173 réponses à ce sujet

[Fromyou]

As the title says how would you feel about multiplayer in ME3. Please stay civil and on topic. I say no

[JrayM16]

I say yay if they do something original ala Assassin's Creed Brotherhood multiplayer.(Not that exact style, but something appropriately unique to Mass Effect)

[Chessrook44]

NAY.

That is all.

[Schneidend]

I'd be fine with something as simple as an online co-op version of the regular story. No bells and whistles, just Player 1 is their Shepard and Players 2 & 3 are squadmates of their choosing.

[Pwner1323]

YAY!



I wanna show off my Shepard once and for all. Blasting away noobs with my trusty Mattok and Phalanx.



25 kills in a row is awarded with an airstrike from the Normandy!



It could also be a team based deathmatch between Alliance soldiers vs Collectors and Husks around the galaxy in the Reaper War (kinda like GoW's multiplayer).

[Tesla17]

What's that sound that horses make?



Oh, yeah, neigh.



Naynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynanaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynay!

[Chosen Predator]

wasn't there a massive thread on this already.

[AdmiralCheez]

Nay.



And stop making this thread.

[Schneidend]

Tesla17 wrote...

What's that sound that horses make?

Oh, yeah, neigh.

Naynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynanaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynaynay!

Actually, the sound horses make is called a "whinny."

[Keyatzin]

Schneidend wrote...

I'd be fine with something as simple as an online co-op version of the regular story. No bells and whistles, just Player 1 is their Shepard and Players 2 & 3 are squadmates of their choosing.

That is what I was thinking, but squaddies would need something to do during conversations. Ultimately, I think they should just focus on the single-player. They can include multi-player in future Mass Effect games.

[Schneidend]

Keyatzin wrote...

Schneidend wrote...

I'd be
fine with something as simple as an online co-op version of the regular
story. No bells and whistles, just Player 1 is their Shepard and
Players 2 & 3 are squadmates of their choosing.

That
is what I was thinking, but squaddies would need something to do during
conversations. Ultimately, I think they should just focus on the
single-player. They can include multi-player in future Mass Effect
games.

No, squaddies would in fact do absolutely nothing during conversations. The whole point of my idea is that it changes nothing about the single player and therefore there's no loss of resources.

It was good enough for Baldur's Gate 1&2, it's good enough for Mass Effect.

Modifié par Schneidend, 13 décembre 2010 - 10:30 .

[Si-Shen]

Nay, simply because, no matter what people claim, MP gameplay DOES take from the SP game. Besides, wouldn't it make more sense to try and make a stand alone MP ME game rather then cram it into a nearly done saga?

[Nuala]

Not particulary bothered. As long as it doesn't take away anytime away from the story or impare character development because of not enough time or people working on that stuff. If its included I'll probably play it once or twice but I hate Xbox Live. Squeeking kids aren't a fun way to end my hundreds of hours of playtime with Commander Shepard.

I like Mass Effect for story, characters, dialogue and single player combat (aka, Insanity runs). Multiplayer would have to introduce objectives like capture the flag or kill so many number of the other team. That doesn't appeal to me that much. The reason I love Mass Effect combat is because its like its got a purpose, such as save someone or find something, both to do with an actual plot.
Killing X amount of the other team doesn't drive a story, its just kill X amount of people.

Modifié par Nuala, 13 décembre 2010 - 10:32 .

[Pwner1323]

People like this aren't fit for progress. Who knows how many people were against multiplayer in Assassins Creed: Brotherhood, but it went great! (as far as I know).



YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!!!!!!!!!

[untoldsarcasm]

No, I just want the focus to be solely on the single player for the conclusion to Shep's story. I wouldn't be opposed to another game set in the Mass Effect universe with a focus on multiplayer however.

I do quite like the idea of multiplayer in the form of your squadmates though. Something that doesn't effect the single player experience in a big way... a sort of drop-in/drop-out thing. 

Modifié par untoldsarcasm, 13 décembre 2010 - 10:36 .

[Fromyou]

Sorry if this forum has already been made i've been away from forums for a while. I would think it would be cool if they had a multiplayer campaign on Earth but thats it

[AdmiralCheez]

Pwner1323 wrote...

People like this aren't fit for progress. Who knows how many people were against multiplayer in Assassins Creed: Brotherhood, but it went great! (as far as I know).

YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!!!!!!!!!

Posting twice does not mean your side gets an extra vote, pal.

[Hathur]

Nay.. save it for spinoff series... Shepard's trilogy needs to stay as a single player experience.



They can go ahead and make other ME related games multiplayer if they want (I won't buy 'em personally.. but I got no problem with them being made)... but I don't want this outstanding trilogy sullied by a filthy multiplayer (Bioshock 2, anyone?)

[Pwner1323]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

People like this aren't fit for progress. Who knows how many people were against multiplayer in Assassins Creed: Brotherhood, but it went great! (as far as I know).

YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!!!!!!!!!

Posting twice does not mean your side gets an extra vote, pal.

Awwwwwwwww............. 

[Pwner1323]

Hathur wrote...

Nay.. save it for spinoff series... Shepard's trilogy needs to stay as a single player experience.

They can go ahead and make other ME related games multiplayer if they want (I won't buy 'em personally.. but I got no problem with them being made)... but I don't want this outstanding trilogy sullied by a filthy multiplayer (Bioshock 2, anyone?)

Brotherhood anyone?

[Kane-Corr]

Hay....thats all I gotta say.

[Nuala]

Pwner1323 wrote...

Hathur wrote...

Nay.. save it for spinoff series... Shepard's trilogy needs to stay as a single player experience.

They can go ahead and make other ME related games multiplayer if they want (I won't buy 'em personally.. but I got no problem with them being made)... but I don't want this outstanding trilogy sullied by a filthy multiplayer (Bioshock 2, anyone?)

Brotherhood anyone?

Brotherhood multi wasn't that great. Enjoyed the single player a million times more. Not to say it was bad, just that it was meh.

[Pwner1323]

Still, they can build from there. They have to start somewhere. MW2 needed almost 20! 20!!!!! ugly world war II to make the masterpiece that it today.

[Hathur]

Brotherhood was designed from the ground up as multiplayer... COD, Halo, those are kings of multiplayer because they're designed as Multiplayer first, singleplayer second (single player is made as an after thought / backseat)... that's why those games rule as multiplayer games.



Mass Effect 1, 2 & 3 are being designed as single player games... multiplayer would be secondary in the development.... no game that made multiplayer development secondary has ever had decent success... and ultimately it cheapened the quality of the game (hence, Bioshock 2).



Look at Uncharted 2... designed as single player and a damn epic single player it was.... the multiplayer was tacked on... it wasn't bad, it wasn't great... it was "ok".... look at how many people are playing Uncharted 2 multiplayer right now compared to Halo, COD, Brotherhood.



If they make multiplayer for ME3, it'll be a tacked on feature.. hence, nowhere near as good as the multiplayer games that already exist that made it the core feature.



You either make a multiplayer game with tacked on single player, or a single player game with tacked on multiplayer... neither is appealing.