Bah. I can never pull off reverse psychology.David Gaider wrote...
SirOccam wrote...
Hey, so, um...whatever you do, DON'T tell us anything new or interesting about Meg. Grrrr and so forth. That would cause lots and lots of rage, I'm sure. So...definitely don't do that.
Okay.
Hellooo sexy elf-man, who are *you*? (You are Fenris! Hooray for you!)
#1026
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:25
#1027
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:26
SirOccam wrote...
Bah. I can never pull off reverse psychology.David Gaider wrote...
SirOccam wrote...
Hey, so, um...whatever you do, DON'T tell us anything new or interesting about Meg. Grrrr and so forth. That would cause lots and lots of rage, I'm sure. So...definitely don't do that.
Okay.
No, it was quite good. But Mr. Gaider is immune, and also used it against you. He's just that good.
#1028
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:32
#1029
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:33
sethroskull79 wrote...
NPC as in Non Playable Character right? Sorry for my ignorance but NPC to me means characters in the game that play a vital role, but you do not get to control or play as them in your party. Is that what Varric and MEG are? Or does NPC in this thread refer to any character other than Hawke?
NPC in all games refers to every character, other than ones you have direct control of.
Modifié par Nerivant, 02 décembre 2010 - 05:34 .
#1030
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:35
Bioware: This is our newest character! His name is Elt-
Fans: Can we hump it?
Modifié par thegreateski, 02 décembre 2010 - 05:35 .
#1031
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:35
Usually NPC applies to any character other than the one you created. But this thread is nothing but maddness anyway, so who knows.sethroskull79 wrote...
Or does NPC in this thread refer to any character other than Hawke?
#1032
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:35
#1033
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:37
Maria Caliban wrote...
I consider companions/followers to be a special type of NPC.
How so?
I just think of them as alternate playable characters if I can control them, NPC's if I can't.
You just think of them as a grey area in between?
#1034
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:37
Sorry, got caught up in it all. Cant believe what a monster of a thread this is already, the dudes already got fanart
#1035
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:38
Guest_Blasto the jelly_*
So Bioware can we?thegreateski wrote...
Oh god, here we go.
Bioware: This is our newest character! His name is Elt-
Fans: Can we hump it?
#1036
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:38
Modifié par aimo_ahmed, 02 décembre 2010 - 05:38 .
#1037
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:39
#1038
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:50
thegreateski wrote...
Oh god, here we go.
Bioware: This is our newest character! His name is Elt-
Fans: Can we hump it?
their fault if they designed him to look humpable :innocent:
Modifié par Maferath, 02 décembre 2010 - 05:50 .
#1039
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:51
Modifié par thegreateski, 02 décembre 2010 - 05:51 .
#1040
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:54
#1041
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:54
Maferath wrote...
their fault if they designed him to look humpable :innocent:
If they designed him to look like a leper in a plastic smock someone would want to.
#1042
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:56
#1043
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 05:56
sethroskull79 wrote...
I could care less about the romance part with MEG. Just as long as he is not as beat and useless as Zevran.
Couldn't care less...
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 02 décembre 2010 - 06:18 .
#1044
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:01
#1045
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:04
#1046
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:04
#1047
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:07
Spartansfan8888 wrote...
Actually he's probably a Dalish elf mage just because they said he wasn't. Remember when Isabela was first seen and people thought she was Isabela the devs were all like "C'mon guys not every pirate woman has to be Isabela" and then they were like "It's Isabela." They're tricky like that....
they didn't outright say she wasn't isabela, just that not every pirate woman has to be isabela.
on this case though...david gaider was very explicit on him not being a dalish or a mage.
#1048
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:07
That is because it is a win either way for them. If they ruin our dreams by giving information, it will cause sweet fanrage and tears of anguish. If they don't tell us anything, it still causes fanrage and tears of frustration (which are also very sweet). YOU CANNOT WINSirOccam wrote...
Bah. I can never pull off reverse psychology.David Gaider wrote...
SirOccam wrote...
Hey, so, um...whatever you do, DON'T tell us anything new or interesting about Meg. Grrrr and so forth. That would cause lots and lots of rage, I'm sure. So...definitely don't do that.
Okay.
#1049
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:09
Winter Wraith wrote...
Maferath wrote...
their fault if they designed him to look humpable :innocent:
If they designed him to look like a leper in a plastic smock someone would want to.
It's a good thing he has scars. Chicks dig scars.
#1050
Posté 02 décembre 2010 - 06:11
nightcobra8928 wrote...
Spartansfan8888 wrote...
Actually he's probably a Dalish elf mage just because they said he wasn't. Remember when Isabela was first seen and people thought she was Isabela the devs were all like "C'mon guys not every pirate woman has to be Isabela" and then they were like "It's Isabela." They're tricky like that....
they didn't outright say she wasn't isabela, just that not every pirate woman has to be isabela.
on this case though...david gaider was very explicit on him not being a dalish or a mage.
True... so it could technically still be Pol, the city elf runaway who joined the Warden's clan. He's not technically Dalish right?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




