Aller au contenu

Photo

Let's hate on Eamon Guerrin.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
969 réponses à ce sujet

#801
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...


Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.

That is your belief. There is nothing in the game at all to support the idea that Ferelden recognizes Anora has a claim based on her being related to Cailan (she is not in any way related to him!).


It is treason if Eamon starts denouncing Anora at the Landsmeet if she is allowed to keep her throne. I think you misunderstood me. Although I also regard Eamon's whole campaign as treason because I hold Anora to be the queen regnant.

But she's not. Regardless of if she should be or will be, in order to be the queen regnant she will have had to have had the Landsmeet confirm it. Loghain did not allow a Landsmeet post Cailan's death and she was Cailan's consort before then. Legally, she is not regnant until you make her it so it is not treason.


I know more of Anora's politics/style of governance than Alastair's. Anora has been proven to be what Ferelden needs; Alistair's reactions if you spare Loghain portray him as exactly what Ferelden doesn't need. I may have my own political reasons to spare Loghain, at least until the Achdemon; and indeed I do, but he won't listen to reason.

Loghain is Alistair's Berserk Button. I don't like it but his acts in that one specific situation are highly unlikely to be indicative of his reign.


don't like Eamon out of a bruised ego? Not really. I assume you are referring to me playing as an HN? Sure I wish there was more dialogue tailored to that specific origin, but that's Bioware's doing, not Eamon's.

I was actually referring more to the fact that you don't think Eamon values your advice as much as he should and the game does not allow you to have an in-depth discussion with him about Anora's policies, what he thinks Alistair's policies ought to be, and what your own plans are.


As for Alistair's kingly qualities: does he show good leadership? Not really. Does he show conviction? Not until he is made king, but we need to see it before then in order to elect him. Does he know how to stand and fight for justice? Yes, but does he show the leadership qualities neccessary for this? The jury is out. Does he show good foresight and decision-making? No, or we are not led to believe so. What Eamon says is pretty much worthless. Lots of kings were good warriors; it didn't make them good kings. All of what Eamon says about trying to convince me to join Alistair's cause and ditch Anora is pointless; I will not be bullied into an opinion by anyone.

He isn't trying to bully anyone! You and Alistair show doubt for Alistair's abilities as king. Eamon disagrees with you and tells you why. First he won't explain anything and now he's bullying you? It seems like you're reaching. You may disagree with Eamon's analysis and since you've spent more time with Alistair than Eamon you can argue that you know better on the matter than Eamon does but that just means that Eamon sees what he wants to see.

He isn't asking you to 'ditch' Anora because this is still the conversation before you can talk to Anora and she hasn't asked you for support yet. You don't know, at this point, if she even wants you on her side. You gave your opinion that Anora would be better and Eamon tells you why he disagrees. You don't have to agree but that doesn't make him explaining his position at all arrogant or bullying. His abilities on the battlefield are part of why Eamon thinks he would make a good king (especially during the Blight) but he's not saying that's all there is. If Anora is queen, she'd need someone else to do that for her and before she was using her father as that.


I don't get what you're trying to say about Anora. My policy is to marry her to stabilize the kingdom, although I have let her rule on her own before.

My point is that (regardless of if she is what is best for Ferelden or not) she is hardly willing to support you unconditionally like Eamon ends up doing. She will get her throne or she will do what she can to see Loghain crush you. You said that she didn't seem hostile and I do not know what she could have done to be any MORE hostile in that situation. Physically attack you? She's not a warrior.

Now, keep in mind that I think Anora is a better ruler than Alistair and always have the two marry (except with my HNs). That said, I don't see why Eamon disagreeing with you (and he has his reasons, several of which we know) makes him such a horrible person and I cetainly don't see where he is being dismissive of you or insulting.


Gaider has stated before that Anora is the reigning queen. If Gaider is correct, then Eamon is a traitor.

I would prefer a more in depth discussion about politics with Eamon and to fully understand his reasoning but I understand why this not possible due development constraints, but this hardly gives me a bruised ego.

How don't you see how Eamon is dismissive? His whole manner is dismissive because of his biased attitude to Anora.

#802
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 278 messages

Gaider has stated before that Anora is the reigning queen. If Gaider is correct, then Eamon is a traitor.



