Aller au contenu

Photo

Why do people consider this romance "unfinished" or "partial"?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
123 réponses à ce sujet

#51
kevL

kevL
  • Members
  • 4 052 messages

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

I liked casavir just fine, but they really did not implement his romance very well. I mean, he pretty much declares his affections for ANY PC, no matter how twisted, corrupt, and wicked, or how low one's influence is with him, which is not only totally OOC for a Paladin, but pretty much an emersion killer at that point.

I mean, when my LE tiefling Warlock/Blackguard of Loviatar who has kicked every puppy and shoved old ladys into the path of oncomming buses, has Casavir talking about what a shining "light" she is (with like -30 influence or so), it really ruins the special feature of in game romances and creates a serious WTF moment.

heh .. now there's a ball that was missed (no pun intended) : now imagine a Casavir who's struggling against his 'lustful thoughts', can barely control himself, becomes a hermit in the Monastery as soon as its built ..

#52
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

kevL wrote...


heh .. now there's a ball that was missed (no pun intended) : now imagine a Casavir who's struggling against his 'lustful thoughts', can barely control himself, becomes a hermit in the Monastery as soon as its built ..



heh, yeah, though the temple, since he's a Tyrran, would be more likely.

They also ruined his character potential there in dropping his original sidequest regarding a past affair with a certain madame of Neverwinter's most prestigous brothel. That would have certainly added something to the game, and given the romance more sense/impact. A paladin of Tyr involved in a rather racy scandal would have certainly added an interesting twist/dimension to him.

But given what we have in game, I still found the idea of getting a wall scene with either Casavir or Elanee, regardless of what sort of person your KC is, was pretty lazy. It should have been based on companion influence and responses in some conversations.

At least you got that somewhat with Bishop. If your influence was more than zero, he admits betraying your female KC was necessary because he was starting to have unwanted feelings for her, an admission you don't get with negative influence. The wall scene with Casavir should have been based on the same factors, and a character who has done little more than ****** him off throught the game should have got nothing as punishment/reward for being so naughty. :devil:

#53
kevL

kevL
  • Members
  • 4 052 messages

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

heh, yeah, though the temple, since he's a Tyrran, would be more likely.

don't matter. As long as he's a friggin hermit and everytime I see him he's kneeling at an altar holding his sword in front of himself like a cross. And he doesn't say anything in that deep, low, effectively whiny "oh, I'm so aggrieved I can barely stand it, but I'll try" tone of voice, right?

*wondering if there's a flagellation animation*

Cut! Cut! We can't print that!!  Posted Image


ps. I actually like playing Paladins, I just think Casavir gives them a bad rep.

#54
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages
I actually liked Casavir better than other paladins, because he was so grim and conflicted. Would have been even more interesting learning he was once Ophallia's toy.



But then again, I tend to be ill-disposed towards enthusiastic righteousness and zeal.



Self Flagelation animations need to standard in all future RPGs. As well as the flagelation of others. ME2 style interrupts in NWN2! The option to suddenly, for no reason, whip out your flail and bash nevalle upside his pretty Barbie-man skull!



Fun for the whole family!

#55
kevL

kevL
  • Members
  • 4 052 messages

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf wrote...

Self Flagelation animations need to [be] standard in all future RPGs.


agreed.

Nevalle .. don't get me started : a flower with purple and yellow petals *springs* to mind ..


geez, i never realized how Bad (sic) the OC is until this thread

*Look Out!
what? what is it?

.. rocks ..

Oh no, not Rocs!!!
no, no, not Rocs .. ROCKS!!

But, they're not moving.
That's how sly, subtle, and insidious they are ..*

okay, sorry, I'll go do something constructive now

#56
Vaalyah

Vaalyah
  • Members
  • 953 messages
I am wondering... my character is a cleric. A big angry cleric. And she is has some interesting spells like all the resurrection things. So, rocks or not rocks, if there is resurrection, why are we still speaking about all the dead NPCs? We can raise them, so, the ending is even more stupid!!!

#57
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages
@kev: LMAO! yeah, the ending really killed would could have been an awesome epilogue show. NWN2 was an excellent game that could have been epic had they not cut so many corners.



