Aller au contenu

Photo

The Official Fenris Discussion thread


55378 réponses à ce sujet

#54551
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 918 messages

You can easily rival Fenris without ever insulting him. In no way are you obligated to always pick the aggressive option with him, even though that does max rivalry the quickest. Challenging his view on mages and magic can earn you plenty of points, even more so if you are a mage yourself. You also gain rivalry by saying Kirkwall is your home now in your first conversation with him, instead of lamenting on the possibility of returning to Lothering. Telling him to spare Variana also earns you rivalry points. Is preventing him from killing his own sister really such a d*ck move? Rivalry with Fenris is about disagreement. "Agree to disagree". Not bitching and insulting.

 

---

 

I like both the friend and rival route. I can definitely understand rivalry not being your thing, but I do think there are some misconceptions about it. Hawke is most certainly not Fenris' new master when rivaled.

I agree with everything. I love rivalmacing Fenris and there are a lot of misconceptions about what it means for their relationship. IMO, I have always believed that rivalling Fenris created the healthiest relationship despite how "soft" friendmancing him is.  rivalmancing forces him to confront his negative habits and behavior. It's about not being his personal "yes man" and cosign all of his destructive behaviors.

 

For example. If you let him kill his sister he never reclaims a very important snippet of his past. Something I think he needed to hear. What I love about that scene the most is having Varric with me after I help him with his crazy brother. The scene was quiet and intense between the three of them...four if you count Fenris' sister. That scene became more than just about Fenris running around killing people who wronged him/didn't like and blaming everyone for his problems, he was forced to confront his own part in it. It was just awesome. I also rival Fenris as my snarky Hawke who never takes his snapping too seriously. He knows he's got that sexy elf wrapped around his finger. :D

 

But is Hawke some sort of master to Fenris? Hardly. They simply disagree on some issues and Fenris is more of the passionate aggressor between them. :wub:


  • Ryzaki, Dutchess et vertigomez aiment ceci

#54552
Finnn62

Finnn62
  • Members
  • 641 messages

You can easily rival Fenris without ever insulting him. In no way are you obligated to always pick the aggressive option with him, even though that does max rivalry the quickest. Challenging his view on mages and magic can earn you plenty of points, even more so if you are a mage yourself. You also gain rivalry by saying Kirkwall is your home now in your first conversation with him, instead of lamenting on the possibility of returning to Lothering. Telling him to spare Variana also earns you rivalry points. Is preventing him from killing his own sister really such a d*ck move? Rivalry with Fenris is about disagreement. "Agree to disagree". Not bitching and insulting.

 

Fenris may indeed show more frustration when rivaled, but that is because the rivalry path forces him to admit he has played a part in why he has been feeling miserable for so long. "What has been done to me I have done to myself." This doesn't mean he starts victim-blaming and no longer despises Danarius and Hadriana for what they have done to him, but he realizes that all these years sitting in that mansion by himself and keeping people at a distance is something he has done himself. He has made some choices that have not exactly contributed to his happiness. Acknowledging and changing that is difficult, more difficult than blaming it all on magic, hence his tendency to lash out more often at Hawke.

If you rivalmance though, it would seem you can't be nice to him at all until you max rivalry (choosing either aggressive or joking responses)… I prefer to just max friendship by the end of Act 2, and then it doesn't matter what I disagree with him on in Act 3. I never let him kill his sister and he still is my best buddy with max friendship. I have a hardtime thinking a positive romantic relationship can start with nothing but disagreeing with someone and trying to change them and challenge their beliefs. I'd say he has a right to be pissed at Danarius and I don't really feel like pushing him to believe his problems are all his fault. He shouldn't blame magic as much as he does, but he had his reasons, and the majority of mages met in DA2 seem to fit with his fears (I don't usually play a mage, & off the top of my head the only mostly "good" mages I can think of are Bethany, Feynriel, and Alain). Maybe, I might try Fenris rivalmance next playthough though… maybe. Just to see what happens. Who knows, might be okay, more so perhaps if I choose to play a mage next game.