I would prefer a more in depth discussion about politics with Eamon and to fully understand his reasoning but I understand why this not possible due development constraints, but this hardly gives me a bruised ego.



How don't you see how Eamon is dismissive? His whole manner is dismissive because of his biased attitude to Anora.

Does anybody actually have that quote? I know it annoyed me because it makes no sense based on what we've been told about the game (so Landsmeet to confirm rulers are optional now?). I know that it said Anora IS being deposed. She can be the ruler but not legally as Loghain's army just sort of declared that she was and then a civil war broke out. I can accept that and don't see it as treason.



The reason I said it seemed like you had a bruised was because it seemed like much of your complaints were that Eamon was dismissing you/insulting you/not taking you seriously/not valuing your advice enough, ect.



I don't see Eamon as dismissive because he just disagrees with you. What is he supposed to say? "Well, I was going to support Alistair because of my deeply held convinctions and weeks/months worth of planning but...you're right. Anora IS a better candidate! Why not support her instead?" He does make sure to be a little dismissive towards Anora herself when she indicates that she wants to keep her crown and he calls her an able administrator for Cailan's lands but he's her political opponent and she has just forced him to rescue and harbor her from the father she may or may not still support. I hardly think that that is unreasonable.

#803
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...



'dislike Eamon pushing them and Alistair into such a situation'

But what choice does Eamon have? Even if he really wanted Anora to be queen, he doesn't know if she supports her father's plans (which she claimed she did when Teagan saw her) and Loghain could feel free to ignore a challenge to step down as regent and letting Anora keep the throne but NOT a challenge to put Alistair on the throne. Loghain needs to be removed from power in order to unite Ferelden and deal with the Blight.

Exactly.  It's even in the wording.  He says "we need a challenge that Loghain cannot ignore."

@Wereparrot, I think we've had the discussion re challenging Anora being treason before already.  Even supposing it is, Loghain's actions (with Anora's support or at the very least without her actively opposing him) have put her reign in question.  Even if she is ruling queen, she has to answer to the Landsmeet, and the LM can decide to set her aside.  That's how it works in Ferelden.  No divine right of kings.

Modifié par Addai67, 12 janvier 2011 - 08:56 .


#804
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Addai67 wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...




'dislike Eamon pushing them and Alistair into such a situation'

But what choice does Eamon have? Even if he really wanted Anora to be queen, he doesn't know if she supports her father's plans (which she claimed she did when Teagan saw her) and Loghain could feel free to ignore a challenge to step down as regent and letting Anora keep the throne but NOT a challenge to put Alistair on the throne. Loghain needs to be removed from power in order to unite Ferelden and deal with the Blight.

Exactly.  It's even in the wording.  He says "we need a challenge that Loghain cannot ignore."

@Wereparrot, I think we've had the discussion re challenging Anora being treason before already.  Even supposing it is, Loghain's actions (with Anora's support or at the very least without her actively opposing him) have put her reign in question.  Even if she is ruling queen, she has to answer to the Landsmeet, and the LM can decide to set her aside.  That's how it works in Ferelden.  No divine right of kings.


We have had it before, but I think Gaider's statement is satisfactory (I think someone quoted it earlier in the thread). Fair enough if people believe otherwise.

#805
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

Wereparrot wrote...
Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.


Now maybe it's different elsewhere, but where I live if you're wife and your brother (even half-brother) are the only relatives living you're closest living relative is your (half)brother.  Your spouse, regarldess of gender, is not a relative they're a partner, similar in many ways to a business partner, they have many of the same rights and privledges as relatives (and even a few extra) but they are not related to you.  You adopt their family as relatives by law, as they adopt yours, but the two of you are not related.  Furthermore in matters of royal succession blood supercedes law (usually).  For example when King George died it was his daughter (Elizabeth) who became Queen, not his wife.  Anora is the reigning Queen because the King died and the Landsmeet has not been allowed to convene to decide on how to proceed.  I've little doubt the Landsmeet would have chosen to let Anora continue to rule had circumstances been different (no other Therin and no civil-war) but that wasn't the case.

