102 réponses à ce sujet

[crockerspaniel]

Right now we're not sure if Mass Effect 3 will have multiplayer or not. But this isn't about wheather it will or won't, if it did have multiplayer how would you predict/want it to be like?

I think it will be small squad objective based game modes. Stuff like capture the flag, or a tug of war type game with areas to capture(basically like War from Cod:WaW).
Mostly smaller maps and lots of cover.

For loadouts, you'd start off with your pistol and choose any 3 between a number of weapons, biotic/tech abilities. Eg. Sniper, shotgun, overload. Or assault rifle, warp, pull. etc.
I would understand if this was limited to humans only (with balancing issues and hitboxes and that), but I think it'd be awesome to play as Turian or Krogan or something. Like if Krogan had a load of health but was slower and easier to hit with their size. Or Quarian, smaller, faster but low health.
Maybe they could have their own passive ability/weapon to go with each race and then choose your 3(maybe 2) weapons/powers. Like Asari comes with warp and humans have assault rifles.

There's probably a million different things you can have in a Mass Effect multiplayer. What do you think it'd be like?

[crockerspaniel]

That'd be cool, too, but I don't think co-op would be right. Like you'd only be helpin your friend level up and progress through the story and you wouldn't make any dialog choices or level up or anything yourself.

[Schneidend]

Pretty much exactly what Brandon said.

My buddy plays his jerkass Shepard, I play Grunt, and another friend can play Zaeed or something for the ultimate big jerks squad.

[JamieCOTC]

It should be a separate part of the game that doesn't interfere with or hinder the quality of the SP at all. Other than that, I really don't care.

[crockerspaniel]

Yeah I'm really hoping if they put in multiplayer, it doesn't take away from the quality or experience of the single player game. The first 2 were too good to ruin just to make it more popular or whatever their reason is. I wouldn't mind seeing a multiplayer DLC though.

[Rivercurse]

If it exists, I hope it's as far removed from the campaign as humanly possible. Preferably on a separate disc. A disc that isn't included in the ME3 box.

[JamieCOTC]

Rivercurse wrote...

If it exists, I hope it's as far removed from the campaign as humanly possible. Preferably on a separate disc. A disc that isn't included in the ME3 box.

LOL

[Pwner1323]

People have said that a co-op mechanic like RE5's would be good.



I agree.

[Tilarta]

Well, I have a few schools of thought on this.



A multiplayer deathmatch would be interesting, if you could play generic aliens or humans in armor (no 50 Shepherds beating on each other please). Or any other kind of multiplayer game.



Co-Op would be nice if someone could take over the role of one of your squadmates, but whoever was playing Shepherd would be controlling the story, you'd essentially just be along for the ride.

Would that other player get ammo and medigel too though?



Finally, a full-on multiplayer would be my number 1 preference.

The end (execution!) of Tabula Rasa has left a void that has not yet been filled,

Stargate Worlds could have been that filler, but that's so in hiatus I think it's permanently on vacation in Hawaii.

Which pretty much leaves Mass Effect as the sole heir to Tabula Rasa's kingdom.

[JamieCOTC]

Modifié par JamieCOTC, 14 décembre 2010 - 03:44 .

[crockerspaniel]

Yeah, I would rather there be no multiplayer, at least in the initial shipping of the game. But if there were multiplayer, I'd like it to be good enough to actually play after I'm done the story. Hopefully the staff increases make a playable multiplayer without taking away from the single player possible.

[Terror_K]

Bennyjammin79 wrote...

Non existent would be nice.

^ This.

[-Skorpious-]

So how about no multiplayer instead? Everybody wins!

[PHub88]

Mass Effect 3 does not need a multiplayer...and if it does have one, then I see no way that ME3 could top ME2 meaning it will be a dissappointment.



Its debatable whether ME2 had enough content, and by that I mean sidequests...stores...Citadel Omega size....



Adding multiplayer will take away space...as well as TIME worked on the main product...Unless its a 3 discer..which I wish was true anyways but I doubt it will happen



Bioware has way too big of a task on wrapping up this story than to build some stupid multiplayer and flat out ruin the game....Have some lame spinoff with all the COD disease multiplayer you want.

[AdmiralCheez]

Bennyjammin79 wrote...

Terror_K wrote...

Bennyjammin79 wrote...

Non existent would be nice.

^ This.

X 1,000,000

X 17,005,341,668.932

[crockerspaniel]

Well it's not up to me or anyone here if there's multiplayer, nor is this the thread to discuss whether or not it should be included. So you get absolutely nothing back from saying no multiplayer. Why even post here?