6249 réponses à ce sujet

[Jentario]

mikethor007 wrote...

Chewin3 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...
 I know, it doesn't make sense! It wouldn't be fair...! 
Isn't Mass Effect 3 supposed to be interactive like the other games?
It is. Which means we get to choose who to kill and who to save? 

Hope it's not another Virmire incident...

And Garrus dying, yeah if it's b/c of his popularity, then it really sucks. I think that we can resue him in the game, but he probably just has a bigger chance of dying than the rest of the crew.

I think that what was written there was merely the mag writer trying to put a different spin on it. It seems that OXM UK got the exact same info that GI got, so they have to put some different spins on it to make themselves look different. I say that's purely speculation on the guy's part. Only served to paint himself as a derp.

It was pure, 100% speculation. They actually said "probably". You should stop dicussing that matter. Imagine that just wasn't written.

Modifié par Jentario, 09 mai 2011 - 05:18 .

[Remus Artega]

It´s just that people who chose the renegade cerberus ending might end up feeling like idiots

And here I thought that this game is not as black/white as it seems to be... so obviously paragon is the only way to go now?...

Modifié par Remus Artega, 09 mai 2011 - 05:17 .

[Jentario]

Remus Artega wrote...

It´s just that people who chose the renegade cerberus ending might end up feeling like idiots

And here I thought that this game is not as black/white as it seems to be... so obviously paragon is the only way to go now?...

Throughout the whole series renagades got rewarded, it's about time they get punished for their actions.

[Thargorichiban]

Remus Artega wrote...

It´s just that people who chose the renegade cerberus ending might end up feeling like idiots

And here I thought that this game is not as black/white as it seems to be... so obviously paragon is the only way to go now?...

Hey, all it does is potentially make the Cerberus parts of the next game more challenging. I don't think many renegade Shepards would be against that. Besides, just imagine the special Renegade interrupts you'll have to curse TIM for his sudden but inevitable betrayal!

[Jzadek72]

Jentario wrote...

Remus Artega wrote...

It´s just that people who chose the renegade cerberus ending might end up feeling like idiots

And here I thought that this game is not as black/white as it seems to be... so obviously paragon is the only way to go now?...

Throughout the whole series renagades got rewarded, it's about time they get punished for their actions.

No, paragon is about doing the right thing despite repercussions. Renegade is about minimising repercussions at the expense of morality. I feel it reduces the meaning of being a paragon if everything goes right.

[kill_switch_423]

Just a heads up for those planing to watch E3:



Kind of a vague and should-be-obvious answer, but I thoughtI'd share anyway.

Modifié par kill_switch_423, 09 mai 2011 - 05:37 .

[timj2011]

the new oxm scans have showed up in case anybody is curious

[mikethor007]

timj2011 wrote...

the new oxm scans have showed up in case anybody is curious

Kind of old news. Already saw them.

[timj2011]

mikethor007 wrote...

timj2011 wrote...

the new oxm scans have showed up in case anybody is curious

Kind of old news. Already saw them.

my bad, i know everybody knew the info, i just wasnt sure about the scans

[Razagon]

@CaseyDHudson Will there be more choices for armor and weapons in ME3 compared to ME2, out of interest? One of few ME1 things I prfrd to 2.

CaseyDHudson Casey Hudson
@Righto Definitely. Much wider variety and more sophisticated decision-making in choosing and customizing gear. A deeper economy overall.

[timj2011]

Razagon wrote...

@CaseyDHudson Will there be more choices for armor and weapons in ME3 compared to ME2, out of interest? One of few ME1 things I prfrd to 2.

CaseyDHudson Casey Hudson
@Righto Definitely. Much wider variety and more sophisticated decision-making in choosing and customizing gear. A deeper economy overall.

Win

[Phaedon]

Gathering up features to add. Give me a minute.

[Phaedon]

Valkyre4 wrote...
I have said it many times before... so many I cant even count anymore. I do not read this thread. I do not read this thread, I do not read this thread.

The spoilers I keep reffering to come from magazines, blogs, Bioware's interviews and generally the spoilers come from Bioware in every single blog, major site that there is out there about videogames. So I really cannot protect myself anymore from Bioware's spoilers... they release massive spoilers and they offer not even the slightest warning... that is a major sign of either:

a) incompetence , especially when you promised that you would not do the same mistakes you did in ME2 which spoiled pretty much the entire game prior to its release,

or

simply retarded for the same reason...

Then stop posting in a thread that is about discussing confirmed features, which you didn't even read. It's that simple.

[Razagon]

You don't get it P. It's Bioware's fault that he does post here. Damn confirmed features, you can't avoid them here.

[Remus Artega]

The thing is it's in no spoilers section...so it is not entirely wrong on his side...

[Razagon]

The thing is ME3 info relased by Bioware is not a spoiler.

[ciaweth]

mikethor007 wrote...

Chewin3 wrote...

RunicDragons wrote...
 I know, it doesn't make sense! It wouldn't be fair...! 
Isn't Mass Effect 3 supposed to be interactive like the other games?
It is. Which means we get to choose who to kill and who to save? 

Hope it's not another Virmire incident...

And Garrus dying, yeah if it's b/c of his popularity, then it really sucks. I think that we can resue him in the game, but he probably just has a bigger chance of dying than the rest of the crew.

I think that what was written there was merely the mag writer trying to put a different spin on it. It seems that OXM UK got the exact same info that GI got, so they have to put some different spins on it to make themselves look different. I say that's purely speculation on the guy's part. Only served to paint himself as a derp.

Yeah, to me it read as, "I ****** to angst, so I'm going to make something horrible up in my head and then freak out as if it were true."  No fear.

[PnXMarcin1PL]

Well, Moderators have already accepted this thread in non spoiler section. What's the problem to read name of a thread and then do not enter it when it looks spolierish? Especially when the thread is named Confirmed features thread. Are those damned haters trying to destroy another thread ? I do not want to offend anyone, but I've really had a bad day today....

Modifié par PnXMarcin1PL, 09 mai 2011 - 06:56 .

[Phaedon]

Remus Artega wrote...

The thing is it's in no spoilers section...so it is not entirely wrong on his side...

The sticky thread says that ME3 spoilers are a-okay. I just moved the story section for people who are trying to learn more about the gameplay, but not spoil themselves too much.

[Fiery Phoenix]

Phaedon, your titles are made of pure win.

[Razagon]

Don't know if it matters but you got two [44] references.

[Phaedon]

Thanks, I didn't notice that. Should be OK now.

[CroGamer002]

I don't have OXM scans. Please PM.

[Phaedon]

Check the twitter. Or Javier's page.

Modifié par Phaedon, 09 mai 2011 - 07:06 .

[Remus Artega]

Razagon wrote...

The thing is ME3 info relased by Bioware is not a spoiler.

*cough* ME2 *cough*

but Phaedon is right...if the thread is accepted by mods then there is no reason for him/her to get angry about being "spoiled"...it is just that some info can be tagged as such