72 réponses à ce sujet

[sabiansix]

Superluminal wrote...

Picked up an arch demon a few weeks ago for $65

cool, can you put the link up for me? Thanks!

[sabiansix]

Superluminal wrote...

I thought the initial buy in now for 399 was quite hilarious

ha, I'll tell you though, every once in a while, people bite on those crazy buy out prices! If it's the only one availabe, and they don't want to lose it, sometimes they'll pay the high end. I've never seen it on Dragon Age though.

Modifié par sabiansix, 12 décembre 2010 - 02:49 .

[SniperREX]

Superluminal wrote...

I thought the initial buy in now for 399 was quite hilarious

Me too, I guess he/she did that because I emailed him/her about re-listing the litho, after I saw that the previous auction ended with 0 bid. So he/she thought that I was ready to shell out big bucks <_<

[sabiansix]

SniperREX wrote...

Superluminal wrote...

I thought the initial buy in now for 399 was quite hilarious

Me too, I guess he/she did that because I emailed him/her about re-listing the litho, after I saw that the previous auction ended with 0 bid. So he/she thought that I was ready to shell out big bucks <_<

Yep, that's probably true.

[NamiraWilhelm]

I just got me a wards for 60 dollars, but 40 dollars on top for shopping. Still, im content.

It was listed as buy it now $150 or best offer, so i offered him 60 lol

Modifié par NamiraWilhelm, 13 décembre 2010 - 05:53 .

[sabiansix]

NamiraWilhelm wrote...

I just got me a wards for 60 dollars, but 40 dollars on top for shopping. Still, im content.

It was listed as buy it now $150 or best offer, so i offered him 60 lol

ha, sweet! Can you link it plz?

[NamiraWilhelm]

sabiansix wrote...

NamiraWilhelm wrote...

I just got me a wards for 60 dollars, but 40 dollars on top for shopping. Still, im content.

It was listed as buy it now $150 or best offer, so i offered him 60 lol

ha, sweet! Can you link it plz?

Shall do.

http://cgi.ebay.co.u...=item45f48ee306

[sabiansix]

NamiraWilhelm wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

NamiraWilhelm wrote...

I just got me a wards for 60 dollars, but 40 dollars on top for shopping. Still, im content.

It was listed as buy it now $150 or best offer, so i offered him 60 lol

ha, sweet! Can you link it plz?

Shall do.

http://cgi.ebay.co.u...=item45f48ee306

thanks! :happy:

[TheKingBoar]

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

I picked up an Afterlife in September for $90 dollars.

Very cool, do you have a link to the auction? It's not that I don't believe, but every new piece of info needs to be verified when it first comes in so that nobody thinks the market is being manipulated. :happy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...em=330478009401

Just FYI, I think it would be helpful to post how long the higher priced ones take to sell. Otherwise, it'll look like you're trying to manipulate the market, and you certainly have more incentive to than anyone else does.

Modifié par TheKingBoar, 13 décembre 2010 - 09:52 .

[sabiansix]

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

I picked up an Afterlife in September for $90 dollars.

Very cool, do you have a link to the auction? It's not that I don't believe, but every new piece of info needs to be verified when it first comes in so that nobody thinks the market is being manipulated. :happy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...em=330478009401

Just FYI, I think it would be helpful to post how long the higher priced ones take to sell. Otherwise, it'll look like you're trying to manipulate the market, and you certainly have more incentive to than anyone else does.

Could you explain how the length of an auction can be contrsued as market manipulation? If I post something on Ebay for an exorbitant amount and it doesn't sell, that's detramental to the one selling it, or at worst, it just shows the high end tolerance for the market.

I'm also trying to understand your angle on that as well. Something isn't calculated into these numbers until it sells, and a sale is a sale, so I fail to see how long something takes to sell is manipulating the market. Now, if all my lithos were selling for 999 dollars, and the same person with zero feedback were winning them all, then I'd start to wonder.

Modifié par sabiansix, 13 décembre 2010 - 10:31 .

[TheKingBoar]

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

I picked up an Afterlife in September for $90 dollars.

Very cool, do you have a link to the auction? It's not that I don't believe, but every new piece of info needs to be verified when it first comes in so that nobody thinks the market is being manipulated. :happy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...em=330478009401

Just FYI, I think it would be helpful to post how long the higher priced ones take to sell. Otherwise, it'll look like you're trying to manipulate the market, and you certainly have more incentive to than anyone else does.

Could you explain how the length of an auction can be contrsued as market manipulation? If I post something on Ebay for an exorbitant amount and it doesn't sell, that's detramental to the one selling it, or at worst, it just shows the high end tolerance for the market.

I'm also trying to understand your angle on that as well. Something isn't calculated into these numbers until it sells, and a sale is a sale, so I fail to see how long something takes to sell is manipulating the market. Now, if all my lithos were selling for 999 dollars, and the same person with zero feedback were winning them all, then I'd start to wonder.

Just helps the average person looking to sell how long it's going to sit on a high price. If the point is that you're trying to establish market value, showing the true cap by posting the autions that didn't sell helps show the true ceiling. I'm not saying that you're manipulating the market by having long acutions, but your claim to be supporting market values isn't exactly supported when you don't include info on the true ceiling too. Just so long as we no longer see something like The Wards for $800 bucks, ya know?

[sabiansix]

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

I picked up an Afterlife in September for $90 dollars.

Very cool, do you have a link to the auction? It's not that I don't believe, but every new piece of info needs to be verified when it first comes in so that nobody thinks the market is being manipulated. :happy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...em=330478009401

Just FYI, I think it would be helpful to post how long the higher priced ones take to sell. Otherwise, it'll look like you're trying to manipulate the market, and you certainly have more incentive to than anyone else does.

Could you explain how the length of an auction can be contrsued as market manipulation? If I post something on Ebay for an exorbitant amount and it doesn't sell, that's detramental to the one selling it, or at worst, it just shows the high end tolerance for the market.

I'm also trying to understand your angle on that as well. Something isn't calculated into these numbers until it sells, and a sale is a sale, so I fail to see how long something takes to sell is manipulating the market. Now, if all my lithos were selling for 999 dollars, and the same person with zero feedback were winning them all, then I'd start to wonder.

Just helps the average person looking to sell how long it's going to sit on a high price. If the point is that you're trying to establish market value, showing the true cap by posting the autions that didn't sell helps show the true ceiling. I'm not saying that you're manipulating the market by having long acutions, but your claim to be supporting market values isn't exactly supported when you don't include info on the true ceiling too. Just so long as we no longer see something like The Wards for $800 bucks, ya know?

I think the setup now IS geared towards the average person. I think that you can look at the last five auctions of a particular lithograph and ascertain what people are willing to pay, don't you? We can go up to 10 as opposed to five, but I'm not going to track how long lithos have sitting there, etc. If I see five Omega's that sold in auctions, I think it's safe for any rational person to say what the market cap is for that particular litho. Markets do change over time, hence the rotation of oldest/latest auction. If people want to start digging deeper than that by looking at inflated auctions, duration, et al., then they are more than welcome to do the leg work. I'm looking at general info, not day trading charts.

Modifié par sabiansix, 13 décembre 2010 - 11:13 .

[SniperREX]

 I think sabiansix method is good enough for the price... free .
Data on the last 10 auctions would definitely be better than 5 

[sabiansix]

SniperREX wrote...

 I think sabiansix method is good enough for the price... free .
Data on the last 10 auctions would definitely be better than 5 

haha, I'll up it to 10 since it seems that we're all data hungry.

[TheKingBoar]

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

TheKingBoar wrote...

I picked up an Afterlife in September for $90 dollars.

Very cool, do you have a link to the auction? It's not that I don't believe, but every new piece of info needs to be verified when it first comes in so that nobody thinks the market is being manipulated. :happy:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...em=330478009401

Just FYI, I think it would be helpful to post how long the higher priced ones take to sell. Otherwise, it'll look like you're trying to manipulate the market, and you certainly have more incentive to than anyone else does.

Could you explain how the length of an auction can be contrsued as market manipulation? If I post something on Ebay for an exorbitant amount and it doesn't sell, that's detramental to the one selling it, or at worst, it just shows the high end tolerance for the market.

I'm also trying to understand your angle on that as well. Something isn't calculated into these numbers until it sells, and a sale is a sale, so I fail to see how long something takes to sell is manipulating the market. Now, if all my lithos were selling for 999 dollars, and the same person with zero feedback were winning them all, then I'd start to wonder.

Just helps the average person looking to sell how long it's going to sit on a high price. If the point is that you're trying to establish market value, showing the true cap by posting the autions that didn't sell helps show the true ceiling. I'm not saying that you're manipulating the market by having long acutions, but your claim to be supporting market values isn't exactly supported when you don't include info on the true ceiling too. Just so long as we no longer see something like The Wards for $800 bucks, ya know?

I think the setup now IS geared towards the average person. I think that you can look at the last five auctions of a particular lithograph and ascertain what people are willing to pay, don't you? We can go up to 10 as opposed to five, but I'm not going to track how long lithos have sitting there, etc. If I see five Omega's that sold in auctions, I think it's safe for any rational person to say what the market cap is for that particular litho. Markets do change over time, hence the rotation of oldest/latest auction. If people want to start digging deeper than that by looking at inflated auctions, duration, et al., then they are more than welcome to do the leg work. I'm looking at general info, not day trading charts.

That's a fair point rotating, I guess I forgot about that. Although if we're doing that, I guess the most valuable information would be the last time one was listed/sold. Not that that would be readily avaliable for some of the rarer ones, but it helps people to keep an eye for the ones that come up less often.

[DarkBeing91]

sabiansix wrote...

