-Skorpious- wrote...
So how about no multiplayer instead? Everybody wins!
So how about no multiplayer instead? Everybody wins!
-Skorpious- wrote...
So how about no multiplayer instead? Everybody wins!
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
SQUARED AND MULTIPLIYED BY INFINITE INFINTE TIMESBrandon lee Shepard wrote...
THIS X 100,000,000,000,000,000,Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Modifié par Brandon lee Shepard, 14 décembre 2010 - 04:03 .
You know, quoting yourself and agreeing with it just makes you look like a dweeb.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
THIS X 100,000,000,000,000,000,Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 14 décembre 2010 - 04:05 .
Guest_Bennyjammin79_*
Fail. "How should multiplayer be?" I answered"Non existent." That's how it should be. Don't ask questions you might not like the answers to. My answer fits the discussion.crockerspaniel wrote...
Well it's not up to me or anyone here if there's multiplayer, nor is this the thread to discuss whether or not it should be included. So you get absolutely nothing back from saying no multiplayer. Why even post here?
Modifié par Bennyjammin79, 14 décembre 2010 - 04:05 .
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
ITS NOT THE ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT SO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND STOP SAYING MULTIPLAYER WOULD RUIN IT BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW:pinched:,.,,,.,PHub88 wrote...
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Considering the only thing you care about is multiplayer.
Anyone who prefers single player gaming KNOWS that multiplayer in games comes at the expense of the single player each and every single time.
I would really think twice about ever buying Bioware again if they are stupid enough to take the biggest one of the series yet and hinder it by attaching some dumb multiplayer to waste space and resources.
Lay off the capslock already. I've seen what online multiplayer looks like, and I hate it. Not worth the resources.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
ITS NOT THE ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT SO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND STOP SAYING MULTIPLAYER WOULD RUIN IT BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW:pinched:,.,,,.,
Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 14 décembre 2010 - 04:06 .
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
ITS NOT THE ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT SO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND STOP SAYING MULTIPLAYER WOULD RUIN IT BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW:pinched:,.,,,.,PHub88 wrote...
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Considering the only thing you care about is multiplayer.
Anyone who prefers single player gaming KNOWS that multiplayer in games comes at the expense of the single player each and every single time.
I would really think twice about ever buying Bioware again if they are stupid enough to take the biggest one of the series yet and hinder it by attaching some dumb multiplayer to waste space and resources.
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
Fix'd.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
well thats your opinion maybe you should think about it IF YOU DONT LIKE MASS EFFECT AS A SINGLE-PLAYER GAME GO PLAY HALO OR TF2 INSTEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
wait did i say that....oh yah no i dident every game with guns does not need multiplayerPHub88 wrote...
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
ITS NOT THE ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT SO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND STOP SAYING MULTIPLAYER WOULD RUIN IT BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW:pinched:,.,,,.,PHub88 wrote...
did i say that... oh wait no i didentBrandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Considering the only thing you care about is multiplayer.
Anyone who prefers single player gaming KNOWS that multiplayer in games comes at the expense of the single player each and every single time.
I would really think twice about ever buying Bioware again if they are stupid enough to take the biggest one of the series yet and hinder it by attaching some dumb multiplayer to waste space and resources.
Great example of the type of people who think every game involving guns needs a multiplayer.
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
dont do that i never said that!!!AdmiralCheez wrote...
Fix'd.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
well thats your opinion maybe you should think about it IF YOU DONT LIKE MASS EFFECT AS A SINGLE-PLAYER GAME GO PLAY HALO OR TF2 INSTEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bennyjammin79 wrote...
Fail. "How should multiplayer be?" I answered"Non existent." That's how it should be. Don't ask questions you might not like the answers to. My answer fits the discussion.crockerspaniel wrote...
Well it's not up to me or anyone here if there's multiplayer, nor is this the thread to discuss whether or not it should be included. So you get absolutely nothing back from saying no multiplayer. Why even post here?
admit it, you said thatBrandon lee Shepard wrote...
dont do that i never said that!!!AdmiralCheez wrote...
Fix'd.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
well thats your opinion maybe you should think about it IF YOU DONT LIKE MASS EFFECT AS A SINGLE-PLAYER GAME GO PLAY HALO OR TF2 INSTEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
i dont understand why me2 was a million times better than me1PoliteAssasin wrote...
Bioware is not a multiplayer developer. Mass Effect (the trilogy) is a single player experience, not a multiplayer experience. It'd be pretty stupid, and a ballsy move, to introduce multiplayer, which many don't want, to the last game of the trilogy. They might as well make a spinoff for that. If they want to ****** off a lot of the fans who are already angry about ME2's turn out, then so be it.
-Polite
AdmiralCheez wrote...
Fix'd.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
well thats your opinion maybe you should think about it IF YOU DONT LIKE MASS EFFECT AS A SINGLE-PLAYER GAME GO PLAY HALO OR TF2 INSTEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
NO I DIDENT SO STOP I HAVE BUSTING MY FINGERS TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO SEE ME3 WITH MULTIPLAYER WOULD BE A GOOD THING now like i said before if you dont like me3's multiplayer than DONT PLAY ITEl_Chala_Legalizado wrote...
admit it, you said thatBrandon lee Shepard wrote...
dont do that i never said that!!!AdmiralCheez wrote...
Fix'd.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
well thats your opinion maybe you should think about it IF YOU DONT LIKE MASS EFFECT AS A SINGLE-PLAYER GAME GO PLAY HALO OR TF2 INSTEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
fixedAdmiralCheez wrote...
Lay off the capslock already. I've seen what online multiplayer looks like, and I love it me3 should definately have multiplayerBrandon lee Shepard wrote...
ITS NOT THE ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT SO GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND STOP SAYING MULTIPLAYER WOULD RUIN IT BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW:pinched:,.,,,.,
Guest_Brandon lee Shepard_*
fixedPHub88 wrote...
Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
multiplayer WOULD NOT RUIN THE GAME IT WOULD MAKE IT BETTER!!!!!
Considering the only thing i care about is multiplayer.
Anyone who prefers single player gaming KNOWS that multiplayer in games comes at the expense of the single player but me3 with multiplayer would be awesome
A lot of improvement in COMBAT SYSTEM (in me1 that part sucks) and also a lot of characters with a high charisma, but in the process they killed a part of the RPG SYSTEM, so, if in ME3 this issue is fixed the game's gonna be practially perfect.Brandon lee Shepard wrote...
i dont understand why me2 was a million times better than me1PoliteAssasin wrote...
Bioware is not a multiplayer developer. Mass Effect (the trilogy) is a single player experience, not a multiplayer experience. It'd be pretty stupid, and a ballsy move, to introduce multiplayer, which many don't want, to the last game of the trilogy. They might as well make a spinoff for that. If they want to ****** off a lot of the fans who are already angry about ME2's turn out, then so be it.
-Polite