Like the sister conversation. <_<
Modifié par Ryzaki, 11 décembre 2010 - 09:44 .
Modifié par Ryzaki, 11 décembre 2010 - 09:44 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Piecake wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
As for the others, maybe you're right.
Personally, I see the characters in ME 2 as generally being superior to those of ME 1.
Agreed, I thought ME 2's characters were one of its strong suits. I really didn't find any of the ME 1 companions terribly interesting, though the antagonists were quite good.
BrotherWarth wrote...
The only ME2 characters that I felt had any depth were Jack, Grunt and Mordin. The rest were cardboard
BrotherWarth wrote...
IMO.
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 11 décembre 2010 - 09:49 .
Upsettingshorts wrote...
They could very easily lampshade fixed outfits though as the character's "adventuring clothes" that they put on when they go out to get into fights with Qunari and such. The narrative gives enough leeway to make that assumption just as believable as "they eat and go to the bathroom when we're not looking."
Maybe changing into pajamas at home is one of the "exceptional" changes they make. We just don't have the info.
thedistortedchild wrote...
My one trepidation is that My Fem-shep was the only female on the Normandy who dressed appropriately. She wore a helmet in space, and she didn't have a belt-bra for armor. I don't want that to be the
same with my fem-Hawke. This worries me because Isabela's outfit looks like the DA2 belt-bra. To me this means that Bella sits in the camp, just like Jack and Miranda did when I played ME2. ../../../images/forum/emoticons/sad.png
My problem with Isabela's outfit isn't that it's inappropiate. My problem with her outfit is that it's not battle worthy. If she wore the outfit we've been when hanging around the city and then slipped to a leather cuirass when going looking for trouble at a dungeon, I'd have no problem with her. The fact that she believes herself inmune to arrows and blades is what bothers me.Apollo Starflare wrote...
Seriously though, I can't see how DA2 is a regression of the portrayal of women in computer games. They based Aveline off of a male model for starters and it really is only Isabela who is dressed in any way that could be considered 'inappropriate' by the more prudish players, considering her background I consider her outfit very much in keeping with her personality anyway.
I'll have to dig up Gaider's quote where he says than personality and dialogue are the important parts of characterization, and then trips over himself when questioned the need of fixed outfits.BrotherWarth wrote...
My concern with this sort of design is that it tells me the developerst hink I'm stupid. Dialogue and actions can tell you everything you need to know about a character, so the developers saying that we need their outfits to express their personality is like saying we can't understand these characters without visual cues.
Pseudocognition wrote...
He's just about as appropriately dressed for battle as Isabela is. I approve.Upsettingshorts wrote...
Why doesn't Varric button his shirt? Is his chesthair and strong jaw meant to compensate for his short stature and make him appear more typically masculine? Just ad libbing that one, but it seems somewhat consistent with that same premise.
Modifié par Xewaka, 11 décembre 2010 - 09:51 .
yukidama wrote...
It killed me that the investigate option was right on her butt too.Upsettingshorts wrote...
The Big Nothing wrote...
Some of this stuff, admittedly, is deliberately sexual, but c'mon, sex sells. We all like it, even if we don't admit it. It's the only reason we KNOW we are alive, 'cause it's the only way to perpetuate life. Enjoy it. Mmm.
Yes and no.
Yes: "I can't admire your body?" *camera pans over Miranda*
No: "Help me rescue my sister." * Miranda's ass fills a third of the screen*
*imagines you're joking about something but is too tired and slightly drunk to notice anymore*
Modifié par The Big Nothing, 11 décembre 2010 - 09:53 .
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
The only ME2 characters that I felt had any depth were Jack, Grunt and Mordin. The rest were cardboard
Jacob had depth, he just wasn't "interesting" and I do not blame FemShep players for simply avoiding him entirely. I would dispute that "comes off as a cool dude with a good head on his shoulders that I'd like to get a beer with and would definitely have my back, but is ambivalent about his role with Cerberus" isn't a deep character.
Samara, Thane, Legion (as representative of his race), Tali - etc - all of the non DLC ones were really well done. Kasumi and Zaeed, for what they were, weren't bad either.BrotherWarth wrote...
IMO.
Ah, right. Disregard the above heh. Anyway...
