I know it's finals week and all... but.. you know.. now that I have time, and well 14 HOURS people WTF!?
So... typical Arquen Wall-O-text!
I've read your lyrium essay and found it very interesting. I do believe the lyrium is harmful for Fenris and I fear he won't become as old as he could have without those markings. Even dwarves are not immune to the effects and cannot just touch it without harm. Remember that dwarven merchant in Orzammer in DAO? He had some kind of accident with the lyrium he works with, and that seriously damaged his mind. I don't recall what exactly was the accident, whether it involved accidental contact with the lyrium or simply too much contact with it, but it proves that even to the people who have some kind of resilience to it need to be very careful. The templars who use it become strongly addicted to it and their minds get altered somewhat as well. Especially when they have withdrawal symptoms.
This was all considered and I definitely agree. It is why I never truly believe or completely throw out the idea that the Lyrium may, one day, mean the death of Fenris. I also put in that he most likely has physical repercussions and changes that are permanent due to the lyrium. The dwarves are resistant to magic, and there are no dwarven mages. What I was refering to in my dwarven immunity is the evolution of the dwarves over time. Handling raw lyrium is indeed dangerous to anyone, which makes the whole idea that Fenris even survived such a ritual with its use quite the anomaly.
It is odd that Fenris has survived that long already with all that stuff in him without any clear effects on his mind. That he would have some kind of inborn resilience however I find I bit too much of a coincidence. He is an elf, not a dwarf. Fenris' body and mind are probably very strong, to make it possible for him to survive the ritual. But I think Danarius' ritual includes a sort of protection against the potential harmful effects and not that it really is an protection he was born with. Although, now that I think of it... his sister is a mage, so a certain affinity for magic runs in his family... but mages can't touch raw lyrium without killing themselves, so that would rather be a disadvantage... Maybe because he isn't a mage some special "magic" gene (lol) gives a certain protection. I'm not sure.
Here is where I have to disagree. I don't find it "convenient." I find it part of Danarius's preparations. We do not know what the "contest" entailed, but it was no doubt to prove strength: physically, mentally, and also against the effects of magic, maybe even lyrium specifically. Now, Fenris is not a dwarf, and therefore does not share that same genetic code of resistance to lyrium and magic. That doesn't mean he wouldn't have some kind of genetics that would predispose him to being resistant anyways. Perhaps as Leto he was exposed to Lyrium? Being around magisters exposed him more and built up some resiliance? Resiliance to lyrium for Fenris comes in the form of tolerance built up over time. It may be he is a unique individual in that regards, and it is why he was chosen during the contest. It may be because he did have a tolerance built up to lyrium due to past exposure even as Leto. I'm inclined to think that whatever protection and damage and maintaining of the lyrium was done during the ritual. As said I do not think the ritual was ever meant to be done again. Danarius wanted a successful prototype, and it doesn't seem feesible that he would have to keep "fixing" said prototype to keep it "functioning" properly.
That being said, there is no doubt in my mind that Danarius provided some protection spell and incantation during the ritual to ensure its success. It isn't about Fenris's well-being or if he cared whether or not Fenris survived. More about pride and that he wanted his efforts to succeed. "He doesn't want me at all.. just the markings on my skin." As far as the sister thing, rather irrelevant since magic isn't really a genetic thing per say, and a mage would be weaker against such things, as you said.
I don't think it is possible to undo the ritual without killing Fenris. Due to its highly addictive effects, he will probably suffer from severe withdrawal symptoms if the lyrium is suddenly removed from his body, and those will probably kill him. His body has adapted to the presence of the lyrium and probably can't simply deal without it anymore, especially if you follow your theory about lyrium in his bloodstream and nervous system. If the markings would be more like regular tattoos, only affecting the skin, it might be possible to cut them out, magically or not, but they likely differ too much from tattoos to allow that. And of course it would hurt like hell to cut everything out.
"If the lyrium does become unstable or begin to poison Fenris then I doubt there would be anything to really help him other than trying to remove the lyrium. Trying to reinfuse the lyrium would most likely guarantee death. It doesn’t make sense to add poison to cure poison. I doubt there would be any possible cure and this may very well be how Fenris dies especially if his body can no longer maintain the connection because the lyrium becomes unstable to the point where Fenris cannot maintain it himself."
When I said this it is meant as the only option, but more than likely there would be nothing to cure/fix him. You are right in that trying to remove the markings would probably kill him. The only things left to try would be to replicate some kind of stabilization spell on the lyrium - manipulating it to keep it from affecting Fenris's mind/body or attempting to remove the lyrium (poison) and deal with the withdrawl. In both cases it is a very long shot and most likely would not work. This is what I meant, just didn't go into it extensively.