Wereparrot wrote...
It is treason if Eamon starts denouncing Anora at the Landsmeet if she is allowed to keep her throne. I think you misunderstood me. Although I also regard Eamon's whole campaign as treason because I hold Anora to be the queen regnant.


I think Fereldan's a bit more liberal than that.  As a HN you can ask Howe about Cailan and he has few kind words to say about him.  Your father objects because it's disrespectful, not treasonous.  Eamon can say all he wants about Anora, denounce her all he wants (unless it's decided he's crossed a line but that's social propriety nothing more), so long as he doesn't act on it.  That's the impression I got anyway.

As for Anora's current position I'm still of the position that she's the reigning Queen by default until the Landsmeet can confirm a new ruler; maybe it would be her but until then she's just a default.  For example a deputy Prime Minister (in Canada) is only in charge until the governing party votes on a new leader.  This can be held off if they like what they deputy is doing until the next election (at which point the party must name the deputy as Party Leader or decide on another one), but they still have the power, at any time, to pull the deputy down.  Until the Landsmeet confirms her as Queen she's just a default, with no real right to rule, she still has the authority but not the right.

As for Eamon's treason I ask this, is a man a traitor for opposing a ruler willing to plunge the lands they rule into Civil War simply to maintain they're position?  Especially if there is an external threat of anihilation on their doorstep?  Anora is responsible, and punishable in my eyes, for the actions of her father because she did nothing to stop it.  As her regent Loghain could be dismissed, replaced by another or Anora herself, Anora did not and as such holds full responsibility for everything Loghain did (IMO).  So given what can be laid at Anora's feet, what she has allowed to happen, I don't view it as treason anymore than I would Loghain's actions at Ostagar taken on their own.

#806
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

We have had it before, but I think Gaider's statement is satisfactory (I think someone quoted it earlier in the thread). Fair enough if people believe otherwise.

As I said, even if she IS reigning queen, she can be set aside because the monarch answers to the Landsmeet.  That's the lore.  Neither you or I are free to have a different opinion because that's what the codex says.  :huh:

#807
Thalorin1919

Thalorin1919
  • Members
  • 700 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Sarah1281 wrote...




It is my opinion that as a bastard Alistair has no reasonable claim to the throne. We can argue about this for all time and not reach a consensus, but I reserve the right to have my own views and play the game as I see fit. My original post was not to attack Alistair's controversial blood, but to attack Eamon's demeanor pertaining to the warden and Anora, his dominating manner and his (on my part) arrogance, not to mention his treason against Anora.

I think you've missed the point slightly. Alistair does not really have a claim to the throne and neither does Anora or anyone else. Cailan has no heir. There is no one in line for the throne. Under these circumstances, candidates can make a bid for the throne and politics support them. Only two p eople have made a bid. Anora-Loghain's faction and Alistair-Eamon's faction. Half of the nobles support Anora and half support Eamon.

I really don't understand why you think it is treason for Eamon to act against Anora. She was queen while Cailan was alive because he was king and she was his wife. Cailan died and it was required that a Landsmeet be called to confirm the new monarch. It wasn't. Just because Loghain had the biggest army left (and the second biggest was Eamon's and thus not available) and insisted on acting like Anora was still queen while he was the one to really rule does not mean that Anora was legitimately the ruler. It is not in any way treason that when a monarch dies with no heir and the time comes to propose a new ruler to put forth a candidate of your own instead of supporting the wife of the previous king whose name has been used for her father's rule over the past year.




The warden has the opportunity to assert his/her own political agenda at the Landsmeet, and we all certainly have our own, regardless of origin or Howe seizing your Terynir; whether that coincides with Eamon's is another matter entirely. so the warden is by no means without political influence.

Okay, how exactly do you get the opportunity to assert your own political agenda at the Landsmeet? Are you talking about when Eamon's done with his speech and Loghain starts debating with you? I don't think that really counts since Loghain and you just take turns accusing each other of things. Is it when Alistair won't accept that winning the duel means winning the crown and Anora tries to claim that this means he doesn't want the crown and thus she should be queen and thus EAMON says that she isn't impartian and thus asks you to do something? Becuase if it is then you only have influence because Eamon gives it to you. If Eamon had asked the Grand Cleric to decide then you would have had no influence at all and no one would have cared what you wanted.