The on-topic question is though what if anything their outfits either contributed to or detracted from their characters.
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
The Big Nothing wrote...
yukidama wrote...
It killed me that the investigate option was right on her butt too.Upsettingshorts wrote...
The Big Nothing wrote...
Some of this stuff, admittedly, is deliberately sexual, but c'mon, sex sells. We all like it, even if we don't admit it. It's the only reason we KNOW we are alive, 'cause it's the only way to perpetuate life. Enjoy it. Mmm.
Yes and no.
Yes: "I can't admire your body?" *camera pans over Miranda*
No: "Help me rescue my sister." * Miranda's ass fills a third of the screen*
*imagines you're joking about something but is too tired and slightly drunk to notice anymore*
Shepard is almost the James Bond of sci-fi; the guy has ****** flying at him left and right. This I understand.
What really bothers me is the notion that violence is preferable to sex. We have games like "Manhunt" and "Grand Theft Auto" where you brutally and ruthlessly murder (sometimes innocent) people, yet we have a brief non-nude inter-species love scene in Mass Effect, and everybody goes insane. It really does bother me.
What kind of society giggles at a decapitation but winces at a nipple?
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
The Big Nothing wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
The only ME2 characters that I felt had any depth were Jack, Grunt and Mordin. The rest were cardboard
Jacob had depth, he just wasn't "interesting" and I do not blame FemShep players for simply avoiding him entirely. I would dispute that "comes off as a cool dude with a good head on his shoulders that I'd like to get a beer with and would definitely have my back, but is ambivalent about his role with Cerberus" isn't a deep character.
Samara, Thane, Legion (as representative of his race), Tali - etc - all of the non DLC ones were really well done. Kasumi and Zaeed, for what they were, weren't bad either.BrotherWarth wrote...
IMO.
Ah, right. Disregard the above heh. Anyway...
The on-topic question is though what if anything their outfits either contributed to or detracted from their characters.
I don't get why anyone has a problem with Jacob; I loved his character. And his sidequest with the Gernsback and the Colonel Kurtz-esque father? Oh, man. Good stuff.
BrotherWarth wrote...
I felt he had no personality
The Big Nothing wrote...
Shepard is almost the James Bond of sci-fi; the guy has ****** flying at him left and right. This I understand.
What really bothers me is the notion that violence is preferable to sex. We have games like "Manhunt" and "Grand Theft Auto" where you brutally and ruthlessly murder (sometimes innocent) people, yet we have a brief non-nude inter-species love scene in Mass Effect, and everybody goes insane. It really does bother me.
What kind of society giggles at a decapitation but winces at a nipple?
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Jacob had depth, he just wasn't "interesting" and I do not blame FemShep players for simply avoiding him entirely. I would dispute that "comes off as a cool dude with a good head on his shoulders that I'd like to get a beer with and would definitely have my back, but is ambivalent about his role with Cerberus" isn't a deep character.
Samara, Thane, Legion (as representative of his race), Tali - etc - all of the non DLC ones were really well done. Kasumi and Zaeed, for what they were, weren't bad either.
Modifié par Piecake, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:03 .
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:04 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
I felt he had no personality
Yeah, I don't get that at all. But since this isn't the Jacob thread - I'll drop it.
His outfit was just as bad as Miranda's, but we've covered that double standard.
Piecake wrote...
Would you find a picture of a man that accentuates his package/butt in some sort of sexy posture more alluring than the superman/batman style pose though?
I am actually curious about this since Id think that a picture of an actractive man conveying strength and power(meaning confidence) would be more attractive than an overtly sexual picture to most women. (If its a misconception, I blame the nudist girlfriend Sienfield episode)
Ryzaki wrote...
The caged animal body language fit Jack extremely well. Miranda's not so much.She wasn't a femme fatale, she didn't flaunt her body and yet the camera acted like she did at the oddest times.
Like the sister conversation. <_<
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:07 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Garrus always struck me as Robin to Shepard's Batman. I don't think that's a bad thing per se, but that's just the impression I got.
I mean competent Robin, not comic relief Robin.
BrotherWarth wrote...
It doesn't help that every time I tried to talk to him, even after I did his loyalty mission, his response was basically "I've got a lot of crap to do. Leave me alone."