  • Cat Lance aime ceci

#54553
Dutchess

Dutchess
  • Members
  • 3 505 messages

If you rivalmance though, it would seem you can't be nice to him at all until you max rivalry (choosing either aggressive or joking responses)… I prefer to just max friendship by the end of Act 2, and then it doesn't matter what I disagree with him on in Act 3. I never let him kill his sister and he still is my best buddy with max friendship. I have a hardtime thinking a positive romantic relationship can start with nothing but disagreeing with someone and trying to change them and challenge their beliefs. I'd say he has a right to be pissed at Danarius and I don't really feel like pushing him to believe his problems are all his fault. He shouldn't blame magic as much as he does, but he had his reasons, and the majority of mages met in DA2 seem to fit with his fears (I don't usually play a mage, & off the top of my head the only mostly "good" mages I can think of are Bethany, Feynriel, and Alain). Maybe, I might try Fenris rivalmance next playthough though… maybe. Just to see what happens. Who knows, might be okay, more so perhaps if I choose to play a mage next game.

 

I'm not sure how much use there is in responding, because I feel it will boil down to repeating myself, but here goes. Like I said before, aggressive dialogue options are the fastest way to max Fenris' rivalry (and that of all other companions) but that does not mean you are in any way obligated to choose these options if you want to rival him. I maxed his rivalry with a sarcastic Hawke who would joke with Fenris and responded nice/diplomatically when he was distressed (e.g. post Bitter Pill). You spared his sister on friendship? Great, and I never sided with slavers and gave Orana a job, which meant I had to deal with some additional friendship points. It is more difficult to max the relationship this way, but it is doable. 

 

You mention the sarcastic responses as the other option to be mean to Fenris and max rivalry, but actually Fenris - unlike Anders, who really needs all the friendly responses to be able to like you - can handle Hawke's jokes and tends to react positively to them. The only sarcastic option that yields rivalry (+5) that I can recall is when he tells you about his sister's arrival ("yeah, everything is going exactly to plan, how awful" or something like that), and I consider that reaction quite justifiable for a Hawke who is hurt by Fenris waiting this long to tell them he has decided to search for his sister. 

 

Know what Fenris also doesn't like? (Extreme) sympathy. During the conversation after recruitment he tells you about having been on the run for a long time. You can be a douche and tell him he whines too much (+10 rivalry) or you can be sympathetic and say that it sounds like a tough situation. + 5 rivalry! "I'm not made of glass". Pfft. My point is that you can gain a lot of rivalry points from magic-related issues and most of the extra points you need by going for options like described above that yield a small amount of rivalry rather than friendship. Also, flirt options net +10 rivalry if you're on the rivalry path, and they are still friendly. 

 

It's not about trying to change everything about Fenris and everything that he believes. It's about challenging his more destructive tendencies, the ones that actually make his suffering worse. I explicitly stated that he does not start "victim-blaming", i.e. he does not start to believe that what Danarius did to him is his own fault. You can even say to him "Danarius isn't exactly blameless, you know" when Fenris states "what has been done to me, I have done to myself" in Act 3 QB. Fenris' reply is: "and he is dead. There is no one left to blame." And THAT is the point. He has finally killed his former master and gotten his revenge, but now he discovers that it does not suddenly make him happy and solve all his problems. He has to face that though he is now truly, finally free, he is still living in a squatted mansion with hardly any friends and no clue what to do next. He was afraid to build a life of his own as long as the possibility existed Danarius would show up, but that means he has nothing once Danarius is finally dead. The only thing he worked for was find his family (and past) but Varania betrayed him and the only thing he can potentially learn about his past is that he "won" the markings and earned his family's freedom. And then he has to admit that he has played a part in why he is living the way he is, practically a ghost as Varric calls it. Keeping people at a distance, freaking out and running away when his memories return after the night with Hawke and refusing to speak of it and face his own feelings for three years, that's him. Of course his life would have been better if he had never been Danarius' slave and he would not have had the issues he has if that was the case, but the way he (tries to) deal(s) with them is him, and as a free man he has to accept the responsibility he has for his own life and happiness.

