123 réponses à ce sujet

[Kane-Corr]

Chino 281 wrote...

Kane-Corr wrote...

Chino 281 wrote...

No. Mass Effect 3 should definitely not be like Mass Effect. If it were, there would be almost no different styles of missions, bad animations, awkward voice acting, repetitive terrains for planet trolling, terrible fill-in graphics, bad texturing, and a rushed story. I do agree that Mass Effect was really fun, and I just played it through only a week ago, but the plot is so much more well thought out for Mass Effect 2 than Mass Effect's was. The things that I did feel that were lacking, however: is the music; the old music was just so calming and up-beat and it is what I think of when I hear "Mass Effect Music," Wrex; he was, with Garrus, a sure pick when I set out on a mission, and the Mako (under certain cirmstances.) Mass Effect 2 is superior in my mind. The reduction of RPG-like game devices was suprising, but a good choice. If I were to say anything about improvements, there would be only one true one: DON'T give us crap messages telling us about how cool the mission was and how awesome the future will be with the things we brought home, let us do something with it, give us another mission, you know? Those darn messages made me mad and all of those mini quests I did in Mass Effect turned out to be only sincere letters in my digital mailbox. Mass Effect 3 needs to be more variable and have less off screen animations with a considerable reduction in cop out scenes like the Skillian Five Poker game. Can't wait for it to come out either way!

I cannot DISAGREE with you more. Where to start? Well....sure Mass Effect 2 WAS an improvement on certain things....like all of the awkwardness and stuff....but, you really think Mass Effect 2's story was better than 1?

Uh...did you even play the first game? I really don't mean to come off as rude or anything but....Mass 1 was way better than 2 in this regard...not only my opinion but of many on this forum, and reputable sites as well. And, the reduction of RPG qualities is absolutely horrible. WHY else would you play Mass Effect...to shoot Aliens? Sorry bro, Modern Warfare is for that. I'm not directing this at you, but at the points you made. I think that if I were to take one thing from Mass Effect 2 it would be the combat and basically infuse that into Mass 1 and then we have the best game known to man.

I understand why you would defend Mass Effect, but you have to agree that there were way too many boring side missions, that were repetitive as heck, I might add. Like I said, Mass Effect 1 and 2 had one large problem that was really getting on my nerves: Stop doing off screen, cop out animations because you didn't want to put in the effort to make the details. And don't get me wrong, Mass Effect was great. I loved it. I just enjoyed Mass Effect 2 more.
EDIT: Spelling

I think the thing that people are forgetting with Mass 1 was that it was developed far before 2006. If you look at the technological capabilities that were available around 2003-2006, then dang, Bioware did a pretty amazing job. But simply comparing the advancement of mass 2 to 1 isn't fair at all.


At the time, I loved the side quest missions of Mass 1,

And

At the time, I didn't really like the side quest missions of Mass 2,



You have to compare the experiences seperately, not directly. Mass 1- the quality was there. With Mass 2, it was watered down to a significant level.

[Kane-Corr]

It really is a whole way of looking at it separately. Do I think that Mass 2 IMPROVED upon alot of things? Absolutely, and the improvements were awesome.


All I'm saying is that Bioware was side-tracked by their enhancements and in the process, they kinda forgot about the qualities that made the game important. They're trying to please a crowd based on what they think they want.


But in all honesty, Look around you. There are far more hate threads and disappointment threads then were on the old Mass Effect 1 forums!


Now, why do you think that is? Hmmmmm.

Modifié par Kane-Corr, 09 décembre 2010 - 08:42 .

[Manic Sheep]

Kane-Corr wrote...


But in all honesty, Look around you. There are far more hate threads and disappointment threads then were on the old Mass Effect 1 forums!


Now, why do you think that is? Hmmmmm.

Because it’s a sequel that doesn’t follow the original in style and has a bigger following now. I don’t think I have ever played a sequel and not seen **** loads of fan hate for it. Why? I don’t know. Maybe people fall in love with the first game, make unrealistic expectations for the 2nd and then when it’s not what they expected it a kick in the pants. Now I’m not saying ME 2 was perfect and all these complaints are unfounded but allot of people seem to be seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses.

Modifié par Manic Sheep, 09 décembre 2010 - 09:08 .

[Marzillius]

I fear that ME3 won't be that good. They are saying that your choices will matter and blah blah. Did anyone other than me notice that they said the same thing for ME2, and that your choices didn't matter at all. They couldn't make them matter, because they had to please the newcomers...