I don't think Anora is overly hostile if you tell her that Alistair should be king, if I remember correctly.

Define 'overly hostile.' What she does is pretend that she will support you and then turn around and tell everyone at the Landsmeet that you kidnapped her and, when pressed, will admit that she never felt she was in danger from her father. It is REALLY difficult to win the Landsmeet without Anora's support.

If you did not say you'd support her by herself, with you, or with Alistair
Anora: Lords and ladies of Ferelden, hear me. This Warden has slandered and defamed Ferelden's greatest hero in a bid to put an imposter on Maric's throne.
[PC: What?!
Anora: It has become clear to me, Warden, that the true threat to this nation is you. I offered you the chance to ally with me for the good of this nation, and you refused it. I will not allow you to destroy the throne Cailan and I have held.]
[PC: He tried to kill you!
Anora: Did he? Are you certain of that? I know my father. He would never do less than his utmost for the sake of his country. But I needed to know your mind, Warden. You could have proven yourself an ally of Ferelden. It is unfortunate for all of us that you did not.]
[PC: I knew you were working with Loghain.
Anora: My father will always do what must be done for Ferelden. And it is clear to me now that you will not.]
Loghain: Who here can say that Anora is not fit to rule this land? And who can say that this Alistair is? We know nothing of him save that he may have royal blood. For five years Anora has been queen, and proven herself worthy of the Theirin name. She can lead our people through this crisis, and I can lead her armies.

How much more hostile can she get? Unlike Eamon, Anora will turn against you to support her father knowing full well that this will probably mean your death. She will put all of Ferelden at risk because she can't keep her crown.




At the Landsmeet Eamon doesn't have any choice but to support the warden, because to do otherwise is to speak treason in front of the whole Landsmeet.

How did you come to this conclusion? And what's with all the accusations of treason? Obviously, Eamon has no choice but to support the Warden but that's not because otherwise he'd commit treason or because the Warden has so much power and influence. He has to support the Warden because he was the one to give the power to make a decision to the Warden. If he says that the Warden should make the call and then turns around and says they should let someone else decide if you pick Anora then it's clear that he's only looking for a yes-man.




And Eamon was hardly supportive when I told him Anora would be a better ruler, just sweeping my comment under the carpet without any political reason why I should support Alistair.

Can you please try to remember that the game is very limited in terms of politics? I doubt that they have ANYONE'S position fully fleshed out. They had to cut a lot of things as it is, why would they spend time getting into little things like policies that Eamon opposes?




You don't vote for someone you know nothing about politically, especialy a king who would find it hard to endear himself to the nobles anyway, going by the conversations in the tavern. I don't remember any support from Eamon regarding my agenda pre-Landsmeet, or any recognition that I even had the intelligence to possess one.

You know nothing of Anora's politics either so yes, you are forced to vote for someone who you know nothing about politically. The conversations in the tavern don't mean that Alistair would find it impossible to win these people over. They don't want to replace Anora at the moment because of the Blight and because they know nothing about him so it looks like a power grab from Eamon.

I have to say, it really seems more like you object to Eamon more out of a bruised ego than anything else.

PC: I think she would make a better ruler than Alistair.
Eamon: Anora was a capable administrator for Cailan's lands, but she has not a drop of royal blood. We did not fight the Orlesians all those years just to lose our royal line in a single generation. Not when there's a surviving son of the blood.
PC: Alistair doesn't know the first thing about being king.
Alistair: No. I don't. Which I've told both of you on many occasions. If Anora's turned against Loghain, I say let her keep the crown. It looks better on her, anyway.
Eamon: You're both wrong. With a few months of experience, Alistair will make a fine king. He knows how to lead troops to defend his land. He knows how to stand and fight for justice. He knows how to show compassion to those less fortunate, and how to trust to the Maker's guidance to know right from wrong. And he knows who to turn to for aid should that training fail him. He will be fine.

Is this where he's being dismissive and insulting your intelligence? When you think that he would be a failure as a king and he takes the time to explain to you why he wouldn't be? I'm really not seeing the brush-off at all. Or maybe here?

PC: And she's single now, right...?
Eamon: Are you thinking you might stand a chance at courtship? It would be unseemly for her to marry so soon after Cailan's death. She wouldn't take that risk unless it helps her secure the throne.

