aldien wrote...
Faerunner , they are going to say you and I need to go get a room after this post.
But, oh well. It is a discussion thread after all.
Exactly, and we'll keep this conversation as Fenris-central as possible.

I completely agree. I think the thing I was trying to relay was that even within the ranks of a second-class citizen there are subclasses. Prostitute elf, dock working elf, maidservant elf, merchant elf, but at the end of all these rungs is slave. So, someone like Fenris, in my opinion, cannot comprehend second-class. To him, and this is just an opinion, second-class seems privaledged, even though if you look at elves as a whole people would say they are all oppressed. I can see Fenris taking offense at everyone getting lumped together. They all have it bad, but Fenris would turn around and say: some of us had it worse. Sorry, off on tanget. 
That's actually a very interesting point. I hadn't thought of it that way. I can see where he would feel that way though, since I adopted a very similar attitude about elves and humans in this game. To this day, I can't bring myself to feel sorry for the Hawkes or Amells because I feel they have it better than elves. Likewise, Fenris likely feels this way toward free elves when mentally comparing them to slaves.
Doesn't that just scream: 'it's always served us well.' Ahhhhh I know that mentality all too well. It's infuriating because the elves have such a rich history in Thedas. Sometimes, I wish the game had been reversed, where the elves ruled Tevinter and it was envied by humans.
If only. It seems the whole point of elves in this franchise is to completely subvert the "beautiful, superior, haughty" Tolkien-esque vision of elves that the Bioware staff clearly hates. I personally like the idea of humbling and humanizing elves, but Bioware seems to enjoy punishing them a little
too much. Their entire existence seems to be one big "Screw you, Elves!"
The focus became narrow in my opinion. Ideally, I would liked to have seen the story change depending on which race you selected, if we had been given a choice to choose our race. [...]
The Elven dynamic would have been an intriguing addition to the scenario. Mages vs. templars is too clear cut in many respects. There's not enough ambiguity there. But, you add in an oppressed society that can claim ancestral rites to the land and throw blame on all humans as oppressors then you have something complicated and interesting. I'd like to see Fenris and Merrill wrestle with that added complication. 
Amen to that!

I also think it would have been amazing if elven mages stepped forward to denounce being opressed for both their magic and their race. Though neither game has explored this yet, I find it very ironic that one of the Chantry's main arguments for controlling mages is to keep them from oppressing non-mages the way Tevinter magisters oppressed the world, but elven mages were enslaved just like everyone else and they're being punished for something their ancestors never did. First they were enslaved by Tevinter magisters (who used their own magic techniques to do it, btw) then they were imprisoned by Chantry templars, but always mage elves get the short end of the stick in human societies.
Very true. But I would argue: who isn't conditioned by their envinronment? Same could be said for noble human versus peasant human. Hawke rose above that, but being human gave him/her the advantage. This is the only time that I see one of Anders arguments holding some weight, that being that elves should join with the mages because they have suffered too... to an extent. He's got a point because there is a good parallell between the condition of mages and elves, which I'm sure drives Fenris batty if he admits it.
That's very true. I guess what I mean is that one thing free and enslaved elves have in common is that they're both conditioned to accept their undeniably rotten lots in life. Slaves are at the bottom of slave-holding societies (duh) and city elves are at the bottom of "free" societies, so both must be conditioned to believe they're not so bad off so they stay at the bottom.
I agree with Anders and you though. I'm very surprised and disappointed that the devs didn't use the already heated mage vs. templar conflict to slip in the elf vs. human conflict, since both elves and mages are oppressed by non-magic humans and they should find some common ground.
Not to mention that seeing each other rebel should encourage each group. Elves seeing mages standing up to templars and then deciding they aren't taking dirt anymore either, then mages seeing elves rebelling and deciding to keep fighting too, with each minority group mutually encouraging each other whether they officially fight together or not. (Since non-magic elves are still conditioned to hate and fear magic, supporting mages might be a problem for some of them--like Fenris--but it would still create interesting dynamics between the oppressed and the oppressors.) Honestly? It feels unrealistic that the game
didn't delve into that.
Funny thing is... all I can think is that magisters are way less compassionate than a regular human. I'm not sure I see magisters having an ounce of humanity left in their bones. Probably too influenced by Fenris. But he may have point about making deals with demons. Do they sap out humanity? Okay... major tanget there. Point being, that most humans who have not been exposed to the corrupt nature of the Imperium will generally have more sympathy even if they utlimately hold the power. But I do wholeheartedly agree with your assessment.
I think Arl Howe, Bann Vaughan and his friends are proof to the contrary. They aren't blood mages and they live in a slave-free society, but that doesn't stop them from brutalizing the elves under their rule on a regular basis for no other reason than they're wealthy, privileged, and know they can get away with it. (And there's probably many other nobles just like them.)
It might just be me, but I don't think magisters are uniformly evil any more than human nobles are uniformly good. Fenris himself admits that there are (probably) good magisters too. They just have less power or are taken out by those that are willing to be more brutal and cut-throat (like Howe to the Couslands). Their society cencourages them to be that way just as it encourages elves to accept their low position, but that doesn't necessarily mean they all adhere to it.
Even if they did, I don't necessarily think that all magisters are uniformly cruel to their slaves. Fenris often mentions how magisters view slaves as little more than property, but then some people take better care of their property than others. Some sadists like Denarius might enjoy beating and torturing their slaves on a regular basis, while others might reserve only some for hurt while others are left alone, or still others might decide their slaves are more worthwhile healthy and productive instead of constantly beating and blowing through them like tissue paper.
I can kind of see some Tevinter slaves lucking out with a master that's relatively kind to them, or at least lets them work in peace instead of hounding or killing them all the time, the same way a city elf might ocassionally luck out with a relatively kind employer or a decent job. (Though I think that both are pretty unlikely.)
Oh! I never knew that! Wow, that really puts a spin on things. Is that somewhat common knowledge? Fenris seems to know quite a bit about Andraste. But he never mentioned that
Selective memory???? Hehehehe.
That would kill him. Honestly, I think the poor man would crawl under a rock and die. But! That being said, he learned that he was the one who fought for the lyrium markings and accepted it in the end. So, I think he would come to terms with that and hopefully decide that he is just Fenris.
I'm so glad you decided to delurk!!!!
This is a fascinating conversation.
Thank you! ^^ I think it's common knowledge for the Dalish (since you can find it in a book at the Dalish Camp) but I'm not sure about city elves. Probably not. Most city elves don't even know about Shartan. (Even if they do know the story, it's probably an extremely watered down version like "Andraste freed our people, then we walked to the Dales, then we ingegrated into human cities, and now we cling to the remnants of our culture.")
Yeah, I think you're right. It would probably be very devastating and humbling, and he'd probably become very depressed and want to be left alone for a while, but he'd eventually come to terms with it. He always does. ^-^
Modifié par Faerunner, 25 mai 2012 - 06:40 .