HOWEVER, it is my opinion, that if such occurances are reflective of cirmcumstances where the human psyche takes a form in and of itself and thus becoming, to put it simply, an "evolved being", then I would acknowledge the merit that the writers used better imagination for the term "demons or spirit".
As you can probably discern, I'm not fond (also read, grown weary) of the demonology concept structurely defined and confined on the basic subject from religion as we know today.
This is why my interest in the lore has been persistent lately.
(from Television tropes and idioms):
Demons are spirits who were originally corrupted by people.Not deliberately, but simply by staying in proximity of a weakness in the Veil. Notice that is where the highest concentration of demons remain, where they're most conscious of the material world, and where they become familiar with psyches through dream. And they are all most basically identified with human flaws, original sins. The spirits exposed to those qualities come to identify themselves with them. They in turn wish to possess human forms because they've become addicted to those qualities, and are driven to experience them more intensely. Not all spirits who come to inhabit the mortal plane are demons, Great Oak for one example, it's just that the most destructive ones that are (dark in nature as) humans get all the attention.There's some support for this in dialog between Anders and Justice:Anders[/b]:Aren't demons simply spirits with unique and sparkling personalities?[/i]Justice[/b]:They have been perverted by their desires.[/i][/list]Justice doesn't deny their similarity, and affirms that demons have been corrupted rather than existing in a state of original evil.Alternatively,all [/i]spirits have been corrupted by proximity to humans[/b] - demons are just the ones unlucky enough to be corrupted by negative emotions rather than positive or neutral ones.That would explain the spirits of higher order ideals, like Courage and Justice. You could go one further and speculate that without that influence, spirits don't coalesce self-awareness, don't become entities, don't reallyexist[/i]. Then you have to wonder what would be the Maker, if not an expression of something in the sentient condition. Sort of like a reverse Platonic idea.[/b][/list][/b]
So...your opinion on this matter?





Retour en haut