Yes, he does think it's a bad idea but he's right that in Ferelden it would look bad for her to do that only a year after Cailan died. She will marry if marrying you or Alistair gets her the throne but only if it's a requirement. I don't see Eamon as insulting you here. He's explaining that it's unlikely that she would unless it helps her get the throne.

Keeping in mind the limits of game mechanics, where did Eamon go wrong? How is he insulting you or acting like you can't have an agenda? And what do you think that he should say that would make him not so detestable (also keeping in mind that it's unreasonable to expect him to change his mind)? His position isn't that Anora would make a horrible queen, just that Alistair would also make a capable king and he's a Theirin.


Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.

It is treason if Eamon starts denouncing Anora at the Landsmeet if she is allowed to keep her throne. I think you misunderstood me. Although I also regard Eamon's whole campaign as treason because I hold Anora to be the queen regnant.

I know more of Anora's politics/style of governance than Alastair's. Anora has been proven to be what Ferelden needs; Alistair's reactions if you spare Loghain portray him as exactly what Ferelden doesn't need. I may have my own political reasons to spare Loghain, at least until the Achdemon; and indeed I do, but he won't listen to reason. 

I don't like Eamon out of a bruised ego? Not really. I assume you are referring to me playing as an HN? Sure I wish there was more dialogue tailored to that specific origin, but that's Bioware's doing, not Eamon's.

As for Alistair's kingly qualities: does he show good leadership? Not really. Does he show conviction? Not until he is made king, but we need to see it before then in order to elect him. Does he know how to stand and fight for justice? Yes, but does he show the leadership qualities neccessary for this? The jury is out. Does he show good foresight and decision-making? No, or we are not led to believe so. What Eamon says is pretty much worthless. Lots of kings were good warriors; it didn't make them good kings. All of what Eamon says about trying to convince me to join Alistair's cause and ditch Anora is pointless; I will not be bullied into an opinion by anyone, and find this particularly offensive. I will be the judge.

I don't get what you're trying to say about Anora. My policy is to marry her to stabilize the kingdom, although I have let her rule on her own before. 



How does Alistair have no claim to the throne?

As a half-brother to Cailan, and son of Maric, he has more of a claim to the throne then Anora does - who was merely Cailan's wife and the daughter of a propped up Teryn.

Also, I don't know how you could hold Eamon's campaign as treason. Anora is no regent. Loghain proclaimed himself as the regent. And thus, he took the regency by force, cause he had the biggest army. In the matter of fact, I could make a argument he held a military coup and took it by force, making it worse then what Eamon did, which was just calling a Landmeet - LIKE LOGHAIN SHOULD'VE DONE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Also, you hardly know any of Anora's policies. Other then that she is described to be like Loghain. And what is Loghain? As Alistair has sad basically - the type of person who thinks they can fix things on their own and not let anyone else help them. Honestly, look what Loghain did - left the king to die and started a civil war cause he thought he was right. And you bash Alistair? As king, he would listen to advisors before making a final decision on something, to make sure he was right or wrong.

And Alistair? I don't think you have really gotten to know him. Throughout the game, if you play as a good person, he agrees with your decisions. He will stand up for them, and say if you're doing something bad. He learns to develop into a person of his own, and gains self-confidence. Till finally, when hardened - viola! - you got a good king. When you got a bastard son who comes out and says he wants to be a good king - one that is just, fights for what he believes in, and possesses the ability to win people over and lead? And don't say he can't lead. He gives a finer speech then Anora before the battle of Denerim, and in Awakening - well, he seems to know what he's doing.

When an NFL team drafts a QB, they don't expect him to already be a leader and great player, he takes time to develop. Though not as drastic as leading a country, Alistair will take time to develop into a great king. He has all the qualities, and as Eamon said, with help of others - he will have experience and develop. I would be willing to take a chance on him any day over a person like Anora.

#808
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 278 messages

He gives a finer speech then Anora before the battle of Denerim, and in Awakening - well, he seems to know what he's doing.

...You do realize that they give the exact same speech, right. I don't think it's fair to say that Alistair is a better king than Anora is queen because he has a better shouting voice.

