251 réponses à ce sujet

[Dave of Canada]

Saibh wrote...

I was always surprised that some people honestly couldn't tell Sten was smiling. It seemed rather obvious to me.

"I like you."

[Atakuma]

After seeing this new screenshot, I have to say, Isabela's outfit looks terrible.
I'm having trouble seeing that design as anything other than fan service.

Modifié par Atakuma, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:39 .

[In Exile]

Daewan wrote...
She's a pirate.  She needs speed and mobility. 

You can have plenty of mobility with pants.

The person she's fighting has no shirt on and is exposing about six major organs as well as the main part of his central nervous system.

I'm not one of those OMG armour! fans. I'm not saying it isn't realistic. I'm just saying I can't see any possible purpose to going around in boots, a t-shirt and underwear unless you're having so much sex or something pants are an annoyance.

What does she need pants for, besides a false and ridiculous sense of modesty?

Pants represent a false and ridiculous sense of modesty? Next time I walk around in my boxers outside in the summer in my boxers, this is what I'm going to tell the court.

We're not talking about covering her up in a robe.

Our social convention (and apparenly DA:O shares this) is that we wear some kind of leg covering. There seems to be a flexible and skin fitting material available for pants, because everyone is wearing them. So why isn't Isabella?

[Saibh]

Daewan wrote...

She's a pirate.  She needs speed and mobility.  The person she's fighting has no shirt on and is exposing about six major organs as well as the main part of his central nervous system.  She's exposing a few inches of her upper thigh, containing a few major arteries.  All of her floppy bits are adequately restrained (no bouncing), so she can could climb ropes and walk across a slippery deck.  What does she need pants for, besides a false and ridiculous sense of modesty?

I despise the "oh, look, she's agile without any clothes" argument. I've heard it time and time again when it comes to people trying to justify chainmail bikinis or inexplicable pantlessness.

Warmth is always nice. Not drawing attention to youself because you're a sneaky-sneaky rogue pirate, that's nice too. And...not wearing clothes makes you trampy (replace this with a non-gender-inclined word for "I'm really easy"). I'm just gonna say it. I think the same thing of guys who walk around shirtless because DUDE MY PECS. She's walking around pantless and that says LOOK, HERE'S MY ASS.

That may be her personality, but it certainly doesn't endear me to her, nor more than Zevran's sleazyness did. I ended up liking Zevran, but only after getting over his constant "I like sex and bondage and whipping" thing.

shepard_lives wrote...

My memory is a little fuzzy, but doesn't his (un)smile look incredibly disturbing?

Credit to Coelasquid.

Modifié par Saibh, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:39 .

[Dave of Canada]

Exploitable screenshot is exploitable.

[ErichHartmann]

At the very least Isabela could use a pair of shorts. I don't even think Lightning flashed panties in FF XIII (similar outfits).

Modifié par ErichHartmann, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:39 .

[Shepard Lives]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Exploitable screenshot is exploitable.

I demand the vanilla version.

[Captain Iglo]

lunarknightmage wrote...

sooo..........wait.........we get 5 specs now?

and we can learn from multiple specs or just concentrate on one?

or am I misreading that???

Im german and that is what they said in the preview...you can set points on different specialisations as much as you can only concentrate on one.

[nightcobra]

Dave of Canada wrote...

Exploitable screenshot is exploitable.

exchange snu snu for "NO" and we're golden:devil:

[Shepard Lives]

Captain Iglo wrote...

lunarknightmage wrote...

sooo..........wait.........we get 5 specs now?

and we can learn from multiple specs or just concentrate on one?

or am I misreading that???

Im german and that is what they said in the preview...you can set points on different specialisations as much as you can only concentrate on one.

I'd love to concentrate on a single specialization if they had some kind of tie to the story (as in, were worth something outside of combat).

Modifié par shepard_lives, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:42 .

[Captain Iglo]

shepard_lives wrote...

I'd love to concentrate on a single specialization if they had some kind of tie to the story (as in, were worth something outside of combat).

dunno...nothing is mentioned about that in the preview.

[Blacklash93]

They're not talking about THE specializations. Just the initial skill trees.

[andar91]

I'm still confounded as to how they're handling the mage abilities. Someone told me they were grouped by element, and now it says there's still the original schools. ????



As a side note, if that screenshot of Hawke shooting that white beam out of his hand is a lightning spell, I will be very happy. It looks cooler than the lightning did in Origins.

[Dave of Canada]

Exploitable Qunari!


---
NO:

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:47 .

[Xewaka]

Captain Iglo wrote...

lunarknightmage wrote...

sooo..........wait.........we get 5 specs now?

and we can learn from multiple specs or just concentrate on one?

or am I misreading that???

Im german and that is what they said in the preview...you can set points on different specialisations as much as you can only concentrate on one.

However, I believe that the things listed are the basic skill trees. I think we still lack info on the specializations proper, such as shadow/duelist/assassin for rogue.

[AbounI]

Captain Iglo wrote...

shepard_lives wrote...

I'd love to concentrate on a single specialization if they had some kind of tie to the story (as in, were worth something outside of combat).

dunno...nothing is mentioned about that in the preview.

Did we lost something about the "arkan" with the translation.does it speak about the arkan warrior or a new sphere of magic?

[tishyw]

In Exile wrote...

That outfit is ridiculous. I thought the no-pants thing was more a joke or exageration.

Sadly not, Isabela is indeed fighting in her underwear.  Someone at Bioware decided it looked 'cool'.

[Dave of Canada]

Now with a bad gif!

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 15 décembre 2010 - 10:48 .

[Clover Rider]

Yes.

[DragonKingReborn]

"If you push the button, something happens immediately Impressive."



Gotta love google translator

[In Exile]

tishyw wrote...
Sadly not, Isabela is indeed fighting in her underwear.  Someone at Bioware decided it looked 'cool'.

I actually think most of the outfit is cool. Just the lack of pants is incoherent.

[Captain Iglo]

AbounI wrote...

Did we lost something about the "arkan" with the translation.does it speak about the arkan warrior or a new sphere of magic?

It simply said arcan. My guess is that they mean arcane warrior but simply used arcan as a short version to say it.

[nightcobra]

when one NO is not enough:devil:

[Xewaka]

tishyw wrote...

In Exile wrote...

That outfit is ridiculous. I thought the no-pants thing was more a joke or exageration.

Sadly not, Isabela is indeed fighting in her underwear.  Someone at Bioware decided it looked 'cool'.

Long, mind-numbing hours in a comitee can make any weird decision pass.

[Dave of Canada]

I took it as an Arcane tree, like Arcane Bolt and such.