GodWood wrote...
When you have been exposed to hentai you can never look at some things the same way again.
This pokemon
Cannot look at the same way ever again.
Hellooo sexy elf-man, who are *you*? (You are Fenris! Hooray for you!)
#1776
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:40
#1777
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:42
#1778
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:42
#1779
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:43
#1780
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:44
#1781
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:45
Anarya wrote...
But this is not an anime thread. Rerail please.
To what? Elf guy we know nothing about is so very * insert fantasy here*
#1782
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:45
leonia42 wrote...
So what are the going theories on MEG's lack of footwear?
Elves don't like shoes - they prefer to be in touch with nature?
#1783
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:46
He's an acrobat.leonia42 wrote...
So what are the going theories on MEG's lack of footwear?
#1784
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:46
#1785
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:46
leonia42 wrote...
So what are the going theories on MEG's lack of footwear?
He possesses the only invisible shoes in Thedas, of course.
#1786
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:48
#1787
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:48
Atakuma wrote...
He's an acrobat.leonia42 wrote...
So what are the going theories on MEG's lack of footwear?
I sort of picture all elves have the inherent ablities of a twyla tharp dancer.
#1788
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:48
slimgrin wrote...
Anarya wrote...
But this is not an anime thread. Rerail please.
To what? Elf guy we know nothing about is so very * insert fantasy here*
Well let's see, to talking about elf guy and not how much anime sucks/rules?
#1789
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:49
#1790
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:50
The Dream of a Fisherman's Wife (NSFW) was painted in 1814, so yeah its pretty old.Anarya wrote...
The tentacle thing predates anime. The more you know!
Anyways OT, I do think he looks better with the blue black hair.
#1791
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:51
slimgrin wrote...
To what? Elf guy we know nothing about is so very * insert fantasy here*
There are so very many things to speculate about dear Meg. Why his hair is white and whether it'll stay that way, what the tattoos mean, his background, what weapons he uses, what the feathers mean, why he's barefoot, what accent you think will suit him, what assumptions you make about his personality from the picture, whether he'll be a companion, a villain or a Tower Guard, what he feeds his Derpicorn, whether he glows in other areas besides neck, arms and feet...
#1792
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:51
Anarya wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
Anarya wrote...
But this is not an anime thread. Rerail please.
To what? Elf guy we know nothing about is so very * insert fantasy here*
Well let's see, to talking about elf guy and not how much anime sucks/rules?
Alright I'm sorry. Let nature take its course here.
#1793
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:53
TJPags wrote...
pizoxuat wrote...
Considering the wide array of art styles used in anime, saying something "seems anime" is pretty meaningless. Do you mean Berserk, Lupin the Third, Gankutsuou, One Piece, Pita-Ten, Star Blazers? Because I don't really see Meg fitting into any of those.
I have no idea what any of those are. Nor do I care.
Basically, I don't know much about anime - I do know that every piece of 'art' - by which I mean, pictures - which have been described to me as 'anime' are things I don't like, for various reasons.
So, Meg may not fit into your definition of a particular anime style. And you may not care if it did. But for me, I'll retreat to a paraphrase of the US Supreme Court's comment on pornography - I may not be able to tell you what anime is, but I know it when I see it.
And when I see it, I invariably don't like it.
I see it in Meg - or influences of it, at least. And I don't care for it. And that's nothing other than my personal opinion of that particular picture of Meg.
As long as you understand that saying "It's too anime, I don't like it" doesn't actually mean anything to anyone other than you. If you say "I don't like it because his proportions seem off, especially the length of his legs in comparison to his torso" then we have an idea what you are objecting to. "I don't like the way the artist inked the hair," means something, "I wish there was more detail in his facial features," means something. "It's anime" doesn't mean anything.
#1794
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:54
Well, DA elves are known to be poor. Maybe they have just one pair for the whole family and his brother is wearing it this week.leonia42 wrote...
So what are the going theories on MEG's lack of footwear?
#1795
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 03:57
pizoxuat wrote...
TJPags wrote...
pizoxuat wrote...
Considering the wide array of art styles used in anime, saying something "seems anime" is pretty meaningless. Do you mean Berserk, Lupin the Third, Gankutsuou, One Piece, Pita-Ten, Star Blazers? Because I don't really see Meg fitting into any of those.
I have no idea what any of those are. Nor do I care.
Basically, I don't know much about anime - I do know that every piece of 'art' - by which I mean, pictures - which have been described to me as 'anime' are things I don't like, for various reasons.
So, Meg may not fit into your definition of a particular anime style. And you may not care if it did. But for me, I'll retreat to a paraphrase of the US Supreme Court's comment on pornography - I may not be able to tell you what anime is, but I know it when I see it.
And when I see it, I invariably don't like it.
I see it in Meg - or influences of it, at least. And I don't care for it. And that's nothing other than my personal opinion of that particular picture of Meg.
As long as you understand that saying "It's too anime, I don't like it" doesn't actually mean anything to anyone other than you. If you say "I don't like it because his proportions seem off, especially the length of his legs in comparison to his torso" then we have an idea what you are objecting to. "I don't like the way the artist inked the hair," means something, "I wish there was more detail in his facial features," means something. "It's anime" doesn't mean anything.
I never claimed to be spaking for anyone other than myself. That said, I did mention it was a combination of the hair, the pose, and the body proportions that led me to that opinion.
However, as has been pointed out, this thread is about Meg, not about what is or is not anime, or whether anime is good or bad. I certainly never meant to spark that debate, although I suppose I should have known better.
So - Meg . . .glowing tattoos . . .why do they glow?
#1796
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 04:03
TJPags wrote...
So - Meg . . .glowing tattoos . . .why do they glow?
It's the sexiness shining through. That glow is what raw sexiness looks like.
Fact.
#1797
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 04:05
PoisonTheCity wrote...
TJPags wrote...
So - Meg . . .glowing tattoos . . .why do they glow?
It's the sexiness shining through. That glow is what raw sexiness looks like.
Fact.
Possible.
Or . . . it could be lyrium related . . . . maybe Meg is made of Lyrium . . . . .
#1798
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 04:06
PoisonTheCity wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
To what? Elf guy we know nothing about is so very * insert fantasy here*
There are so very many things to speculate about dear Meg. Why his hair is white and whether it'll stay that way, what the tattoos mean, his background, what weapons he uses, what the feathers mean, why he's barefoot, what accent you think will suit him, what assumptions you make about his personality from the picture, whether he'll be a companion, a villain or a Tower Guard, what he feeds his Derpicorn, whether he glows in other areas besides neck, arms and feet...
...
I like you too.
#1799
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 04:08
Here's hoping the in-game creation is better put together because he's quite intriquing.
#1800
Posté 04 décembre 2010 - 04:11
They're most likely veins.
Compare to reference: bicep foot
Modifié par Pseudocognition, 04 décembre 2010 - 04:12 .




Ce sujet est fermé

Retour en haut