 

Oh my, why can't I ever write short posts? :whistle:


  • Ryzaki, Hazegurl, renfrees et 1 autre aiment ceci

#54554
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 918 messages

If you rivalmance though, it would seem you can't be nice to him at all until you max rivalry (choosing either aggressive or joking responses)… I prefer to just max friendship by the end of Act 2, and then it doesn't matter what I disagree with him on in Act 3. I never let him kill his sister and he still is my best buddy with max friendship. I have a hardtime thinking a positive romantic relationship can start with nothing but disagreeing with someone and trying to change them and challenge their beliefs. I'd say he has a right to be pissed at Danarius and I don't really feel like pushing him to believe his problems are all his fault. He shouldn't blame magic as much as he does, but he had his reasons, and the majority of mages met in DA2 seem to fit with his fears (I don't usually play a mage, & off the top of my head the only mostly "good" mages I can think of are Bethany, Feynriel, and Alain). Maybe, I might try Fenris rivalmance next playthough though… maybe. Just to see what happens. Who knows, might be okay, more so perhaps if I choose to play a mage next game.

It's true you can stop him from killing his sister and not get rival points if you have him at max friendship, but for a player who doesn't know and don't have him at max yet it comes across as very destructive to let him murder his sister just to get some friendship points out of him. The fact that it gives friendship points to begin with is telling.

 

Healthy relationships can from from challenging each other. As a matter of fact I have yet to come across anyone who respects a partner they can walk all over and who agrees with them about everything. With Fenris, you're not trying to change who he is as a person but you are essentially saying "Look, being a free man means taking responsibility for your own life and right now it's looking kinda sh*tty." if Fenris was on drugs and destroying his own life would you try to get him off that path? or say hey, I fully support your drug habit cause I love you. In some ways that's how I personally see some of the friendmance path. Also, I actually agree with some of Fenris's opinion about Mages. He offers plenty of knowledge on the future possibility of what could happen with Mages. Fenris' problem is that "mage" is all he sees until he is forced to be around Bethany or Hawke. If you confront him on his opinions he admits that it's not all mages but he sees no other alternatives. What gets me about Fenris is that he's all for a mage being locked up even if they have to face sexual abuse and mind control(of a sort) yet will protest to the heavens about the mind abuse he himself suffered. I don't mind turning in blood mages or the crazies but there were some good mages who were just better off outside of the Circle and yet Fenris is right there to give those rivalry points for letting them go. It's like there is no middle ground. As for Danarius, it's not about telling him it's his fault for that but that he has had control over his own life for years now and yet he never bothers to improve it. He just sits in that mansion with those same rotting corpses, getting drunk, and talking about being a slave and cursing mages. Like Duchess mentioned, getting revenge doesn't ensure happiness or that all problems are resolved.

 

Besides, for making my Hawke wait for three freaking years after ditching him during one night of sex he deserves to have Hawke say a lot more than he did say. But it's all about different strokes for different folks. Friendmancing isn't the worst, I actually like it too it's just that people judge rivalmance without actually playing it and I don't think that's fair.


  • Dutchess, vertigomez et Finnn62 aiment ceci

#54555
Finnn62

Finnn62
  • Members
  • 641 messages
Spoiler

Thanks, those are very good points and the whole "Danarius isn't exactly blameless" conversation sounds interesting. Sorry to make you repeat yourself. I guess I was a bit confused what you meant by victim-blaming at first. I will try rivalry romance over the next month sometime and see how it goes. Yeah, I realized that Fenris didn't like too much sympathy. I guess rivalry would just mean I'd have to take him on the opposite quests from my usual. I'll have to take him when I help the Starkhaven mages escape, but not when I attack the slavers, that sort of thing. 

