What is this wrote...
Tiax Rules All wrote...
Longer is better..
Its all about the length
"Length doesnt matter" is something that short games say to make themselves feel better.
Lol "length dosen't matter"
That's what Allistar says
Guest_simfamUP_*
rab****annel wrote...
DA:O didn't really have insane replayability. Yes, you could make different in-game choices and see where that went, so story-wise, yeah. Game play however... If you play the first time with a balanced party, you've pretty much covered what it would be like to be a mage/rogue/warrior. This is because there is no distinction between companions. The only unique characters would be Shale, Dog, and to a lesser extent, Sten (for having 1 spec). The 2nd time around you would have covered the alternative builds/specs. They took out companion uniqueness. What makes Morrigan and Alistair different from a Mage/Shapeshifter and Warrior/Templar? Nothing. The should have followed NWN's route. The different origins help, but it's like, what, 2 hrs?
3 classes + 3 races + lack of companions with unique abilities = less replayability.
what else made Dragon age different from any other fantasy RPG other than it's awesome dialouge and companions?
Faust1979 wrote...
I don't care if it's longer or shorter than the first Dragon Age just want it to be fun to play through. Also how did some people get over 40 hours from the first one? I have played through the first one multiple times did lots of side quests did the whole main quest I get about 30-35 hours out of it including the three download quests I have. I'd be happy with 20-25 hours
Modifié par slimgrin, 05 décembre 2010 - 11:16 .
rab****annel wrote...
DA:O didn't really have insane replayability. Yes, you could make different in-game choices and see where that went, so story-wise, yeah. Game play however... If you play the first time with a balanced party, you've pretty much covered what it would be like to be a mage/rogue/warrior. This is because there is no distinction between companions. The only unique characters would be Shale, Dog, and to a lesser extent, Sten (for having 1 spec). The 2nd time around you would have covered the alternative builds/specs. They took out companion uniqueness. What makes Morrigan and Alistair different from a Mage/Shapeshifter and Warrior/Templar? Nothing. The should have followed NWN's route. The different origins help, but it's like, what, 2 hrs?
3 classes + 3 races + lack of companions with unique abilities = less replayability.
The impact it had was trivial at best.Ryzaki wrote...
rab****annel wrote...
DA:O didn't really have insane replayability. Yes, you could make different in-game choices and see where that went, so story-wise, yeah. Game play however... If you play the first time with a balanced party, you've pretty much covered what it would be like to be a mage/rogue/warrior. This is because there is no distinction between companions. The only unique characters would be Shale, Dog, and to a lesser extent, Sten (for having 1 spec). The 2nd time around you would have covered the alternative builds/specs. They took out companion uniqueness. What makes Morrigan and Alistair different from a Mage/Shapeshifter and Warrior/Templar? Nothing. The should have followed NWN's route. The different origins help, but it's like, what, 2 hrs?
3 classes + 3 races + lack of companions with unique abilities = less replayability.
Right because your origin didn't have an impact on the entire game.
Atakuma wrote...
The impact it had was trivial at best.Ryzaki wrote...
rab****annel wrote...
DA:O didn't really have insane replayability. Yes, you could make different in-game choices and see where that went, so story-wise, yeah. Game play however... If you play the first time with a balanced party, you've pretty much covered what it would be like to be a mage/rogue/warrior. This is because there is no distinction between companions. The only unique characters would be Shale, Dog, and to a lesser extent, Sten (for having 1 spec). The 2nd time around you would have covered the alternative builds/specs. They took out companion uniqueness. What makes Morrigan and Alistair different from a Mage/Shapeshifter and Warrior/Templar? Nothing. The should have followed NWN's route. The different origins help, but it's like, what, 2 hrs?
3 classes + 3 races + lack of companions with unique abilities = less replayability.
Right because your origin didn't have an impact on the entire game.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 05 décembre 2010 - 11:14 .
Please explain how you came to this conclusion. I am curious.MIke_18 wrote...
I'm calling it twelve hours. It sure looks like a twelve hour game.
Modifié par ErichHartmann, 05 décembre 2010 - 11:15 .
Atakuma wrote...
Please explain how you came to this conclusion. I am curious.MIke_18 wrote...
I'm calling it twelve hours. It sure looks like a twelve hour game.
Atakuma wrote...
The impact it had was trivial at best.Ryzaki wrote...
rab****annel wrote...
DA:O didn't really have insane replayability. Yes, you could make different in-game choices and see where that went, so story-wise, yeah. Game play however... If you play the first time with a balanced party, you've pretty much covered what it would be like to be a mage/rogue/warrior. This is because there is no distinction between companions. The only unique characters would be Shale, Dog, and to a lesser extent, Sten (for having 1 spec). The 2nd time around you would have covered the alternative builds/specs. They took out companion uniqueness. What makes Morrigan and Alistair different from a Mage/Shapeshifter and Warrior/Templar? Nothing. The should have followed NWN's route. The different origins help, but it's like, what, 2 hrs?
3 classes + 3 races + lack of companions with unique abilities = less replayability.
Right because your origin didn't have an impact on the entire game.
Good for you, but I didn't ask you how long it took you to play ME2.MIke_18 wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
Please explain how you came to this conclusion. I am curious.MIke_18 wrote...
I'm calling it twelve hours. It sure looks like a twelve hour game.
ME2 lasted me twelve hours. I did all the loyalty quests, besides Jacks, because she wouldn't talk to me.
MIke_18 wrote...
Atakuma wrote...
Please explain how you came to this conclusion. I am curious.MIke_18 wrote...
I'm calling it twelve hours. It sure looks like a twelve hour game.
ME2 lasted me twelve hours. I did all the loyalty quests, besides Jacks, because she wouldn't talk to me.
MIke_18 wrote...
I'm not leaving out anything. I just didn't do any planet scanning. That sucked. Seriously i wanted to kill myself. And i was supposed to scan every planet to find every five minute side quest, without even voiced dialogue. No thanks.
Modifié par Faust1979, 05 décembre 2010 - 11:27 .
Modifié par Apollo Starflare, 05 décembre 2010 - 11:30 .
MIke_18 wrote...
Dude it was pointless. None of the side quests were really good.
Some were like time trials, without any backstory and voiced dialogue. Please tell me one good side quests in that entire game.
And not to mention you had to play the most annoying mini-game to get to them. Planet scanning sucks, i hope they remove it for the next game.
I believe the majority of DA:O's Length comes from mindless filler. without all the distractions it could easily be a fifteen hour game.slimgrin wrote...
Short games are the domain of action and adventure games, not rpg's. Rpg's are typically long, and for good reason. I'm not asking for mindless filler, but seriously, if DA2 was only like 20hrs long that would be disappointing.
Retour en haut