Mass Effect 3 Confirmed Features Thread (Updated 14th June) - Farewell, old thread
#3526
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 04:14
#3527
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:25
ExtremeOne wrote...
Babli wrote...
I like the sound of this.Jebel Krong wrote...
I: ME2 was perfect, how can you top it?
CH: well obviously not, so
they look at feedback to see what they can improve - deeper space
exploration systems, deeper rpg systems, a more customised experience
overall.Yeaaah, not punishing renegades...I: ME2 end, cerberus enemies in ME3, punishing renegades?
CH: not punishing but you will see different results of that, as TIM obviously benefits from that resource, but it doesn't punish renegades, it just means some end-scenarious may be different or harder to get.
Somehow I doubt that any renegade choice will benefit us more then any paragon one. Seriously, its like from disney movie...sort of.
Mass Effect 3 is turning into a disney movie . I mean look at the info so far . paragon players and their choices are not going to be punished . If choices have no effects no matter what choice you make then Bioware needs to remove the choice system from ME 3 . If they will only punish renegade players something is messed up
Should I remind you the rachni husks or did you already forget? Everyone's getting punished. Its part of the story line.
#3528
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:27
#3529
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:46
#3530
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 07:59
I think we can completely forget the idea now that this character is in any way related to Kahlee Sanders from the novels.
#3531
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:07
#3532
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:12
ExtremeOne wrote...
Well I have no need to worry about the Rachni because I murdered them in ME 1 . but the idea that paragons get off with no punishment from the end decision in 2 is bull sh*t. Bioware needs to make player choice have impact for both renegades and paragons
I'd agree, and I'm a paragon. However, we shouldn't assume that there will be no consequences, just ones that are more spoiler-y. For all you know, Mass Effect 3 could involve the choice of whether to restore Cerberus under Shepard's leadership or destroy them, and if you restore them, you get the base back. If you're a paragon, you lose that force.
#3533
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:13
Jzadek72 wrote...
I'd agree, and I'm a paragon. However, we shouldn't assume that there will be no consequences, just ones that are more spoiler-y. For all you know, Mass Effect 3 could involve the choice of whether to restore Cerberus under Shepard's leadership or destroy them, and if you restore them, you get the base back. If you're a paragon, you lose that force.
I'd like that choice. Could put their resources to good use for once.
#3534
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:15
SomeKindaEnigma wrote...
Mr. Hudson answered a question of mine as well. James Sanders had a name change and is now James Vega. To quote what he said, "He's actually James Vega now. We were still designing his character when GameInformer came by."
I think we can completely forget the idea now that this character is in any way related to Kahlee Sanders from the novels.
If this is true, that's awesome news. Not that I am too excited about the new squad-mate anyway but the possible connection to Kahlee was sort of cringe-worthy.
#3535
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:18
#3536
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:20
Joe_of_the_Dead Wrote: Any chance remaining loyal to the same romance through all three games will earn the player a special achievement?
CH: I won't spoil any details on it but we love to track that stuff so the game can respond accordingly
Modifié par Vez04, 10 mai 2011 - 08:21 .
#3537
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:23
"ground Reapers" Do you mean Reapers that land on the ground or what?Jentario wrote...
Casey Hudson answered me! He actually read my post on ground Reapers! Now you can surely believe we will see GR at least in some capacity!!! "ME3 is the full-blown galactic war against the Reapers, so there will be some insane situations up close and personal with them." Hell yeah!!! Anyway, I'm pretty lucky to get both an answer from him and from Christina.
#3538
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:45
#3539
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 08:57
AlbertoAquilani wrote...
I don't have to Twitter and don't plan to use it but can someone ask him about their version of 'loot' please mentioned in OXM and also about HUB worlds, are there more and are they bigger?
You dont need twitter account to read post on twitter...
http://twitter.com/#...?q=#masseffect3
Modifié par eTheBlack, 10 mai 2011 - 08:58 .
#3540
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 09:03
atheelogos wrote...
"ground Reapers" Do you mean Reapers that land on the ground or what?Jentario wrote...
Casey Hudson answered me! He actually read my post on ground Reapers! Now you can surely believe we will see GR at least in some capacity!!! "ME3 is the full-blown galactic war against the Reapers, so there will be some insane situations up close and personal with them." Hell yeah!!! Anyway, I'm pretty lucky to get both an answer from him and from Christina.
Actually, I ment remote conrolled Reaper drones. Specifically made for ground based objectives and not just total destruction.
#3541
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 09:04
eTheBlack wrote...
AlbertoAquilani wrote...
I don't have to Twitter and don't plan to use it but can someone ask him about their version of 'loot' please mentioned in OXM and also about HUB worlds, are there more and are they bigger?
You dont need twitter account to read post on twitter...
http://twitter.com/#...?q=#masseffect3
Yeah, I should have clarified, I do read Twitter but I don't have an account to send messages. So if anyone could be nice and ask him about those two things, it'd be appreciated.
#3542
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 09:05
#3543
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 09:33
cool thanks for the info.Jentario wrote...
atheelogos wrote...
"ground Reapers" Do you mean Reapers that land on the ground or what?Jentario wrote...
Casey Hudson answered me! He actually read my post on ground Reapers! Now you can surely believe we will see GR at least in some capacity!!! "ME3 is the full-blown galactic war against the Reapers, so there will be some insane situations up close and personal with them." Hell yeah!!! Anyway, I'm pretty lucky to get both an answer from him and from Christina.
Actually, I ment remote conrolled Reaper drones. Specifically made for ground based objectives and not just total destruction.
#3544
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 09:43
atheelogos wrote...
cool thanks for the info.Jentario wrote...
atheelogos wrote...
"ground Reapers" Do you mean Reapers that land on the ground or what?Jentario wrote...
Casey Hudson answered me! He actually read my post on ground Reapers! Now you can surely believe we will see GR at least in some capacity!!! "ME3 is the full-blown galactic war against the Reapers, so there will be some insane situations up close and personal with them." Hell yeah!!! Anyway, I'm pretty lucky to get both an answer from him and from Christina.
Actually, I ment remote conrolled Reaper drones. Specifically made for ground based objectives and not just total destruction.
Do you think his answer was a confirmation?
#3545
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:18
#3546
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:26
In about 2-6 hours it's morning so that i assume CH will answer Qs again on twitter.
Modifié par Vez04, 10 mai 2011 - 10:32 .
#3547
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:31
#3548
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:39
Jentario wrote...
cool, someone should really ask about the Citadel.
And this.
#3549
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:44
#3550
Posté 10 mai 2011 - 10:48




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





