Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 Confirmed Features Thread (Updated 14th June) - Farewell, old thread


6249 réponses à ce sujet

#2526
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Thanks!

#2527
Vez04

Vez04
  • Members
  • 4 266 messages
(Just saying) 1st march on First page needs to be changed to 1st may instead.

#2528
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Fixed that as well.

#2529
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Posted Image

Wait, wasn't I supposed to retweet Lance Henriksen, not the other way around?

#2530
samurai crusade

samurai crusade
  • Members
  • 1 405 messages

Liec wrote...

TheOtherTheoG wrote...

OK, is this new? It's popped up on another forum I follow.
http://www.computera...an-art-or-leak/

Apparently, it might be leaked concept art, mostly of the new Normandy, with a picture of some mining planet. Whatever it is, the guy who made it is damn talented!


That's fanart.


Fanart. but I did love the creature concept! That thing looked awesome

#2531
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 561 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Posted Image

Wait, wasn't I supposed to retweet Lance Henriksen, not the other way around?


Who cares, we're going to see Hackett in ME3.^_^

#2532
McAllyster

McAllyster
  • Members
  • 736 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Posted Image

Wait, wasn't I supposed to retweet Lance Henriksen, not the other way around?


I think this isn't an official Twitter account just a fan account maybe.

#2533
Gatt9

Gatt9
  • Members
  • 1 748 messages
I'm sorry, but I find the bullet point on Bioware striving for photorealism (Through lighting no less) to be drop-down hysterical!

They're limiting themselves to console capabilities, which means 5+ year old tech with around the power of a 7-series GeForce. It's like trying to achieve the land speed record in a ford focus. Consoles are so underpowered at this point it's scary, heck, my X-box choked on the side-mission with the sandstorm due to being saturated with the particles.

If they want photorealism, they're seriously doing it wrong.

#2534
DieselSmack

DieselSmack
  • Members
  • 5 messages

Gatt9 wrote...

I'm sorry, but I find the bullet point on Bioware striving for photorealism (Through lighting no less) to be drop-down hysterical!

They're limiting themselves to console capabilities, which means 5+ year old tech with around the power of a 7-series GeForce. It's like trying to achieve the land speed record in a ford focus. Consoles are so underpowered at this point it's scary, heck, my X-box choked on the side-mission with the sandstorm due to being saturated with the particles.

If they want photorealism, they're seriously doing it wrong.


i dunno if Dice can do it with Battlefield 3 than im sure Bioware can achieve the same 

#2535
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 561 messages
Photorealism is boring, anyway.

#2536
dm3565

dm3565
  • Members
  • 62 messages

Gatt9 wrote...

I'm sorry, but I find the bullet point on Bioware striving for photorealism (Through lighting no less) to be drop-down hysterical!

They're limiting themselves to console capabilities, which means 5+ year old tech with around the power of a 7-series GeForce. It's like trying to achieve the land speed record in a ford focus. Consoles are so underpowered at this point it's scary, heck, my X-box choked on the side-mission with the sandstorm due to being saturated with the particles.

If they want photorealism, they're seriously doing it wrong.


Because, you know, there's no such thing as scaling--such as DAO looking better on PC than the 360--or art design--like Portal 2 looking gorgeous on a seven year-old engine...

If you bothered to check the source for that bullet point, you would find that they said they were shooting for photorealism by experimenting with different lighting techniques, something which can be done with the existing engine and console limitations.

It's called context. It sort of helps.

#2537
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
Hackett is backett? Yes!

#2538
Reever

Reever
  • Members
  • 1 443 messages
So, was thinking about having more varying playthroughs, and these questions came up:
1) Are there any consequences if your LI dies? (does the game even take that into consideration?)
2) How big will be the influence of the chars that live/die? (will it only be so when dealing with more major(as in influential to a certain story line) characters like Tali/Legion)
I think there was something about how the chars that accompany you will affect the endgame, but I seem to miss that when searching through the list...

And do you guys think that the squadie armors from the Appearance packs will carry over? I know that some of the weapons will (Mattocl ftw! :D), but how about armor? (answers to this question will influence my buying an Appearance pack or waiting for other Weapon/Armor packs if there should be some others coming...)