@Vaalyah: That was actually probably the number one point brought up many times on the old board: resurrecton. I mean, even with Zhjaeve vanishing, there's still a rez rod, plus possibly rez scrolls, and Khelgar and neeshka are both confirmed to still be amongst the living. Neeshka being a rogue can use magic items, and anyone can use the rod. And according to 3.5e rules, you can rez a person quite sometime after their death.



yeah. Plot pothole from hell.

#58
Zaxares

Zaxares
  • Members
  • 2 096 messages
Not to mention that the 9th level cleric spell, True Resurrection, doesn't even require you to have the body of the dead person present. :P Shandra's dead? Pfft, just let me get to level 17 and I'll have her back! Same goes for anybody who died at the end of the OC.



Well, except the Golem... He can't be raised seeing how he doesn't have a soul and all...

#59
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

Zaxares wrote...


Well, except the Golem... He can't be raised seeing how he doesn't have a soul and all...



Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology...

#60
HoonDing

HoonDing
  • Members
  • 3 012 messages
Wouldn't it be a problem for the resurrection that all the bodies are underneath a huge pile of rubble, and mangled at that? Or does a new body just materialize out of nowhere?

#61
ottery

ottery
  • Members
  • 83 messages

virumor wrote...

Wouldn't it be a problem for the resurrection that all the bodies are underneath a huge pile of rubble, and mangled at that? Or does a new body just materialize out of nowhere?


It's not a problem - the cleric just needs to find a suitable 'host' for the soul. This was the cause of the Possessed Guinea Pig Epidemic of '55, which I'll tell you all about some other time. 

#62
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

virumor wrote...

Wouldn't it be a problem for the resurrection that all the bodies are underneath a huge pile of rubble, and mangled at that? Or does a new body just materialize out of nowhere?



No, a ressurection completely restores the body in full, woulds healed, status effects gone. It is an "act of (insert deity here)."

#63
Seagloom

Seagloom
  • Members
  • 7 094 messages
Skadi got it right. Raise dead on the other hand is not as thorough. That aside, resurrection is not the magic bullet NWN mechanics make them out to be. Going by P&P logic, those spells only work under two circumstances. Firstly, the recipient must be willing to come back. Some souls see their ultimate fate in the afterlife and prefer it to returning from the grave. Secondly, each spell has to be sanctioned by the god doing the resurrecting. Unlike what NWN implies, gods do not hand these out willy nilly. They usually demand reciprocation from either their cleric or the person returned, and circumstances might result in the spell failing outright.

Say your character is a priest of Tyr and you were trying to raise Neeshka or Grobnar... chances are Tyr would refuse unless he felt there was a *very* good reason to bring them back. Since the King of Shadows is dead by then, they are not needed to defeat him--hence he would probably deny his cleric's request. Generally the farther one strays from a given god's ethos and alignment, the more likely that is. Tyr would probably be quick to okay a raise for Casavir, and he may even accept Sand or Zhjaeve, but a character like Qara? Not happening. Conversely, Talos might be fine with raising Qara but is unlikely to raise Casavir or Elanee. Although Talos, being the muffin he is, will likely still demand recompense. In any case, that is how it goes.

Resurrection, when given the oversight of a DM, is not a revolving door. NWN2 just makes it seem trivial.

Modifié par Seagloom, 21 décembre 2010 - 04:48 .


#64
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages
Then my character would try and kick Tyr in the nuts.

#65
The Fred

The Fred
  • Members
  • 2 516 messages
Still, resurrection *is* possible, however it's handled. You'd think that a character of MotB's proportions, someone who can get to a stage where he/she gets to argue face-to-face with Kelemvor (however briefly or lamely before he tells you he doesn't care what you think), would be able to remove a few rocks and bring back their beloved... hell, even Orpheus managed it (almost) and all he could do was sing well, let alone cast L9 spells.

#66
Kaldor Silverwand

Kaldor Silverwand
  • Members
  • 1 585 messages
I prefer a more open-ended ending. I think they could have allowed the party to survive their victory, had a few scenes showing that Faerun, for the moment anyway, is safe, and then allowed you to travel back to the cities and explore some more. There wouldn't need to be anything major to do, but it would allow people to play on and explore a bit until they bored of having no major plot to follow. These games always like to end with a flourish though for some reason.