[uzivatel]

Manic Sheep wrote...

Because it’s a sequel that doesn’t follow the original in style and has a bigger following now. I don’t think I have ever played a sequel and not seen **** loads of fan hate for it. Why? I don’t know. Maybe people fall in love with the first game, make unrealistic expectations for the 2nd and then when it’s not what they expected it a kick in the pants. Now I’m not saying ME 2 was perfect and all these complaints are unfounded but allot of people seem to be seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses.

Its pretty common. Just look at the Fallout series...

[TexasToast712]

I dont care what they change for ME3 as long as they dont change these things.

1. Soundtrack style. ME2 > ME1
2. Combat - I LIKE actually having to reload my gun.
3. Customization - MOAR IS BETTER!

[TexasToast712]

uzivatel wrote...

Manic Sheep wrote...

Because it’s a sequel that doesn’t follow the original in style and has a bigger following now. I don’t think I have ever played a sequel and not seen **** loads of fan hate for it. Why? I don’t know. Maybe people fall in love with the first game, make unrealistic expectations for the 2nd and then when it’s not what they expected it a kick in the pants. Now I’m not saying ME 2 was perfect and all these complaints are unfounded but allot of people seem to be seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses.

Its pretty common. Just look at the Fallout series...

Same for the Halo series.

The Bungie forum is basically a war ground between the Competitive (MLG Losers) and Casuals. All because of a few changes from Halo 3 to Halo Reach. (I support the changes)

[Kane-Corr]

Manic Sheep wrote...

Kane-Corr wrote...


But in all honesty, Look around you. There are far more hate threads and disappointment threads then were on the old Mass Effect 1 forums!


Now, why do you think that is? Hmmmmm.

Because it’s a sequel that doesn’t follow the original in style and has a bigger following now. I don’t think I have ever played a sequel and not seen **** loads of fan hate for it. Why? I don’t know. Maybe people fall in love with the first game, make unrealistic expectations for the 2nd and then when it’s not what they expected it a kick in the pants. Now I’m not saying ME 2 was perfect and all these complaints are unfounded but allot of people seem to be seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses.

No...actually, and you'll have to agree with me on this, many of the people did this to Mass Effect 2. When suggesting what should happen, everyone complained about the Mako and:

About the characters

About the COMBAT (one for the better) -But, too much dang emphasis

About the side missions (Okay, so...cut em in half! And make em do with the Collecter quest, since it IS an overall dull story after all.)

About ...well, why change the music? I guess to keep it interesting...

About the inventory...gosh, so many people complained about this.


About the weapons


About the Normandy


About the quicker intro...(haha, shot yourselves in the foot there community, good luck skipping that bad boy!)




Here's my point. I never wanted these things to be taken away. If Bioware kept the same things from Mass1 but also updated the graphics, weaponry, introduced new characters, and lengthened the main quest by 2 more smaller missions and a longer Suicide Mission...then there wouldn't nearly be as much discontent!



Bioware really DOES listen people, so why don't you stop your false complaining, make up your minds, and tell Bioware what you REALLY want and not try an experiment with this amazing franchise.

[Kane-Corr]

Ok edited my post because it didn't make sense...uhhhh, bascially Manic Sheep, this game, people on this forum wanted to see Change, much like in The United States with our president...


Please bear with me on this and leave my next words as a simple metaphor....



Obama promised change in America, but now, the majority of Americans who put him into office don't like the change that he and his team are bringing. That is the overall census. You see it in teh news polls, the same news companies that WANTED him in office. Now there is discontent.


NOW...ennd Metaphor.



With Mass Effect 2, people are upset....why....because the subconscious consensus believes that the first game was better than the second. Even though people wanted to see change...it wasn't for the best. It took the game BACK a step. Now, whre this can all get better is here....



If they combine the best of 1 - Atmoshpere, mood, dreaminess of the galaxy, music, story

And 2- Combat, fluidness, graphics, characters, dialogue....


Then 2's sins will have been forgiven, seen as strengths, and Everyone will be happy! There should NEVER be too much of Combat or Too much of story for this trilogy. A hybrid in the truest sense needs to be created.

Modifié par Kane-Corr, 09 décembre 2010 - 09:33 .

[uzivatel]

TexasToast712 wrote...

uzivatel wrote...