Edit: And what is with all this 'Anora has a claim and Alistair doesn't' and 'No, Alistair has a claim and Anora doesn't!' It is complete bull. They have about equal claim (they both aren't heirs but have a sizeable political backing) which is the whole point. If Anora had the right to rule and Alistair didn't or vice versa then the Landsmeet would just tell the unqualified candidate that they were SOLD and crown their legitimate ruler.

Modifié par Sarah1281, 13 janvier 2011 - 02:54 .


#809
Thalorin1919

Thalorin1919
  • Members
  • 700 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...


He gives a finer speech then Anora before the battle of Denerim, and in Awakening - well, he seems to know what he's doing.

...You do realize that they give the exact same speech, right. I don't think it's fair to say that Alistair is a better king than Anora is queen because he has a better shouting voice.


Leadership qualities man.

Which one would you follow more?

And yes, it is very narrow-minded.

#810
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 278 messages
Anora wouldn't usually be riding into battle with her troops (and for that matter, I doubt Alistair would either). That's what generals are for, it's just that Loghain is dead/disgraced and it's Denerim itself under attack. Anora's voice is fine for speeches, just not yelling.

#811
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...
Alistair has no claim. Anora's claim is that she is the closest living relative of Cailin.


Now maybe it's different elsewhere, but where I live if you're wife and your brother (even half-brother) are the only relatives living you're closest living relative is your (half)brother.  Your spouse, regarldess of gender, is not a relative they're a partner, similar in many ways to a business partner, they have many of the same rights and privledges as relatives (and even a few extra) but they are not related to you.  You adopt their family as relatives by law, as they adopt yours, but the two of you are not related.  Furthermore in matters of royal succession blood supercedes law (usually).  For example when King George died it was his daughter (Elizabeth) who became Queen, not his wife.  Anora is the reigning Queen because the King died and the Landsmeet has not been allowed to convene to decide on how to proceed.  I've little doubt the Landsmeet would have chosen to let Anora continue to rule had circumstances been different (no other Therin and no civil-war) but that wasn't the case.


My point is that Anora is the only living relative of any kind eligible to the throne. I do not recognise Alistair due to his illegitimacy. Therefore what I have said stands as my opinion. Note that it's my opinion (although based on constitution).

If you must bring history into this, may I point out that the throne may only be inherited by legitimate heirs of Sophia of Hanover. Legitimacy has always been a factor in the succession to the throne, although admittedly not all heirs' legitimacy has been without question.

#812
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Thalorin1919 wrote...

How does Alistair have no claim to the throne?


I keep saying. See countless of my previous posts.

#813
ejoslin

ejoslin
  • Members
  • 11 745 messages
Hmmm, while Alistair is illegitimate and normally would not be a contender for the throne, he IS the last surviving of the Theirin bloodline, and this is important to some of the nobles. They want an actual blood descendant on the throne, not the wife of one.

While some of Loghain's dialog is suspect as Alistair's age changed between the beginning of writing dialog and the final product (from 32 to 21), Loghain does mention that if Maric had openly acknowledged Alistair, Calin's right to the throne would have been threatened(this was probably written when Alistair was still going to be 32 and therefore older than Cailin). Anyway, my point there is, if illegitimacy were that big an issue in Ferelden, Alistair would not have been a threat.

*Grin* I know this post is confusing. I need more coffee.

Modifié par ejoslin, 13 janvier 2011 - 12:38 .


#814
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

[
As for Eamon's treason I ask this, is a man a traitor for opposing a ruler willing to plunge the lands they rule into Civil War simply to maintain they're position?  Especially if there is an external threat of anihilation on their doorstep?  Anora is responsible, and punishable in my eyes, for the actions of her father because she did nothing to stop it.  As her regent Loghain could be dismissed, replaced by another or Anora herself, Anora did not and as such holds full responsibility for everything Loghain did (IMO).  So given what can be laid at Anora's feet, what she has allowed to happen, I don't view it as treason anymore than I would Loghain's actions at Ostagar taken on their own.


All rebellions are treason by their very nature. The English Civil War, the Glorious Revolution: both rebellions against undesirable kings, but nevertheless treason. Anora is, however, not an undesirable queen, which is why I believe the rebellion should have centred around Loghain entirely.

