Dragon Age II PC system specs announced
#426
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 12:39
#427
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 06:41
#428
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 07:59
#429
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 09:16
na i'll be running at 1440x900 since im using a 3 years old 19" monitor :innocent:Yenkaz wrote...
We can't say anything for certain, but probably yes unless you are running at 2560x1600 or something.
#430
Posté 12 janvier 2011 - 11:31
#431
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 07:11
#432
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 09:43
#433
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:25
#434
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:31
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
Modifié par LukaCrosszeria, 13 janvier 2011 - 01:32 .
#435
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:39
You should be able to play it but not at the highest settings as that card doesn't support DX11.LukaCrosszeria wrote...
Em...I'm not up to speed on video cards, will I be able to play the game with the best graphic setting if I have a NVIDIA GF GT 340? Is that better than this?
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
#436
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 01:40
Since I am betting you have something odd there, you'll be a long time getting the most accurate information. It's entirely possible it's an OEM version of something quite mundane, like the G 210, or GT 220, neither of which is good enough. Or it could be related to the cheapened GDDR3 version of the GT 240, which is at best on the borderline near Minimum.LukaCrosszeria wrote...
Em...I'm not up to speed on video cards, will I be able to play the game with the best graphic setting if I have a NVIDIA GF GT 340? Is that better than this?
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
Whatever it is, is not a standard retail card, so that we'll all be in the dark at first. (Edied: there were some speculation articles showing up already, based on the announced specifications, and it does turn out to be essentially a refresh of the GT 240.)
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 13 janvier 2011 - 03:07 .
#437
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 02:42
Taint Master wrote...
You should be able to play it but not at the highest settings as that card doesn't support DX11.LukaCrosszeria wrote...
Em...I'm not up to speed on video cards, will I be able to play the game with the best graphic setting if I have a NVIDIA GF GT 340? Is that better than this?
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Since I am betting you have something odd there, you'll be a long time getting the most accurate information. It's entirely possible it's an OEM version of something quite mundane, like the G 210, or GT 220, neither of which is good enough. Or it could be related to the cheapened GDDR3 version of the GT 240, which is at best on the borderline near Minimum.LukaCrosszeria wrote...
Em...I'm not up to speed on video cards, will I be able to play the game with the best graphic setting if I have a NVIDIA GF GT 340? Is that better than this?
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater
Whatever it is, is not a standard retail card, so that we'll all be in the dark at first.
Thanks for the reply guys. I'm going to buy a new computer and one of the computers I was looking at in a store had that graphics card. I guess it's not up to the job then, I best look for something else. Ideally I'd like to have a computer that has either of those cards, but I imagine that will be quite expensive.
#438
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 03:03
There is a reference article on the DAO forum you can refer to. I'm waiting on more benchmarks to show up before entering the most recent Mainline and better cards in their appropriate Shader Function order.
http://social.biowar...58/index/128343
#439
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 03:41
Modifié par Kuroi Kenshi, 13 janvier 2011 - 05:45 .
#440
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 03:57
Is this not en par with the ATI 5850?
http://www.nvidia.co..._gt_340_us.html
Modifié par LukaCrosszeria, 13 janvier 2011 - 04:12 .
#441
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 04:11
#442
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 04:12
Gorath Alpha wrote...
No.
Lolz, sorry for a video card noob this is hard.
Edit: I didn't see that link there on Video Card Rankings and Basics,
"We seem to have a sizable influx of new arrivals who have never gamed on PCs coming in"
I just checked that thread, doesn't look like either card (ATI HD 5450 or ATI HD 5570.) can cut it. Sigh. That means the Acer Eliminator is my only option
Modifié par LukaCrosszeria, 13 janvier 2011 - 04:28 .
#443
Posté 13 janvier 2011 - 04:48
The Radeons do tend to be less expensive, cooler running, and more power efficient than most of the matching Geforce cards.
#444
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 12:58
LukaCrosszeria wrote...
Lolz, sorry for a video card noob this is hard.