Its pretty common. Just look at the Fallout series...

Same for the Halo series.

The Bungie forum is basically a war ground between the Competitive (MLG Losers) and Casuals. All because of a few changes from Halo 3 to Halo Reach. (I support the changes)

The Reach beta was bit of a shock even for me and I am in the casual Halo crowd. I got used to it and going back to 3 ... it was just not the same - Reach was clearly better.

Modifié par uzivatel, 09 décembre 2010 - 09:34 .

[Bad King]

Kane-Corr wrote...

I 100% agree with this thread.....We NEED the whole feel of the first game in Mass Effect 3.

It's basically what I've been preaching about. If anything needs to be modified for the third installment, it's this aspect. Where is the subtle background 80's Sci-Fi music??????? Where is the blueish tint that makes you feel like the galaxy is dreamy and amazing, where is the floating debris, the kind of slowed air that makes you anticipate some ambush or something.

Where is the intimacy? I felt like in Mass Effect 2, there wasn't enough down time to actually think about anything. It was more like: Here's 3 dossiers, go find them....oh, here's 3 more...go get em...oh help horizon....oh make sure teammates are loyal....oh do this and do that....no reflection like in the first game after every mission, and actually thinking with your teammates in an in-depth way like in Mass 1....

Don't get me wrong....I will love every Mass Effect game that Bioware puts out because I love the series...but Mass 3 will be that much better if it can instill the atmosphere of Mass1 into it. It will ultimately bring back the most Nostalgic feelings for me and I'm sure the majority of other players.

I agree with a lot of this. Despite prefering Mass Effect 2 to Mass Effect 1 (just), I really missed ME1's atmosphere.

[TexasToast712]

uzivatel wrote...

TexasToast712 wrote...

uzivatel wrote...

Its pretty common. Just look at the Fallout series...

Same for the Halo series.

The Bungie forum is basically a war ground between the Competitive (MLG Losers) and Casuals. All because of a few changes from Halo 3 to Halo Reach. (I support the changes)

The Reach beta was bit of a shock even for me and I am in the casual Halo crowd. I got used to it and going back to 3 ... it was just not the same - Reach was clearly better.

Agreed. I played the beta as well and liked it.

[aeetos21]

ME1 had more plot development but that's how it always is in trilogies and why sequels have such a hard time developing their own stories when in all reality their main purpose is to bridge the 1st and 3rd chapters. Still all in all I liked ME2 better than ME1 and I really don't see how ME3 can top it.

[Manic Sheep]

Kane-Corr wrote...

Ok edited my post because it didn't make sense...uhhhh, bascially Manic Sheep, this game, people on this forum wanted to see Change, much like in The United States with our president...


Please bear with me on this and leave my next words as a simple metaphor....



Obama promised change in America, but now, the majority of Americans who put him into office don't like the change that he and his team are bringing. That is the overall census. You see it in teh news polls, the same news companies that WANTED him in office. Now there is discontent.


NOW...ennd Metaphor.



With Mass Effect 2, people are upset....why....because the subconscious consensus believes that the first game was better than the second. Even though people wanted to see change...it wasn't for the best. It took the game BACK a step. Now, whre this can all get better is here....



If they combine the best of 1 - Atmoshpere, mood, dreaminess of the galaxy, music, story

And 2- Combat, fluidness, graphics, characters, dialogue....


Then 2's sins will have been forgiven, seen as strengths, and Everyone will be happy! There should NEVER be too much of Combat or Too much of story for this trilogy. A hybrid in the truest sense needs to be created.

As I said these complaints aren’t unfounded. I wasn’t trying to imply that all the people who want a change are only seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses. There are some things ME1 did better than ME2 and vice versa and no doubt when ME3 comes out there will be some things I prefer form the other 2 games and some things I prefer from ME3. Not everyone has the same taste and it is inevitable that a few steps will be taken backwards if bioware is going to try to continue to improve the franchise instead of playing it safe and sticking with what they have. The trick is making sure it is mostly steps forward.