How do you hold Anora responsible for Loghain's actions? That's like holding Edward III responsible for Roger Mortimer. Edward, despite being king, was in no position to overide Mortimer (although he eventually did), and Anora is in no position to overide Loghain.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 13 janvier 2011 - 12:54 .


#815
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
Wereparrot,



What you say about legitamacy is normally true at least in the Anglo-Saxon and German Royal traditions, but it's not always the case. I remind you that the first of the Tudor Kings (IIRC King Henry VII) was granted the throne by parliament because he showed he had *illegitament* Lancester blood and was the last of the Yorks and Lancesters available (and it didn't hurt that he had a large army to back his claim either).



-Polaris

#816
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Wereparrot,

What you say about legitamacy is normally true at least in the Anglo-Saxon and German Royal traditions, but it's not always the case. I remind you that the first of the Tudor Kings (IIRC King Henry VII) was granted the throne by parliament because he showed he had *illegitament* Lancester blood and was the last of the Yorks and Lancesters available (and it didn't hurt that he had a large army to back his claim either).

-Polaris


Hence what I said about some claims of legitimacy being controversial. Henry VII's ancestor, John Beaufort, was a bastard of John of Gaunt, but Beaufort was legitimised by the pope following John of Gaunt's marriage to Katherine Swynford. England, still a Catholic country, had to accept. Also, Henry VII userped Richard III, so he is not a good example. William the Bastard/Conqueror was also a userper, although William himself would have us believe that he had been promised the kingdom by Edward the Confessor; but this is obviously to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Essentialy, though there have been discrepencies at times, the rule has remained since the foundation of the kingdom. It's why Richard I's brother Geoffrey (older) was never king.

Also, what you said about German royal tradition is not wholly true. The Holy Roman Empire incorporated Bavaria, and the Holy Roman Emperor was elected.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 13 janvier 2011 - 02:28 .


#817
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Also, what you said about German royal tradition is not wholly true. The Holy Roman Empire incorporated Bavaria, and the Holy Roman Emperor was elected.


Yes, but to be an elector you had to be hoch-adel.  The HRE wasn't really an inherited royal title but rather a sinecure much like the Pope.   I was really refering to rules of German inhertance, but your notation of the HRE is noted.  Also not only was Bavaria an elector to the HRE, but IIRC Saxony was too (talking about German Traditions).

My point was that Candidates to the throne could be "legitimised' at least in the English tradition, and Parliament (at least after the Magna Carta and certainly after the Glorious Restoration) was and remains the first and last word as to who can and can not be crowned.

Getting back to the game, the Landsmeet holds the same power (near as I can tell) as Parliament and thus reflects the first and last word as to who can and can not be King (or Queen).  Obviously Fereldan puts less stock in legitimacy than RL England or European countries do (or did).

As for treason, near as I can tell, Arl Eamon under the circumstances had the uncontested right to call a landsmeet and if you talk with Ser Bryant and others, Anora's rise to ruling Queen was very contraversial especially without a Landsmeet (and people were wondering where Eamon was).  So I don't think you can call Arl Eamon a traitor and certianly not if he wins the vote!

-Polaris

#818
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

My point is that Anora is the only living relative of any kind eligible to the throne. I do not recognise Alistair due to his illegitimacy. Therefore what I have said stands as my opinion. Note that it's my opinion (although based on constitution).


Technically, you could argue that the Drydens are also descendants of Calenhad, since Sophia Dryden was a contender for the throne of Ferelden, and Gaider has admitted that there are other relatives who are still alive.

#819
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
In many Feudal countries the Kings were elected by a council. And of the possible candidates, little else than royal blood was actually required. Anora does not have any (as mentioned) and therefore loses her claim to the throne with the death of Cailen, having been queen during his reign does not give her any claim, no matter how much of a political backing she have. She can, however, get the throne, just not through traditional claims.

#820
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Wereparrot wrote...

My point is that Anora is the only living relative of any kind eligible to the throne. I do not recognise Alistair due to his illegitimacy. Therefore what I have said stands as my opinion. Note that it's my opinion (although based on constitution).


