eamon.

I have to say, it really seems more like you object to Eamon more out of a bruised ego than anything else.

PC: I think she would make a better ruler than Alistair.
Eamon: Anora was a capable administrator for Cailan's lands, but she has not a drop of royal blood. We did not fight the Orlesians all those years just to lose our royal line in a single generation. Not when there's a surviving son of the blood.
PC: Alistair doesn't know the first thing about being king.
Alistair: No. I don't. Which I've told both of you on many occasions. If Anora's turned against Loghain, I say let her keep the crown. It looks better on her, anyway.
Eamon: You're both wrong. With a few months of experience, Alistair will make a fine king. He knows how to lead troops to defend his land. He knows how to stand and fight for justice. He knows how to show compassion to those less fortunate, and how to trust to the Maker's guidance to know right from wrong. And he knows who to turn to for aid should that training fail him. He will be fine.

Is this where he's being dismissive and insulting your intelligence? When you think that he would be a failure as a king and he takes the time to explain to you why he wouldn't be? I'm really not seeing the brush-off at all. Or maybe here?

PC: And she's single now, right...?
Eamon: Are you thinking you might stand a chance at courtship? It would be unseemly for her to marry so soon after Cailan's death. She wouldn't take that risk unless it helps her secure the throne.

Yes, he does think it's a bad idea but he's right that in Ferelden it would look bad for her to do that only a year after Cailan died. She will marry if marrying you or Alistair gets her the throne but only if it's a requirement. I don't see Eamon as insulting you here. He's explaining that it's unlikely that she would unless it helps her get the throne.

Keeping in mind the limits of game mechanics, where did Eamon go wrong? How is he insulting you or acting like you can't have an agenda? And what do you think that he should say that would make him not so detestable (also keeping in mind that it's unreasonable to expect him to change his mind)? His position isn't that Anora would make a horrible queen, just that Alistair would also make a capable king and he's a Theirin.


Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.

It is treason if Eamon starts denouncing Anora at the Landsmeet if she is allowed to keep her throne. I think you misunderstood me. Although I also regard Eamon's whole campaign as treason because I hold Anora to be the queen regnant.

I know more of Anora's politics/style of governance than Alastair's. Anora has been proven to be what Ferelden needs; Alistair's reactions if you spare Loghain portray him as exactly what Ferelden doesn't need. I may have my own political reasons to spare Loghain, at least until the Achdemon; and indeed I do, but he won't listen to reason. 

I don't like Eamon out of a bruised ego? Not really. I assume you are referring to me playing as an HN? Sure I wish there was more dialogue tailored to that specific origin, but that's Bioware's doing, not Eamon's.

As for Alistair's kingly qualities: does he show good leadership? Not really. Does he show conviction? Not until he is made king, but we need to see it before then in order to elect him. Does he know how to stand and fight for justice? Yes, but does he show the leadership qualities neccessary for this? The jury is out. Does he show good foresight and decision-making? No, or we are not led to believe so. What Eamon says is pretty much worthless. Lots of kings were good warriors; it didn't make them good kings. All of what Eamon says about trying to convince me to join Alistair's cause and ditch Anora is pointless; I will not be bullied into an opinion by anyone, and find this particularly offensive. I will be the judge.

I don't get what you're trying to say about Anora. My policy is to marry her to stabilize the kingdom, although I have let her rule on her own before. 

Modifié par Wereparrot, 12 janvier 2011 - 07:49 .


#797
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...
I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly.

Oh no, she smiles just as sweetly.  Then denounces you as a traitor and a fraud in front of the Landsmeet and stands by while her father calls for your execution.  LOL

At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet.

Uh, what?  Eamon is calling the Landsmeet.  It's Eamon who gives the floor to the Warden to mediate if there is a deadlock.  Wow... Mary Sue much?

And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair. You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern.  I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

He doesn't support it because he disagrees with it.  We're back to the idea of it being a crime simply for him to disagree and pursue his own political agenda.

#798
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.

That is your belief. There is nothing in the game at all to support the idea that Ferelden recognizes Anora has a claim based on her being related to Cailan (she is not in any way related to him!).



It is treason if Eamon starts denouncing Anora at the Landsmeet if she is allowed to keep her throne. I think you misunderstood me. Although I also regard Eamon's whole campaign as treason because I hold Anora to be the queen regnant.

