6249 réponses à ce sujet

[FLYING GRENADE11]

I hope Miranda doesn't join Cerberus again, because i blew up the base lol.

[Razagon]

I don't know what you guys saw in you playthroughs but in mine at the end she pretty much says **** *** to TIM. And she quits. Why would she be back in Cerberus? Does she have a death wish?

[didymos1120]

Razagon wrote...

I don't know what you guys saw in you playthroughs but in mine at the end she pretty much says **** *** to TIM. And she quits. Why would she be back in Cerberus? Does she have a death wish?

Even if you keep the base, she's not very kosher about it and is very much doubting the Cerberus way.

[TomY90]

FLYING GRENADE11 wrote...

I hope Miranda doesn't join Cerberus again, because i blew up the base lol.

I agree and to be honest i would much rather have miranda be a full squad member rather than short term or an appearance.

I hope Jack has done a disappearing act the same as the inventory did and would love less about Tali (Do not get the obession with daffy duck with a bucket on his head (sorry her))

[FLYING GRENADE11]

Jack=whiny emo girl no 1 cares about

[Razagon]

Ok guys it's ok not to like some characters but keep the insults to minimum please. Nobody needs a flame war.

Modifié par Razagon, 14 avril 2011 - 01:12 .

[FLYING GRENADE11]

Ok,im sorry jack fans.

[Kandid001]

I'm sure all 3 Jack fans in the world were very offended by that post.

Anyway, I wonder how they will handle Samara (and especially you-know-who if you did you-know-what during Samara's loyalty mission). I don't expect Samara (or you-know-who) to be recruitable characters, but there should be dire ramifications depending on how you handled her situation in ME2.

[ApplesauceBandit]

I hope they don't completely abandon our LI's D:
If i don't get to see Miranda's ass i will be pissed!

[JeffZero]

I think my biggest question plot-wise right now is just how antagonistic TIM will be to Shepards with particularly Machiavellian streaks throughout ME2.

[Daryst]

Can someone tell me what NG+ is? Is it correct for me to assume that it is a second playthrough with the same character?

I just noticed this phrase while looking through the first page.

[asindre]

Daryst wrote...

Can someone tell me what NG+ is? Is it correct for me to assume that it is a second playthrough with the same character?

Yes

[zico291]

I am just happy that Liara is a actual squad member again.

[Aradace]

Wait, so the timed decisions ala Alpha protocol are confirmed? NICE!!!!

[Daryst]

zico291 wrote...

I am just happy that Liara is a actual squad member again.

I think its safer to assume that her role will be similair to what she did in the LotSB DLC.

[Razagon]

Aradace wrote...

Wait, so the timed decisions ala Alpha protocol are confirmed? NICE!!!!

Dude it's in the rumor mill. In fact I would bet there are no timed decisions.

[Bill the Illusive man]

TIM brought me back to life, and I gave TIM the base. I thought we had an understanding here lol. What happened that makes him foolishly try to hunt me down, as I am known for distributing death across the Cosmos? Or is it safe to say that he would inevitably try to screw me over lol.

That features list looks pretty good there. Good stuff. I can't wait.

[Aradace]

Razagon wrote...

Aradace wrote...

Wait, so the timed decisions ala Alpha protocol are confirmed? NICE!!!!

Dude it's in the rumor mill. In fact I would bet there are no timed decisions.

Only reason I asked is because of the link.  No sense getting upity about it lol.  

[Phaedon]

There are no timed decisions in AP, there are only timed dialogue choices.

[Aradace]

Phaedon wrote...

There are no timed decisions in AP, there are only timed dialogue choices.

Which is essentially the same thing only stating it differently.  I played AP as well.  Timed dialog was the only thing I liked about the damn game lol

[Phaedon]

But timed decisions is probably something like the Reaper IFF mission.

[Razagon]

I don't think I would've liked to reach my all-affecting-universe decisions in 5 secs or less.

[Aradace]

Razagon wrote...

I don't think I would've liked to reach my all-affecting-universe decisions in 5 secs or less.

Why not?  Given, not all of them should be "timed" per se.  But at the same time, some of them should (No paragon/renegade interupts dont count lol) IMO.  I know using the term "real life" is bad juju to some but in "reality" you dont get to sit there for minutes on end pondering what you're going to say to someone.  Well, sometimes you do but most of the time a person has a proverbial "window" to respond in a timely manner.  

Again, attempting to apply RL scenarios to a video game is rather far fetched for some seeing as how thats the whole reason they play video games is to escape reality.  It's just that the concept AP used was cool and was, in my opinion, the only good thing about the game     

@Phaedon - True, but at the same time, when you argue the symantics, you are still making a decision when you choose what dialog choice you are picking.  So again, essentially the same thing

Modifié par Aradace, 14 avril 2011 - 02:49 .

[Razagon]

It's perfectly fine if you liked it in AP but ME isn't AP. What works in one game doesn't have to work for the other. They aren't the same games and the universes are different (by that I mean spies and Reaper apocalypse). But for me it would only be frustrating as I lead my conversations the way I want them to and having a limited time would inevetably lead to mistake due to a pressure I would feel which would lead me to loading my game. Saving before every conversation and loading it until I nail it doesn't sound fun. Considering I could just analyse my answer for several seconds and pick it.

And in real life nobody is holding a stopwatch for me when he askes me something. I always take my time to think and then answer to give the best possible answer. That's why I rarely sound stupid around my friends.

[Aradace]

[quote]Razagon wrote...

It's perfectly fine if you liked it in AP but ME isn't AP. What works in one game doesn't have to work for the other. They aren't the same games and the universes are different (by that I mean spies and Reaper apocalypse). But for me it would only be frustrating as I lead my conversations the way I want them to and having a limited time would inevetably lead to mistake due to a pressure I would feel which would lead me to loading my game. Saving before every conversation and loading it until I nail it doesn't sound fun. Considering I could just analyse my answer for several seconds and pick it.

And in real life nobody is holding a stopwatch for me when he askes me something. I always take my time to think and then answer to give the best possible answer. That's why I rarely sound stupid around my friends.[/quotei
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is fine.  I never said that they had to implement it.  I just said it would be fun IMO if they did.  I personally do very well at making snap decisions under pressure (military training kind of instills that in you to keep your head under pressure).  So for me, it'd be kind of fun.  But again, I can see it from your PoV as well.  Not everyone can keep a level head under pressure and make quick, decisive decisions.  Not saying that as a bad thing so I apologize ahead of time if it's taken as such.

Secondly, I never said anything about anyone timing someone about their RL responses.  But if someone asks you a question and you take 5 mins to respond, that's just assinine lol.  No offense intended for anyone who really does take that long but you get my point.

Modifié par Aradace, 14 avril 2011 - 03:07 .