i never said always, you're putting words in my mouth.Murmillos wrote...
Crying? How is having a debate crying - I don't think I said I wasn't going to buy ME3 because of it. I'm just mildly disappointed in the direction it took.Clonedzero wrote...
are you still crying about the ammo thing? let it go dude lol.
you'll be alot happier
Just as much as they mangled the lore for game-play reasons and being called out on it. I'm going to call people out who have to ignore lore and make up crap just to try to win an argument.
I get it, an ammo based system MAY be better for game play reasons and thats why you like it; in your view, game play should always trump lore. I have no problem with that, thats your view point and its valid to your own reasonings. But if you have a strong view point, you shouldn't have to resort to lies and ignorance to try to claim your side of the debate.
lore-wise the specifics on how guns operate is pretty damn minor, so therefore its acceptable for gameplay to take priority.
if it was a more signifancant thing, like the entire way the base technology worked was changed for gameplay reasons, or how different aliens act, then that'd be more important and i'd be bothered by that.
but its just ammo, its SUPER minor is all. i understand when a little thing like that itches at you though. i cant ever play a sole survivor shepard after ME2 and it was my favorite backround.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut








