IanPolaris wrote...
It's not valid for one very important reason which somehow gets neglected here. Sure Loghain's men could have tailed the Warden (but they should have answered to Howe since Howe was Loghain's spymaster). However, those men have absolutely no way to know that you actually killed Arl Howe!
And...Anora not only knows this (even though she was nowhere near your Warden when you did) she also managed to, in a short space of time, escape, or send Erlina, to inform Cauthrien that you have just killed Howe...all in the space of the few minutes it takes you to get from the dungeon to Anora's room...and be back in time for you to release her? Really?
I thought the codexes state there's no such thing as teleportation magic? Somebody better inform the circle...the queen is the most epicest mage in da world!

This is where this hypothesis completely fails. Ser Cauthrien comes in specifically arresting the Warden for the Murder of Arl Howe. There is absolutely no way (since this was a last minute change of plans that any would-be tail couldn't possibly know) that Ser Cauthrien could have been told this UNLESS that information came from Anora.
Lol. Yeah. The epic mage queen who teleports from her room, across the city, and teleports them all back in the space of a few minutes. Lol.
Because, of course, ser Cauthrien is a complete idiot who can't put two and two together. That Loghain's spies, upon seeing the Warden sneak into Howe's state, thought the Warden was going there for tea and biscuits, and NOT to attack Loghain's most powerful ally. Yeah.
This isn't a matter of fantacism or an unwillingness to see the other side. I've seen it. I've rejected it as impossible as should the rest of you...not because you like or dislike Anora but because there is no other explaination that fits ALL the facts the game presents.
-Polaris
Or perhaps...because you dislike Loghain and Anora, have formed a theory that fits YOUR view of what was in the game? And then you call them "facts", even though it's all theory based on minute pieces of incredibly disjointed and ambigious information. You base your theory on a single statement in game taken at absolute face value.
No, sorry, all the "facts" point to incomplete writing. You do realize that developers and writers are not infalliable gods when it comes to continuity and total logic, right?