I was just trying to point out that sequels always get more hate and complaints than originals and that the fact that are more people wanting change is not necessarily because ME2 was particularly bad in comparison to other games or was worse than the original. I’m just sick of the people saying that everything about ME1 was better than ME2, which I know isn’t most people and I’m not pointing at you.
I also think when people talk about overall feel, atmosphere and story its worth keeping in mind that A) this is the 2nd in a trilogy and the bridge between the 1st and the 3rd. It isn’t going to feel as epic as the 1st where everything is introduced or the 3rd where everything reaches its climax and is concluded (if they do it right) and this is a sequel the universe itself is not new to you anymore so you will lose that sense of awe a bit. (tho yes they did also change the tone of the series and its understandable that some wouldn’t like that)

For example with bioshock 1 and 2 allot of people complained the sense of mystery had been lost in the 2nd game. Of course it had! The intrigue and mystery of the first game came from the setting and the fall of rapture itself not from the main plot. The 2nd game can’t draw from that anymore and has only the plot to stand up on. Same for mass effect, most the appeal for me came from the setting not the main plot. I think mass effect 2 did a relatively decent job of keeping the setting fresh by putting you in the terminus system.

Now that there are 2 games they can be compared and people can better decide what sort of things they want and what is working rather than simply saying they don’t like something and having it get nuked. So with luck ME3 will be an improvement on both 1 and 2.

EDIT: gah I can't type

Modifié par Manic Sheep, 09 décembre 2010 - 10:44 .

[Googlesaurus]

TexasToast712 wrote...

Same for the Halo series.

The Bungie forum is basically a war ground between the Competitive (MLG Losers) and Casuals. All because of a few changes from Halo 3 to Halo Reach. (I support the changes)

Incorrect, we've been hatin' since Halo 2. We knew Halo 3 was a subpar game, and Reach just made it worse. 

Modifié par Googlesaurus, 09 décembre 2010 - 10:40 .

[Kane-Corr]

Manic Sheep wrote...

Kane-Corr wrote...

Ok edited my post because it didn't make sense...uhhhh, bascially Manic Sheep, this game, people on this forum wanted to see Change, much like in The United States with our president...


Please bear with me on this and leave my next words as a simple metaphor....



Obama promised change in America, but now, the majority of Americans who put him into office don't like the change that he and his team are bringing. That is the overall census. You see it in teh news polls, the same news companies that WANTED him in office. Now there is discontent.


NOW...ennd Metaphor.



With Mass Effect 2, people are upset....why....because the subconscious consensus believes that the first game was better than the second. Even though people wanted to see change...it wasn't for the best. It took the game BACK a step. Now, whre this can all get better is here....



If they combine the best of 1 - Atmoshpere, mood, dreaminess of the galaxy, music, story

And 2- Combat, fluidness, graphics, characters, dialogue....


Then 2's sins will have been forgiven, seen as strengths, and Everyone will be happy! There should NEVER be too much of Combat or Too much of story for this trilogy. A hybrid in the truest sense needs to be created.

As I said these complaints aren’t unfounded. I wasn’t trying to imply that all the people who want a change are only seeing ME1 thru rose tinted glasses. There are some things ME1 did better than ME2 and vice versa and no doubt when ME3 comes out there will be some things I prefer form the other 2 games and some things I prefer from ME3. Not everyone has the same taste and it is inevitable that a few steps will be taken backwards if bioware is going to try to continue to improve the franchise instead of playing it safe and sticking with what they have. The trick is making sure it is mostly steps forward.

I only was just trying to point out that sequels always get more hate and complaints than originals and that the fact that are more people wanting change is not necessarily because ME2 was particularly bad in comparison to other games or was worse than the original. I’m just sick of the people saying that everything about ME1 was better than ME2, which I know isn’t most people and I’m not pointing at you.
I also think when people talk about overall feel, atmosphere and story its worth keeping in mind that A) this is the 2nd in a trilogy and the bridge between the 1st and the 3rd. It isn’t going to feel as epic as the 1st where everything is introduced or the 3rd where everything reaches its climax and is concluded (if they do it right) and this is a sequel the universe itself is not new to you anymore so you will lose that sense of awe a bit. (tho yes they did also change the tone of the series and its understandable that some wouldn’t like that)

For example with bioshock 1 and 2 allot of people complained the sense of mystery had been lost in the 2nd game. Of course it had! The intrigue and mystery of the first game came from the setting and the fall of rapture itself not from the main plot. The 2nd game can’t draw from that anymore and has only the plot to stand up on. Same for mass effect, most the appeal for me came from the setting not the main plot. I think mass effect 2 did a relatively decent job of keeping the setting fresh by putting you in the terminus system.