#2539
Jzadek72

Jzadek72
  • Members
  • 1 884 messages
I was just wondering Phaedon, have you thought about putting latest updates in bold or different coloured text? It'd make it easier to find what's new.

#2540
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Jzadek72 wrote...

I was just wondering Phaedon, have you thought about putting latest updates in bold or different coloured text? It'd make it easier to find what's new.

Bold would make the text a bit clutterred, though I wouldn't mind it.
Colour tags are out of the question, they break everytime I edit the post.

If the changelog is not enough, I wouldn't mind it.

#2541
AlbertoAquilani

AlbertoAquilani
  • Members
  • 737 messages
Does anybody else think there might be some confusion about Thessia and Illium?

I don't think we're going to both, it has to be one or the other. OXM France says Thessia, and Level says Illium.

Maybe it is both, but I highly doubt it.

#2542
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

AlbertoAquilani wrote...

Does anybody else think there might be some confusion about Thessia and Illium?

I don't think we're going to both, it has to be one or the other. OXM France says Thessia, and Level says Illium.

Maybe it is both, but I highly doubt it.

I think that Level says both.

#2543
DarthSliver

DarthSliver
  • Members
  • 3 335 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Jzadek72 wrote...

I was just wondering Phaedon, have you thought about putting latest updates in bold or different coloured text? It'd make it easier to find what's new.

Bold would make the text a bit clutterred, though I wouldn't mind it.
Colour tags are out of the question, they break everytime I edit the post.

If the changelog is not enough, I wouldn't mind it.


What about if you put dates on the info thats added like on the side like you do with the source?

#2544
AlbertoAquilani

AlbertoAquilani
  • Members
  • 737 messages

Phaedon wrote...

AlbertoAquilani wrote...

Does anybody else think there might be some confusion about Thessia and Illium?

I don't think we're going to both, it has to be one or the other. OXM France says Thessia, and Level says Illium.

Maybe it is both, but I highly doubt it.

I think that Level says both.


Wow, didn't know that. Pretty cool if true.

#2545
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Isn't that done by the changelog already though? I don't know, I don't want to derp the text any further by making it more complex. What I could is:

CHANGELOG
[56] = Admirall Hackett to return, as well as Tali, from the OXM. (01/01/12)

The sources are next to every info, so I don't think there would be a problem.

Modifié par Phaedon, 01 mai 2011 - 10:04 .


#2546
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 561 messages

Phaedon wrote...
I think that Level says both.


Nope.

Just Illium.

But there's still a chance that we might be able to visit their homeworld, because I don't think BioWare would throw all their cards out at once. 

#2547
DarthSliver

DarthSliver
  • Members
  • 3 335 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Isn't that done by the changelog already though? I don't know, I don't want to derp the text any further by making it more complex. What I could is:

CHANGELOG
[56] = Admirall Hackett to return, as well as Tali, from the OXM. (01/01/12)

The sources are next to every info, so I don't think there would be a problem.


Sorry i forgot about the change log, was trying to help lol

#2548
Aradace

Aradace
  • Members
  • 4 359 messages

Gatt9 wrote...

heck, my X-box choked on the side-mission with the sandstorm due to being saturated with the particles.

.


Then YOUR particular Xbox just sucks bro, no other way to put it.  My old Xbox didnt have that problem and my new one sure as **** doesnt have that problem.  And Im pretty sure Im not the only one that doesnt have that problem.  My theory is that the issue probably was on the user end.  With the emphasis being on the user.  Dont frickin make this into a "zomgpcpwnj00alln00bz" thread.  Take that bull**** else where and stick with the actual topic of ME3.  

And yes, by making that statement you most likely DID intend for it to be taken that way otherwise you wouldnt have put such emphasis on it.

#2549
Harmless Crunch

Harmless Crunch
  • Members
  • 1 528 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Posted Image

*Nerd-Gasam*
Oh and thanks Phaedon I've been really enjoying this thread. But I have one question.
If for instance ME3 was leaked and videos of it appeared on Youtube and they contained spoliers would you put thoe spoliers in you blog or here?
And thanks one last time this has been really helpfull.

#2550
Gvaz

Gvaz
  • Members
  • 1 039 messages
I can't ****ing BELIEVE that they're putting hte mining minigame back in. You stupid ****ers.

Guess I'm getting it for the PC so i can cheat my way to a million resources so I don't have to grind that unfun minigame