Play.tm Dragon Age II Preview
#251
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 05:42
#252
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 05:42
Liana Nighthawk wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Fortune favors the bold.
So do undertakers.
Of course. But I always "go for it" in video games. Why play it safe when the worst possible consequence of failure is reloading?
#253
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 05:43
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Of course. But I always "go for it" in video games. Why play it safe when the worst possible consequence of failure is reloading?
Serious business.
#254
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:06
crimzontearz wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
I have to throw my cents in: I kind of hate DA:O
Nothing against the game, well I guess so. The story never registered as pivotal, never gave me a reason to really CARE about any characters (where as mass effect does) hence while DA2 announcment and news came into being i've jumped into the hype. The story sounds a lot better with focusing on a central main character, gives is more.. cohession? centered? whatever. Not to mention that combat in DAO was boring as hell. I'm a console player. I don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer and I prefer analogue stick movement over anything else: I have more control. Keys would always lead me into killing myself in games.
In DAO it was press A to attack, and spam abilities when they recharged. Waiting all the while for a thing to die. It bored me to death, but I did beat the game. DA2 combat looks.. well FUN. Entertaining. So, yeah, I can't wait.
Never gave you reason to care about the characters!? Combat boring as hell?
Oh wait...you're a console gamer. Carry on.
lovely.....I am a console gamer too you know?
THANKS YOU! I play on console is it my damn fall that its more comfortable? I've played PC games and doing so makes me feel like I've got carpel tunnel going on. It hurts my fingers and the controls are not as responsive. I grew up on Nintendo so sue me. (and now I hate nintendo for their huge gaps between games that are actually worth getting).
The story of games is why I play mostly, hence why I gave DAO a chance. That and I don't like entering a sequel without playing the previous. I don't care if it takes place in the same time frame of sorts. Its a pet peve of mine even if others go into a sequel without touching the first. Where the story begins is something everyone should know first. YOu don't start wastching a movie in the middle, nor a book and therefore you don't start a series in the middle or at the end.
DAO had me waiting for something cool to happen. ANd I got pissed when Ali..wow can't even remember the dudes whole first name. WHen the straight dude lol, took my epic dragon kills (him being the one do acrobats around its neck is NOT ALOUD! ME because I am the main character). That and I also hated when the character had no voice of their own. I couldn't care about the world of DA because my character didn't play a role in it. They said things via text, no dialogue. In this day in age with gaming, with DEMAND dialogue in a story driven game, not text. At least I do.
Mirage III wrote...
Trolling is obvious.Not to
mention that combat in DAO was boring as hell. I'm a console player. I
don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer and I prefer
analogue stick movement over anything else: I have more control. Keys
would always lead me into killing myself in games.
Don't worry, you'll definitely play games that you like in the future. Something like Fable or Final Fantasy 14. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/grin.png[/smilie]
For your information I
don't like Fable (never appealed to me) and Final Fantasy 14 is a mmo, a
genre that I detest. Pay to Play = go to hell in my book. If I buy a
game I'm going to be able to play it when I want, how I want. So your comment is moot.
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Liana Nighthawk wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Fortune favors the bold.
So do undertakers.
Of
course. But I always "go for it" in video games. Why play it safe
when the worst possible consequence of failure is reloading?
I do the same thing. I take risks in games because its more entertaining. Someone earlier complained the ME2 was too repetative, sure it was a times but I enjoyed the hell out of it, especially this 4th play as a Vanguard as I would mix up out to use my abilities with my companions. Would bring up the wheel and tacticaly have allies use an area warp on a group of husks for instance then SHOCKWAVE them away. Just one example. Would take risks and charge into a Harbinger on Insanity with a shotgun in hand. Sometimes I'd survive and feel proud of doing so, other times die. Risks make it more fun. I always play on insanity in ME2 now, even though I got the achievement long ago.
Modifié par LoveAsThouWilt, 12 décembre 2010 - 06:22 .
#255
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:37
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
DAO had me waiting for something cool to happen. ANd I got pissed when Ali..wow can't even remember the dudes whole first name. WHen the straight dude lol, took my epic dragon kills (him being the one do acrobats around its neck is NOT ALOUD! ME because I am the main character). That and I also hated when the character had no voice of their own. I couldn't care about the world of DA because my character didn't play a role in it. They said things via text, no dialogue. In this day in age with gaming, with DEMAND dialogue in a story driven game, not text. At least I do.
To paraphrase that other site, this is: The Cancer That Is Killing Vidya Games.
#256
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:41
#257
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:44
Drasanil wrote...
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
DAO had me waiting for something cool to happen. ANd I got pissed when Ali..wow can't even remember the dudes whole first name. WHen the straight dude lol, took my epic dragon kills (him being the one do acrobats around its neck is NOT ALOUD! ME because I am the main character). That and I also hated when the character had no voice of their own. I couldn't care about the world of DA because my character didn't play a role in it. They said things via text, no dialogue. In this day in age with gaming, with DEMAND dialogue in a story driven game, not text. At least I do.
To paraphrase that other site, this is: The Cancer That Is Killing Vidya Games.
I'm assuming this is a mock on my spelling due to diareah-of-the-key-board syndrome. If so, touche. If not, then I have no idea what the joke is so.. yeah lol
leonia42 wrote...
Sounds like someone doesn't really like Dragon Age so why are they hanging aound the DA 2 forums at all?