But she's not. Regardless of if she should be or will be, in order to be the queen regnant she will have had to have had the Landsmeet confirm it. Loghain did not allow a Landsmeet post Cailan's death and she was Cailan's consort before then. Legally, she is not regnant until you make her it so it is not treason.



I know more of Anora's politics/style of governance than Alastair's. Anora has been proven to be what Ferelden needs; Alistair's reactions if you spare Loghain portray him as exactly what Ferelden doesn't need. I may have my own political reasons to spare Loghain, at least until the Achdemon; and indeed I do, but he won't listen to reason.

Loghain is Alistair's Berserk Button. I don't like it but his acts in that one specific situation are highly unlikely to be indicative of his reign.



don't like Eamon out of a bruised ego? Not really. I assume you are referring to me playing as an HN? Sure I wish there was more dialogue tailored to that specific origin, but that's Bioware's doing, not Eamon's.

I was actually referring more to the fact that you don't think Eamon values your advice as much as he should and the game does not allow you to have an in-depth discussion with him about Anora's policies, what he thinks Alistair's policies ought to be, and what your own plans are.



As for Alistair's kingly qualities: does he show good leadership? Not really. Does he show conviction? Not until he is made king, but we need to see it before then in order to elect him. Does he know how to stand and fight for justice? Yes, but does he show the leadership qualities neccessary for this? The jury is out. Does he show good foresight and decision-making? No, or we are not led to believe so. What Eamon says is pretty much worthless. Lots of kings were good warriors; it didn't make them good kings. All of what Eamon says about trying to convince me to join Alistair's cause and ditch Anora is pointless; I will not be bullied into an opinion by anyone.

He isn't trying to bully anyone! You and Alistair show doubt for Alistair's abilities as king. Eamon disagrees with you and tells you why. First he won't explain anything and now he's bullying you? It seems like you're reaching. You may disagree with Eamon's analysis and since you've spent more time with Alistair than Eamon you can argue that you know better on the matter than Eamon does but that just means that Eamon sees what he wants to see.



He isn't asking you to 'ditch' Anora because this is still the conversation before you can talk to Anora and she hasn't asked you for support yet. You don't know, at this point, if she even wants you on her side. You gave your opinion that Anora would be better and Eamon tells you why he disagrees. You don't have to agree but that doesn't make him explaining his position at all arrogant or bullying. His abilities on the battlefield are part of why Eamon thinks he would make a good king (especially during the Blight) but he's not saying that's all there is. If Anora is queen, she'd need someone else to do that for her and before she was using her father as that.



I don't get what you're trying to say about Anora. My policy is to marry her to stabilize the kingdom, although I have let her rule on her own before.

My point is that (regardless of if she is what is best for Ferelden or not) she is hardly willing to support you unconditionally like Eamon ends up doing. She will get her throne or she will do what she can to see Loghain crush you. You said that she didn't seem hostile and I do not know what she could have done to be any MORE hostile in that situation. Physically attack you? She's not a warrior.



Now, keep in mind that I think Anora is a better ruler than Alistair and always have the two marry (except with my HNs). That said, I don't see why Eamon disagreeing with you (and he has his reasons, several of which we know) makes him such a horrible person and I cetainly don't see where he is being dismissive of you or insulting.

#799
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly.

Oh no, she smiles just as sweetly.  Then denounces you as a traitor and a fraud in front of the Landsmeet and stands by while her father calls for your execution.  LOL

At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet.

Uh, what?  Eamon is calling the Landsmeet.  It's Eamon who gives the floor to the Warden to mediate if there is a deadlock.  Wow... Mary Sue much?

And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair. You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern.  I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

He doesn't support it because he disagrees with it.  We're back to the idea of it being a crime simply for him to disagree and pursue his own political agenda.


'dislike Eamon pushing them and Alistair into such a situation'

This. Quote: skadi_the_evil_elf

I've been saying this the whole time.

#800
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 280 messages

'dislike Eamon pushing them and Alistair into such a situation'

But what choice does Eamon have? Even if he really wanted Anora to be queen, he doesn't know if she supports her father's plans (which she claimed she did when Teagan saw her) and Loghain could feel free to ignore a challenge to step down as regent and letting Anora keep the throne but NOT a challenge to put Alistair on the throne. Loghain needs to be removed from power in order to unite Ferelden and deal with the Blight.