Edit: I didn't see that link there on Video Card Rankings and Basics,
"We seem to have a sizable influx of new arrivals who have never gamed on PCs coming in"
I just checked that thread, doesn't look like either card (ATI HD 5450 or ATI HD 5570.) can cut it. Sigh. That means the Acer Eliminator is my only optionIt has a ATI HD 5850.
Am I to understand from this that the ATI HD 5570 1GB will not be able to support DA2's minimum requirements?
Or have I misunderstood what you're saying?
#445
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 01:09
[/quote]
Am I to understand from this that the ATI HD 5570 1GB will not be able to support DA2's minimum requirements?
Or have I misunderstood what you're saying?
[/quote]
I believe the person was talking about reccomended specs. You will not get a very decent performence from a 5570 unless you bring the settings way down. and it certainly won't cut it at DX11.
Modifié par Moondoggie, 14 janvier 2011 - 01:09 .
#446
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 01:12
Gorath Alpha wrote...
If you want to meet the Recommended Level, you can't choose a system with a Low End, Low-Medium, or borderline Business/Medium zone, video card. The HD 5570 and the GT 240 aren't that far apart in performance, although the 240 / 340 should rank somewhat above the 5570, unless it's the "slow" GT 240, and so far, I haven't seen any indication that there will be two different 340s.
The Radeons do tend to be less expensive, cooler running, and more power efficient than most of the matching Geforce cards.
Thanks again for the advice, I'm glad you took the trouble to make that post. I went for the Acer with the ATI HD 5850 card. It's a monster
#447
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 01:26
Moondoggie wrote...
I believe the person was talking about reccomended specs. You will not get a very decent performence from a 5570 unless you bring the settings way down. and it certainly won't cut it at DX11.
I'm getting a little confused about graphics cards since http://www.ukgamingcomputers.co.uk/ asserts the 5570 is a very decent gaming card that, and I quote, 'The ATI Radeon HD 5570 graphics card joins the award-winning line of AMD graphics that fully support DirectX 11'.
How will a card that fully supports DX11 not 'cut it'?
Yes, I'm clearly a gfx card noob, apologies!
#448
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 03:07
Games are rated by their developers on a scale that they hope will provide maximum enjoyment, so that the RECOMMEND a particular level of hardware performance, and the Direct3D version is only a part of that judgment. An HD 5570 is a BUDGET choice. The card chosen by the recent new system buyer is one of the HIGH END cards from the 2009 generation of Radeon cards. As such, a budget level represents the lower end of what should work. It is above the minimum by a nice amount, and should handle all Medium everything, from resolution and image quality to frame rates.benbah wrote...
Moondoggie wrote...
I believe the person was talking about reccomended specs. You will not get a very decent performence from a 5570 unless you bring the settings way down. and it certainly won't cut it at DX11.
I'm getting a little confused about graphics cards since http://www.ukgamingcomputers.co.uk/ asserts the 5570 is a very decent gaming card that, and I quote, 'The ATI Radeon HD 5570 graphics card joins the award-winning line of AMD graphics that fully support DirectX 11'.
How will a card that fully supports DX11 not 'cut it'?
Yes, I'm clearly a gfx card noob, apologies!
But the developers hoped you would opt for the higher, smoother running frame rates, and their configuration will set the resolution and image quality to low, automatically, for a system with an HD 5n00 card, to enable at least 35- 45 FPM worth of animation speed.
In order to support all medium without some slow downs in the frame rates, you need at least a middle of the Mainline range card, which is where the HD 5670 was aimed, a year ago. The HD 5750 and 5770 are at the high end of Medium. They are still mainline cards, but verging on High End.
Does that help you any?
Gorath
#449
Guest_Monkey FunkR_*
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 04:13
Guest_Monkey FunkR_*
Handy site. Cheers!
Modifié par Monkey FunkR, 14 janvier 2011 - 04:14 .
#450
Posté 14 janvier 2011 - 04:22
Thanks again





Retour en haut