Now that there are 2 games they can be compared and people can better decide what sort of things they want and what is working rather than simply saying they don’t like something and having it get nuked. So with luck ME3 will be an improvement on both 1 and 2.

Ok I agree with you yeah....my thing is that i just dont want to see Mass3 be like 2

[Kane-Corr]

I'd rather have it balanced with 1 and 2's qualities....it just seems like people are completely bashing the first game...

[Cra5y Pineapple]

In my opinion, the bullets sound and look better in ME2. It feels like you're actually ripping apart the merc with your assault rifle rather than shooting and bit, looking over your sights and seeing a bloody mess (aka ME1). The sounds were better too and felt more ferocious.
Similar for music. It felt more dramatic and moving and ME1's felt cheesy and low-budget. Like a man from the 80s was given a keyboard and told "good luck."

I agree about the level cap however and that the charm/intimidate skills need to be brought back. However, no induvidual skills for each weapon like there was. That was annoying. And no un-nesassary weapons. In ME2 it felt like every weapon was unique and different. In ME2 it was "herp derp this gun trumps this gun" and it had no real soul. Same with armour to be honest.

ME1 also felt...cultish to me. I wanted to like the "feel" of it but I couldn't really, especially after playing ME2 with it's brilliant atmosphere and characters. However ME1 did have a better plot (but I wouldn't say better writing).

Chino 281 wrote...

No. Mass Effect 3 should definitely not be like Mass Effect. If it were, there would be almost no different styles of missions, bad animations, awkward voice acting, repetitive terrains for planet trolling, terrible fill-in graphics, bad texturing, and a rushed story. I do agree that Mass Effect was really fun, and I just played it through only a week ago, but the plot is so much more well thought out for Mass Effect 2 than Mass Effect's was. The things that I did feel that were lacking, however: is the music; the old music was just so calming and up-beat and it is what I think of when I hear "Mass Effect Music," Wrex; he was, with Garrus, a sure pick when I set out on a mission, and the Mako (under certain cirmstances.) Mass Effect 2 is superior in my mind. The reduction of RPG-like game devices was suprising, but a good choice. If I were to say anything about improvements, there would be only one true one: DON'T give us crap messages telling us about how cool the mission was and how awesome the future will be with the things we brought home, let us do something with it, give us another mission, you know? Those darn messages made me mad and all of those mini quests I did in Mass Effect turned out to be only sincere letters in my digital mailbox. Mass Effect 3 needs to be more variable and have less off screen animations with a considerable reduction in cop out scenes like the Skillian Five Poker game. Can't wait for it to come out either way!

I like this human! He understands!

Modifié par Cra5y Pineapple, 09 décembre 2010 - 11:22 .

[Kane-Corr]

Cra5y Pineapple wrote...

In my opinion, the bullets sound and look better in ME2. It feels like you're actually ripping apart the merc with your assault rifle rather than shooting and bit, looking over your sights and seeing a bloody mess (aka ME1). The sounds were better too and felt more ferocious.
Similar for music. It felt more dramatic and moving and ME1's felt cheesy and low-budget. Like a man from the 80s was given a keyboard and told "good luck."

I agree about the level cap however and that the charm/intimidate skills need to be brought back. However, no induvidual skills for each weapon like there was. That was annoying. And no un-nesassary weapons. In ME2 it felt like every weapon was unique and different. In ME2 it was "herp derp this gun trumps this gun" and it had no real soul. Same with armour to be honest.

ME1 also felt...cultish to me. I wanted to like the "feel" of it but I couldn't really, especially after playing ME2 with it's brilliant atmosphere and characters. However ME1 did have a better plot (but I wouldn't say better writing).

I agree with you on the bit about the weapons....but you could find the music in ME2 in any other action game you wanted. Mass Efect 1's was unique....bottom line. With 2's, yeah it was good, but did it really fit the Mass Effect realm? Not really. Heck Overlord DLC had better music than the game. But I will say the Suicide Mission song was cool---and I could hear some faint beats from Mass Effect 1. But, they were deviating from that passion that the first game HAD.


The dreamy atmoshpere music. Now, I know they had specific feels for the individual trilogy games, but honestly, I would hate to see Mass 3's feel become more like Mass 2's.


I say, bring Mass 1 feel and story, and music, and then everything else from Mass 2....combat, characters, graphics, all of that stuff.