Whether the memory wipe was intentional... I tend to believe it was a side effect of the ritual and the pain that came with it. I think Fenris was "broken" by all the pain, as happens in the book Wizard's first rule (don't know if you guys have read it of course, but the main character is tortured until he is "broken" and when that has happened, he forgets who he is and doesn't remember things of his old life. He becomes a sort of obedient pet of the woman who tortured him). I think it might even have been a negative thing to happen for Danarius, because now Fenris has forgotten that he wanted the markings and that he actually competed for them. Plus if he still remembered his mother and sister, their existence may have prevented his escape because he feared Danarius would hurt them. It might have helped to keep him in line. If Danarius didn't lie about the affection Fenris once had for him, the memory wipe has done more harm than good by erasing that too.
I've actually read Wizard's First Rule (Sword of Truth series is one of my favorites), but I don't agree it is the same thing at all. The use of systemic abuse and psychological torment that the Mord-Sith learn and use is a breaking of the psyche akin to severe Stockholm's syndrome. The ritual was meant to have a clean slate. This would make it both easier for Danarius to attach the lyrium as a catalyst to Fenris's emotions and make it easier to control him afterwards. "If had known, I may have felt differently." What you describe is not anything at all like the amnesia one suffers from a traumatic event, but the accumulation of conditioning to believe something is true. To forget who you are and everything you are because that is the only way you stay alive. Sooner or later you develop "affection" for your "master," and well.. that relationship is more akin to Fenris and Danarius AFTER the ritual than during.
Which is another reason why when Danarius says "you once had affection for me" I want to rip his **** head off because that is EXACTLY the sort of response people illicit to control prisoners/slaves/abuse victims. One cannot develop Stockholm's without having some kind of attachment to their tormenter. It becomes a twisted affection because the tormenter mixes fleeting kindness/reward with severe abuse/torment. So the victim does everything possible to earn the kindness even if it is simply being allowed to live. Sorry, another topic...
Ehm... I wanted to say something else as well... oh yes, about the knowledge of the ritual dieing with Danarius. Well, probably not. Danarius didn't exactly keep his lyrium infused slave hidden. He liked to show off with him. Considering how competitive the magisters are, several of his colleague likelys felt inspired to experiment themselves. Danarius is a powerful magister, but nothing states he is the most powerful of all. I see no reason why other magisters would not succeed in recreating his results. At the time, Fenris might have been the first of his kind, but I don't think he will be the last. Lyrium infused slaves will come in pretty handy in the war against the Qunari...
After several test subjects, Danarius would have perfected the method and concluded he needed a very strong person, both of body and mind, to survive the ritual. Because he wanted a body guard, selection by battle was a nice method to find the best subject.
All in all I fear Fenris's mind and/or body will sooner or later clearly begin to suffer from the unnatural presence of lyrium inside him. How long it will take is hard to tell, because he has already managed so well for 15 years or so (in act 3). Maybe Danarius' magical protection will start to wear off after all those years as well.
Answering all this in one lump...
Basically, I don't think the other magisters would be privvy to Danarius's research. He wouldn't have wanted that to be in anyone else's hands besides his own. I'm sure he had previous test subjects, but Fenris was, admittedly the first, and only successful prototype. Danarius would have guarded that secret and that research carefully. Other magisters can try to replicate it, no doubt, but Danarius's specific research and secrets probably did die with him. Unless he trusted it to an apprentice (which I doubt), or other people were involved in the ritual (which is more likely the case, but I'm sure they were probably killed afterwards.) So, while it is always possible that Fenris is not the last, I doubt we will see an army of Lyrium Warriors any time soon. He is a unique being, in all regards there.
Gaider used the word "maintaining" to describe what Danarius did with the lyrium. "Without Danarius maintaining..." the lyrium we don't know what could happen. Now, while everyone else is all about doom and gloom and he's going to go mad and Danarius's spells will fade eventually. It begs the question -- what spells? what maintainance? It obviously wasn't something Danarius had to be physically present to do. He obviously didn't have to actively be around Fenris "maintaining" the markings with weekly check-ups or something. Therefore, it makes more sense to me that it is a sort of passive thing. Unless it was connected with Danarius's life and then after his death the magic starts to break down. That's the only thought I have that makes sense about "maintenance," but it makes more sense that Fenris could probably pick up on this passive type maintenance himself. Within his many years of being on his own and learning more about how to use his markings I think it is only a matter of time before the "maintenance" is either not required, or something he does passively. Basically, I think he might have his years cut short already because of the markings, the ritual, and the lyrium in general, but I don't see him being doomed per say to a mental breakdown or an anguished death due to it. More than likely just a shorter lifespan.
<3