Does it matter which side you choose in Ohzammar... Between which of the two want to be king? I've been sitting on the fence.
Ohzammar. does it matter which side
Débuté par
Kulharin
, nov. 13 2009 12:00
#1
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:00
#2
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:04
bhelen : killed his brother, and make sure his other brother was found guilty and exiled. He is a tyrant, but with his rules the dwarf will be strong. He also seems to want change the cast thing, which is a good thing.
Harrowmont : cool guy, chosen by the old king. But if he is king, the civil war between dwarf will not end.
Choice is yours, but if you play the dwarf noble origin, you will know which side is best
Harrowmont : cool guy, chosen by the old king. But if he is king, the civil war between dwarf will not end.
Choice is yours, but if you play the dwarf noble origin, you will know which side is best
Modifié par daguest, 13 novembre 2009 - 12:04 .
#3
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:10
I was dissapointed that you couldn't take the throne yourself as a Dwarf Noble.
I know you get stricken from the memories and everything but surely there is some way to get the assembly to reverse their decision? Or have a paragon endorse you?
I was also dissapointed that as a dwarf you couldnt just kill bhelen. I went through all the trouble of working against harrowmont just so I could arrange a meeting with bhelen, thinking I'd have my revenge.
I know you get stricken from the memories and everything but surely there is some way to get the assembly to reverse their decision? Or have a paragon endorse you?
I was also dissapointed that as a dwarf you couldnt just kill bhelen. I went through all the trouble of working against harrowmont just so I could arrange a meeting with bhelen, thinking I'd have my revenge.
#4
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:16
I killed Bhelen in the Assembly hall.
#5
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:19
If you give Harrowmont the crown, you discover that Bhelen's a bit of a sore loser.
And also not much of a fighter.
And also not much of a fighter.
#6
Posté 13 novembre 2009 - 12:22
If you choose bhelen, you agree on the fact YOU killed your brother, because if you disagree, bhelen couldn't be king, and he must die or be exiled.Dtelm wrote...
I was dissapointed that you couldn't take the throne yourself as a Dwarf Noble.
I know you get stricken from the memories and everything but surely there is some way to get the assembly to reverse their decision? Or have a paragon endorse you?
I was also dissapointed that as a dwarf you couldnt just kill bhelen. I went through all the trouble of working against harrowmont just so I could arrange a meeting with bhelen, thinking I'd have my revenge.
If you choose harrowmont, there is a little hope, but if he agree to tell the truth, you can ask for the throne. And you also throw the dwarf kingdom in civil war, because harrowmont was chosen by your father, and you have the right from the blood to reign. Same problem than for behlen vs harrowmont.
Plus add the fact you have gone to the surface, which is a case of being stripped of your caste. Plus you are a Grey Warden, which mean you didn't have any right to be king or something else (warden must be neutral). Even if you could be queen/king to the end if you play a human noble.
In any case, you loose. Anyway, since you kill behlen if you side with harrow, you have your revenge. And it's sweat, isn't it ?
Modifié par daguest, 13 novembre 2009 - 12:24 .





Retour en haut