 

Spoiler

Good points. Thanks for taking the time to respond. I guess, I can be kind of a pushover in romance in real life and it's not like that works out the best. I probably wouldn't want to get involved with a drug addict in the first place, tbh. I mean what do you like about them in the first place if their primary trait is drug addiction? Trying to change that would be kind of a losing battle. I actually usually choose to let mages free, but I don't usually bring Fenris along for those quests. I definitely agree that Fenris should get over the whole mage prejudice, but I guess I just wanted a more gentle nudge rather than blatant ongoing argument. Rivalry with Anders and Merrill seems to improve their relationships quite a bit, mind you I wasn't romancing them at the time. I'll see how it goes, when I try it. You're right I can't really make an educated response without trying it, I suppose. I'll have to get back to this. 

 

One thing I don't get, if you break up with a rivalmance, do you still gain rivalry points and does that mean the relationship is actually improving? JK :P


  • Dutchess aime ceci

#54556
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 2 002 messages

@Dutchess

 

Fenris owning up to his own misery should be irrelevant to friendship/rivalry. I don't recall that even being a discussion, and certainly not strongly linked to rivalry points, until Act 3. Hawke's influence should affect his views on magic if anything. Yet even after 6 years of potentially working and even romancing a mage Hawke his attitude is unchanged. He says things in front of Hawke that make me wonder why he doesn't turn Hawke in. That's poor character development.

 

You can headcanon something that doesn't exist in the game like Fenris agreeing to read to make him less of a dick on the rivalry path but you're just making things up because he does refuse the offer.



#54557
Finnn62

Finnn62
  • Members
  • 641 messages

You can headcanon something that doesn't exist in the game like Fenris agreeing to read to make him less of a dick on the rivalry path but you're just making things up because he does refuse the offer.

He refuses to learn to read on the rivalry path? Fenris, why?! Literacy is important!!

 

Spoiler



#54558
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 918 messages

@Dutchess

 

Fenris owning up to his own misery should be irrelevant to friendship/rivalry. I don't recall that even being a discussion, and certainly not strongly linked to rivalry points, until Act 3. Hawke's influence should affect his views on magic if anything. Yet even after 6 years of potentially working and even romancing a mage Hawke his attitude is unchanged. He says things in front of Hawke that make me wonder why he doesn't turn Hawke in. That's poor character development.

 

You can headcanon something that doesn't exist in the game like Fenris agreeing to read to make him less of a dick on the rivalry path but you're just making things up because he does refuse the offer.

I agree somewhat, I think the writers didn't want the player to be some major influence to the companions to the point where they just agree with anything you say. But they don't take any real consideration into the possibility of the player romancing the character. idk, if I can flat out call it bad writing because I wouldn't be interested in Fenris if he just flip flopped on his beliefs because he's dating a Mage. But I do like that he does compliment Mage Hawke and trusts him. I think that is a pretty big leap for him. My only issue is that he holds even a blood Mage Hawke in high regard. It totally sucks that the creators didn't bother to implement class specs in the story.  As for the reading, yeah it sucks that he doesn't want to learn how to read all because he disagrees with you. It does show where friendmancing is better than rivalling in some ways. I think there is a bug that still mentions him improving on his reading so one can just claim it as canon that once he calmed down he agreed o take Hawke up on his offer. I do the same thing with the blade of mercy. I just equip it on him and headcanon that he accepted it later on.

 

@Finnn62

 

I agree, i wouldn't date a drug addict either, lol. I just used it as a metaphor for someone who is making unhealthy choices. i think if you go into rivalmancing with an open mind and have some fun with it it wouldn't be so bad but you can also walk away knowing that you totally hate it and will never do it again. ;)

 

I've never broken up in a rivalmance...wait...i dumped Anders after sleeping with him one time. I don't recall if I got anything from it as I think I had him maxed. But dumping him was a lot of fun. :lol:



#54559
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 2 002 messages

I'm not expecting Fenris to do 180 on his magic beliefs, but there's no change at all. To me the Fenris rivalmance is the most unhealthy relationship in the game besides maybe an Anders rivalmance. With Merrill Hawke fears for her safety and with Isabela Hawke tries to make her less of a scumbag. With Fenris rivalry conversations he simply behaves like he doesn't like Hawke; not that they disagree over something in particular. And then they're dating.