The start of MotB needn't have been based on the collapse and death of the party.



Regards

#67
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages

Seagloom wrote...

Skadi got it right. Raise dead on the other hand is not as thorough. That aside, resurrection is not the magic bullet NWN mechanics make them out to be. Going by P&P logic, those spells only work under two circumstances. Firstly, the recipient must be willing to come back. Some souls see their ultimate fate in the afterlife and prefer it to returning from the grave. Secondly, each spell has to be sanctioned by the god doing the resurrecting. Unlike what NWN implies, gods do not hand these out willy nilly. They usually demand reciprocation from either their cleric or the person returned, and circumstances might result in the spell failing outright.

Say your character is a priest of Tyr and you were trying to raise Neeshka or Grobnar... chances are Tyr would refuse unless he felt there was a *very* good reason to bring them back. Since the King of Shadows is dead by then, they are not needed to defeat him--hence he would probably deny his cleric's request. Generally the farther one strays from a given god's ethos and alignment, the more likely that is. Tyr would probably be quick to okay a raise for Casavir, and he may even accept Sand or Zhjaeve, but a character like Qara? Not happening. Conversely, Talos might be fine with raising Qara but is unlikely to raise Casavir or Elanee. Although Talos, being the muffin he is, will likely still demand recompense. In any case, that is how it goes.

Resurrection, when given the oversight of a DM, is not a revolving door. NWN2 just makes it seem trivial.



You are right in terms of PnP/ general lore, in that ressurections are special cases and rely on the will of the diety as well as the desire of the ressurected.

Though the KoS is dead, it is possible that the fallen companion's "work" on the Prime might not be done, hence a legit reason to have them ressurected. Since theorhetically, the KC, even a Cleric, has already been abducted by gargoyles and is currently either in Rashamen or the Plane of Shadow, that leaves the rez rod and any raise dead/rez scrolls to bring the companions back to life. I am not fully certain how objects imbued with such divine spells work in terms of resurrection guidelines, but would imagine, if they were created with the power of some deity, then they still apply in terms of deity's will/master plan.

Of course, priests could be brought to the site weeks later by the survivors and attempt ressurections on anyone who is dead, and from there, one can decide whether or not the spells would be granted.

But ressurections are possible, regardless. And in some cases, a deity one would think would oppose the ressurection of a certain companion might allow it, if, for some reason, that deity has some unknown but future purpose for their continued existance.

All that said, it doesn't change my opinion that "rocks fall, everyone dies, teh end" is a pretty lame and sloppy way to end the game and remove companions from the board. With a little imagination, there are more creative and sensible ways to kill off or remove companions from the scene if one wanted to. Just lazy writing.

#68
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages
To expand upon this, I will give examples of possible ways to deal with the ending.



The KoS is dead, mega power surge. KC gets knocked out or trapped/seperated from companions somehow. Portal to Shadow Plane opens, gargoyles jump out and snatch KC and take off. Maybe one companion is killed by falling rocks, the others manage to escape. But you want to make reasons for OC companions to be out of the picture, in terms of MotB and beyond.



Sand: If he's alive, he could assist in scrying or other magical efforts to figure out what happened to KC, but eventually gives up and goes on to do something else.

Neeshka: she survives anyway.

Khelgar: survives anyway.

Zhjaeve: vanishes. Understandable, she was with you for a purpose, a purpose you succeeded at. However, when you vanished, so did the Sword of Gith. So maybe p[ossible future encounter there.

Qara: If she's alive, she could decide to go and expand upon her powers. Dies in some very dangerous and risky magical experiment, or becomes such a nuissance and threat to public welfare that she is assassinated by someone.

Elanee: If in relationship with KC, decides to search for whereabouts, possibly meeting an untimely end in the process. If not, disappears into Mere to start regenrating the land, might meet untimely end that way as well.

Grobnar: 1001 possiblities to kill him in some amusing way, given his penchant for tinkering and screwing with things he knows little about.

