Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 Confirmed Features Thread (Updated 14th June) - Farewell, old thread


6249 réponses à ce sujet

#3476
1Minsc1

1Minsc1
  • Members
  • 224 messages

Jebel Krong wrote...
Interviewer: ME3 reapers are coming?
CH: Actually Reapers are here. beginning ME3 they take the earth, shep narrowly escapes and the game is about full-scale galactic war and, eventually, taking back the earth.


:blink: Ah, Reapers, yes...

#3477
RunicDragons

RunicDragons
  • Members
  • 697 messages

Jebel Krong wrote...

I: sex?
CH: not right now, but in the game: definitely.

Nice! :lol:

Modifié par RunicDragons, 09 mai 2011 - 09:27 .


#3478
Geth_Prime

Geth_Prime
  • Members
  • 907 messages
The interviewer sounded a bit too excited when Casey talked about sex in ME3...something tells me he doesn't get out much.

#3479
Babli

Babli
  • Members
  • 1 316 messages

Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration
systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.

I like the sound of this.

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.

#3480
Da Mecca

Da Mecca
  • Members
  • 999 messages
Well it doesn't help that most renegade decisions in ME are a bit on the ignorant side.

#3481
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 561 messages

Da Mecca wrote...

Well it doesn't help that most renegade decisions in ME are a bit on the ignorant side.


More like "Take the quickest way out of this and hope for the best"

#3482
JRCHOharry

JRCHOharry
  • Members
  • 7 782 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

Da Mecca wrote...

Well it doesn't help that most renegade decisions in ME are a bit on the ignorant side.


More like "Take the quickest way out of this and hope for the best"

I see most renegade choices as "Better safe than sorry"

#3483
Mr Plow

Mr Plow
  • Members
  • 520 messages

Geth_Prime wrote...

I've seen the OXM video on Live. No new info really, other than a confirmed feature from Casey Hudson: "There will be sex".


Well I'm convinced to get the game now!    Posted Image



(only kidding I'm getting the game anyway.  I'm not a pervert...probably)

#3484
atheelogos

atheelogos
  • Members
  • 4 554 messages

JRCHOharry wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Da Mecca wrote...

Well it doesn't help that most renegade decisions in ME are a bit on the ignorant side.


More like "Take the quickest way out of this and hope for the best"

I see most renegade choices as "Better safe than sorry"

You put it perfectly my friend.

#3485
Darkhour

Darkhour
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.


Agree. Sounds like things will be harder for Renegade (ie.e renegades are punished).

Unless he says, "This isn't a Disney movie. Everything can't be solved with the nicest outcome. Our story isn't all black and white. Some paragon choices will bite Shepard in the ass", I can only assume Renegade = wrong choice. Paragon = right choice.

I have six different Shepards with various different choices.  But it's seeming more and more like you only need two: all renegade and all paragon. I have one that, I felt, sorta joined Cerberus.  So now that angle is pointless.  It would be nice to have a Council/Spectre trying to kill shepard option, but oh well.

Modifié par Darkhour, 09 mai 2011 - 10:23 .


#3486
Da Mecca

Da Mecca
  • Members
  • 999 messages
So Paragons are people who invoke heavy risk for the priiiiize?

#3487
RunicDragons

RunicDragons
  • Members
  • 697 messages

JRCHOharry wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Da Mecca wrote...

Well it doesn't help that most renegade decisions in ME are a bit on the ignorant side.


More like "Take the quickest way out of this and hope for the best"

I see most renegade choices as "Better safe than sorry"

This. 

#3488
ExtremeOne

ExtremeOne
  • Members
  • 2 829 messages

Babli wrote...

Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration
systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.

I like the sound of this.

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.

   



Mass Effect 3 is turning into a disney movie . I mean look at the info so far . paragon players and their choices are not going to be punished . If choices have no effects no matter what choice you make then Bioware needs to remove the choice system from ME 3 . If they will only punish renegade players something is messed up 

#3489
ExtremeOne

ExtremeOne
  • Members
  • 2 829 messages

Da Mecca wrote...

So Paragons are people who invoke heavy risk for the priiiiize?

   


Paragons just have the same protection that VS do from Bioware thats all 

#3490
Maike91

Maike91
  • Members
  • 506 messages

ExtremeOne wrote...

Babli wrote...

Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration
systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.

I like the sound of this.

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.