 

3 years of no romantic discussion and then it's:

 

"We're not exactly friends, Fenris."

 

-- A few sentences later we hear:

 

"If there is a future to be had I will gladly walk it at your side."

 

...


  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#54560
Dutchess

Dutchess
  • Members
  • 3 505 messages

@Dutchess

 

Fenris owning up to his own misery should be irrelevant to friendship/rivalry. I don't recall that even being a discussion, and certainly not strongly linked to rivalry points, until Act 3. Hawke's influence should affect his views on magic if anything. Yet even after 6 years of potentially working and even romancing a mage Hawke his attitude is unchanged. He says things in front of Hawke that make me wonder why he doesn't turn Hawke in. That's poor character development.

 

You can headcanon something that doesn't exist in the game like Fenris agreeing to read to make him less of a dick on the rivalry path but you're just making things up because he does refuse the offer.

 

I disagree. Urging him to let go of his past, move on and live his life tends to lead to rivalry points and is available from the very beginning. In the first conversation after recruitment you can agree with him it's a good idea to go after Danarius if Danarius never shows up (+friendship) or you can say "why bother?" (+rivalry). At first glance that might not seem all that related to getting him to move on, but I think it's definitely related to his inability to move on while Danarius is still alive. If Danarius never comes for him, he would really rather go back to Tevinter, to Minrathous, the capital filled with magisters, and try to kill his powerful master there, instead of trying to move on and start a life of his own? 

When he shows up at your house after A Bitter Pill you can very blatantly tell him that he is stuck in the past and should move past his hatred, and I'm pretty sure he rewards you with rivalry points for that. So even though it isn't the main focus and the mage issue tends to receive the most attention, it is there.

 

Fenris will always remain cautious of mages, but I do think he shows some growth, again in that he no longer blames magic for absolutely everything that has happened to him. His problem is that he still give that knee jerk reaction when he's is hurt and upset (but who can blame him, when his sister betrays him in such a way?) but when he has calmed down he can look more rationally at it. He will help Hawke defend the mages when maxed. 

 

I'm not expecting Fenris to do 180 on his magic beliefs, but there's no change at all. To me the Fenris rivalmance is the most unhealthy relationship in the game besides maybe an Anders rivalmance. With Merrill Hawke fears for her safety and with Isabela Hawke tries to make her less of a scumbag. With Fenris rivalry conversations he simply behaves like he doesn't like Hawke; not that they disagree over something in particular. And then they're dating.

 

3 years of no romantic discussion and then it's:

 

"We're not exactly friends, Fenris."

 

-- A few sentences later we hear:

 

"If there is a future to be had I will gladly walk it at your side."

 

...

 

I wholly admit that line is awkward and doesn't mesh very well with the romance. I honestly think it's something meant for the plain rivalry path and that they did not bother to change it for the romance situation. However, I can still make sense of it when I keep in mind they've supposedly had not much contact once Fenris walked out on Hawke. Such a long time of awkwardness and unspoken issues and desires between them might prompt Hawke to say that they haven't really been acting as friends. 

You accuse the Fenris rivalmance of being "I don't like you. I don't like you. I love you now!" but I think that is far more the case with Isabela. She thinks Hawke's boring and a stick-in-the-mud when rivaled, and then suddenly at the end she loves them. Why? I have far less trouble making sense of the rivalry romance with Fenris, as Fenris never expresses such a personal dislike for Hawke. Yes, he will respond more angrily most of the time, but he never outright says that Hawke is boring, stupid or an idiot or something like that. Instead he still comments on Hawke's strength.


  • Hazegurl aime ceci

#54561
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 2 002 messages

@Dutchess

 

I've never argued that Fenris letting go isn't part of friendship/rivalry points. It is discussed at times as you said though. I've said it's not where the majority of points are and yet that becomes the focus in Act 3 while his view of mages is ignored.