Technically, you could argue that the Drydens are also descendants of Calenhad, since Sophia Dryden was a contender for the throne of Ferelden, and Gaider has admitted that there are other relatives who are still alive.


Then if Alistair is no true heir and there are closer crown relatives than Anora then the whole story is a farce.

Modifié par Wereparrot, 13 janvier 2011 - 04:17 .


#821
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

In many Feudal countries the Kings were elected by a council. And of the possible candidates, little else than royal blood was actually required. Anora does not have any (as mentioned) and therefore loses her claim to the throne with the death of Cailan, having been queen during his reign does not give her any claim, no matter how much of a political backing she have. She can, however, get the throne, just not through traditional claims.


Ferelden is a pretty young nation, and it seems that all of the prior Kings have been descended directly from Calenhad, so it stands to reason that Anora would be the first reigning Queen not to be of the Theirin bloodline should the Warden select her as the new ruler. I know a few people have commented that Anora isn't a noble, which is also echoed by some of the rumors and heresay in the game, but Anora is a noble. Technically, she is the Teyrn's daughter, so that makes her noble. Unless the Warden specifically asks for the teyrnir of Gwaren, there's nothing in the way of Anora being recognized as the new Teyrn of Gwaren once Loghain loses all of his rights to it. As there are only two Teyrns in Ferelden, and one of them is dead, Anora is one of the most powerful members of the nobility. She's well-liked by many of the nobles, and even persuading them to the Warden's side is more about siding against Loghain than anything else.

#822
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

In many Feudal countries the Kings were elected by a council. And of the possible candidates, little else than royal blood was actually required. Anora does not have any (as mentioned) and therefore loses her claim to the throne with the death of Cailen, having been queen during his reign does not give her any claim, no matter how much of a political backing she have. She can, however, get the throne, just not through traditional claims.


I base my arguments on the English system, which is hereditary and subject to legitimacy.

#823
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Wereparrot wrote...

Then if Alistair is no true heir and there are closer crown relatives than Anora then the whole story is a farce.


The lack of prominence for the relatives could imply that they could be distant cousins, since Gaider mentioned them during a discussion of whether Alistair and Anora's potential inability to have children could mean the end of the Theirin bloodline. As for the Drydens, until the Warden becomes the Hero of Ferelden and reveals what really happens at Warden's Keep, the Drydens still have to contend with the bad association their name has because of the smear campaign against Sophia Dryden. (Awakening directly mentions that the Warden revealed the true story at the Keep). Given their ties to the Warden during the civil war and the Blight, it's possible the Drydens could be heirs to the throne once Sophia's name is cleared.

#824
Sarah1281

Sarah1281
  • Members
  • 15 278 messages

Technically, she is the Teyrn's daughter, so that makes her noble. Unless the Warden specifically asks for the teyrnir of Gwaren, there's nothing in the way of Anora being recognized as the new Teyrn of Gwaren once Loghain loses all of his rights to it. As there are only two Teyrns in Ferelden, and one of them is dead, Anora is one of the most powerful members of the nobility. She's well-liked by many of the nobles, and even persuading them to the Warden's side is more about siding against Loghain than anything else.

Well...except her refusal to swear fealty to Alistair. He's not stupid enough to make someone who won't acknowledge him as king and who openly wants the throne herself one of the most powerful nobles around.



The lack of prominence for the relatives could imply that they could be distant cousins, since Gaider mentioned them during a discussion of whether Alistair and Anora's potential inability to have children could mean the end of the Theirin bloodline.

I imagine that all those carrying the Theirin name were killed by the Orlesians save Maric's direct ancestors but they could still have relatives that married into, say, the Brylands.

#825
Wereparrot

Wereparrot
  • Members
  • 806 messages

Sarah1281 wrote...



The lack of prominence for the relatives could imply that they could be distant cousins, since Gaider mentioned them during a discussion of whether Alistair and Anora's potential inability to have children could mean the end of the Theirin bloodline.

I imagine that all those carrying the Theirin name were killed by the Orlesians save Maric's direct ancestors but they could still have relatives that married into, say, the Brylands.


Or any other noble family for that matter. I would suggest that since kings normally give their relatives the highest positions that the Cousland Warden may be more illegible to the throne than anyone else in-game.