//

Normandy: 228, 186, 300, 230, 162 for an average close of: 221 = 188 for board member
Three pack of Tali, Grunt, & Thane: 499, 399, 375, 299 for an average close of: 393 = 334 for board member
Omega: 190, 89 for an average close of: 140 = 119 for board member
Illusive Man: 177, 225 for an average close of: 201 = 171 for board member
Garrus: 177, 188 for an average close of: 183 = 156 for board member
Jack: 158 = 134 for board member
The Wards: 87, 74, 85, 115, 60  for an average close of: 84 = 71 for board member
Collectors: 56, 45, 80 for an average of: 60 = 51 for board member
Minuteman: 122, 120 for an average close of: 121 = 103 for board member
Afterlife: 160 =  136 for board member
Korlus: 62, 80 for an average close of: 71 = 60 for board member
Tali: 225 = 191 for board member

//

Am I the only one that thinks this looks like a mess?

[sabiansix]

DarkBeing91 wrote...

sabiansix wrote...

//

Normandy: 228, 186, 300, 230, 162 for an average close of: 221 = 188 for board member
Three pack of Tali, Grunt, & Thane: 499, 399, 375, 299 for an average close of: 393 = 334 for board member
Omega: 190, 89 for an average close of: 140 = 119 for board member
Illusive Man: 177, 225 for an average close of: 201 = 171 for board member
Garrus: 177, 188 for an average close of: 183 = 156 for board member
Jack: 158 = 134 for board member
The Wards: 87, 74, 85, 115, 60  for an average close of: 84 = 71 for board member
Collectors: 56, 45, 80 for an average of: 60 = 51 for board member
Minuteman: 122, 120 for an average close of: 121 = 103 for board member
Afterlife: 160 =  136 for board member
Korlus: 62, 80 for an average close of: 71 = 60 for board member
Tali: 225 = 191 for board member

//

Am I the only one that thinks this looks like a mess?

haha, yeah, I challenge you to form something that works and won't shift in this site's code, and I don't mean that in a smart *** way. I tried a few things, and it hasn't worked for me yet.

[DarkBeing91]

Suggestion::

Normandy:
228, 186, 300, 230, 162
average close of: 221 = 188 for board member
Three pack of Tali, Grunt, & Thane:
499, 399, 375, 299
average close of: 393 = 334 for board member
Omega:
190, 89
average close of: 140 = 119 for board member
Illusive Man:
177, 225
average close of: 201 = 171 for board member
Garrus:
177, 188
average close of: 183 = 156 for board member
Jack:
158 = 134 for board member
The Wards:
87, 74, 85, 115, 60
average close of: 84 = 71 for board member
Collectors:
56, 45, 80
average of: 60 = 51 for board member
Minuteman:
122, 120
average close of: 121 = 103 for board member
Afterlife:
160 =  136 for board member
Korlus:
62, 80
average close of: 71 = 60 for board member
Tali:
225 = 191 for board member

Modifié par DarkBeing91, 15 décembre 2010 - 04:59 .

[NamiraWilhelm]

Can i put on the want list as something like : possibly interested in any DA or ME. Ive not long started collecting so theres a lot im missing lol

[sabiansix]

DarkBeing91 wrote...

Suggestion::

Normandy:
228, 186, 300, 230, 162
average close of: 221 = 188 for board member
Three pack of Tali, Grunt, & Thane:
499, 399, 375, 299
average close of: 393 = 334 for board member
Omega:
190, 89
average close of: 140 = 119 for board member
Illusive Man:
177, 225
average close of: 201 = 171 for board member
Garrus:
177, 188
average close of: 183 = 156 for board member
Jack:
158 = 134 for board member
The Wards:
87, 74, 85, 115, 60
average close of: 84 = 71 for board member
Collectors:
56, 45, 80
average of: 60 = 51 for board member
Minuteman:
122, 120
average close of: 121 = 103 for board member
Afterlife:
160 =  136 for board member
Korlus:
62, 80
average close of: 71 = 60 for board member
Tali:
225 = 191 for board member

see, I tried something very similar to that, but then it kept reverting to some screwy line after I saved it. I'll try yours and hopefully it will save. Thanks!

edit: lookin' good! I think that I may have gotten a little too excited with the color coded setup that I had, but yours seems fine, thanks again.

edit 2: see, now the colored sections have reverted back to white text. I love Bioware, but I'm not a fan of the site structure.

Modifié par sabiansix, 15 décembre 2010 - 05:54 .

[sabiansix]

NamiraWilhelm wrote...

Can i put on the want list as something like : possibly interested in any DA or ME. Ive not long started collecting so theres a lot im missing lol

haha, I'll toss your name up there.

[DarkBeing91]

Although the color would make the sections more obvious, I don't think its necessary.

Edit:
My color seems to stay :/

Modifié par DarkBeing91, 15 décembre 2010 - 06:09 .

[sabiansix]

DarkBeing91 wrote...
Edit:
My color seems to stay :/

It's still red for you? It's white to me on three different browsers, or was that a typo on your part?

Modifié par sabiansix, 15 décembre 2010 - 06:38 .

[SniperREX]

sabiansix wrote...

DarkBeing91 wrote...
Edit:
My color seems to stay :/

It's still red for you? It's white to me on three different browsers, or was that a typo on your part?

It's white for me too on Chrome.

I'd like to buy Arch Demon and Minuteman . I got a Korlus to trade.