 

I agree that Isabela seems, at least initially, like she doesn't like Hawke. It can be argued that she fears being a better person. Also, someone fighting a duel for you can certainly sway you. And while Hawke may not let her get a ship, Hawke does solve the Castillon problem. Regardless, in many of her quests there's a particular thing that keeps coming up (trying to make her a better person) that is the source of much of their conflict. With Fenris there's no sway on the topic of magic.



#54562
renfrees

renfrees
  • Members
  • 2 060 messages

What sway on the topic of magic, when both main quests in A3 - is hunting down deranged abominations, and confrontation with Grace? Yes, that same mage you mercifully let loose. Fenris acknowledges that Hawke/Bethany is a strong mage, refuses to turn mage companions in, when Sebastian asks him, and fights for mages if Hawke asks him. Who he sees in these years as a good example of mages - Hawke/Bethany? That's about all, or you want him to trust Anders' lamentations? I'm not sure what more would you ask from a person with his scars (both physical and mental). If you want him hugging every mage and supporting Anders in his rebellion, then... How to say to not be rude - you need to stop living with pink glasses on.

On the other hand, his development in social department improves dramatically. He makes friends with Donnic and Aveline, jokes with Aveline and Varric, plays cards with the group in Hanged Man instead of holing in his mansion, tries to find a faith. If you discard all this on the basic of his poor reaction on mages in general, then you can say that his character has no development.


  • Cat Lance, vertigomez, LiquidLyrium et 1 autre aiment ceci

#54563
Dutchess

Dutchess
  • Members
  • 3 505 messages

I think you can also see Fenris' mage issue - as prevalent as it is - as a symptom of his deeper problems with trust and getting past the terrible things that have been done to him. When you look at it like that there is less of a change in focus. I don't think it's strange to have Act 3 focus on Fenris finally closing that chapter of his life. His entire arc most certainly focuses on Danarius and his personal struggles and is not similar to Anders' very mage-freedom focused quests. In Act 2 hunters show up and he is faced with Hadriana. In Act 3 he has finally contacted his sister but ends up face to face with his former master. His entire arc is about being free and yet still needing to reclaim part of his freedom and life, and you are surprised this is the central topic in Act 3?

 

Fenris will always be distrustful of mages, and with good reason. What changes is how much blame he shifts upon magic in general vs. himself when it comes to his own life and happiness. I think he also realizes on both frienship and rivalry paths that not all mages are inherently evil. He can be surprisingly rational in his views and reasoning when he's not upset (= right after dealing with Hadriana or Danarius). It's just that he believes everyone has a price and when faced with something important to them, whether that is survival, power, wealth, or the life of someone dear to them, it is too easy for these people to succumb to greater, darker powers. You're not going to convince him that's not the case, so his overall view that mages cannot be allowed to do as they please will not change. In Tevinter are plenty of mages who do not rule anything, after all, but you only need a few magister types and you end up with Tevinter.


  • Hazegurl et Finnn62 aiment ceci

#54564
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 2 002 messages

I don't expect a 180 on Fenris' view of mages as I've already said. I would like some character development letting him at least reconsider locking mages up for the "greater good," especially if his potential lover is a mage. But there's nothing.


  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#54565
Dutchess

Dutchess
  • Members
  • 3 505 messages

But wouldn't reconsidering the issue of mages' freedom not be a 180 on Fenris' opinion? Either you allow those with magic to live their own life, without templars breathing down their necks, or you have them in a place where they can be contained and watched. There's not really a middle ground between those. Fenris already realizes from the start that it sucks for mages to be imprisoned and he acknowledges that, but to him it's still necessary to prevent greater misfortune. What is there to reconsider? If Hawke is an apostate and Fenris' lover, Fenris will obviously be happy Hawke is not in the Circle, but to him that is still one mage or one of the few mages who have proven to be strong enough to resist temptation (because we are conveniently ignoring class specializations). There are probably more of mages with this admirable constraint, but among them will also be potential Danariuses. And Fenris rather sees both strong and weak mages imprisoned than the weak who will abuse their power walk free.