BrotherWarth wrote...
I see Garrus more as the Watson to Shepard's Sherlok.
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:06 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
It doesn't help that every time I tried to talk to him, even after I did his loyalty mission, his response was basically "I've got a lot of crap to do. Leave me alone."
I'd respond to this post, but I've really got to finish these calibrations.
BrotherWarth wrote...
The Big Nothing wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
The only ME2 characters that I felt had any depth were Jack, Grunt and Mordin. The rest were cardboard
Jacob had depth, he just wasn't "interesting" and I do not blame FemShep players for simply avoiding him entirely. I would dispute that "comes off as a cool dude with a good head on his shoulders that I'd like to get a beer with and would definitely have my back, but is ambivalent about his role with Cerberus" isn't a deep character.
Samara, Thane, Legion (as representative of his race), Tali - etc - all of the non DLC ones were really well done. Kasumi and Zaeed, for what they were, weren't bad either.BrotherWarth wrote...
IMO.
Ah, right. Disregard the above heh. Anyway...
The on-topic question is though what if anything their outfits either contributed to or detracted from their characters.
I don't get why anyone has a problem with Jacob; I loved his character. And his sidequest with the Gernsback and the Colonel Kurtz-esque father? Oh, man. Good stuff.
I felt he had no personality and actually thought his loyalty mission was the most boring.
Modifié par The Big Nothing, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:09 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
The Big Nothing wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
The Big Nothing wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
The only ME2 characters that I felt had any depth were Jack, Grunt and Mordin. The rest were cardboard
Jacob had depth, he just wasn't "interesting" and I do not blame FemShep players for simply avoiding him entirely. I would dispute that "comes off as a cool dude with a good head on his shoulders that I'd like to get a beer with and would definitely have my back, but is ambivalent about his role with Cerberus" isn't a deep character.
Samara, Thane, Legion (as representative of his race), Tali - etc - all of the non DLC ones were really well done. Kasumi and Zaeed, for what they were, weren't bad either.BrotherWarth wrote...
IMO.
Ah, right. Disregard the above heh. Anyway...
The on-topic question is though what if anything their outfits either contributed to or detracted from their characters.
I don't get why anyone has a problem with Jacob; I loved his character. And his sidequest with the Gernsback and the Colonel Kurtz-esque father? Oh, man. Good stuff.
I felt he had no personality and actually thought his loyalty mission was the most boring.
I guess I just think about it more cinematically. If it were a movie, it would kick rump. Like a good version of Rescue Dawn.
"A space freighter stranded on a foreign world where the only indigenous food causes neural decay. Once friends, the survivors begin fighting desperately over resources. It is decided that some must suffer to allow for enough time for the reparations on the distress beacon to be completed.
Years later, those who had eaten the poison fauna have devolved into primitive tribes that begin raiding the camp of the survivors, where one man, mad with power, has usurped the title of King, awaiting a rescue team.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
BrotherWarth wrote...
It doesn't help that every time I tried to talk to him, even after I did his loyalty mission, his response was basically "I've got a lot of crap to do. Leave me alone."
I'd respond to this post, but I've really got to finish these calibrations.BrotherWarth wrote...
I see Garrus more as the Watson to Shepard's Sherlok.
Eh, Watson is curious and interested - but he doesn't want to emulate Sherlock Holmes. Watson is Holmes' friend and partner, not his protege.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
I mean competent Robin, not comic relief Robin.
Maria Caliban wrote...
Richard Grayson, Jason Tod, Tim Drake, or Carrie Kelly?
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:14 .
Guest_BrotherWarth_*
Maria Caliban wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
I mean competent Robin, not comic relief Robin.
Richard Grayson, Jason Tod, Tim Drake, or Carrie Kelly?
Modifié par The Big Nothing, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:16 .
BrotherWarth wrote...
Damian.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Richard Grayson, Jason Tod, Tim Drake, or Carrie Kelly?
I've only heard of any of them because I once played an online Batman-themed game of Mafia and was "Nightwing." But I know next to nothing about comics, I just wanted to make clear as best I could that I didn't mean Chris O'Donnell or Burt Ward.
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 11 décembre 2010 - 10:19 .