Casavir: If in relationship with KC, same thing as Elanee. Goes off looking for KC, meets untimely end. otherwise, returns to old calling as knight errant, meets end valiantly fighting evil or something.

Bishop: There are so many ways to off him. Luskans end up catching up with him, old enemies hunt him down and kill him, he is captured, tried, and executed by Neverwinter for treason and mass murder (Red Fallows Watch).



All of the above scenarios took next to no imagination to come up with. Given even a touch of imagination, one can easily do better.

#69
Vaalyah

Vaalyah
  • Members
  • 953 messages
Ehm, guys, I think we're not getting the point. There could be THOUSANDS or reason for resurrecting (ie: they defeat the King of Shadow with their sacrifice, so they could have a "prize" resurrection) or not resurrecting them, but the point is that the game doesn't allow us to have the option. We can't select the "try to resurrect companions" option and then get a "your deity doesn't want to help you" answer. There is no option at all! :_(

#70
Quixal

Quixal
  • Members
  • 1 790 messages

The Fred wrote...
Still, resurrection *is* possible, however it's handled. You'd think that a character of MotB's proportions, someone who can get to a stage where he/she gets to argue face-to-face with Kelemvor (however briefly or lamely before he tells you he doesn't care what you think), would be able to remove a few rocks and bring back their beloved... hell, even Orpheus managed it (almost) and all he could do was sing well, let alone cast L9 spells.

Given who Kelemvor is, I could easily see you having even more trouble getting resurrections than a relative nobody. Burned bridges and all that.

#71
Seagloom

Seagloom
  • Members
  • 7 094 messages
I think a party member stopping to raise fallen companions during a massive collapse is a stretch to be honest. It takes six seconds to activate the rod each time. I hope whoever is doing the raising can maintain their composure long enough to pull it off while everything is falling apart around them. Think about how much stress and fear a given person would be feeling in that situation too, especially if several people they knew for a while were dropping like flies around them? Granted, adventurers are made of sterner stuff than normal folk, but other than a rogue or full caster, I do not think most characters could easily survive a situation it.



Putting that aside, I do agree with Skadi that it was a cop out. Rocks fall, everyone dies is so old it was a tabletop trope long before NWN2 say the light of day. Whoever approved that ending had a sadistic sense of humor *and* a fondness for tradition. I can only imagine what it must have felt like to finish NWN2 early on, before we knew MotB continued KC's story. I bought the game at launch but did not finish it until much later.



On the topic of rods of resurrection, I am not sure those rods even exist in tabletop. Someone please correct me if I am wrong. As far as I am aware there is no way by the rules to craft a rod like that. A cleric could theoretically scribe a scroll of resurrection, however, and I think by the rules divine power is already stored in an item for use at the time of its creation. That might be able to bypass deity oversight on raising. Maybe. There is nothing saying otherwise far as I know.

#72
Haley Starshine

Haley Starshine
  • Members
  • 43 messages
I also romanced Bishop and didn't find anything odd about it in the story... But through fanfictions and the like, girls always seem to explore this "tame the bad guy" idea, indeed... Same thing with Zevran at Dragon Age Origins.

#73
Skadi_the_Evil_Elf

Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
  • Members
  • 6 382 messages
Bishop doesn't need taming. Maybe a joint to mellow his active, neurotic tendancy to dig himself into deeper holes, but beyond that, nah.

#74
Vaalyah

Vaalyah
  • Members
  • 953 messages
OT: oh, Haley! I love Order of the Stick! :-)



I keep my idea: I am a cleric, so at the end of the battle, as usual, I would have raised everyone. So, why don't let this option? I'm so mad that each time I enter a town, my character goes around to cast cure spells on everyone around who's injured! (really!) So it would be perfectly aligned with my PC's behaviour to raise back all her friends...

#75
Seagloom

Seagloom
  • Members
  • 7 094 messages
Keep in mind that after the King of Shadows falls his entire abode is collapsing around you. That and gargoyles haul off your character. Raising everyone is probably not a viable option, if indeed anyone is even dead when your character is dragged off. Judging by the fact KC is unaware of what specifically transpires, she must be taken before anyone is endangered. That said, I did think not having a chance to rescue Shandra was a bit lame. I knew it was done for drama's sake, but still...