91 réponses à ce sujet

[Busomjack]

The gun is useless if the bullet can't hit it's target. I can trace even the most minimal of movements up to the tremor of my opponent's gun wielding hand as he sees me draw my blade. The gun is predictable, the bullet will always fly forward wherever the gun is pointing and so I can deflect any bullet which is fired at me. So long as guns continue to have this limitation then the sword will always be superior to the gun in the hands of a true master.

[ObserverStatus]

Ok, i know you don't want to discuss this, but is it the "turning swallow cut" that you've mastered?

[Busomjack]

bobobo878 wrote...

Ok, i know you don't want to discuss this, but is it the "turning swallow cut" that you've mastered?

If you want to discuss this further, take it to PM.

[KillaKow]

Busomjack wrote...

The gun is useless if the bullet can't hit it's target. I can trace even the most minimal of movements up to the tremor of my opponent's gun wielding hand as he sees me draw my blade. The gun is predictable, the bullet will always fly forward wherever the gun is pointing and so I can deflect any bullet which is fired at me. So long as guns continue to have this limitation then the sword will always be superior to the gun in the hands of a true master.

Deflect any bullet that's been fired at you? You do realize
that bullets travel at over 700mph and break the sound barrier right? That is dozens
of times faster than you can move your hand/sword. Also anyone with any kind of
experience with a firearm won't "tremble" when they see someone draw
a sword because they are fully aware of this.

And if that's not enough, bullets can be fired in rapid succession. Two or more
tiny metal objects traveling over 700mph fired within a half second of each
other all traveling on different trajectories? Yeah, let’s see you block that.

Modifié par KillaKow, 02 décembre 2010 - 03:33 .

[Busomjack]

It's not about how fast the bullet can move, it's about the aim of my opponent's gun. A bullet's velocity can only travel straight from the barrel it's fired from and so long as my reflexes can match that of my opponent's then the blade's path will never leave the trail of the bullet.

[KillaKow]

Busomjack wrote...

It's not about how fast the bullet can move, it's about the aim of my opponent's gun. A bullet's velocity can only travel straight from the barrel it's fired from and so long as my reflexes can match that of my opponent's then the blade's path will never leave the trail of the bullet.

That's not actually true. All firearms have a spread of some sort, and bullets do not travel along a perfectly straight line. So while you could in theory do that for a semiautomatic weapon, it wouldn't work in the case of an automatic weapon, or a shotgun.

And note I said in theory. Tracking the barrel of a gun exactly against someone who is moving both themselves and their aim, while you yourself are moving... and you have to have that matched up every half second or less when they fire... well now if you could pull that off and come out alive I'd be truly impressed.

Edit: Oh, and you have to factor in distance, which makes tracking their movements that much harder.

Modifié par KillaKow, 02 décembre 2010 - 04:06 .

[Busomjack]

Please, I'm not an apprentice. All of my techniques are incorporated to take into consideration such outliers such as distance and gunfire spread.

[KillaKow]

Busomjack wrote...

Please, I'm not an apprentice. All of my techniques are incorporated to take into consideration such outliers such as distance and gunfire spread.

Well, you at least sound like you know what you're talking about. Since there's no way to prove that you are in fact able to do what you say you can, this seems like a good place to end this little (and massively off topic) debate.

Good day to you sir.

[Sajuro]

Busomjack wrote...

Please, I'm not an apprentice. All of my techniques are incorporated to take into consideration such outliers such as distance and gunfire spread.

What about the fact that guns can fire more than one bullet before reloading? What about a musket? that will mess you up big time. Do you use the dull end or cut it in half and get hit two times? and what if there are multiple people, or a rhino, how would your sword play go against an angry rhino?

[Computer_God91]

Crimmsonwind wrote...

Computer_God91 wrote...

Mash Mashington wrote...

As soon as i saw the "scrogging"word i thought of Busomjack

As did I, which instantly reminded me of our last riveting discussion about how he hates Liara, which reminds me that I hate this guy and he's damn stupid. Pay no attention to this guy.

I sometimes wonder why the mods allow him to continue existing...

I was thinking the exact same thing. You'd think after this guy tried to threaten me with murder they'd do something. apparently the mods have been a bit lazy

Busomjack wrote...

I don't like her personality either. She reminds me of this really nerdy fat girl who tried to sexually assault me back in college.
She would always prattle non-stop about geeky stuff and then out of nowhere she would be like "oh yeah, please scrog me!" thinking that just because I humored her out of pity means I am in anyway attracted to her.

Man, I need to hit the weights.

What's this I smell? The forty year old virgin trying to act tough, good luck pal. Your just a juice monkey who gets a stiff messing with people on the forums because you have nothing better to do.

[Computer_God91]

Busomjack wrote...

The gun is useless if the bullet can't hit it's target. I can trace even the most minimal of movements up to the tremor of my opponent's gun wielding hand as he sees me draw my blade. The gun is predictable, the bullet will always fly forward wherever the gun is pointing and so I can deflect any bullet which is fired at me. So long as guns continue to have this limitation then the sword will always be superior to the gun in the hands of a true master.

P.S. if the shooter is 200 meters away and has you in the scope of his rifle while dressed in a ghillie suit in some brush, you will not do a damn thing to him if you even see him from such a distance.

On a side note shouldn't this guy be in a loon bin somewhere...

One more thing it is impossible to dodge and or deflect a bullet which is fired at you. You will take that bullet right in the teeth unless you have super human abilties which I'll guarantee you do not. The only possible way that you wont be hit when that weapon fires is if you are not in its path prior to it going off. If its fired while your in its path its a done deal, lights out for you, but please don't let my cold hard facts stop you from arguing your madness. Please go on.

Modifié par Computer_God91, 02 décembre 2010 - 06:19 .

[Soahfreako]

OF COURSE you're in this thread CG91 OF COURSE you are. XD Jebus, you are so predictable.

[Computer_God91]

Soahfreako wrote...

OF COURSE you're in this thread CG91 OF COURSE you are. XD Jebus, you are so predictable.

Of course you come in and make a retarded comment, of course. Now who is predictable?

The way I see it, this is round 2.

[Funkcase]

Why hasn't this thread been locked yet?

[Pacifien]

Funkcase wrote...
Why hasn't this thread been locked yet?

Because you have to report the thread to a moderator first.