I liked DA, the history and the story, while not altogether original in my opinion was intringuing. The characters themselves never pulled me in to actually caring about it. I beat the game, so something had to have entertained me enough to do so, just not enough to do it more than once. This is a DA2 thread, and from what I've seen DA2 is looking like the game DAO should have been in my book and something that will keep me entertained enough to play it multiple types. Perhaps DAO was too classic an RPG style for me. I've never been a fan of invisible dice behind the scenes determining the damage I do or whether I hit an opponent at all, even if physically I did hit them. I feel that I might as well be playing a D&D with a group of people if such chance was behind effectiveness, rather than quick thinking and skill.
Modifié par LoveAsThouWilt, 12 décembre 2010 - 06:49 .
#258
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:46
I have the opposite reaction. Mass Effect is boring as rocks. And not even the fun kind of rocks you find on the beach.LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
Nothing against the game, well I guess so. The story never registered as pivotal, never gave me a reason to really CARE about any characters (where as mass effect does) hence while DA2 announcment and news came into being i've jumped into the hype. The story sounds a lot better with focusing on a central main character, gives is more.. cohession? centered? whatever. Not to mention that combat in DAO was boring as hell. I'm a console player. I don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer and I prefer analogue stick movement over anything else: I have more control. Keys would always lead me into killing myself in games.
You're fighting in a squad..?DAO had me waiting for something cool to happen. ANd I got pissed when Ali..wow can't even remember the dudes whole first name. WHen the straight dude lol, took my epic dragon kills (him being the one do acrobats around its neck is NOT ALOUD! ME because I am the main character).
If that were universally true, Fallout and Oblivion would not sell like they do. It's a bit ridiculous to say the PC plays no role in the world when you go on to save the world.That and I also hated when the character had no voice of their own. I couldn't care about the world of DA because my character didn't play a role in it. They said things via text, no dialogue. In this day in age with gaming, with DEMAND dialogue in a story driven game, not text. At least I do.
These are just your preferences, I understand.
#259
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:46
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
I'm a console player. I don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer.
And consoles are not expensive these days? You don't need a top tier gaming computer to play DA, far from it.
#260
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:54
Andferne wrote...
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
I'm a console player. I don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer.
And consoles are not expensive these days? You don't need a top tier gaming computer to play DA, far from it.
Even so, it seems to me that if I were to purchase a computer specificaly for gaming then it would shortly be obsolete with the games. I can't buy one that will work for one game specificaly, thats like buying a console based soley on one title. Waste of money.
That and as I've said earlier, console is just more familiar to me. Less hand cramping and more responsive. TO ME. That doesn't mean its everyones opinion or that it "should" be their opinion. Its mine. Analogue sticks allow for more maneuverability and control.
Lets end this Console vs. PC tirade anyways.
#261
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:55
Andferne wrote...
LoveAsThouWilt wrote...
I'm a console player. I don't have the money to invest in an expensive computer.
And consoles are not expensive these days? You don't need a top tier gaming computer to play DA, far from it.
Damn Straight. Your every day Best Buy bargain bin laptops can probably run DAO on max with out any problems these days and make consoles look outdated.
#262
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:55
#263
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 06:58
And also : Gaming PCs are not overly expensive.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 décembre 2010 - 06:59 .
#264
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:00
#265
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:06
Ryzaki wrote...
And also : Gaming PCs are not overly expensive.
And building one yourself or having someone build one for you? Even more ridiculously cheap.
#266
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:10
Upsettingshorts wrote...
What about people who loved ME1 when it came out but loved ME2 even more? Is there a club I can join?

Use it well.
#267
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:10
Upsettingshorts wrote...
What about people who loved ME1 when it came out but loved ME2 even more? Is there a club I can join?
Yes, its called the PWGTA. I'm its leader, and I demand strict obedience from all our members. And money, cant forget about money
#269
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:11
Upsettingshorts wrote...
What about people who loved ME1 when it came out but loved ME2 even more? Is there a club I can join?
Nothing wrong with that. It's just I find people who completely hate the first one and play the second to be confusing.
#270
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:13
Maria Caliban wrote...
Use it well.
I wonder how many people will guess wrongly what that is.
#271
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:16
Liana Nighthawk wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Use it well.
I wonder how many people will guess wrongly what that is.
/puts her hand up
Yeah I totally guessed wrong.
#272
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:25
Your avatar is eerie yet cute.
#273
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:25
leonia42 wrote...
Liana Nighthawk wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Use it well.
I wonder how many people will guess wrongly what that is.
/puts her hand up
Yeah I totally guessed wrong.
Ah. I'm just glad I wasn't the only one.
#274
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 07:37
Drasanil wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
What about people who loved ME1 when it came out but loved ME2 even more? Is there a club I can join?
You're asking us? You're on the wrong board, I believe these forums are for Grognards only
Hey, being a grognard is why I like ME2. It's not perfect, but it's a major step back towards the goodness of Traveller, which had minimal inventory and no experience system at all.
(Kidding -- somewhat)
#275
Posté 12 décembre 2010 - 08:12
I must admit that the mission structure of ME2 was too.. simple. Too small. Recruit, recruit, mandatory mission, recruit, loyalty mission, IFF point of no return, collector base. It was essentially doing the same thing over and over again. Would have liked more over arching missions. We got what.. 2? 3? it feels like.
Modifié par LoveAsThouWilt, 12 décembre 2010 - 08:18 .





Retour en haut