  • teh DRUMPf!! aime ceci

#54566
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 2 002 messages

Doubts of previous beliefs is not a 180. Becoming like Anders would be.

 

What is there to reconsider? You pretty much said it yourself. If a mage Hawke romances Fenris then by Fenris' own beliefs Hawke should be locked up; thus never allowing them to be together.

 

Is there no middle ground? There might be. It's irrelevant. At no point is Fenris torn in his views regardless of romancing a mage. He's always adamant that mages should be locked up.

 

Want an example of what they could have done?

 

Fenris: "I've always thought the world was better off without magic; with mages locked away. But meeting you... Now I'm not so sure. If my previous beliefs were satisfied then we could never be together."

 

Good enough?



#54567
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 918 messages

Fenris's deal is that he does not see any other way then to lock them up. Sure he won't turn in Hawke and his "friends" as he is no snitch but he has no solution for the mage problem. Which is totally understandable because not even the Grand Cleric or anyone else in charge have an answer. What Fenris understands is that all mages have easy access to darker powers which can run amuck, even mages like Hawke and Bethany, whom he respects, have access to this power.  What Fenris realizes, is that for every Hawke or Bethany there are Anders and Merrills. Not many magess are strong enough to stand on their own two feet when times are rough and not every mage can make themselves useful enough to keep from getting locked up. If Bethany is sent to the circle he remarks at how strong she is to go.  When push comes to shove Fenris supports the Circle but understands that there are some strong mages in the world. Knowing that does not suddenly make the Circle evil or something that must be dissolved because no one will take the risk of allowing all mages to roam free in the hopes that a handful will behave themselves.

 

With all honesty, I think most of the strong mages who don't succumb to the fade demons et al are already free. Mage Warden, kooky wizard in the woods in DAO, Morrigan, Flemeth (no one knows what she is), Mage Hawke and father Hawke, and a few others. Most mages deserve their place inside the Circle no matter how sweet they are. If a mage has to rely on demons and blood magic to escape the Templars then off to the Circle they go. That's why I always turn Alain in to the Templars but let that mage girl who was about to be raped by Alrik go, along with the mage who just wanted to get laid. They were all sweet characters, but Alain resorted to blood magic, kidnapping, and aligning himself with possessed mages.


  • Dutchess et Finnn62 aiment ceci

#54568
Finnn62

Finnn62
  • Members
  • 641 messages

That's why I always turn Alain in to the Templars but let that mage girl who was about to be raped by Alrik go, along with the mage who just wanted to get laid. They were all sweet characters, but Alain resorted to blood magic, kidnapping, and aligning himself with possessed mages.

Actually, Alain ran as soon as he found the others in that cave were doing blood magic, and only uses it to free Bethany (or whoever else is kidnapped) because there was no other way, apparently. I don't think there's an option to let him go when you first meet him. I wish there was. He seems to run back to the Templars no matter what you say. He seemed a decent sort.

 

In fact, I wish we could just kill Grace & just let the others escape. I'm just surprised the Templars didn't kill her first when they started killing Starkhaven mages as "examples". Grace was the worst.



#54569
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 918 messages

Actually, Alain ran as soon as he found the others in that cave were doing blood magic, and only uses it to free Bethany (or whoever else is kidnapped) because there was no other way, apparently. I don't think there's an option to let him go when you first meet him. I wish there was. He seems to run back to the Templars no matter what you say. He seemed a decent sort.

 

In fact, I wish we could just kill Grace & just let the others escape. I'm just surprised the Templars didn't kill her first when they started killing Starkhaven mages as "examples". Grace was the worst.