   



Mass Effect 3 is turning into a disney movie . I mean look at the info so far . paragon players and their choices are not going to be punished . If choices have no effects no matter what choice you make then Bioware needs to remove the choice system from ME 3 . If they will only punish renegade players something is messed up 


What about the rachni husks? Or won't there be any? But yeah, hopefully paragons will also be punished for some of their choices

#3491
Razagon

Razagon
  • Members
  • 540 messages
I don't understand. Do people want to have same endings for paragon and renegade? Renegades are practicaly lone wolfs. They destroy or reject all allies and stand alone. The only victory I see for them is that the humanity is left as a dominant or possibly the only species left. Paragon on the other hand is all about building bridges to other species and massing allies instead of inividual strenght. They are deeply connected to their friends and as such deciding which one needs to be sacrificied or left to their doom is punishment enough.

#3492
ExtremeOne

ExtremeOne
  • Members
  • 2 829 messages

Maike91 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

Babli wrote...

Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration
systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.

I like the sound of this.

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.

   



Mass Effect 3 is turning into a disney movie . I mean look at the info so far . paragon players and their choices are not going to be punished . If choices have no effects no matter what choice you make then Bioware needs to remove the choice system from ME 3 . If they will only punish renegade players something is messed up 


What about the rachni husks? Or won't there be any? But yeah, hopefully paragons will also be punished for some of their choices

    


The rachni husks is a form of punishment for paragon players but that is not enough. The end decision of ME 2 should have punishment for paragon players as well .  They need to even the choice punishment out for both renegade and paragons . saving the base should me us renegade players remain working with Cerberus . because that is what ME 2 implies at the end 

#3493
1136342t54_

1136342t54_
  • Members
  • 3 197 messages
So do people actually want to be rewarded for giving the base to Cerberus? Honestly even if Cerberus wasn't going to turn against you (Thats a big if) they have a horrible track record when dealing with projects such as the Collector Base. Eventually they'd build a human Reaper then lose control of it and it will began to tear up the Galaxy.

The only major Renegade decisions that may come and bite you in the ass would be killing the Rachni (Not too sure on that one) Killing the Council, Killing Wrex and not saving the Genophage.

Saving the Geth could be a bad idea since Legion wasn't a hundred percent sure the virus was wiped out. Most Renegade decisions are basically a better safe than sorry decisions or just being idiotic (Saving Morinth). Shepard will likely win even as a Renegade but it won't be without loss.

#3494
1136342t54_

1136342t54_
  • Members
  • 3 197 messages

ExtremeOne wrote...

Maike91 wrote...

ExtremeOne wrote...

Babli wrote...

Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration
systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.

I like the sound of this.

I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.

Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...:?

Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.

   



Mass Effect 3 is turning into a disney movie . I mean look at the info so far . paragon players and their choices are not going to be punished . If choices have no effects no matter what choice you make then Bioware needs to remove the choice system from ME 3 . If they will only punish renegade players something is messed up 


What about the rachni husks? Or won't there be any? But yeah, hopefully paragons will also be punished for some of their choices

    


The rachni husks is a form of punishment for paragon players but that is not enough. The end decision of ME 2 should have punishment for paragon players as well .  They need to even the choice punishment out for both renegade and paragons . saving the base should me us renegade players remain working with Cerberus . because that is what ME 2 implies at the end 


Rachni husks will likely be in the game no matter what the players do. Cerberus, Binary Helix and Saren got their hands on Rachni. Sovereign may easily have some Rachni specimens stowed away somewhere for later use.

Shepard doesn't have to work with Cerberus at the end of the game when Shep saves the base. Shepard may just see the technology as extremely useful and making a deal with the devil is necessary for the safety of the galaxy. Shepard would likely work with Cerberus too keep them in check but not for them.

#3495
Thompson family

Thompson family
  • Members
  • 2 748 messages

Agree. Sounds like things will be harder for Renegade (ie.e renegades are punished).


First off, relatively few choices really matter either way. Whether you let that goofy keeper scanner who was trying to recover his data or not, for instance. Does anyone believe that will really make a difference? Shoving a pistol in Conrad Verner's face? So forth and so on.

So let's bear down on the choices that might matter:

1. Rachni Queen. (ME1)
2. Wrex lives or dies. (ME1)
3. Handing the Collector base to TIM. (ME2)

Note that I do not include the Reprogram/Kill the Geth Heretics, since you can get their alliance or at least neutrality (I presume) either through Renegade options in Overlord or in your decsion on what to do with Legion.