[Kane-Corr]

I mean, I guess I'm just afraid that we will have a crap story for Mass Effect 3 and that it won't be fulfilling enough. But then again, they changed pretty drastically from 1 to 2, so who knows, maybe they will fix everything for the better. If Mass 3 comes out and it has an amazing story and everything is so vast, then you can cancel out all of this speculation and all. It just comes down to the fact that this is it....then final game....PLEASE get it right Bioware. This could potentially go down as the best trilogy known to gaming and the RPG realm.

[Relix28]

LPPrince wrote...

Relix28 wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

It seems my "Featherhead" name has achieved some popularity.

*sheds tear*

I'm so proud of myself.

Oh, so you invented the whole Featherhead thing? Honor to meet you sir. lol
I think I've heard the Featherhead phrase a couple of times here on the boards and I think it's very much appropriate. So I have decided to start using it as well. 

Please please, don't bow. HAR HAR

But yeah, I came up with it right after I played Firewalker for the first time. I thought the speed was cool, but everything else was just, ugh. It was a featherhead. Literally.

Bring back the Mako. But you know what else I want?

THE TAXI FROM LAIR OF THE SHADOW BROKER.

That is my favorite part of ME2. It was SO FUN. I want to do that again, but maybe to get from place to place, like on Illium.

For example, instead of taking a taxi to Samara's place, you'd drive a taxi there.

Or to get to Dantius towers, you'd actually drive there. Know what I mean?

It would add a cool atmospheric element that would inject some RPG into ME3.

Yeah the Taxi with it's fare meter cannons was kinda fun.  Too bad it was over before it started. And yeah, basically anything that would replace those non-stop linear corridors from ME2 would definitelly improve the atmosphere. More mission diversity in ME3 ftw, and squad banter, cause squad banter is awesome.

[Skyline GT-R34]

Here's my 2 cents on it.

I do believe that Mass Effect 2 did improve upon this amazing game that was Mass Effect; better graphics, no carrying 20 armors and a million guns in your "backpack", better weapon sound effect, etc. But I alos feel that the "RPG" element and the tangible bigness got the short end of the stick. I'm going to quote my favorite reviewer on this one: "While most of Mass Effect 2 feels like swapping between a bunch a enclosed shooting gallery before coming back to your ship to play with your train sets" and this is what Mass Effect 2 feels like.

Here is a list of elements from ME what should be in ME3:
- Open up the citadel (and the Normandy)
- Let us go down to random planets
- More weapons choices
- Let us use more than 1 power at once, even if it means longer cooldown (I don't want to have the need for 2 people just to be able to lift a guy and throw him off a cliff)
- Get the vehicule section back (I NEVER said I want the Mako back)
- Bring the Paragon/Renegade talents back (I want to be able to said what I want without playing the entire game in paragon or renegade just for that 1 dialogue)
- More armor choices
- The power wheel that actually allows you to direct your squad (like the one from ME)
- MOAR KROGANS!!! (I want Wrex back)
- Liara
- Garrus
- Threwser Maws in random planets
- Joker
- Elevators (atleast in the Normandy, the stupid loading screen is $^%@#)

Here is a list of elements from ME2 what should be in ME3:
- Nice graphics (duh)
- Thermal clip (but PLEASE boost up the "ammo" count, its in the future for crying out loud, it feels weird to be over 200 years into the future and modern machine guns pack more firepower (and bullets) than that)
- Miranda
- GRUNT!!!
- Garrus
- Joker romance
- The streamlined inventory
- Armor colours
- MORE weapons/armor/tech/biotic upgrades
- Keep the heavy weapons and expand the selection
- More SMG choices
- More customizable armor parts

That should be about it.

Modifié par Skyline GT-R34, 10 décembre 2010 - 12:19 .

[SkittlesKat96]

 Mass Effect 2 did lose a few good things (storyline, awesome villain, some of the small things) but ME2 was still my favorite out of the two and it sets the way for the final game.

EDIT: One thing people should appreciate from Mass Effect 2 though is the AWESOME cutscenes and smoother interesting dialog, and I don't just mean the normal cutscenes but also the CGI cutscenes were great.

Modifié par SkittlesKat96, 10 décembre 2010 - 01:05 .

[Pacifien]

Sorry, if people wanted their own personal threads to discuss their own wishes for ME3, that would be an awful lot of threads. This is why there's a thread stickied on this forum for ME3 wishlists.