Yet Alain still hung out with Grace back at the Circle (If you turn them all in) and then ran off with her again. If I have to judge him by the company he keeps then he doesn't keep very good company. Makes it harder to feel for him.  As for killing Grace and releasing the others? Not for me. They aided her in the cave, aided her in the kidnapping, and was willing to kill the hostage for her. Alain is a good guy, but tempted to use blood magic and perhaps more to secure his freedom because he's just too weak to do otherwise. I'm not blaming him for it and I even understand it. But this is the type of weakness Fenris speaks of.


  • Dutchess et Finnn62 aiment ceci

#54570
Finnn62

Finnn62
  • Members
  • 641 messages

Yet Alain still hung out with Grace back at the Circle (If you turn them all in) and then ran off with her again. If I have to judge him by the company he keeps then he doesn't keep very good company. Makes it harder to feel for him.  As for killing Grace and releasing the others? Not for me. They aided her in the cave, aided her in the kidnapping, and was willing to kill the hostage for her. Alain is a good guy, but tempted to use blood magic and perhaps more to secure his freedom because he's just too weak to do otherwise. I'm not blaming him for it and I even understand it. But this is the type of weakness Fenris speaks of.

I suppose the meta-gamer in me just wants to get as many potentially innocent people out of Kirkwall before I side with the Templars and bring down near every mage in the city in the name of order, hahaha. Not that any of them actually escape in the end, anyways, but I tried, even if I had to let Grace go as well. Plus, Varric & witty Hawke's dialogue upon tricking the Templars was worth it, LOL. Maybe if the circle was more like the one in Ferelden, not run by the lunatic Meredith, and not rampant with corrupt abusive Templars like Alrik & Varnell, I'd be more tempted to send them there. 



#54571
renfrees

renfrees
  • Members
  • 2 060 messages

For all the claims about Circle as a prison, mages actually leave it for days, even in A3, when the Templars grasp is at it strongest. Confirmed by Orsino, nonetheless, when you take the quest "Best served cold".

 

"All I know is numerous mages have left the Circle at night, sometimes for days at a time."

 

Doesn't sound much like a prison to me, eh? This, and Bethany's words (if she is sent to the Circle) only reinforce my belief, that some mages are not against victimizing themselves.



#54572
AbsoluteApril

AbsoluteApril
  • Members
  • 771 messages

Been taking a BSN break to avoid DA:I spoilers, come back and everything has changed! Oh my! Where did profile pic go? So much to figure out.
 

I had forgotten Mr. Emery did the VA for the crusader class in Diablo, bf was playing the other day and I listened and then commented on what a great class he chose! He kept playing, paused after a moment, looked at me askew and asked 'Is that Fenris?'. I smirked and smiled way too big, he promptly scowled and muted the game. Dang it. Why does he not share my FenLove?

 

Anyways, hello Fenris thread! Glad to see this is still going strong.



#54573
renfrees

renfrees
  • Members
  • 2 060 messages

Welcome back :) You might be delighted to know, that we might get to hear Gideon Emery in Inquisition.


  • Hazegurl aime ceci

#54574
TheMadHarridan

TheMadHarridan
  • Members
  • 357 messages

Gideon Emery in Inquisition???????????? When was this revealed? I assume he'll be Fenris if that happens, but with Emery's mad vocal skills he could be a myriad of voices. Now I have to go clean up a puddle of drool. :)



#54575
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 655 messages

Q: Will we see Fenris make a return or at least the voice actor (Gideon Emery).
A: You may indeed see Gideon Emery again. (MD)

 

That's from yesterday's Raptr Q&A. It's worrying to me because Mike Laidlaw specifically says GE is returning, not Fenris. Elsewhere in the Q&A he seemed to suggest that Zevran wouldn't be returning:

 

Q: Okay, so Jon Curry is voicing male inquisitor.. but.. that doesn't mean Zevran won't be making an appearance, right. Right? D:
A: It doesn't mean that.
But he's not  (MD)

 

So looks like my canon LIs get ignored yet again :( Oh to be an Alistair or Morrigan romancer! But no word yet on ANY of the DA2 romances making appearances.