Shacary wrote...
been reading about the abuse topic of Danarius/fenris. I have to quip in here, as a child abuse survivor, from my own perspective, the fear is always there. It doesnt matter if you see that person years after you [ as fenris was] made a living weapon , you still see that person with the same Fear and hopelessness, I really think BW did a terrific job of Fen's eyes when he first sees Danarius in the hanged man. He had been a slave since birth, we cant imagine how many ways a person may be degraded, abused, mentally physically etc. the sense of hopelessness must be pervading!
In the hanged Man, i see Hawke stepping in there saying her/his line not a slave or whatever as lending their strength to get out of the past trauma , to step forward to strike, It also makes perfect sense to me about the Fog warrior slaying... when you cannot dare believe in another life, and give up to the tides of disappointment. call it conditioning... it happens.
So even a 3 year gap in the relationship is ridiculous sounding, there may have been the underlying strength companionship that was not sexual in nature, to heal and osmotically cross the wounded soul. I think he would be worth waiting for, and my Hawke always does!
sorry for long text....
The problem with the three years that I have... it IS too long. Nothing is spoken about -- he refuses to discuss it at all. So basically you have a guy who started a relationship, but then ran out after having a one night stand and never would speak of it. And if you read his last codex, you see that during that three year time, the last year of it he is talking about leaving Kirkwell with increasing frequency -- he would have left already had he not felt indebted to Hawke -- not affection, indebted. And while it is clear he still has feelings, he also is talking about leaving forever.
So how long do you wait? 6 months? 1 year? 3 years? 10 years? The rest of your life? Had he been willing to speak of it, I could see perhaps. Had it only been a year, I could also see it. If there was a tenuous relationship there, yes, perhaps.
Gah, that gap just bugs me. The codex makes it worse.
Modifié par ejoslin, 01 avril 2011 - 12:20 .