Clearly, killing the Rachni Queen could cost a potential ally, but I'd be thunderstruck if that alone will cost the Organics the war.

Even a Renegade should have wanted to keep Wrex. Wrex is more than half Renegade himself. Even if your Shep didn't save him, the Krogan are looking extinction in the face too.

The third one is the big one: Keeping or blowing up the Collector base.

That's not even a matter of Renegae or Paragon, IMHO. That decision boils down to whether Shep trusted TIM or not.

If my Shep had been the biggest Renegade in the known galaxy, he still wouldn't have trusted TIM.

A renegade is somebody who will shoot an unarmed Salarian for making a dumb, hopeless attack  over keeper scans or watch a whole refinery blow up and the people inside it burn to death just so a squadmate can settle a grudge. Yet he hands a Reaper factory over to a guy just as ruthless as he is, only smoother?

:huh:

What am I missing here?

Modifié par Thompson family, 09 mai 2011 - 10:51 .


#3496
1136342t54_

1136342t54_
  • Members
  • 3 197 messages

Thompson family wrote...


Agree. Sounds like things will be harder for Renegade (ie.e renegades are punished).


First off, relatively few choices really matter either way. Whether you let that goofy keeper scanner who was trying to recover his data or not, for instance. Does anyone believe that will really make a difference? Shoving a pistol in Conrad Verner's face? So forth and so on.

So let's bear down on the choices that might matter:

1. Rachni Queen. (ME1)
2. Wrex lives or dies. (ME1)
3. Handing the Collector base to TIM. (ME2)

Note that I do not include the Reprogram/Kill the Geth Heretics, since you can get their alliance or at least neutrality (I presume) either through Renegade options in Overlord or in your decsion on what to do with Legion.

Clearly, killing the Rachni Queen could cost a potential ally, but I'd be thunderstruck if that alone will cost the Organics the war.

Even a Renegade should have wanted to keep Wrex. Wrex is more than half Renegade himself. Even if your Shep didn't save him, the Krogan are looking extinction in the face too.

The third one is the big one: Keeping or blowing up the Collector base.

That's not even a matter of Renegae or Paragon, IMHO. That decision boils down to whether Shep trusted TIM or not.

If my Shep had been the biggest Renegade in the known galaxy, he still wouldn't have trusted TIM.

A renegade is somebody who will shoot an unarmed Salarian for making a dumb, hopeless attack  over keeper scans or watched a whole refinery blow up and the people inside it burn to death just so a squadmate can settle a grudge. Yet he hands a Reaper factory over to a guy just as ruthless as he is, only smoother?

What am I missing here?


Exactly.

Rengades aren't idiots. They just take ends justify means more seriously. Also they need a hug:)

#3497
Maike91

Maike91
  • Members
  • 506 messages
On my first playthrough I played an almost paragon shepard, but I saved the base, because I thought you could keep the reaper tech for yourself and won't have to hand it over to TIM. That might be a reason for TIM to hunt shepard, even if he/she made the renegade choice, but I am not so sure if that's going to happen

Modifié par Maike91, 09 mai 2011 - 11:08 .


#3498
SSJ5

SSJ5
  • Members
  • 229 messages
What does bigger economy mean? Can we expect that our spending of credits will have a bigger impact on the game?

#3499
1136342t54_

1136342t54_
  • Members
  • 3 197 messages

SSJ5 wrote...

What does bigger economy mean? Can we expect that our spending of credits will have a bigger impact on the game?


Well you may began to be involved in funding the war effort?

#3500
AquamanOS

AquamanOS
  • Members
  • 445 messages
Could be that people who gave him the base only have Cerberus after them as a show only, to keep you on the Alliances good side, so you can rally the galaxy (most people won't trust Shep with Cerberus and Cerberus and Shep alone can't fight all the Reapers), while you're still secretly allied with them. But if you denyed him the base, he's geninuely pissed and trying to kill Shep for real.

So something like, Didn't give him the base- You have to fight top Cerberus agents throughout the game, and you have to fight Kai Leng in a boss battle. You get no help from Cerberus at all throughout the game. Gave him the base- You fight far less Cerberus agents, and nothing very strong, as IM is only sending guys he knows won't even slow Shepard down. You also get some credits and weapons sent your way from Illusive Man.