167 réponses à ce sujet

[Marionetten]

I'm Commander Shepard and this is.... SIXTY BUCKS FOR A PC GAME!?

[Chala]

Marionetten wrote...

I'm Commander Shepard and this is.... SIXTY BUCKS FOR A PC GAME!?

have you seen how much space that Mass effect 2 occupy in the hard disk? I sure that mass effect 3 will be bigger, that means more discs = more expensive

[deo160]

it better be good or for that price i can hacx in the future

[Stazro]

It's a promotional text of three and a bit lines and there already are people who believe they know everything about the game and start b****ing around. Typical.

[Zackr43l]

i'dont like the news about Multi but that means they have free personel ready to work on it ergo SWTOR is near

Modifié par Zackr43l, 11 décembre 2010 - 01:12 .

[charmingcharlie]

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

have you seen how much space that Mass effect 2 occupy in the hard disk? I sure that mass effect 3 will be bigger, that means more discs = more expensive

The point he was trying to make is that they are charging the same price for the PC version as they are the console version and they shouldn't.  There are extra costs involved with the console version that are NOT present with the PC version.  The main extra cost is the console royalty fee, every console game sold at least $10 goes straight to Sony/Microsoft.  The PC does not have this royalty fee and it is the reason nearly all games on the PC are $10 cheaper than the console version.

In short EA are price gouging PC gamers there should be a $10 difference between the PC version and the console version and it is obvious EA are trying to take PC gamers for mugs.

[Sailears]

bijobis wrote...

Ok, don't you think it's a bit stupid to hate the game before you see a trailer and get more information?

Stazro wrote...

It's a promotional text of three and a bit lines and there already are people who believe they know everything about the game and start b****ing around. Typical.

If there's information available, no matter how little, you can expect people to form an opinion on it.
This can range from "wow this is the best thing I've heard" to "ok, but I'll wait until I've read more" to "that doesn't sound too good".
I agree not to form a strong judgement based on so little, but I am entitled to state what I think about it.

[V-rex]

Marionetten wrote...

I'm Commander Shepard and this is.... SIXTY BUCKS FOR A PC GAME!?

I live in Australia.

Over here on average every game costs up to and above $100.

Stop complaining, you seriously have no idea how good you have it.

Modifié par V-rex, 11 décembre 2010 - 01:37 .

[MikkroBitti]

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

[Kronner]

For 60 bucks PC version better have proper PC interface and not the console crap ME2 has.

[leeboi2]

Mass Effect 3 confirmed? It's been confirmed since ME1...

[Chala]

charmingcharlie wrote...

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

have you seen how much space that Mass effect 2 occupy in the hard disk? I sure that mass effect 3 will be bigger, that means more discs = more expensive

The point he was trying to make is that they are charging the same price for the PC version as they are the console version and they shouldn't.  There are extra costs involved with the console version that are NOT present with the PC version.  The main extra cost is the console royalty fee, every console game sold at least $10 goes straight to Sony/Microsoft.  The PC does not have this royalty fee and it is the reason nearly all games on the PC are $10 cheaper than the console version.

In short EA are price gouging PC gamers there should be a $10 difference between the PC version and the console version and it is obvious EA are trying to take PC gamers for mugs.

I didn't know that, thanks for the info

[Inverness Moon]

The best way to get the price lowered to $50 is to not buy the game. But you guys can't resist and they know it.

[DarthCaine]

Mass Effect 3 has been confirmed since 2007

[RaduM]

Dragon Age IN SPACE! alright...



Although there is nothing intrinsically wrong with a story about rallying the galaxy against an unknown and unknowable foe. If properly done right ( and if the two MEs are any indication we will not be disappointed ) it can turn out to be a fittingly roaring ending to the story of Shepard and the Reapers.

[V-rex]

DarthCaine wrote...

Mass Effect 3 has been confirmed since 2007

No kidding, these days everything is a trilogy. Truth be told, I actually reckon Mass Effect 1 could have been a stand alone story but hey, the second I saw a sequel I knew there was going to be another.
Trilogies are like iphones.... started out as just a trend but now it is the social standard to have one.

[Inverness Moon]

DarthCaine wrote...

Mass Effect 3 has been confirmed since 2007

Why do people keep repeating this as if everyone doesn't already know we're dealing with a trilogy? Quite obviously, there is more than one kind of confirmation.

Modifié par Inverness Moon, 11 décembre 2010 - 01:39 .

[RaduM]

V-rex wrote...

DarthCaine wrote...

Mass Effect 3 has been confirmed since 2007

No kidding, these days everything is a trilogy. Truth be told, I actually reckon Mass Effect 1 could have been a stand alone story but hey, the second I saw a sequel I knew there was going to be another.
Trilogies are like iphones.... started out as just a trend but now it is the social standard to have one.

True, but ME was thought out as a trilogy from the start. ME2 wasn't made as a response to breaking open the cash-cow.

So Bioware is guilty of "Premeditated Trilogy with aggravat(ingly awesome) circumstances". Guilty I say!

Modifié par RaduM, 11 décembre 2010 - 01:41 .

[Ryuukishi]

My opinion is that a lot of people are very quick to make huge assumptions about a game's plot and focus based on a dinky two-sentence description.

[Loerwyn]

Personally? I don't care. We've known in a fairly official capacity that ME3 would happen sooner or later, we know Earth would have to be involved at some point and that since ME2 released, there have been constant references to a third game, both in-game and out of game.

I'll likely buy it when it releases, but I don't think it's worth getting excited for. Why? Because it's still quite far away and we know, roughly, what will likely happen in the game. We know who a number of the characters will be, we can guess the plotline with, possibly, some accuracy and all we really "need" to know pre-release is what changes will happen in terms of gameplay and RPG or shooter mechanics. That's it. I can't see them diverting too much from the ME2 formula, either.

I doubt it'll be $60 for the PC, though, and I'll explain why. The EA store is pretty expensive as far as places go, and it's very visible if you compare to other stores. Sims Medieval is listed at £40 on the UK EA Store, but that's not a price PC games sell at (Unless they're Acticrap games or collector's/special editions) Medal of Honor is listed at £35, but again, it doesn't sell at that price anywhere else. It's either a placeholder figure or the EA store is just going to continue being expensive; Don't take it as an indication of the price where you buy your games from - Wait until they put the details up. 

[V-rex]

RaduM wrote...

V-rex wrote...

DarthCaine wrote...

Mass Effect 3 has been confirmed since 2007

No kidding, these days everything is a trilogy. Truth be told, I actually reckon Mass Effect 1 could have been a stand alone story but hey, the second I saw a sequel I knew there was going to be another.
Trilogies are like iphones.... started out as just a trend but now it is the social standard to have one.

True, but ME was thought out as a trilogy from the start. ME2 wasn't made as a response to breaking open the cash-cow.

So Bioware is guilty of "Premeditated Trilogy with aggravat(ingly awesome) circumstances". Guilty I say!

True, but what I was saying was that I didn't even need to be told that it was going to be a trilogy to know that it was going to be a trilogy. These days, it just happens.

Speaking of, I am predicting that, before the year 2015 Disney makes a Prince of Persia 2... if that comes to be let it be known throuought the lands that I called it.

[Xette]

Marionetten wrote...

I'm Commander Shepard and this is.... SIXTY BUCKS FOR A PC GAME!?

Be thankful you don't live in Australia. We pay over $100 for anticipated new release titles on PC. And I'm not exaggerating. To be fair, the old currency differences used to make the amounts slightly closer but now it's just sad.

[Kronner]

Xette wrote...

Marionetten wrote...

I'm Commander Shepard and this is.... SIXTY BUCKS FOR A PC GAME!?

Be thankful you don't live in Australia. We pay over $100 for anticipated new release titles on PC. And I'm not exaggerating. To be fair, the old currency differences used to make the amounts slightly closer but now it's just sad.

Why don't you buy it from eBay then? Or have some American gift it to you on Steam (to save a lot of money)?

[hed777]

As an ME junkie, I'm absolutely thrilled to hear that there's to be a third in the series. But, as a few have already pointed out, there's little point in all this speculation at this stage in the proceedings. I'd probably buy it even I'd spent the time from now until its release buried alive in a cave, and therefore knew nothing about the game! And I know I'm not alone in that. Still, I suppose all those who get off on guessing the content of impending games [ME3 and DA2] have every right to do so.



Dragon Age in space? Sounds ok to me.

[Chuvvy]

inb4 how me3 plays out.

Opening cinematic which involves the reapers attacking earth.

Tutorial mission.

Initial story mission introducing you to your first party members.

{Choose one of four planets}

Go to that planet, meet with the leader.

"Our army is too occupied with (small scale problem) to even think about joining you."

Go and solve their problem, maybe a moral choice on the way and meet party members.

"We pledge our allegiance"} x3

Another story mission where '**** gets real'.

Previous loop, one last time.

Final missions.

Credits roll. (with no Faunts)